Résumés
Abstract
Entire generations of First Nations people have been separated from their birth families and tribes by historical acts of relocation, boarding schools, and the adoption era. Reunification is an essential component to rebuilding the First Nations population. It is echoed across tribes captured by the phrase, “generation after generation we are coming home” (White Hawk, 2014). The purpose of this study was to investigate personal and social identity indicators that contribute to a satisfactory reunification for 95 First Nations adult adoptees who were separated from their birth families during childhood by foster-care and/or adoption. Retrospective survey data originated from the Experiences of Adopted and Fostered Individuals Project. The overall model of satisfactory reunification was statistically significant, and explained 16.6% of the total variance. The study’s findings revealed two social identity variables were statistically significant in relation to the reunification experience – high social connection to tribe (positive relationship) and reunification with the birthmother (negative relationship). First Nations adoptees have not only a biological/birth family to return to, but also a tribe, and ancestral land. Components of social identity are particularly important for the reunification process of First Nations adoptees. Reconnection with extended family and social connection to tribe play a critical role in bettering the reunification experience from the adoptee’s perspective.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Becker-Green, J. (2009). Developing one's self: Adoption and identity formation through the eyes of transracially adopted Native American adults. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 3368247).
- Carriere, J. (2007). Promising practice for maintaining identities in First Nation adoption. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 3(1), 46-64.
- Carriere, J. (2005). Connectedness and health for First Nation adoptees. Paediatr Child Health, 10(9), 545.
- Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011a). Family reunification: What the evidence shows. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
- Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011b). Searching for birth relatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
- Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
- Crofoot, T. L., & Harris, M. S. (2012). An Indian Child Welfare perspective on disproportionality in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review,
- Farr, R. H., Grant-Marsney, H. A., & Grotevant, H. D. (2014). Adoptees' contact with birth parents in emerging adulthood: The role of adoption communication and attachment to adoptive parents. Family Process, Early View, 1-16.
- Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., & Turner, H. A. (2007). Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(1), 7-26.
- Gladstone, J., & Westhues, A. (1998). Adoption reunions: A new side to intergenerational family relationships. Family Relations, 47(2), 177-184.
- Harness, S. D. (2006). After the Indian Adoption Project: A search for identity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Colorado.
- Howe, D., & Feast, J. (2001). The long-term outcome of reunions between adult adopted people and their birth mothers. British Journal of Social Work, 31(3), 351–368.
- Hussong, R. G. (1978). A phenomenological study of the experience of adult transracially adopted American Indians who have been reunited with their birth parents (Order No. DP10819). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (302940061). Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/302940061?accountid=14586
- IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
- Jacobs, M. D. (2013). Remembering the “Forgotten Child”: The American Indian child welfare crisis of the 1960s and 1970s. The American Indian Quarterly, 37(1), 136-159.
- March, K. (1997). The dilemma of adoption reunion: Establishing open communication between adoptees and their birth mothers. Family Relations, 46(2), 99-105.
- March, K. (1995). Perception of adoption as social stigma: Motivation for search and reunion. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(3), 653-660.
- Müller, U., Gibbs, P., & Ariely, S. G. (2004). Adults who were adopted contacting their birthmothers: What are the outcomes, and what factors influence these outcomes? Adoption Quarterly, 7(1), 7-25.
- Müller, U., & Perry, B. (2001a). Adopted persons' search for and contact with their birth parents I: Who searches and why? Adoption Quarterly, 4(3), 5-37.
- Müller, U., & Perry, B. (2001b). Adopted persons' search for and contact with their birth parents II: Adoptee-birth parent contact. Adoption Quarterly, 4(3), 39-62.
- Palmiste, C. (2011). From the Indian Adoption Project to the Indian Child Welfare Act/ the resistance of Native American communities. Indigenous Policy Journal, 22(1), 1-10.
- Petta, G. A., & Steed, L. G. (2005). The experience of adoptive parents in adoption reunion relationships: a qualitative study. American journal of orthopsychiatry, 75(2), 230.
- Peterson, J. J. (2002). Lostbirds: An exploration of the phenomenological experience of transracially adopted Native Americans (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3060581).
- Pratt, M. G. (2003). Disentangling collective identities. In J. Polzer, E. Mannix, & M. Neale (Eds.), Identity issues in groups: Research in managing groups and teams, v. 5, (pp.161-188). Stamford, CT: Elsevier Science.
- Red Horse, J. G., Martinez, C., Day, P., Day, D., Poupart, J., & Scharnberg, D. (2000). Family preservation: Concepts in American Indian communities. Casey Family Programs. Retrieved from http://www.nicwa.org/research/01.FamilyPreservation.pdf
- Sachdev, P. (1992). Adoption reunion and after: A study of the search process and experience of adoptees. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 71(1), 53-68.
- Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 225-248). New York, NY: Springer.
- Silverman, P. R., Campbell, L., Patti, P., & Style, C. B. (1988). Reunions between adoptees and birth parents: The birth parents' experience. Social Work, 33(6), 523-528.
- Sindelar, R. (2004). Negotiating Indian identity: Native Americans and transracial adoption (Order No. 1423466). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (305172838). Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/305172838?accountid=14586
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2012). Child maltreatment 2012. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
- White Hawk, S. (2014, September 29). We are coming home. Retrieved from http://www.wearecominghome.com/ComingHome.php