Résumés
Abstract
Both the 1987 “Brundtland Report”, and Chapter 26 of Agenda 21 (which emerged from the 1992 “Earth Summit”), formally recognized the role of Indigenous people in global sustainable development. Agenda 21 requires that Aboriginal values, traditional knowledge, and resource management practices are recognized and meaningfully involved in sustainable development undertakings; and that capacity-building in Aboriginal communities, based on the adaptation and exchange of traditional knowledge, is developed so as to increase the ability of Aboriginal peoples to participate in sustainable development. This paper documents the principles behind and development of a practical program aimed at meeting these two criteria head on. Funded by the Canadian government and developed by an Aboriginal corporation with western scientific expertise, the “Earth Keepers” program represents a significant move towards establishing a truly collaborative program with benefits for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal constituents alike. While participants in the program recognize areas for improvement, key among the program’s successful strategies to date has been the meaningful inclusion of Aboriginal community partners from the outset. The program’s built-in feedback system allows it to adapt to better meet the needs of participants over time. Continued scrutiny of this program as it evolves is warranted as it represents a significant departure from outmoded “colonial” approaches to research and development in Aboriginal communities, and an innovative step towards an improved environmental future for all participants.
Résumé
Tant le « Rapport Brundtland » de 1987 que le chapitre 26 de l’« Action 21 » (qui a résulté du « Sommet de la Terre » de 1992) ont officiellement reconnu le rôle des populations autochtones dans le développement durable mondial. L’Action 21 recommande, d’une part, que les valeurs, les connaissances traditionnelles et les pratiques de gestion des ressources autochtones soient reconnues et mises sérieusement à contribution dans des activités de développement durable et, d’autre part, que le renforcement des capacités des collectivités autochtones soit basé sur l’adaptation et l’échange du savoir traditionnel afin d’accroître leur participation au développement durable. Cet article étaye l’élaboration et les principes sous-jacents d’un programme pratique visant à répondre de front à ces deux critères. Financé par le gouvernement canadien et élaboré par une société autochtone possédant une expertise scientifique occidentale, le programme des « Gardiens de la Terre » représente un progrès décisif vers l’établissement d’un véritable programme de collaboration dans l’intérêt des citoyens tant autochtones que non autochtones. Bien que des participants au programme constatent qu’il y a des aspects qui gagneraient à être améliorés, la clé du succès des stratégies du programme jusqu’à ce jour a été d’inclure concrètement des partenaires des collectivités autochtones dès le départ. Le système de rétroaction intégré a permis au programme de s’adapter pour mieux répondre aux besoins des participants au fil du temps. Un examen constant du programme à mesure qu’il évolue s’impose, car il représente non seulement un changement radical par rapport aux approches « coloniales » dépassées à l’égard de la recherche et du développement dans des collectivités autochtones, mais aussi un pas novateur vers un meilleur avenir sur le plan environnemental pour tous les participants.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Assembly of First Nations (AFN). 1993. “Environment.” In Assembly of First Nations. Reclaiming Our Nationhood: Strengthening Our Heritage. Report to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. AFN, Ottawa, ON. pp. 39-50.
- Battiste, M., and Henderson, J. 2000. Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge. Purich Publishing, Saskatoon, SK. 324 pp.
- Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA. 209 pp.
- Borrows. J. 2005. Crown and Aboriginal Occupations of Land: A History & Comparison. Research Paper prepared for the Ipperwash Inquiry. The Honourable Sidney B. Linden. Commissioner. Government of Ontario. Toronto, ON, 85 pp. Available online: http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/ipperwash/policy_part/index.html [Accessed April 2009].
- Brascoupe, S., and Mann, H. 2001. A Community Guide to Protecting Indigenous Knowledge. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada/Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa, ON.
- Cajete, G. 2000. Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Clear Light Publishing, Sante Fe, NM.
- Cardinal, L. 2001. “What is an Indigenous Perspective?” Canadian Journal of Native Education 25(2):180-182.
- Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources (CIER). 2005. Environmental Issues Research Report. CIER, Winnipeg, MB. (www.CIER.ca, accessed June 2008)
- Chiefs of Ontario Working Group on Nationhood and Sustainability. 1997. “Nationhood and Sustainability Framework.” In Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Towards Sustainable Development: A Strategy for the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Volume II - Part 4. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.
- Clarkson, L., Morrrissette, V., and Regallet, G. 1992. Our Responsibility to the Seventh Generation: Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, MB. 88 pp.
- Cleveland, D., and Soleri, D. 2002. “Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Plant Breeding: Similarities, Differences and Implications for Collaboration.” In Sillitoe, P., Bicker, A., and Pottier, J. (eds.). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Monographs 39. Routledge, New York, NY.
- Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. (CESD). 2005. Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons, Chapter 5: Drinking Water in First Nations Communities. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa, ON. 34 pp.
- Croal, P., and Darou, W. 2002. “Canadian First Nations’ Experiences with International Development.” In Sillitoe, P., Bicker, A., and Pottier, J. (eds.). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Mongraphs 39. Routledge, New York, NY.
- Crowshoe, C. 2005. Sacred Ways of Life: Traditional Knowledge. Prepared for the National Aboriginal Health Association. Ottawa, ON. http://www.naho.ca/firstnations/english/documents/FNC-TraditionalknowledgeToolkit-Eng.pdf.
- Davis, L., O’Donnell, V., and H. Shpuniarsky. 2007. “Aboriginal-Social Justice Alliances: Understanding the Landscape of Relationships through the Coalition for a Public Inquiry into Ipperwash.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 36:95-119.
- Doyle-Bedwell, P., and Cohen, F. 2001. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Their Role in Shaping Environmental Trends in the Twenty-first Century.” In Parson, E. (ed.). Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON. pp. 169-206.
- Duckworth, G., Walker, J., McCrea, R., Turner, J., and J. Batise. 1999. Final Report of the Moose River Basin Environmental Information Partnership Steering Committee. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON. 43 pp.
- Elijah, R. 1997. “Youth Perspective. Nationhood and Sustainability Framework.” In Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Towards Sustainable Development: A Strategy for the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Volume II - Part 4. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.
- Ellen, R. 2002. “Deja Vu, All over Again: Reinvention and Progress in Applying Local Knowledge to Development.” In Sillitoe, P., Bicker, A., and Pottier, J. (eds.). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Mongraphs 39. Routledge, New York, NY.
- Ellis, S. 2005. “Meaningful Consideration? A Review of Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Decision Making.” Arctic 58(1): 66-77.
- First Nations Centre (FNC). 2007. OCAP: Ownership. Control, Access and Possession. Assembly of First Nations, Ottawa, ON.
- Gregoire, L. 2008. “Students of Weather.” Canadian Geographic 128(5):26.
- Gunton, T., and Joseph, C. 2007. Toward a National Sustainable Development Strategy for Canada: Putting Canada On the Path to Sustainability within a Generation. David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, BC.
- GRRB 2009. The Gwich’in Renewable Resources Board (GRRB). Available on-line. http://www.grrb.nt.ca/ [Accessed June 2009].
- Haudenosaunee Environmental Task Force (HETF).1999. Words that Come Before All Else: Environmental Philosophies of the Haudenosaunee. Native North American Traveling College, Cornwall Island, ON.
- Higgins, C. 1998. “The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Managing for Biodiversity.” Forestry Chronicle 74(3):323-326.
- Houde. N. 2007. “The Six Faces of Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Challenges and Opportunities for Canadian Co-Management Arrangements.” Ecology and Society 12 (2): 34 pp.
- Johnson, M. (Ed). 1992. Lore: Capturing Traditional Environmental Knowledge. Dene Cultural Institute & International Development Centre, Hay River, NWT.
- Kassi, N. 1996. “A Legacy of Maldevelopment: Environmental Devastation in the Arctic.” In Weaver, J. (ed.). Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY. pp.72-84.
- Kimmerer, R. 2002. “Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action.” Bioscience 52(5):432-438.
- LaDuke, W. 1999. All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life. South End Press, Cambridge, MA. 241 pp.
- LaDuke, W. 1994. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Futures.” In Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Politics. Endangered Peoples: Indigenous Rights and the Environment. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO. pp.127-148.
- Lickers, H. 2008. Remarks made at the “Engaging First Nations in Environmental Strategies” Workshop. September 23. Turtle Island Environmental Resources, Toronto, ON.
- Manseau, M., Parlee, B., and Ayles, G. 2005. “A Place for Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Resource Management.” In Berkes, F. Breaking Ice: Renewable Resource and Ocean Management in the Canadian North. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, AB. pp. 141-164.
- McGregor, D. 2008. “Water Quality in the Province of Ontario: an Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Perspective.” In Hermon, E. (ed.). L’eau comme patrimoine : de la Méditerraneé à l’Amérique du Nord. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec, QC. pp. 543-562.
- McGregor, D. 2004a. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Sustainable Development: Toward Co-existence.” In Blaser, M., and Feit, H. (eds.). In the Way of Development: Indigenous Peoples, Civil Society and the Environment. Zed Books, New York, NY. pp. 72-91.
- McGregor, D. 2004b. “Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment and Our Future.” American Indian Quarterly 28(3/4):385-410.
- McGregor, D. 2000. “The State of Traditional Ecological Knowledge Research in Canada: A Critique of Current Theory and Practice.” In Laliberte, R., Settee, P., Waldram, J., Innes, R., Macdougall, B., McBain, L., and F. Barron (eds.). Expressions in Canadian Native Studies. University of Saskatchewan Extension Press, Saskatoon, SK. pp.436-458.
- Menzies, C., and Butler, C. 2006. “Understanding Ecological Knowledge.” In Menzies, C. (ed.). Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Natural Resource Management. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. pp.1-17.
- Nadasdy, P. 1999. “The Politics of TEK: Power and the ‘Integration’ of Knowledge.” Arctic Anthropology 36(1/2):1-18.
- Nadasdy, P. 2006. “The Case of the Missing Sheep: Time, Space and the Politics of ‘Trust’ in Co-management Practice.” In: Menzies, C. (ed.). Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Natural Resource Management. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. pp.127-151.
- NAHO. (2007). Handbook and Resource Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity. National Aboriginal Health Organization, Ottawa, ON.
- Natcher, D & Davis, S. 2007. “Rethinking Devolution: Challenges for Aboriginal Resource Management in the Yukon Territory.” Society and Natural Resources 20: 3, 271-279.
- National Forest Strategy Coalition (NFSC). 2003. National Forest Strategy (2003-2008). A Sustainable Forest: The Canadian Commitment. NFSC, Ottawa, ON. 27 pp. http://nfsc.forest.ca.
- Nunavut Tunngavik. 2009. Nunavut Tunngavik (NT). Nunavut Land Claim Agreement. Available online: http://www.tunngavik.com/category/publications/nunavut-land-claims-agreement [Accessed June 2009).
- O’Flaherty, R., Davidson-Hunt, I., and M. Manseau. 2008. “Indigenous Knowledge and Values in Planning for Sustainable Forestry: Pikangikum First Nation and the Whitefeather Forest Initiative.” Ecology and Society 13(1): 6-16.
- Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation (OFNTSC). 2008. About Us: Corporate Overview. http://www.ofntsc.org/about. (accessed 18 Aug 2008).
- Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation (OFNTSC). 2002. The Earth Keepers Solid Waste Management Planning Program: an Overview. OFNTSC, Toronto, ON. 22 pp.
- Pikangikum First Nation and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (PFN and OMNR). 2006. Keeping the Land: A Land Use Strategy for the Whitefeather Forest and Adjacent Areas. PFN, Pikangikum, ON, and OMNR, Red Lake, ON. 98 pp.
- Posey, D. 2002. “Upsetting the Sacred Balance: Can the Study of Indigenous Knowledge Reflect Cosmic Connectedness?” In Sillitoe, P., Bicker, A., and Pottier, J. (eds.). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Mongraphs 39. Routledge, New York, NY.
- Roberts, K. 1996. Circumpolar Aboriginal People and Co-Management Practice: Current Issues in Co-Management and Environmental Assessment. [conference proceedings]. Arctic Institute of North America and Joint Secretariat - Inuvialuit Renewable Resources Committees. Arctic Institute of North America, University of Calgary, AB. 172 pp.
- Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP). 1996a. “Lands and Resources.” InReport of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Volume 2: Restructuring the Relationship. pp. 421-685. Canada Communication Group - Publishing Ottawa, ON. pp.421-685.
- Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP). 1996b. “Rekindling the Fire.” In Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Volume 1: Looking Forward, Looking Back. Canada Communication Group - Publishing, Ottawa, ON. pp. 615-671.
- Sable, T., Howell, G., Wilson, D., and P. Penashue. 2006. “The Ashkui Project: Linking Western Science and Innu Environmental Knowledge in Creating a Sustainable Environment.” In Sillitoe, P. (ed.). Local Science vs Global Science: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge in International Development. Berghahn Books, New York, NY. pp. 109-127.
- Shackerof, J., and Campbell, L. 2007. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Conservation Research: Problems and Prospects for their Constructive Engagement.” Conservation and Society 5(3):343-360.
- Sillitoe, P. 2002. “Globalizing Indigenous Knowledge.” In Sillitoe, P., Bicker, A., and Pottier, J. (eds.). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Mongraphs 39. Routledge, New York, NY. pp. 108-138.
- Sillitoe, P., and Bicker, A. 2004. “Hunting for Theory, Gathering Ideology.” In Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., and Pottier, J. (eds). Development and Local Knowledge. Routledge, New York, NY. pp.1-18.
- Simpson. L. 2004. “Anti-colonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge.” American Indian Quarterly 28(3/4):373-384.
- Spak, S. 2005. “The Position of Indigenous Knowledge in Canadian Co-management Organizations.” Anthropologica 47(2):233-246.
- Stevens, J. 1998. “Indigenous Activism at the U.N.” Native Americas 15(1):46-53.
- Stevenson, M. 2005. Traditional Knowledge in Sustainable Forest Management. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, AB.
- Stevenson, M. 2006. “The Possibility of Difference: Rethinking Co-management.” Human Organization. 63:2, p. 167-180.
- Teillet, J. 2005. The Role of the Natural Resources Regulatory Regime in Aboriginal Rights Disputes in Ontario. Research Paper prepared for the Ipperwash Inquiry. The Honourable Sidney B. Linden. Commissioner. Government of Ontario. Toronto, ON, 78 pp. Available online: http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/ipperwash/policy_part/index.html [Accessed April 2009].
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). 2004. Agenda 21: Chapter 26. Recognizing and Strengthening the Role of Indigenous People and their Communities. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter26.htm (accessed 18 Aug 2008).
- United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. http://www.dd-rd.ca/site/_PDF/un/A_61_L67eng.pdf. (accessed June 28, 2008).
- Usher, P. 2000. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management.” Arctic 53(2):183-193.
- Wavey, R. 1993. “International Workshop on Indigenous Knowledge and Community Based Resource Management: Keynote Address.” In Inglis, J. (ed.). Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and Cases. Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Knowledge and International Development Research Centre: p11-16.
- Washnawatok, I. 1997. “International Emergence: Twenty Years at the United Nations.” Native Americas 14(2):13-21.
- Wheeler, W. 2005. “Reflections on the Social Relations of Indigenous Oral Histories.” In Lischke, U., and McNab, D. (eds.). Walking a Tightrope: Aboriginal People and their Representations. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, ON. pp.189-213.
- White, G. 2006. Cultures in Collision: Traditional Knowledge and Euro-Canadian Governance Processes in Northern Land-Claim Boards. Vol. 59. No. 4. pp. 401-414.
- Wilson, B., and Harris, H. 2005. “Tllsda Xaaydas K’aaygang.nga: Long, Long Ago Haida Ancient Stories.” In Fedje, D., and Mathewes, R. Haida Gwaii: Human History and Environment from the Time of Loon to the Time of the Iron People. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC. pp. 121-139.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 454 pp.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2000. Roundtable on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge. www.wipo.int/eng/meetings/1999/folklore/indexrt.htm.
- Wyatt, S. 2008. “First Nations, Forest Lands, and ‘Aboriginal Forestry’ in Canada: From Exclusion to Co-management and Beyond.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 38: 171-180.