Résumés
Abstract
Academic research in Canada involving Aboriginal peoples has changed dramatically during the last 20 years. From an academic researcher’s perspective, the changes have recently become formalised in the release of the 2nd edition of the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethics in Human Research. In this article we examine similarities and differences in the way ethical review is constructed and approached from university, Aboriginal and, in particular, Inuit perspectives. We begin our argument with a general comparison of research ethics as expressed in academic and Aboriginal sources in order to find areas of commonality, difference, and potential ambiguity between the two perspectives. We then briefly review our own experience with a multiyear research project involving several Inuit governments of different spatial and administrative scales. We conclude with discussion of a common issue arising from academic research, including our own work with Inuit and the research ethics board chaired by one of the authors. It concerns how to address potential tension between critical inquiry associated with Western scientific paradigms and respect and use of Inuit knowledge within a collaborative research process. In conclusion, we offer some “best practice advice” to academic researchers who face such a dilemma.
Résumé
Les recherches universitaires au Canada impliquant des peuples autochtones ont spectaculairement changé au cours des 20 dernières années, et ces changements ont été récemment formalisés par la publication de la 2e édition de l’Énoncé de politique des trois Conseils: Éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains. Dans cet article, nous examinons les similitudes et les différences de construction et d’approche des questions éthiques du point de vue des perspectives tant universitaires qu’autochtones, et en particulier, inuit. Nous commençons par une comparaison générale de l’éthique de la recherche telle qu’elle se dévoile dans les sources universitaires et autochtones afin de percevoir leurs points communs, leurs différences et les ambiguïtés que pourraient potentiellement recéler les deux perspectives. Nous présentons ensuite brièvement notre propre expérience au sujet d’un projet de recherche de plusieurs années dans lequel étaient impliqués divers gouvernements inuit d’échelles spatiales et administratives diverses. Nous terminons en exposant un problème commun dans la recherche universitaire, incluant nos propres travaux avec des Inuit et le comité d’éthique de la recherche présidé par l’un des auteurs. Il s’agit de résoudre les tensions potentielles entre l’investigation critique relevant des paradigmes scientifiques occidentaux et le respect et la mise à profit des savoirs inuit au sein d’un processus de recherche en collaboration. Pour conclure, nous proposons quelques «conseils de bonne pratique» aux chercheurs universitaires confrontés à un tel dilemme.
Parties annexes
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- ARMITAGE, Peter, 2009 Legalization of Aboriginal Knowledge in Canada: Methodological, Ethical and Property Rights Implications, paper presented at the Sami Rights in Coastal Landscapes and Seascapes Conference, Faculty of Law and the Centre for Sami Studies, Tromsø, University of Tromsø, Norway, April 22-24, 2009.
- BRIGGS, Jean, 1998 Inuit Morality Play: The Emotional Education of a Three Year Old, St. John’s, ISER Books, New Haven, Yale University Press.
- BRYMAN Alan, 2004 Social Research Methods, 2nd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- CASTELLANO, Marlene, 2004 Ethics of Aboriginal Health Research, Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1): 98-114.
- CASTELLANO, Marlene, 2008 Aboriginal Ethics Guide Ethical Research (online at: http://www.heretohelp.bc.ca/publications/aboriginal-people/alt/2).
- CASTELLANO, Marlene, 2010 The work on research ethics at Inuit Tuttarvingat of NAHO, panel presentation at the Conference on Celebrating Indigenous Knowledges, Peoples, Lands and Cultures, Peterborough, Trent University, June 19, 2010.
- CIHR (CANADIAN INSTITUTES FOR HEALTH RESEARCH), 2007 CIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal People, Ottawa, Canadian Institutes for Health Research (online at: http://www.chir-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html).
- CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), 2010 Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct For Research Involving Humans, December 2010.
- DORAIS, Louis-Jacques, 2008 The Language of the Inuit. Syntax, Semantics, and Society in the Arctic, Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- EDWARDS, Karen, Carrielynn LUND and Nancy GIBSON, 2008 Expecting the Unexpected in Community Based Research, Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Health, 6(3): 17-30.
- ELLIS, Stephen C., 2005 Meaningful Consideration? A Review of Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Decision Making, Arctic, 58(1): 66-77.
- FURGAL, Christopher M., Christopher FLETCHER and Cindy DICKSON, 2006 Ways of Knowing and Understanding: Towards the Convergence of Traditional and Scientific Knowledge of Climate Change in the Canadian North, report prepared for Environment Canada, Ottawa.
- FIENUP-RIORDAN, Ann, 1999 Yaqulget Qaillun Pilartat (What the birds do) Yup’ik Eskimo understandings of geese and those who study them, Arctic, 52(1): 1-22.
- HACKING, Ian, 2001 The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
- HARDING, Sandra, 1991 Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
- INUIT TUTTARVINGAT , 2010 Ethics and Research (online at: http://www.naho.ca/inuit/e/ethics/).
- INUIT TUTTARVINGAT AND ITK (INUIT TAPIRIIT KANATAMI), 2010 Inuit-Specific Perspectives on Research and Research Ethics, Ottawa, Inuit Tuttarvingat of the National Aboriginal Health Organization and Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (online at: http://www.naho.ca/documents/it/2010_Ethics_Research_presentation.pdf).
- ITK (INUIT TAPIRIIT KANATAMI), >n.d. Inuit Qaujisarvingat: Inuit Knowledge Centre at Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami’s website: http://www.inuitknowledge.ca/.
- ITK (INUIT TAPIRIIT KANATAMI) and NRI (NUNAVUT RESEARCH INSTITUTE), 2007 Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers, Scot Nickels, Jamal Shirley and Gita Laidler (eds), Ottawa, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Iqaluit, Nunavut Research Institute (online at: http://www.itk.ca/sites/default/files/Negotitiating-Research-Relationships-Researchers-Guide.pdf).
- KUHN, Thomas, 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
- LILCA (LABRADOR INUIT LAND CLAIMS AGREEMENT), 2003 Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement, Ottawa, Queen’s Printer for Canada and Nain, Labrador Inuit Association.
- NADASDY, Paul, 2003 Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge, and Aboriginal-State Relations in the Southwest Yukon, Vancouver, UBC Press. 2007 The Gift in the Animal: The Ontology of Hunting and Human-animal Sociality, American Ethnologist, 34(1): 25-43.
- NAHO (NATIONAL ABORIGINAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION), 2007a Considerations and Templates for Ethical Research Practices, Ottawa, National Aboriginal Health Organization.
- NAHO (NATIONAL ABORIGINAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION), 2007b OCAP: Ownership, Control, Access and Possession, Ottawa, National Aboriginal Health Organization (online at: http://cahr.uvic.ca/nearbc/documents/2009/FNC-OCAP.pdf).
- NATCHER, David and Lawrence FELT, 2006-2007 From the Minds of Elders to the Policeis of Government: Incorporating Inuit Environmental Knbowledge into Nunartsiavut Resource Management and Policy, St. John’s, Memorial University and Hopedale, Government of Nunatsiavut (proposal presented 2006; signed April 2007).
- NEW WEBSTER’S DICTIONARY AND THESAURUS, 1991 New Webster’s Dictionary and Thesaurus, New York, Ottenheimer Publishers (Book Essentials, Inc.).
- NRI (NUNAVUT RESEARCH INSTITUTE) and ITK (INUIT TAPIRIIT KANATAMI), 2002[1998] Negotiating Research Relationships: A Guide for Communities, Iqaluit, Nunavut Research Institute, Ottawa, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (online at: http://www.itk.ca/sites/default/files/Negotitiating-Research-Relationships-Community-Guide.pdf).
- NUNATSIAVUT GOVERNMENT, 2008 Interim Research Process Statement, Nain, Nunatsiavut.
- PROCTER, Andrea, Lawrence FELT and David NATCHER, in press Introduction, in David Natcher, Lawrence Felt and Andrea Procter (eds), Settlement, Subsistence and Change among the Labrador Inuit: The Nunatsiavummiut Experience, Winnipeg, The University of Manitoba Press: 1-14.
- THORPE, Natasha, Naikak HAKONGAK, Sandra EYEGETOK and THE KITIKMEOT ELDERS, 2001 Thunder on the Tundra: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit of the Bathurst Caribou, Tuktu and Nogak Project, Vancouver, Generation Printing.
- USHER, Peter, 2000 Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management, Arctic, 53(2): 183-193.
- WENZEL, George, 1999 Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Inuit: Reflections on TEK Research and Ethics, Arctic, 52(2):113-124.
- WENZEL, George, 2004 From TEK to IQ: Qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit Cultural Ecology, Arctic Anthropology, 41(4): 238-250.
- WILSON, Shawn, 2008 Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods, Halifax and Winnipeg, Fernwood Books.