Résumés
Résumé
Quelques aspects dans le domaine du contrôle du tabac ont été marqués par une conceptualisation plus large des facteurs complexes qui déterminent la santé de la population. Les programmes de santé publique de contrôle du tabac accordent une part de plus en plus grande à des interventions à plusieurs niveaux et à des changements de politiques pour influencer le contexte. De plus, des concepts socio-écologiques (par exemple, stratégies visant des interactions intrapersonnelles, interpersonnelles et socio-environnementales) sont implicites à de nombreuses politiques exhaustives de réduction du tabac. Par contraste, la recherche interventionnelle sur le tabac est à la traîne par rapport à cette progression, avec des stratégies au niveau individuel qui continuent à dominer le programme de recherche. De nouvelles méthodes de recherche sont suggérées pour renforcer la recherche interventionnelle dans la prévention et l’arrêt du tabagisme. En utilisant l’exemple des adolescents et des transitions développementales, nous illustrerons comment la réflexion entourant les modèles socio-écologiques offre de nouvelles possibilités pour la recherche interventionnelle sur le contrôle du tabac.
Mots-clés:
- Tabac,
- recherche interventionnelle,
- modèles socio-écologiques,
- interventions multiples
Abstract
Some aspects of the tobacco control field have been informed by a broader conceptualization of the complex factors that determine population health. Tobacco control programs increasingly include multi-level interventions and policy changes to influence context. Further, socioecological concepts (e.g., strategies targeting intrapersonal, interpersonal and socioenvironmental interactions) are implicit in many comprehensive tobacco reduction policies. In contrast, tobacco intervention research lags behind this progression, with individual level strategies continuing to dominate the research agenda. New research methods are suggested to strengthen intervention research in tobacco prevention and cessation. Developmental transitions are briefly explored to consider the impact of developmental vulnerability and resiliency on youth tobacco use, providing an expanded focus and new opportunities for intervention research.
Keywords:
- Tobacco,
- intervention research,
- socioecological models,
- multiple interventions
Resumen
Algunos aspectos en el campo del control del tabaco han sido marcados por una conceptualización más amplia de los factores complejos que determinan la salud de la población. Los programas de salud pública acuerdan una parte cada vez más grande a las intervenciones en varios niveles y a los cambios de políticas para influenciar el contexto. Además, los conceptos socioecológicos (por ejemplo, las estrategias que apuntan a las interacciones intrapersonales, interpersonales y socioambientales) están implícitos en numerosas políticas exhaustivas de reducción del tabaco. Por el contrario, la investigación intervencional sobre el tabaco está atrasada con respecto a este progreso, y el programa de investigación sigue estando dominado por estrategias a nivel individual. Se sugieren nuevos métodos de investigación para reforzar la investigación intervencional en la prevención y la supresión del tabaquismo. Utilizando el ejemplo de los adolescentes y de las transiciones del desarrollo se ilustra de qué manera la reflexión que rodea los modelos socioecológicos ofrece nuevas posibilidades para la investigación intervencional sobre el control del tabaco.
Palabras clave:
- Tabaco,
- investigación intervencional,
- modelos socioecológicos,
- intervenciones múltiples
Parties annexes
Références
- Ashley, M.J., Broadway, T., Cameron, R., d’Avernas, J., Ferrence, R., Pipe, A., Schabas, R. & Thomsen, P. (1999). Actions will speak louder than words: Getting serious about tobacco control in Ontario: A report to the Ministry of Health from her Expert Panel on the Renewal of the Ontario Tobacco Strategy. Toronto, ON : Expert Panel on the Renewal of the Ontario Tobacco Strategy.
- Aveyard, P., Markham, W.A. & Cheng, K.K. (2004). « A methodological and substantive review of the evidence that schools cause pupils to smoke ». Social Science and Medicine. 58 (11), p. 2253-2265.
- Best, J.A., Thomson, S.J., Santi, S., Smith, E.A., & Brown, K.S. (1988). « Preventing cigarette smoking among school children ». Annual Review of Public Health. 9, p. 161-201.
- Breinbauer, C. & Maddaleno, M. (2005). Youth: Choices and Change. Promoting Health Behavior in Adolescents. Pan American Health Organization : Scientific and Technical Publication N° 594.
- Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2003). Comprehensive Statewide Tobacco Prevention Programs Effectively Reduce Tobacco Use. Washington, DC : Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. Atlanta, GA : CDC.
- Chassin, L., & Presson, C.C. (2001). « From adolescence to adulthood: age-related changes in beliefs about cigarette smoking in a midwestern community sample ». Health Psychology. 20 (5), p. 377-386.
- Conrad, K.M., Flay, B.R., & Hill, D. (1992). « Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset ». British Journal of Addiction. 87 (12), p. 1711-1724.
- Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
- Crozier Kegler, M. & Miner, K. (2004). « Environmental health promotion interventions : considerations for preparation and practice ». Health Education and Behaviour. 31 (4), p. 510-525.
- Dyke, J.C. (2004). « Public participation in the development of a tobacco control policy: the case of a municipal smoke-free bylaw ». Thèse (M.Sc.), Université d’Ottawa.
- Edwards, N., Mill, J., & Kothari, A. (2004). « Multiple intervention research programs in community health ». Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 36 (1), p. 40-55.
- Epp, J. (1986). Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion. Ottawa, ON : Ministry of Supply and Services.
- Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population. (1999). Towards a Healthy Future. Second Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa, ON : Auteur.
