Résumés
Abstract
Canada’s research productivity in Library and Information Science (LIS) is significant: studies have found that Canada ranks third globally in terms of output. As the LIS field continues to grow, the pace of output accelerates, and the scope of this work expands. The recently launched Canadian Publications in Library and Information Science Database compiles all Canadian scientific publications, including those authored by faculty members and academic librarians. This database offers the advantage of encompassing articles and librarian publications that may not be typically included in traditional bibliometric surveys, such as those conducted using databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Using this data, this study maps the scholarly contributions of Canadian LIS scholars and academic librarians to the field of LIS and examines whether Canadian LIS research is characterized by silos. This paper examines the similarities and differences in research output, impact, topics, and publication venues between academic librarians and scholars in Canada, as well as the extent to which academics and practitioners engage in research collaborations or reference each other’s work. We find that while there is some degree of overlap in research topics and publication venues between LIS academics and academic librarians, the two groups appear to act as distinct research communities with distinct topical foci and publishing habits. The two groups also do not appear to engage with each other strongly, either through collaboration or citing each other’s work.
Keywords:
- Library and Information Science,
- Academic Librarians,
- LIS faculty,
- Canadian universities,
- Scholarly Communication,
- Scholarly Publishing
Résumé
La productivité de la recherche au Canada en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information (BSI) est significative : des études ont révélé que le Canada se classe au troisième rang mondial en termes de production. À mesure que le domaine continue de croître, le rythme de production s'accélère et la portée de ce travail s'élargit. La base de données récemment lancée des Publications canadiennes en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information compile les publications de membres du corps professoral et de bibliothécaires universitaires au Canada. Cette base de données offre l'avantage d'inclure des articles et des publications de bibliothécaires qui ne sont pas toujours inclus dans les enquêtes bibliométriques traditionnelles, telles que celles menées à l'aide de bases de données comme Web of Science, Scopus et Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). En utilisant ces données, cette étude cartographie les contributions scientifiques des chercheurs canadiens en BSI et des bibliothécaires universitaires au domaine et examine si la recherche canadienne en LIS est caractérisée par des silos. Cet article examine les similitudes et les différences dans la production de recherche, l'impact, les sujets et les lieux de publication entre les bibliothécaires universitaires et les chercheurs au Canada, ainsi que la mesure dans laquelle les universitaires et les praticiens s'engagent dans des collaborations de recherche ou se réfèrent aux travaux des uns et des autres. Nous constatons que, bien qu'il existe un certain degré de chevauchement dans les sujets de recherche et les lieux de publication entre les universitaires en LIS et les bibliothécaires universitaires, les deux groupes semblent constituer des communautés de recherche distinctes avec des focalisations thématiques et des habitudes de publication distinctes. Les deux groupes ne semblent pas non plus intéragir fortement tant au niveau de la collaboration qu'au niveau des citations.
Mots-clés :
- bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information,
- bibliothécaires universitaires,
- corps professoral,
- universités canadiennes,
- publication savante,
- communication savante
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aharony, N. (2011). Library and Information Science research areas: A content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007–8. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611424819
- Akers, K. G., & Amos, K. (2017). Publishing case studies in health sciences librarianship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.212
- Aria, M., Le, T., Cuccurullo, C., Belfiore, A., & Choe, J. (2024). openalexR: An R-tool for collecting bibliometric data from OpenAlex. The R Journal, 15(4), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2023-089
- Babb, M. N. (2017). An exploration of academic librarians as researchers within a university setting. ERA. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3CF9JK1W
- Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
- Berg, S. A., Jacobs, H. L., & Cornwall, D. (2013). Academic librarians and research: A study of Canadian library administrator perspectives. College & Research Libraries, 74(6), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-366
- Blecic, D. D., Wiberley, S. E., De Groote, S. L., Cullars, J., Shultz, M., & Chan, V. (2017). Publication patterns of US academic librarians and libraries from 2003 to 2012. College & Research Libraries, 78(4), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.4.442
- Bloss, J. E., Sewell, K., Schellinger, J., & Haberstroh, A. (2022). Health sciences and medical librarians conducting research and their experiences asking for coauthorship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1485
- Borrego, Á., Ardanuy, J., & Urbano, C. (2018). Librarians as research partners: Their contribution to the scholarly endeavour beyond Library and Information Science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012
- CAPAL. (2020, July 31). Statement on academic status – Canadian Association of Professional Academic Librarians. https://capalibrarians.org/statements/statement-on-academic-status/
- CARL. (n.d.). Librarians’ Research Institute. Canadian Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://www.carl-abrc.ca/strengthening-capacity/workshops-and-training/librarians-research-institute/
- CAUT. (n.d.). Research and scholarship | CAUT. Retrieved July 24, 2023, from https://www.caut.ca/content/research-and-scholarship
- Chang, Y.-W. (2018). Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of Library and Information Science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors. Library & Information Science Research, 40(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.06.004
- Chang, Y.-W. (2019). Are articles in Library and Information Science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors? Scientometrics, 121(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03186-w
- Clayton, P. (1992). Bridging the gap: Research and practice in librarianship. In P. Clayton & R. McCaskie (Eds.), Priorities for the future: Proceedings of the First National Reference and Information Service Section Conference and the University, College and Research Libraries Section Workshop on Research (pp. 73–76). D. W. Thorpe.
