Résumés
Abstract
Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) is a complex process involving the person seeking care and their relatives. MAiD involves physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs, and consequently the involvement of an interdisciplinary team is beneficial. Therefore, updating the knowledge and skills of healthcare and social services professionals is critical. An interdisciplinary team from Laval University (Quebec, Canada) has developed a continuous training program for all health care and social services professionals who could be involved in the care of persons who request MAiD and their loved ones. It is crucial to assess whether the objectives of the continuous training program are being met, especially since this new training addresses several complex issues (legal, ethical, and clinical). Bandura's self-efficacy theory has been widely used to develop scales for assessing the impact of training programs and identifying knowledge gaps. Bandura's theory states that feeling secure in one's self-efficacy leads to self-determined motivation. Although there are various scales intended to measure self-efficacy in palliative care, none include self-efficacy for participating in the process surrounding MAiD. As a result, we aim to create a bilingual (English-French) interdisciplinary scale to assess self-efficacy for participating in the process surrounding MAiD. The scale will allow decision-makers and researchers to identify current knowledge gaps. It will also be useful for assessing the impact of current and future training programs addressing this end-of-life practice. In this work in progress, we briefly introduce the training program and the future steps in the development and validation of the scale.
Résumé
L’aide médicale à mourir (AMM) est un processus complexe impliquant la personne qui demande le soin et ses proches. L’AMM implique des besoins physiques, psychosociaux et spirituels. Par conséquent, l’implication d'une équipe interdisciplinaire est bénéfique et la mise à niveau des connaissances et des compétences des professionnel.es est essentielle. Une équipe interdisciplinaire de l’Université Laval (Québec, Canada) a développé un programme de formation continue destiné aux professionnelles de la santé et des services sociaux susceptible d’être impliqué es dans ls soins et services des personnes qui demandent l’AMM et de leurs proches. Il est crucial d’évaluer si les objectifs du programme de formation continue sont atteints, d’autant plus que cette nouvelle formation aborde plusieurs questions complexes (juridiques, éthiques et cliniques). La théorie du sentiment d’auto efficacité de Bandura a été largement utilisée pour développer des échelles permettant d’évaluer l’impact des programmes de formation et d’identifier les lacunes en matière de connaissances. Cette théorie stipule que le fait de se sentir sûre de son efficacité personnelle conduit à une motivation intrinsèque à accomplir le comportement visé. Bien qu’il existe plusieurs échelles destinées à mesurer l’auto-efficacité dans le domaine des soins palliatifs, aucune n’inclut l’auto-efficacité pour la participation au processus entourant l’AMM. Par conséquent, nous développons une échelle interdisciplinaire bilingue (anglais-français) pour évaluer l’auto-efficacité à participer au processus entourant l’AMM. L’échelle permettra aux décideuses, décideurs et aux chercheuses et chercheurs d’identifier les lacunes actuelles en matière de connaissances. Elle sera également utile pour évaluer l’impact des programmes de formation actuels et futurs portant sur cette pratique de fin de vie. Dans cet article, nous présentons brièvement le programme de formation et les étapes futures du développement et de la validation de l’échelle.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Brown, J. Goodridge D, Harrison A, Kemp J, Thorpe L, Weiler R. Care considerations in a patient- and family-centered medical Assistance in Dying program. J. Palliat. Care. 2022;37,341‑351 https://doi.org/10.1177/0825859720951661
- Hill JE, Stephani A-M, Sapple P, Clegg AJ. The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review. Implement. Sci. 2020;15,23 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2
- Dehghani F, Barkhordari-Sharifabad M, Sedaghati-Kasbakhi M, Fallahzadeh H. Effect of palliative care training on perceived self-efficacy of the nurses. BMC Palliat. Care 2020;19,63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00567-4
- Liu L, Zhao Y-Y, Zhang L-H, Chan HY-L. Measuring self-efficacy and readiness for advance care planning in Chinese older adults. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;60,622‑629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.013
- Bandura. Self-efficacy: the exercice of control. 1997; W. H. Freeman.
- Phillips J, Salamonson Y, Davidson PM. An instrument to assess nurses' and care assistants' self-efficacy to provide a palliative approach to older people in residential aged care: a validation study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2011;48, 1096‑1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.015
- Desbiens J-F, Fillion L. Development of the palliative care nursing self-competence scale. J. Hosp. Palliat. Nurs. 2011;13, 230‑241. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0b013e318213d300
- Terwee CB, Prinse CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual. Life Res. 2018;27,1159‑1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
- Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front. Public Health 2018;6,149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
- Collège des médecins du Québec et al. Guide d'exercice et lignes directrices pharmacologiques. 2019;226. https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/3438
- LeBlanc S, MacDonald S, Martin M, Dalgarno N, Schultz K. Development of learning objectives for a medical assistance in dying curriculum for Family Medicine Residency. BMC Med. Educ. 2022;22,167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03204-1
- Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J. Caring Sci. 2015;4,165‑178 https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
- Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health 30, 459‑467 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
- Koller M, Aaronson NK, Blazeby J, et al. Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach. Eur. J. Cancer. 2007;43, 1810‑1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.029
- Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 1, 1970;185‑216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
- Bertrand R, Blais J-GR, Bertrand J-G. Modèles de mesure : l'apport de la théorie des réponses aux items. 2004;376, 37‑69.
- Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 2021. Wolters Kluwer.
- Devellis RF, Thorpe CT. Scale development. 2021. Sage Publications.