Résumés
Abstract
We explore relationality and decolonization within the context of our shared attempts to blend Indigenist (Wilson & Hughes, 2019) and Western approaches to information sharing on a redesigned writing centre website. To reflect and honour the importance of story-telling in Indigenous ways of knowing and being, our core discussion is framed as a conversation that is experiential, reflective, and relational. We explain how the redesigned website supports students’ learning about themselves as academic storytellers through invitational, meaningful, personal online experiences. By telling the story of where the project started and our motivations, choices, emotional experiences, and lessons learned, we articulate an actionable, broadly adaptable pedagogical approach to decolonizing academic writing support.
Keywords:
- writing centre,
- Indigenous Knowledge,
- Reconciliation,
- academic writing,
- website
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alphonse, S. R., Charles, D. N., & Bell, T. (n.d.). Four feathers writing guide. Royal Roads University. https://libguides.royalroads.ca/fourfeathers
- Bell, T. (2020, June 21). Four feathers writing guide: Traditional Coast Salish teachings and approaches to learning to support Indigenous students develop as academic writers. Canadian Writing Centres Association/Association Canadienne des Centres de Rédaction, 1(2). https://cwcaaccr.com/2020/06/21/four-feathers-writing-guide/
- Canadian Federation of Library Associations - Fédération Canadienne des Associations de Bibliothèques. (2017). Truth and Reconciliation report and recommendations. http://cfla-fcab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Truth-and-Reconciliation-Committee-Report-and-Recommendations-ISBN1.pdf
- de Voil, N. (2020). User experience foundations. BCS.
- Harvey, A., & Russell-Mundine, G. (2019). Decolonising the curriculum: Using graduate qualities to embed Indigenous Knowledges at the academic cultural interface. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1508131
- Kovach, M. (2010). Conversation method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child & Family Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices, Perspectives, and Knowledges of First Peoples through Research, Critical Analyses, Stories, Standpoints and Media Reviews, 5(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069060ar
- Nielsen, J. (2008). How Little Do Users Read? https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/.
- Okun, T. (2023). Either/or & the binary. White Supremacy Culture. https://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/eitheror--the-binary.html
- Royal Roads University. (n.d.-a). Chapters in our history. https://www.royalroads.ca/about/history-traditions/chapters-our-history
- Royal Roads University. (n.d.-b). Strategic commitments. https://www.royalroads.ca/about/strategic-commitments
- Sasakamoose, J., & Pete, S. M. (2015). Towards Indigenizing university policy. Education Matters: The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/em/article/view/62922
- Suetterlin, K. (2021, June 18). UX writing for everyone: What neurodiversity can teach us. Counter Arts. https://medium.com/counterarts/ux-writing-and-neurodiversity-a51a319d8c19
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. Government of Canada. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/trc/IR4-8-2015-eng.pdf
- Wilson, S. & Hughes, M. (2019). Why research is reconciliation. In Wilson, S., Breen, A. V., & DuPré, L. (Eds.), Research & reconciliation: Unsettling ways of knowing through Indigenous relationships (pp. 5-20). Canadian Scholars.
10.7202/1069060ar