Résumés
Résumé
Le guide La formation à l’enseignement : les orientations, les compétences professionnelles, du ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport du Québec, présente douze compétences professionnelles à maîtriser. La huitième de ces compétences porte sur l’intégration des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC). L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer les facteurs influençant l’utilisation des TIC par les futurs enseignants du secondaire en période de stage. Une analyse de régression logistique a permis de prédire les probabilités d’utilisation des TIC en stage par les participants (n = 455). Les résultats montrent que trois facteurs principaux se distinguent parmi les cinq relevés au total : 1) planifier des activités intégrant les TIC, 2) intégrer les TIC aux activités pédagogiques, 3) utiliser les TIC pour planifier son enseignement.
Abstract
The guide “Teacher Training, Orientations, Professional Competencies”, by the Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport du Québec highlights 12 professional competencies to be mastered. The eighth competency relates to using information and communication technologies (ICT) in the classroom. The objective of this study was to assess factors influencing the use of ICT by these future teachers during their internships. A logistic regression analysis allowed a prediction of the probabilities of participants using ICT during their internships. (n = 455). Three main factors stand out in the results of the five surveys: 1) planning activities using ICT, 2) making ICT part of educational activities, 3) using ICT in lesson planning.
Resumen
El guía « La formación magisterial: orientación y competencias profesionales » del ministerio de la Educación, de la Recreación y del Deporte de Quebec, presenta 12 competencias profesionales por dominar. La octava competencia es la integración de las tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación (TIC). El objetivo del presente estudio es la evaluación de los factores que influyen la utilización de las TIC entre los futuros maestros de secundaria en periodo de prácticas. Un análisis de la regresión logística permitió predecir las probabilidades de utilizar las TIC durante el periodo de prácticas (n=455). Los resultados muestran que tres factores principales se desmarcan de los cinco enunciados : 1) planificar las actividades que integran las TIC, 2) integrar las TIC a las actividades pedagógicas, 3) utilizar las TIC en la planificación de la enseñanza.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- BENNETT, S., BISHOP, A., DALGARNO, B., WAYCOTT, J. et KENNEDY, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education. A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524-534.
- BIRCH, A. et IRVINE, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295-315. doi :10.1080/09523980903387506
- BULLOCK, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.
- CHAI, C. S. et LIM, C. P. (2011). The Internet and teacher education: Traversing between the digitized world and schools. Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 3-9.
- COLLIS, B. et JUNG, I. S. (2003). Uses of information and communication technologies in teacher education. Dans B. R. C. Latchem (dir.), Teacher Education Through Open and Distance Learning (p. 171-192). Londres, R.-U. : Routledge Falmer.
- DEDE, C., KETELHUT, D. J., WHITEHOUSE, P., BREIT, L. et MCCLOSKEY, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8-19.
- DESJARDINS, J. (2005). L’analyse de régression logistique. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 35-41. Récupéré de http://www.tqmp.org
- DOHN, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 343-363.
- DRENT, M. et MEELISSEN, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers and Education, 51(1), 187-199.
- FOX, B. (2007). Teaching through technology. Changing practices in two universities. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(2), 187-203.
- GALANOULI, D. et MCNAIR, V. (2001). Students’ perceptions of ICT-related support in teaching placements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 396-408.
- GIBBS, G. et COFFEY, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100.
- GOKTAS, Y., YILDIRIM, S. et YILDIRIM, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204. Récupéré de http://www.ifets.info
- GREENHOW, C., ROBELIA, B. et HUGHES, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
- GRENON, V. (2008). Impact de la formation en milieu de pratique sur les stagiaires quant au développement de leur niveau d’alphabétisation informatique, de leur sentiment d’auto-efficacité et de leurs attitudes de stress et d’utilité perçue au regard des TIC (Thèse de doctorat non publiée). Sherbrooke, Canada : Université de Sherbrooke.
- HAMMOND, M., CROSSON, S., FRAGKOULI, E., INGRAM, J., JOHNSTON-WILDER, P., JOHNSTON-WILDER, S., WRAY, D. (2009). Why do some student teachers make very good use of ICT? An exploratory case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 59-73.
