Citer cet article
- MLA
-
DuBroy, Michelle. « Manuscripts Published in a Specific Chemistry Journal Must Be Both Important and Suitable According to Peer Reviewers / Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010. » Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 16, numéro 2, 2021, p. 156–157. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29936
- APA
-
DuBroy, M. (2021). Compte rendu de [Manuscripts Published in a Specific Chemistry Journal Must Be Both Important and Suitable According to Peer Reviewers / Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 16(2), 156–157. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29936
- Chicago
-
DuBroy, Michelle « Manuscripts Published in a Specific Chemistry Journal Must Be Both Important and Suitable According to Peer Reviewers / Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010 ». Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 16, no 2 (2021) : 156–157. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29936
Exporter la notice de cet article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 et +), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero
