Résumés
Résumé
Les pratiques enseignantes (PE) restent encore relativement peu étudiées dans la recherche sur l’enseignement supérieur (ES), surtout en ce qui concerne l’observation des pratiques. Cet article se propose de fournir un cadre de référence pour la conception d’un modèle théorique des PE en classe dans l’ES. Ce travail permettra d’explorer ultérieurement le rôle des PE dans la réussite des étudiants. Une analyse narrative a été menée sur deux modèles des PE de l’enseignement obligatoire, ayant de solides fondements théoriques et empiriques, afin de les transposer au contexte de l’ES. Les résultats ont permis d’identifier quatre catégories clefs des pratiques.
Mots-clés :
- Enseignement supérieur,
- pratiques enseignantes,
- enseignant,
- réussite
Abstract
Teaching practices are still relatively unexplored in higher education research, especially when it comes to observing practices. This study provides a framework for the development of a theoretical model of teaching practices into HE classroom. It will enable future research to explore the concrete role of teaching practices in student success. A narrative analysis was conducted of two models of teaching practice from compulsory education, with strong theoretical and empirical foundations, in order to transfer them to the HE context. The results identified four key categories of practice.
Keywords:
- Higher education,
- teaching practices,
- teacher,
- success
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of Effective Teacher-Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement With the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary. School Psych Rev, 42(1), 76-98. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931966
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
- Berthaud, J., Erard, C., Giret, J. F., Guégnard, C., Morlaix, S., & Perret, C. (2018). Regards croisés sur les conditions de réussite dans l’enseignement supérieur français. Rapport pour le CNESCO Septembre 2018. Responsables scientifiques.
- Bezeau, D. (2018). L’accompagnement d’enseignantes en éducation physique et à la santé visant l’optimisation de leurs pratiques évaluatives en éducation à la santé [thèse de doctorat, Université de Sherbrooke]. http://hdl.handle.net/11143/14931
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, VoI. I : Attachment. New York: Basic. Bretherton, I. (1992). The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.
- Brophy, J. (2000). Teaching. Brussels: International academy of education. International Bureau of Education (IAE).
- Cosnefroy, O., Nurra, C., & Dessus, P. (2016). Analyse dynamique de la motivation des élèves en début de scolarité obligatoire en fonction de la nature de leurs interactions avec l’enseignant. Éducation & formations (90), 29-51. 10.48464/hal-01306393
- Coulon, A. (2017). Le métier d’étudiant: l’entrée dans la vie universitaire. Educação e Pesquisa, 43, 1239-1250.
- Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School effectiveness and school improvement, 17(3), 347-366.
- De Clercq, M. (2017). L’étudiant face à la transition universitaire : approche multidimensionnelle et dynamique du processus de réussite académique [thèse de doctorat, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve].
- De Clercq, M., Frenay, M., Wouters, P., & Raucent, B. (2022). Pédagogie active dans l’enseignement supérieur : Description de pratiques et repères théoriques. Peter Lang
- De Clercq, M., & Perret, C. (2020). Étude exploratoire des obstacles à la transition universitaire selon le vécu d’étudiants français et belges. Éducation et socialisation. Les Cahiers du CERFEE(58).
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
- Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018). Effects of three basic dimensions of instructional quality on students’ situational interest in sixth-grade biology instruction. Learning and instruction, 56, 42-53.
- Duguet, A. (2015). Les pratiques pédagogiques à l’université en France : quels effets sur la réussite en première année ? Le cas du cours magistral. Recherche et formation (79), 9-26.
- Duguet, A., Le Mener, M., & Morlaix, S. (2016). Les déterminants de la réussite à l’université. Quels apports de la recherche en Éducation, 31-53.
- Dupont, S., De Clercq, M., & Galand, B. (2015). Les prédicteurs de la réussite dans l’enseignement supérieur. Revue critique de la littérature en psychologie de l’éducation. Revue française de pédagogie. Recherches en éducation (191), 105-136.
- Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Occasional report, 1, 1-19.
- Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and instruction, 29, 1-9.
- Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, 493-541.
- Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: a typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in higher education, 39(5), 734-753.
- Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system–secondary. The Journal of early adolescence, 35(5-6), 651-680. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319784/pdf/nihms847416.pdf
- Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Learning opportunities in preschool and early elementary classrooms.
- Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., & Downer, J. T. (2007). Building a science of classrooms: Application of the CLASS framework in over 4,000 US early childhood and elementary classrooms. Foundation for Childhood Development, 30(2008).
- Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1(1), 371-404.
- Holzberger, D., Praetorius, A. K., Seidel, T., & Kunter, M. (2019). Identifying effective teachers: The relation between teaching profiles and students’ development in achievement and enjoyment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-00410-8
- Hora, M. T. (2015). Toward a descriptive science of teaching: How the TDOP illuminates the multidimensional nature of active learning in postsecondary classrooms. Science Education, 99(5), 783-818.