- Flay, B.R., d’Avernas, J.R., Best, J.A., Kersell, M.W. & Ryan, K.B. (1983). « Cigarette smoking: why young people do it and ways of preventing it ». [In P. Firestone & P. McGrath (Eds.) :Pediatric and Adolescent Behavioral Medicine] New York : Springer, p. 132-181.
- Green, L. (2006). « Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? ». American Journal of Public Health. 96 (3), p. 406-409.
- Green, L.W., Richard, L. & Potvin, L. (1996). « Ecological foundations of health promotion ». American Journal of Health Promotion. 10 (4), p. 270-281.
- Hancock, T. (1993). « Health, human development and the community ecosystem: three ecological models ». Health Promotion International. 8 (1), p. 41-47.
- Jairath, N., Mitchell, K. & Filleon, B. (2003). « Childhood smoking: the research, clinical and theoretical imperative for nursing action ». International Nursing Review. 50 (4), p. 203-14.
- Kothari, A. & Birch, S. (2004). « Multilevel health promotion research: conceptual and analytical considerations ». Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 36 (1), p. 56-75.
- Kothari, A., Leatherdale, S., Edwards, N., Atkinson, C. (2007, en cours de révision). « Untangling the influence of youth, their peers and their schools on smoking ». American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
- Krauss, M., Mueller, N. & Luke, D. (2004). « Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: a social network analysis ». Prevention of Chronic Disease. 1 (4), p. 1-25.
- Kremers, S.P.J., Mudde, A.N. & De Vries, H. (2004). « Model of unplanned smoking initiation of children and adolescents: an integrated stage model of smoking behavior ». Preventive Medicine. 38 (5), p. 642-650.
- Labonté, R. (1993). Health Promotion and Empowerment: Practice Frameworks. Toronto, ON : Centre for Health Promotion and ParticiACTION.
- Lalonde, M. (1974). A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa, ON : Government of Canada.
- Mancini, J. & Marek, L. (2004). « Sustaining community-based programs for families: conceptualization and measurement ». Family Relations. 53 (4), p. 339-347.
- Novak, S.P. & Clayton, R.R. (2001). « The influence of school environments and self-regulation on transition between stages of cigarette smoking: a multilevel analysis ». Health Psychology. 20 (30), p. 196-207.
- O’Connor, S.C., Cohen, J.E. & Osterlund, K. (2001). Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs: A Review and Synthesis of Evaluation Strategies in the United States. Toronto, ON : Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Special Report.
- Ontario Tobacco Research Unit. (2003). The Fiscal Impact of Tobacco Control in Ontario. Toronto, ON : Special Report Series.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé-Conference on Health Promotion. (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Ottawa, ON : Health and Welfare Canada.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (2003a). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Genève : Auteur.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (2003b). Tobacco Control Country Profiles. Genève : American Cancer Society.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (s.d.). Frequently asked questions on the WHO FCTC and the context in which it was negotiated. Genève : Auteur. Page consultée en ligne le 5 juin 2006 sur le site : http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/faq/en/.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (2006a). Opening remarks by the Director-General to the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control at its first session: February 6, 2006. Genève : Auteur.
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (2006b). Updated status of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Genève : Auteur.
- Renaud, L., O’Laughlin, J. & Dery, V. (2003). « The St. Louis de Parc Heart Health Project: a critical analysis of the reverse effects of smoking ». Tobacco Control, 12, p. 302-309.
- Richard, L., Potvin, L., Kishchuk, N., Prlic H. & Green L. (1996). « Assessment of the integration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs ». American Journal of Health Promotion. 10 (4), p. 318-328.
- Rohrbach, L., Howard-Pitney, B., Unger, J., et coll. (2002). « Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998 ». Journal of American Public Health. 92 (6), p. 975-984.
- Sallis, F. & Owen, N. (1997). « Ecological models ». [In Glanz, K., Lewis, L., Rimer, R.K. (Eds.) : Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice] 2nd edition. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, Inc., p. 403-424.
- Santé Canada. (2002). Population Health Approach: What Determines Health? Ottawa, ON : Auteur.
- Smedley, B.D. & Syme, S.L. (2000). Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
- Stanton, W.R. & Smith, K.M. (2002). « A critique of evaluated adolescent smoking cessation programmes ». Journal of Adolescence. 25 (4), p. 427-438.
- Tucker, J.S., Ellickson, P.L. & Klein, D.J. (2002). « Smoking cessation during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood ». Nicotine and Tobacco. 4 (3), p. 321-332.
- Tyas, S.L. & Pederson, L.L. (1998). « Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature ». Tobacco Control. 7, p. 409-420.
- Valente, T.W. (1996) « Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations ». Social Networks. 18 (1), p. 69-89.
- Valente, T.W. & Fosados, R. (2006). « Diffusion of innovations and network segmentation: the part played by people in promoting health ». Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 33 (7), p. S23-S31.
- Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
- Whittemore, R. & Knafl, K. (2005). « The integrative review: updated methodology ». Journal of Advanced Nursing. 52 (5), 546-553.
- Wild, C. (May 26, 2006). Predicting Uptake of Cigarette Smoking among Alberta Adolescents: An Evaluation of the Prototype-Willingness Model. Document présenté à la conférence Tobacco Reduction Together: Linking Research, Policy and Practice. Edmonton, Alberta : Alberta Alcohol & Drug Abuse Commission.
- Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks : Sage.