- HEW, K. F. et BRUSH, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
- HSU, S. (2011). Who assigns the most ICT activities? Examining the relationship between teacher and student usage. Computers & Education, 56(3), 847-855.
- INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION. (2000). ISTE NETS: Essential Conditions for Teacher Preparation. Washington, DC : ISTE.
- JUNG, I. (2005). ICT-pedagogy integration in teacher training: Application cases worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 94-101. Récupéré de http://www.ifets.info
- KARSENTI, T., COLLIN, S., DUPUIS, A. VILLENEUVE, S., DUMOUCHEL, G. et ROBIN, J.-P. (2012). Avantages et défis inhérents à l’usage des ordinateurs au primaire et au secondaire : 2e enquête auprès de la Commission scolaire Eastern Townships. Synthèse des principaux résultats. Montréal, Canada : CRIFPE.
- KARSENTI, T., COLLIN, S., VILLENEUVE, S., DUMOUCHEL, G. et ROY, N. (2008). Pourquoi les nouveaux enseignants d’immersion ou de français langue seconde quittent-ils la profession? Résultats d’une enquête pancanadienne. Ottawa, Canada : Association canadienne des professeurs d’immersion.
- KARSENTI, T., RABY, C., VILLENEUVE, S. et GAUTHIER, C. (2007). La formation des maîtres et la manifestation de la compétence professionnelle à intégrer les technologies de l’information et des communications (TIC) aux fins de préparation et de pilotage d’activités d’enseignement-apprentissage, de gestion de l’enseignement et de développement professionnel. Montréal, Canada : CRIFPE.
- KIM, H. (2011). Exploring freshmen preservice teachers’ situated knowledge in reflective reports during case-based activities. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 10-14.
- LEASK, M. (2011). Improving the professional knowledge base for education: Using knowledge management and Web 2.0 tools. Policy Futures in Education, 9(5), 644-660.
- MADDUX, C. D., GIBSON, D. et DODGE, B. (dir.). (2011). Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2010. Chesapeake, VA : Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE).
- MAHIN, L. (2004). PowerPoint pedagogy. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(2), 219-222.
- MARKAUSKAITE, L. (2007). Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: The main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 547-572.
- MARTINET, M. A., RAYMOND, D. et GAUTHIER, C. (2001). La formation à l’enseignement : les orientations, les compétences professionnelles. Québec, Canada : Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec.
- MINISTÈRE DE L’ÉDUCATION DU QUÉBEC (1994). La formation à l’enseignement : les stages. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec.
- MUMTAZ, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-341.
- MURPHY, C. (2000). Effective Use of ICT by Student Teachers – Is It Improving? Récupéré de ERIC (ED444549)
- ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUES (2011). L’enseignement supérieur à l’horizon 2030. Vol. 2 : Mondialisation. Paris, France : OCDE.
- OVERBAY, A., MOLLETTE, M. et VASU, E. S. (2011). A technology plan that works. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 56-59.
- PARASKEVA, F., BOUTA, H. et PAPAGIANNI, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.
- RABY, C. (2004). Analyse du cheminement qui a mené des enseignants du primaire à développer une utilisation exemplaire des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) en classe (Thèse de doctorat non publiée). Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
- REDECKER, C. (2009). Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. Séville, Espagne : Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
- SANG, G., VALCKE, M., VAN BRAAK, J. et TONDEUR, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112.
- STILES, K. E., LOUCKS-HORSLEY, S., MUNDRY, S., LOVE, N. et HEWSON, P. W. (2009). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. San Francisco, CA : Corwin Press.
- TEO, T., CHAI, C. S., HUNG, D. et LEE, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163-174.
- TEO, T., LEE, C. B. et CHAI, C. S. (2008). Understanding preservice teachers’ computer attitudes : Applying and extending the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143.
- TONDEUR, J., COOPER, M. et NEWHOUSE, C. P. (2010). From ICT coordination to ICT integration: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 296-306.
- UNDERWOOD, J. et DILLON, G. (2011). Chasing dreams and recognising realities: Teachers’ responses to ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 317-330.
- UNESCO (2002). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education: A Planning Guide. Paris, France : UNESCO.
- ZHANG, Z. et MARTINOVIC, D. (2008). ICT in teacher education: Examining needs, expectations and attitudes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(2). Récupéré de http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca