Résumés
Résumé
La théorie de l’action situationnelle (TAS) est une théorie générale du crime qui propose d’expliquer la décision du passage à l’acte délinquant comme le résultat de l’interaction entre la propension criminelle d’un individu et l’environnement criminogène dans lequel cet individu décide de commettre un délit. Sur la base de l’échantillon des données belges de la Recherche Internationale de Délinquance Auto-révélée (ISRD-3), composé de 4758 adolescents, des régressions multiples (OLS) ont été menées afin de tester les questions centrales de l’axe situationnel ainsi que quelques questions de l’axe sociodéveloppemental. Les résultats obtenus démontrent que la propension criminelle et l’exposition à des environnements criminogènes participent individuellement et conjointement au comportement délinquant des adolescents ; que la moralité explique davantage cette propension criminelle que le contrôle de soi ; et enfin, que cette propension est elle-même expliquée de façon significative par de faibles relations avec les parents et avec l’école ainsi que par une criminalité perçue à l’école et dans le voisinage (exposition socioécologique). Les contributions de cette recherche tendent à confirmer les questions centrales de la TAS auprès d’un échantillon européen, en partie francophone, nous permettant de discuter certaines pistes de prévention et défis méthodologiques autour de la TAS.
Mots-clés :
- Moralité,
- contrôle de soi,
- exposition aux environnements criminogènes,
- théorie de l’action situationnelle
Abstract
The Situational Action Theory (SAT) is a general action theory of crime that explains the decision to commit a crime as the result of interaction between an individual’s criminal propensities and the environment in which the decision to commit a crime is made. As a test of several key situational and socio-developmental propositions of the SAT, multiple regression analyses (OLS) were performed on a sample of 4758 Belgian adolescents as part of the International Study of Research on Delinquency (ISRD-3). The results show that criminal propensity and specific criminogenic exposure contribute both individually and interactively to offending, that morality has a greater effect on criminal propensity than self-control, and that individual differences in criminal propensity are significantly explained by the cumulative effect of weak relationships with parents and at school and the level of exposure to crime in school or neighborhood (socio-ecological exposure). Our findings confirm the major hypotheses of the SAT using a partly francophone European sample and allow us to discuss some avenues for prevention as well as methodological issues for future research.
Keywords:
- Morality,
- self-control ability,
- criminogenic moral settings,
- situational action theory
Resumen
La teoría de la acción situacional (TAS) es una teoría general del crimen que propone explicar la decisión del pasar al acto delincuente como el resultado de la interacción entre la propensión criminal de un individuo y el ambiente criminógeno en el cual este individuo decide cometer el delito. Con base en la muestra de los datos belgas de la Investigación Internacional de Delincuencia Auto-revelada (ISRD-3), compuesto de 4758 adolescentes, unas regresiones múltiples (OLS) fueron realizadas con el fin de probar las cuestiones centrales del eje situacional, así como algunas preguntas del eje socio-desarrollista. Los resultados obtenidos demuestran que la propensión criminal y la exposición a ambientes criminógenos participan, individualmente y conjuntamente, al comportamiento criminal de los adolescentes ; que la moralidad explica en mayor medida esta propensión criminal que el auto-control ; y, finalmente, que esta propensión está de por sí explicada de forma significativa por relaciones débiles con los padres y con el colegio, así como por una criminalidad percibida en la escuela y en el vecindario (exposición socio-ecológica). Las contribuciones de esta investigación tienden a confirmar las hipótesis centrales de la TAS en una muestra europea, en parte francófona, permitiéndonos discutir algunas pistas de prevención y retos metodológicos en torno a la TAS.
Palabras clave:
- Moralidad,
- auto-control,
- exposición a ambientes criminógenos,
- teoría de la acción situacional
Parties annexes
Références
- Agnew, R. (2005). Pressured into crime : An overview of general strain theory (1re éd.). Roxbury Publishing Company.
- Agnew, R. (2011). Toward a unified criminology : Integrating assumptions about crime, people and society (vol. 1). NYU Press.
- Barton-Crosby, J. (2020). The nature and role of morality in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology. DOI : 10.1177/1477370820977099.
- Barton-Crosby, J. et Hirtenlehner, H. (2020). The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior. DOI : 10.1080/ 01639625.2020.1738645.
- Bernasco, W., Ruiter, S., Bruinsma, G. J., Pauwels, L. J. et Weerman, F. M. (2013). Situational causes of offending : A fixed-effects analysis of space-time budget data. Criminology, 51(4), 895-926.
- Brauer, J. R. et Tittle, C. R. (2017). When crime is not an option : Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818-846.
- Burt, C. H. (2020). Self-control and crime : Beyond Gottfredson et Hirschi’s theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 43-73.
- Cohen, L. E. et Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends : A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
- Cooper, J. (2011). Cognitive dissonance theory. Dans P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski et E. T. Higgins (dir.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (vol. 1, p. 377-398).
- Craig, J. M. (2019). Extending situational action theory to white-collar crime. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 171-186.
- Cullen, F. T. et Wilcox, P. (dir.). (2010). Encyclopedia of criminological theory (vol. 1). Sage.
- De Buck, A. et Koeleman, A. (2015). Stagerapport : Een onderzoek naar individuele verschillen in regelovertredend gedrag op basis van ISRD-3. Ghent, Belgique : Ghent University.
- De Buck, A. et Pauwels, L. J. (2019). Intention to shoplift : On the importance of dimensions of propensity in an integrated informal control/lifestyle model. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(3), 297-315.
- Declerck, N. et Pauwels, L. J. (2010). Individu, Omgeving En De Verklaring Van Jeugdcrimineel Gedrag. Een Toets In Twee Stedelijke Settings. Antwerpen, Belgique : Maklu.
- Doelman, E. H., Luijk, M. P., Haen Marshall, I., Jongerling, J., Enzmann, D. et Steketee, M. J. (2021). The association between child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency in the context of Situational Action Theory : Crime propensity and criminogenic exposure as mediators in a sample of European youth ? European Journal of Criminology. DOI : 10.1177/14773708211013300.
- Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology : Key theoretical and empirical issues-the 2002 Sutherland Award address. Criminology, 41(2), 221-225.
- Gerstner, D. et Oberwittler, D. (2018). Who’s hanging out and what’s happening ? A look at the interplay between unstructured socializing, crime propensity and delinquent peers using social network data. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 111-129.
- Gottfredson, M. R. et Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
- Gottfredson, M. R. et Hirschi, T. (2019). Modern control theory and the limits of criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
- Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, J. R. J. et Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5-29.
- Hirtenlehner, H. et Hardie, B. (2016). On the conditional relevance of controls : An application of situational action theory to shoplifting. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 315-331.
- Hirtenlehner, H. et Leitgöb, H. (2021). Differential self-control effects : Moral filtering and the subsidiary relevance of self-control. International Criminology. DOI : 10.1007/s43576-021-00012-3.
- Hirtenlehner, H., Bacher, J. Leitgöb, H. et Schartmueller, D. (2021) : Do morality and self-control protect from criminogenic peer influence ? Testing multidimensional person–environment interactions. Justice Quarterly. DOI : 10.1080/07418825.2021.1903069.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books Ltd.
- Kerr, M. et Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment : Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental psychology, 36(3), 366.
- Kessler, G. et Reinecke, J. (2021). Dynamics of the causes of crime : A life-course application of situational action theory for the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. DOI : 10.1007/s40865-021-00161-z.
- Kokkalera, S. S., Marshall, I. H. et Marshall, C. E. (2020). How exceptional is India ? A test of situational action theory. Asian Journal of Criminology, 15, 195-218.
- Kroneberg, C. et Schulz, S. (2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(3), 56-76.
- Liu, W., Qiu, G. et Zhang, S. (2020). Situational action theory and school bullying : Rethinking the moral filter. Crime & Delinquency. DOI : 10.1177/0011128720974318.
- Mathys, C. et Claes, S. (2020). Conduites de harcèlement et de cyber-harcèlement chez les adolescents : interrelations et spécificités, place de l’empathie et actions de prise en charge. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 68(5), 251-256.
- Menting, B., Van Lier, P. A., Koot, H. M., Pardini, D. et Loeber, R. (2016). Cognitive impulsivity and the development of delinquency from late childhood to early adulthood : Moderating effects of parenting behavior and peer relationships. Development and psychopathology, 28(1), 167-183.
- Parcel, T. L. et Bixby, M. S. (2016). The ties that bind : Social capital, families, and children’s well-being. Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 87-92.
- Pauwels, L. J. (2018a). The conditional effects of self-control in situational action theory. A preliminary test in a randomized scenario study. Deviant Behavior, 39(11), 1450-1466.
