Résumés
Abstract
This paper considers the relationship between the procedural concern of monitoring international child rights and the general principle of best interests of the child. Canadian monitoring processes to determine the situation of child rights are analysed using the best interests principle as a lens. It is argued that despite the importance of the best interests principle in relation to monitoring, many Canadian actors or processes continue to reflect their priorities, preoccupations or authority—despite their limitations— because they know best or have authority to do so. This approach mirrors the traditional, outdated understanding of best interests of the child principle. In contrast, the best interests of the child principle in child rights sense demands recognition, reorientation and commitment to progress so that monitoring is guided and influenced by child rights. The paper concludes with a number of recommendations to advance the best interests principle in monitoring.
Résumé
Cette étude traite de la relation entre les questions de procédure de surveillance des droits des enfants à l’échelle internationale et le principe général de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant. Le Canada emploie des processus de surveillance qui déterminent l’état des droits des enfants en fonction du concept de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant. Or, l’argument invoqué est que, malgré la place centrale que devrait occuper le principe d’intérêt supérieur dans le processus de surveillance, de nombreux intervenants du Canada et leurs procédures continuent de refléter leurs propres priorités, préoccupations ou autorité. Ils outrepassent ainsi leur mandat sous prétexte qu’ils sont plus avisés ou qu’ils possèdent l’autorité voulue pour le faire. Cette approche reflète la théorie traditionnelle désuète du principe de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant. En revanche, pour qu’il évolue et que la surveillance repose et soit axée sur les droits des enfants, le principe d’intérêt supérieur dans l’optique du droit des enfants requiert une reconnaissance, une réorientation et un engagement. Les conclusions renferment plusieurs recommandations pour faire évoluer le principe d’intérêt supérieur dans un contexte de surveillance.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Alston, P. & Tobin, J. (2005). Laying the Foundations for Children’s Rights: An Independent Study of some Key Legal and Institutional Aspects of the Impact of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti.
- Alston, P. & Gilmour-Walsh, B. (1996). The Best Interests of the Child: Towards a Synthesis of Children’s Rights and Cultural Values. Innocenti Studies. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Research Centre.
- Blackstock, C. (2009). Executive Director of First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (FNCFCS), Personal Communication with author, 17 February 2009.
- Canada (1994). Convention on the Rights of the Child: First Report of Canada. Ottawa: Human Rights Directorate, Department of Canadian Heritage.
- Canada (2001). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Second report of Canada, covering the period January 1993 to December 1997. Hull, Quebec: Aboriginal Peoples’ and Human Rights Programs Directorate, Department of Canadian Heritage.
- Canada (2007). ‘Government Response to the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights Report: “Children: The Silenced Citizens Effective Implementation of Canada’s International Obligations with Respect to the Rights of Children”’, Ottawa, November 2007.
- Canada (2009). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Third and Fourth Reports of Canada Covering the period January 1998 – December 2007. Gatineau, Quebec: Human Rights Program, Department of Canadian Heritage. Retrieved from http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/pdp-hrp/docs/pdf/canada3-4-crc-reports-nov2009-eng.pdf
- Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children (CCRC) (2009a). The Best Interests of the Child: Meaning and Application in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Coalition for the rights of Children, Accessed 14 May 2010 from http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/bic-report-eng-web.pdf
- Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children (2009b). “Canada and the Rights of Children: 2003 Review of Canada’s Record”, Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children, Accessed 19 March, 2009, http://www.rightsofchildren.ca/pdf/overview.pdf
- Canadian Council of Social Development (2006). The Progress of Canada’s Children and Youth, Accessed 14 May, 2010, http://www.ccsd.ca/pccy/2006/health.htm
- Chinkin, C. (2001). Gender Mainstreaming in Legal and Constitutional Affairs, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
- Collins, T., Pearson, L., & Delany, C. (2002). Rights-based Approach, Ottawa: Office of the Honourable Landon Pearson, The Senate of Canada.
- Collins, T. M. (2005). The Monitoring of the Rights of the Child: A Child Rights-Based Approach, Ph.D. thesis (law), defended in 2006, University of London.
- Collins, T. M. (2008a). “Monitoring: More than a report”. In T. Collins, R. Grondin, V. Pinero, M. Pratte and M-C Roberge (Eds.), Droits de l’enfant : Actes de la Conférence internationale, Ottawa, 2007 – Rights of the Child: Proceedings of the International Conference, La Collection Bleue, Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur, 2008, pp. 1-14.
- Collins, T. M. (2008b). “The Significance of Different Approaches to Monitoring: A Case Study of Child Rights”, 12 International Journal of Human Rights, pp. 159-187, April 2008.
- Collins, T. M. (2009). Unpublished letter to Dr. Théroux, Canadian Human Rights Commission in response to request for comments about draft Human Rights Report Card, 17 May, 2009. Copy on file with author.
- Pearson, L. & Collins, T. (2009). “Not There Yet: Canada’s Implementation of the General Measures of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child”, Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre and UNICEF-Canada.
- Covell, Katherine, Executive Director, Children’s Rights Centre, Cape Breton University, ‘Canada’s Compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Comments to the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights’, February 07, 2005.
- First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (FNCFCS), “Fact Sheet: JORDAN’S PRINCIPLE”, 2007, Accessed 19 March, 2009 http://www.fncfcs.com/docs/JordansPrincipleFactSheet.pdf
- First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (FNCFCS), “Breaking News: Another family forced to place a child in foster care because Jordan’s Principle not fully implemented”, posted May 13, 2010, First Accessed 14 May, 2010 from http://www.fncfcs.com/breaking_news.html
- Garbarino, J. & Stott, F. (1990). What Children Can Tell Us, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Glossop, Executive Director of Programs and Research (as he then was), The Vanier Institute of the Family (2003). Interview with author, Ottawa, 7 January.
- Grant, UNICEF Executive Director (as he then was), (1992). “Address” at Children at Risk, International Interdisciplinary Conference, Bergen, Norway, 13 May.
- Griffin, S. President of the Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children & Executive Director of the Canadian Child Care Federation (as she then was) (2002). Interview with author, Ottawa: 30 September.
- Himes, J. (1992), Implementing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Resource Mobilization and the Obligations of the States Parties. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Spedali degli Innocenti.
- House of Commons (2007). Official Reports: 39th Parliament, 2nd Session, Edited Hansard, Number 036, Wednesday, December 12, 2007 Retrieved from http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Hansard&Doc=36&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2#OOB-2270451
- Howe, B., and Covell, K. (2007). ‘Conclusion: Canada’s Ambivalence toward Children’, A Question of Commitment: Children’s Rights in Canada, Howe & Covell (eds.) Waterloo, Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2002). Advisory Opinion OC-17/2002 of August 28, 2002: The legal status and human rights of the child, requested by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Legal Status and Human Rights of the Child, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117 Doc. 1 rev.1.
- Landon Pearson Resource Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children’s Rights (2007). Shaking the Movers - Final Report, Ottawa, Landon Pearson Resource Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children’s Rights, June 2007. O
- Lavallee, T. L. (2005). ‘Honouring Jordan: Putting First Nations children first and funding fights second’, Paediatrics and Child Health, vol 10, no. 9, November 2005.
- Leitch, Dr. K. (2007). Reaching for the Top: A Report by the Advisor on Healthy Children & Youth, Ottawa: Health Canada, Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/child-enfant/2007-advisor-conseillere/advisor-conseillere-eng.pdf
- MacDonald, N.E., and Attaran, A. (2007). ‘Jordan’s Principle, governments’ paralysis’, Editorial, Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 177, no. 4, 14 August 2007, <www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/177/4/321> accessed on11 August 2009.
- Matas, R. and Stueck, W. (2009). “Polygamy Charges in Bountiful”, The Globe and Mail Update and The Canadian Press, January 7, 2009, Accessed 20 March 20, 2009 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090107.wbountiful0107/BNStory/National/home?cid=al_gam_mostemail
- Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2006). Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation, United Nations, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FAQen.pdf
- Save the Children Canada (2001). A Canada Fit for Children: A report on the realities for young people in Canada today, Toronto, Save the Children Canada, July 2001.
- Save the Children (2001). An Introduction to Child Rights Programming: Concept and application. London: The Save the Children Fund, UK.
- Senate of Canada, Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights (2005). Who’s in Charge Here? Effective Implementation of Canada’s International Obligations with respect to the Rights of Children - Interim Report, Ottawa, Senate of Canada, November 2005.
- Senate of Canada, Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights (2007). Children: The Silenced Citizens. Effective Implementation of Canada’s International Obligations with Respect to the Rights of Children - Final Report of the Standing Committee on Human Rights, Ottawa, Senate of Canada, April 2007.
- Society for Children and Youth of BC (SCY-BC), Child and Youth Officer for British Columbia, and Institute for Safe Schools of British Columbia (2006). ‘Child Rights Public Awareness Campaign: Ipsos Reid Survey Summary’, 2006, <www.rcybc.ca/groups/Project%20Reports/survey_summary_nov_15.pdf> last visited 18 March 18, 2009.
- South Africa (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996, Act 108 of 1996.
- Toope, Stephen (1995), “The Convention on the Rights of the Child: Implications for Canada.” Children’s Rights: A Comparative Perspective. Michael Freeman (ed.), Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth Publishing.
- UNICEF (2001), ‘Operationalization for ESAR of UNICEF Global Guidelines for Human Rights Programming’, 29 October, UNICEF Regional Office (ESARO) Nairobi.
- United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations, adopted 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945, as amended by General Assembly resolutions: 1991 (XV111) 17 December, 1963, entered into force 31 August, 1965; 2101 of 20 December 1965, entered into force 12 June 1968; and 2847 (XXVI) of 20 December 1971, entered into force 24 September 1973.
- United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN Doc. A/RES/217 A (III), 10 December 1948.
- United Nations (1966), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, A/RES/2200 A (XXI), 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976.
- United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN Doc. A/RES/2200 A (XXI), 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976.
- United Nations, Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) (1991). Guidelines for initial reports of States Parties, to be submitted in accordance with Article 44 para. 1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, UN Doc. CRC/C/5, 15 October 1991.
- United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (1996). General Guidelines Regarding the Form and Contents of Periodic Reports to Be Submitted by States Parties Under Article 44, Paragraph 1 (B), of the Convention, UN Doc. CRC/C/58, 20 November 1996.
- United Nations, Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009). ‘General Comment No. 12 (2009): The right of the child to be heard’, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/12, 20 July 2009.
- United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2008). Special Procedures assumed by the Human Rights Council: Thematic Mandates, 20 November 2008, OHCHR, 13 March 13, 2009 http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/themes.htm
- United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2008). Special Procedures assumed by the Human Rights Council: Country Mandates, 1 November 2008, OHCHR, 13 March 13, 2009 http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/countries.htm
- United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted by the General Assembly with resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 and entered into force 2 September 1990.
- United Nations, Committee on the Rights of the Child (2003). Concluding observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Canada, UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.215.
- Wintersberger, H. (2001). “Preface”, in Measuring and Monitoring Children’s Well-Being, Ben-Arieh et al. (eds.) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Cases Cited
- Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817
- Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General) [2004] S.C.R. 76, (2000) 188 D.L.R. (4th) 718, (2000) 57 O.R. (3rd) 511
- Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education [1997] 1 S.C.R. 241, 142 D.L.R. (4th) 385
- Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education 2000 (4) SA 757 (CC); 2000 (10) BCLR 1051 (CC) 18 August 2000.