Citer cet article
- MLA
-
Goertzen, Melissa. « Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53. » Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 14, numéro 4, 2019, p. 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
- APA
-
Goertzen, M. (2019). Compte rendu de [Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
- Chicago
-
Goertzen, Melissa « Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53 ». Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 14, no 4 (2019) : 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
Exporter la notice de cet article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 et +), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero
