Résumés
Abstract
Before Indigenous scholars engage in decolonial research with human participants, Canadian universities must grant them ethics approval. Grounded by the experiences of the nehiyaw researcher and the Chair of the research ethics board who reviewed the research, we explore the experience of REB review with research exploring self-determination and sovereignty with nehiyaw iskwewak (Cree females) as Knowledge Holders. In accordance with iyiniwak (Indigenous Peoples) beliefs, the co-creators and authors positioned themselves in the centre of a circle with Natural Law teachings of kindness, honesty, caring, strength, and determination. In this shared space, we brought together dialogues connected to thematics grounded in ceremony, Natural Law (iyiniwak teachings), and cyclical process. Through four directions, we examine colonial processes and identify REB accountabilities.
Keywords:
- Research Ethics Boards,
- Wisdom Seeking,
- Indigenous research methodology,
- invasion of sexual boundaries,
- self-determination,
- international research policy,
- sovereignty
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Anderson, K. (2000). A recognition of being: Reconstructing Native womanhood. Sumach Press.
- Armenta, A. (2016). Racializing crimmigration: Structural racism, colorblindness, and the institutional production of immigrant and criminality. Sociology of Race and Society, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649216648714
- Auger, J., Cardinal, L., Loonskin, S., & James, A. (2020). Invasion of Sexual Boundaries: How has it affected Indigenous women’s views of government, the past, their way of life, their thinking, the way they get along with people, and their relationship to the earth and environment? [Manuscript in preparation]. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Athabasca University.
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. (2020). AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. https://aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical-research/code-ethics
- Battiste, M. (Ed.). (2000). The Assembled Circle of Delegates of the Summer Institute. Appendix 2: Saskatoon Declaration of Indigenous Cultural Restoration and Policy Recommendations on Cultural Restoration Developed at the Saskatoon Summer Institute. In Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. UBC Press.
- Boal, A., & Epstein, S. (1990). The cop in the head: Three hypothesis. The Drama Review, 34(3), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1146067
- Balfour, G. & Martel, J. (2018). Critical prison research and university research ethics boards: Homogenization of inquiry and policing of carceral knowledge. Oñati Socio-legal Series, 8(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0931
- Borrows, J. (2010). Sources and scope of Indigenous legal traditions. In Canada’s Indigenous Constitution (pp. 23-58). University of Toronto Press.
- Borrows, J., & Tully, J. (2018). Introduction. In Resurgence and Reconciliation: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings (pp. 3–25). University of Toronto Press.
- Canadian Association of University Teachers. (November 2018). Equity: CAUT Policy Statement. https://www.caut.ca/about-us/caut-policy/lists/caut-policy-statements/policy-statement-on-equity
- Chatterjee, P., & Sunaina M. (2014). The imperial university: Academic repression and scholarly dissent. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816680894.001.0001
- Chatterjee, S., & Das Gupta, T. (2020). On Migration and Indigenous Sovereignty in a Chronically Mobile World. Studies in Social Justice, 14(2), pp. 246–267. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v14i2.2622
- Dhamoon, R. K. (2019). Relational othering: Critiquing dominance, critiquing the margins. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(5), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1691023
- Donald, D. (2012) Forts, curriculum, and ethical relationality. In N. Ng-A-Fook, J. Rottmann (Eds.), Reconsidering Canadian curriculum studies (pp. 39–46). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008978_3
- Ells, C. (2011). Communicating qualitative research study designs to research ethics review boards. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 881–891.
- Frideres, J. S., & Gadacz, R. R. (2012). Aboriginal Peoples in Canada (9th ed.). Pearson.
- First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2021). OCAP and Information Governance. https://fnigc.ca/what-we-do/ocap-and- information-governance/
- Gaudry, A., & Lorenz, D. (2018). Indigenization as inclusion, reconciliation and decolonization: Navigating the different visions for indigenizing the Canadian academy. AlterNative, 14(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180118785382
- Government of Canada. (2018). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans – TCPS 2 (2018). https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html
- Haggerty K., D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3
- Haggerty, K. D. (In Press). Uneasy relations: Crime ethnographies and research ethics. In S. Bucerius, K. D. Haggerty, & L. Berardi (Eds.), University press handbook on ethnographies of crime and criminal justice. Oxford UP.
- Hill, S., M. (2008). Travelling down the river of life together in peace and friendship, forever: Haudenosaunee land ethics and treaty agreements as the basis for restructuring the relationship with the British crown. In L. Simpson (Ed.), Lighting the eighth fire: The liberation, resurgence, and protection of Indigenous nations (pp. 23-45). Arbeiter Ring.
- hooks, B. (1990). Yearning. South End.
- Hudson, M., & Russell, K. (2009). The Treaty of Waitangi and research ethics in Aeotearoa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, (6), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9127-0
- Jane Finch Community Research Partnership (JFCRP). (n.d.). Who are we? https://janefinchresearch.ca/
- Jonker, S. S., Vasquez Guzman, C. E., & McCully, B. H. (2021). Addressing structural racism within institutional bodies regulating research. Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00853.2020
- Kenny, C. (2000). A sense of place: Aboriginal research as ritual practice. In R. Neil (Ed.), Voice of the drum: Indigenous education and culture (pp. 139–150). Kingfisher.
- Kovach, M. (2005). Emerging from the margin: Indigenous methodologies. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 19–36). Canadian Scholars Press.
- Lawrence, B. & Dua, E. (2005). Decolonizing Antiracism. Social Justice, 32(4), 120-143.
- Macklem, P. (2001). Indigenous difference and the constitution of Canada. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442627901
- Makokis, L., Bodor, R., Tyler, S., McLellan, A., Veldhuisen, A., Kopp, K., McLeod, S., & Goulet, S. (2020). iyiniw tapwewin ekwa kiskeyihtamowin. In L. Makokis, R. Bodor, A. Calhoun, & S. Tyler (Eds.), ohpikinawasowin growing a child: Implementing Indigenous ways of knowing with Indigenous families (pp. 13–41). Fernwood.
- Manitoba Network Environment for Indigenous Health Research. (n.d.). Kishaadigeh: Indigenous Self-Determination through Research for our Future Generations. https://www.mbneihr.ca/
- Marker, M. (2003). Indigenous voice, community, and epistemic violence: the ethnographer’s “interests” and what “interests” the ethnographer. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000086736
- Moreton-Robinson, A., M. (2017). Relationality: A key presupposition of an Indigenous social research paradigm. In C. Andersen & J. M. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources and methods in Indigenous studies (pp. 69–77). Routledge.
- Nader, L. (1972). Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED065375
- Nichols, J. (2017). Reconciliation without recollectio[n]. [PhD dissertation, University of Victoria].
- Patel, S., Moussa, G., & Upadhyay, N. (2015). Complicities, connections, & struggles: critical transnational feminist analysis of settler colonialism. Feral feminisms, 4(Summer), 5-19.
- Patel, S., & Nath, N. (2022). What is pedagogic about ‘Settler of Colour’? White universities and ethics of decolonial work for non-Black people of colour. In A. Gebhard, S. McLean, & V. St. Denis (Eds.), Whiteness at work: Disturbing practices of racism across the Canadian prairies (pp. 146-162). Fernwood.
- Patterson, D. (2008). Research ethics boards as spaces of marginalization: A Canadian story. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407308915
- Regan, P. (2018). Reconciliation and resurgence: Reflections on the TRC Final Report. In M. Asch, J. Borrows, & J. Tully (Eds.), Resurgence and reconciliation: Indigenous-settler relations and earth teachings (pp. 209-227). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487519926-008
- Rose, D. B. (1996). Land rights and deep colonizing: The erasure of women. Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 3(85), 6–13.
- Sabati, S. (2019). Upholding “colonial unknowing” through the IRB: Reframing institutional research ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9-10), 1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418787214
- Simpson, L. B. (2016). Indigenous resurgence and co-resistance. Critical Ethnic Studies, 2(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.5749/jcritethnstud.2.2.0019
- Snelgrove, C., Dhamoon, R. K., & Corntassel, J. (2014). Unsettling settler colonialism: The discourse and politics of settlers, and solidarity with Indigenous nations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 1–32.
- Starblanket, G. (2019). The Numbered Treaties and the Politics of Incoherency. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42, 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423919000027
- Tallbear, K. (2014). Standing with and speaking as faith: A feminist-Indigenous approach to inquiry. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 17.
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada 2012. 4–5 https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.801236/publication.html
- Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
- Tuck, E., & Yang, K., W. (2014). R-Words: Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-249). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544329611.n12
- Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 1(1), 1-40.
- UN General Assembly. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/61/295.
- First Nations, Metis, and Inuit Health Research Strategic Planning Committee. (n.d.). Framework for Research Engagement with First Nation, Metis, and Inuit Peoples. University of Manitba, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences. https://umanitoba.ca/health-sciences/sites/health-sciences/files/2021-01/framework-research-report-fnmip.pdf
- Veracini, L. (2011). Isopolitics, deep colonizing, settler colonialism. Interventions, 13(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.573215
- Weber-Pillwax, Cora. (2001). What is Indigenous research? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 166–174.
- Whetung, M., & Wakefield, S. (2018). Colonial conventions: Institutionalized research relationships and decolonizing research ethics. In L. Tuhiwai Smith, E. Tuck & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Indigenous and Decolonizing Studies in Education (pp. 146– 158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505010-10
- Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
- Wynn, L. L., & Israel, M. (2018) The fetishes of consent: Signatures, paper, and writing in research ethics review. American Anthropologist, 120(4), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13148
- York University (2023, March 21). Indigenous Research Ethics Board sets nationwide precedent – Yfile. yorku.ca