- Pauwels, L. J. (2018b). Criminaliteit als situationele keuze ? Kritische toetsing en appreciatie van Wikström’s situationele actietheorie. La Haye, Pays-Bas : Boom Criminologie (Reeks het Groene Gras).
- Pauwels, L. J. (2018c). Analysing the perception-choice process in situational action theory. A randomized scenario study. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 130-147.
- Pauwels, L. J. et Svensson, R. (2010). Informal controls and the explanation of propensity to offend : A test in two urban samples. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16(1), 15-27.
- Pauwels, L. J. et Svensson, R. (2017). How robust is the moderating effect of extremist beliefs on the relationship between self-control and violent extremism ? Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1000-1016.
- Pauwels, L. J., Svensson, R. et Hirtenlehner, H. (2018). Testing situational action theory : A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32-55.
- Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city : Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
- Sampson, R. J. et Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural ?) tolerance of deviance : The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777-804.
- Schepers, D. (2017). Causes of the causes of juvenile delinquency : Social disadvantages in the context of situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 14(2), 143-159.
- Song, H. et Lee, S. S. (2019). Motivations, propensities, and their interplays on online bullying perpetration : a partial test of situational action theory. Crime & Delinquency, 66(12), 1787-1808.
- Svensson, R. et Pauwels, L. J. (2010). Is a risky lifestyle always “risky” ? The interaction between individual propensity and lifestyle risk in adolescent offending : A test in two urban samples. Crime & Delinquency, 56(4), 608-626.
- Svensson, R., Pauwels, L. J., Weerman, F. M. et Bruinsma, G. J. (2017). Explaining individual changes in moral values and moral emotions among adolescent boys and girls : A fixed-effects analysis. European Journal of Criminology, 14(3), 290-308.
- Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J. et Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
- Trivedi-Bateman, N. (2019). The combined roles of moral emotion and moral rules in explaining acts of violence using a situational action theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. DOI : 10.1177/0886260519852634.
- Van Vugt, E., Gibbs, J., Stams, G. J., Bijleveld, C., Hendriks, J. et van der Laan, P. (2011). Moral development and recidivism : A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(8), 1234-1250.
- Vaske, J., Galyean, K. et Cullen, F. T. (2011). Toward a biosocial theory of offender rehabilitation : Why does cognitive-behavioral therapy work ? Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 90-102.
- Warner, R. M. (2012). Applied statistics : From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2004). Crime as alternative : Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. Dans J. McCord (dir.), Beyond empiricism : Institutions and intentions in the study of crime (p. 1-37). Routledge.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime : Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. Dans P.-O. H. Wikström et R. J. Sampson (dir.), The explanation of crime : Context, mechanisms and development (p. 61-107). Cambridge University Press.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2010). Explaining crime as moral actions. Dans S. Hiltin et S. Vaisey (dir.), Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (p. 211-239). Springer.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2011). Social sources of crime propensity : A study of the collective efficacy of families, schools, and neighbourhoods. Dans T. Bliesener, A. Beelmnaan et T. Stemmler (dir.), Antisocial behavior and crime : Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (p. 109-122). Hogrefe Publishing.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2014). Why crime happens : A situational action theory. Dans G. Manzo (dir.), Analytical sociology : Actions and networks (p. 74-94). John Wiley et Sons.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2017). Character, circumstances, and the causes of crime : Towards an analytical criminology. Dans A. Liebling, S. Maruna et L. Mcara (dir.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (p. 501-521). Oxford University Press.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. (2019). Explaining crime and criminal careers : The DEA model of situational action theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1-16. Doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00116-5.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. et Treiber, K. (2007). The role of self-control in crime causation : Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. European Journal of criminology, 4(2), 237-264.
- Wikström, P.-O. H. et Treiber, K. (2017). Beyond risk factors : An analytical approach to crime prevention. Dans B. Teasdale et M. Bradley (dir.), Preventing crime and violence (p. 73-87). Springer.
- Wikström, P.-O. H., Mann, R. P. et Hardie, B. (2018). Young people’s differential vulnerability to criminogenic exposure : Bridging the gap between people-and place-oriented approaches in the study of crime causation. European journal of criminology, 15(1), 10-31.
- Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K. et Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules : The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press.
- Wikström, P.-O. H., Treiber, K. et Roman, G. (sous presse). Character, circumstances and criminal careers. Towards a dynamic developmental and life course criminology. Oxford University Press
- Young, J., Rebellon, C., Barnes, J. et Weerman, F. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance : Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60-86.