- Katamba Muamba, M., Frenay, M., & Mukendi Wa Mpoyi, P. (2023). Observer les pratiques d’enseignement au supérieur : Adaptation et validation d’une grille d’observation des dimensions de l’enseignement en contexte congolais. Évaluer. Journal international de recherche en éducation et formation, 9(1), 123-155. https://doi.org/1048782/e-jiref-9-1-123
- Kleickmann, T., Steffensky, M., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2020). Quality of teaching in science education: more than three basic dimensions? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66(1), 37-53.
- Klieme, E. (2016). TIMSS 2015 and PISA 2015: How are they related on the country level. German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF).
- Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I:” Aufgabenkultur” und Unterrichtsgestaltung. In TIMSS-Impulse für Schule und Unterricht (pp. 43-57). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
- Klieme, E., & Thußbas, C. (2001). Kontextbedingungen und Verständigungsprozesse im Geometrieunterricht: Eine Fallstudie. In Nutzung von Videodaten zur Untersuchung von Lehr-Lernprozessen (pp. 41-59). Waxmann.
- Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643-680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
- Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2013). The model of instructional quality in COACTIV: A multicriteria analysis. In Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 97-124). Springer.
- Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 36, 143-152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010
- Lefeuvre, G. (2005). Les pratiques d’exercice de la discipline des enseignants du primaire dans et hors de la classe. Dans la classe et hors de la classe. L’évolution de l’espace professionnel des enseignants, 119-132.
- Lenoir, Y. (2009). L’intervention éducative, un construit théorique pour analyser les pratiques d’enseignement. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 12 (1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017474ar
- Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and instruction, 19(6), 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
- Marcel, J.-F. (2009). De la prise en compte des pratiques enseignantes de travail partagé. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 12 (1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017487ar
- Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D. M., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child development, 79(3), 732-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x
- Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American psychologist, 59(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
- McCance, K., Weston, T., & Niemeyer, E. (2020). Classroom Observations to Characterize Active Learning Within Introductory Undergraduate Science Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(4), 24-29.
- McKellar, S. E., Cortina, K. S., & Ryan, A. M. (2020). Teaching practices and student engagement in early adolescence: A longitudinal study using the Classroom Assessment Scoring System. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102936
- Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., Van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art–teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School effectiveness and school improvement, 25(2), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
- Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2003). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. In Educational Psychologist (pp. 89-101). Routledge.
- Phan, H. P. (2009). Relations between goals, self efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: a path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903289423
- Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. J. (2008a). Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 365-397. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308230
- Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational researcher, 38(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
- Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012). The CLASS-secondary manual. Charlottesville, VA : University of Virginia.
- Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008b). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
- Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of educational research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
- Praetorius, A.-K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: looking back and looking forward. ZDM, 50(3), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
- Praetorius, A.-K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: The German framework of three basic dimensions. ZDM, 50(3), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4
- Quinlan, K. M. (2019). What triggers students’ interest during higher education lectures? Personal and situational variables associated with situational interest. Studies in higher education, 44(10), 1781-1792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665325
- Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2007). Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction: Cognitive and motivational effects of a structured organisation of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG priority programme, 101-120.
- Rey, O. (2017). Étiqueter les méthodes ou parler des pratiques réelles ? Cahiers Pedagogiques, 72 (541), 7-7.
- Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of educational psychology, 107(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
- Schaeper, H., & Weiß, T. (2016). The conceptualization, development, and validation of an instrument for measuring the formal learning environment in higher education. In Methodological issues of longitudinal surveys: The example of the National Educational Panel Study (pp. 267-290). Springer.
- Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
- Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of educational research, 77(4), 454-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
- Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kwanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. A Research and Development Report.
- Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3-28.
- Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Yu, F. (2006). The international system for teacher observation and feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational research and evaluation, 12(6), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600874067
- Tobin, R. M., & Graziano, W. G. (2006). Development of Regulatory Processes Through Adolescence: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.
- Trautwein, C., & Bosse, E. (2017). The first year in higher education—critical requirements from the student perspective. Higher Education, 73(3), 371-387.
- Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational psychology review, 16, 359-384.
- Verstrepen, M.-F. (2021). Construction et validation d’échelles de mesure de l’activation cognitive pour le cours d’initiation scientifique auprès d’élèves de 5° et 6° année primaire de la région liégeoise [Master’s thesis, Université de Liège].
- Virtanen, T., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2018). A validation study of Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary in the Finnish school context. The Journal of early adolescence, 38(6), 849-880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617699944
- Vygotski, L. (1934). Le problème de l’apprentissage et du développement intellectuel à l’âge scolaire. Vygotsky, une théorie du développement et de l’éducation, 223-249.
10.7202/1017474ar