- DeLong, K., Hannaford, J., Sgrazzutti, B., Urbain, C., & Waytuck, B. (2020). Competencies for librarians in Canadian research libraries (p. 16). Canadian Association of Research Libraries. https://www.carl-abrc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Competencies-Final-EN-1-2.pdf
- Detlor, B., & Lewis, V. (2015). Promoting academic library research through the “Faculty-Member-In-Residence” program. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.011
- Doucette, L., & Hoffmann, K. (2019). Conceptions of research among academic librarians and archivists. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship, 5, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.33137/CJALRCBU.V5.30417
- Ducas, A., Michaud-Oystryk, N., & Speare, M. (2020). Reinventing ourselves: New and emerging roles of academic librarians in Canadian research-intensive universities. College and Research Libraries (Online), 81(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.1.43
- Figuerola, C. G., García Marco, F. J., & Pinto, M. (2017). Mapping the evolution of Library and Information Science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1507–1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
- Finlay, S. C., Ni, C., Tsou, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Publish or practice? An examination of librarians’ contributions to research. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 13(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0038
- Fox, D. (2007a). A demographic and career Profile of Canadian research university librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(5), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.05.006
- Fox, D. (2007b). Finding time for scholarship: A survey of Canadian research university librarians. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0041
- Fox, D. (2007c). The scholarship of Canadian research university librarians. Partnership : The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 2(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v2i2.305
- Genoni, P., Merrick, H., & Willson, M. A. (2006). Scholarly communities, e‐research literacy and the academic librarian. The Electronic Library, 24(6), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610714189
- Harrington, M., & Gerolami, N. (2014). Highs and lows: An examination of academic librarians’ collective agreements. FIMS Presentations, 20. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fimspres/20
- Hall, L. W., & McBain, I. (2014). Practitioner research in an academic library: Evaluating the impact of a support group. The Australian Library Journal, 63(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.898238
- Hildreth, C. R., & Aytac, S. (2007). Recent library practitioner research: A methodological analysis and critique. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(3), 236–258.
- Hoffmann, K., Berg, S. A., Brancolini, K. R., & Kennedy, M. R. (2023). Complex and varied: Factors related to the research productivity of academic librarians in the United States. College and Research Libraries, 84(3), 392–427. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.3.392
- Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., & Jabeen, M. (2015). Research productivity of library scholars. Bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World, 116(7/8), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0132
- Jacobs, H. L. M., & Berg, S. A. (2013). By librarians, for librarians: Building a strengths-based institute to develop librarians’ research culture in canadian academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.02.003
- Julien, H., & Fena, C. (2018). Thirty-one years of the Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science: A content analysis. Canadian The Journal of Information and Library Science-La Revue canadienne des sciences de l'information et de bibliothéconomie, 42(1–2), 1–17.
- Kandiuk, M., & Sonne de Torrens, H. M. (2018). Academic freedom and librarians’ research and scholarship in Canadian universities. College & Research Libraries, 79(7), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.7.931
- Kennedy, M., & Brancolini, K. (2018). Academic librarian research: An update to a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College & Research Libraries, 79(6), 822–851. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.822
- Kennedy, M. R., & Brancolini, K. R. (2012). Academic librarian research: A survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College and Research Libraries, 73(5), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-276
- Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and Information Science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22645
- Lund, B. D. (2020). Who really contributes to Information Science research? An analysis of disciplinarity and nationality of contributors to ten top journals. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 25(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.2
- Luo, L. (2011). Fusing research into practice: The role of research methods education. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.001
- Ma, J., & Lund, B. (2021). The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24474
- Matusiak, K. K., Osinska, V., Organisciak, P., & Thomas Pitts, R. (2024). Research methods and the use of visual representation in library and information science research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24945
- Mongeon, P., Gracey, C., Riddle, P., Hare, M., Simard, M.-A., & Sauvé, J.-S. (2023). Mapping information research in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science / La Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’information et de Bibliothéconomie, 46(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.15568
- Nguyen, L. C., & Hider, P. (2018). Narrowing the gap between LIS research and practice in Australia. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 67(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1430412
- O’Brien, T., & Cronin, K. (2016). Research output of academic librarians from Irish higher education institutions 2000–2015: Findings From a Review, Analysis, and Survey. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(2–3), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1181666
- Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Forty-five years of LIS research evolution, 1971–2015: An informetrics study of the author-supplied keywords. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(3), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3
- Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., & Shu, F. (2016). Portraying the landscape of Canadian Library and Information Science research. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-La Revue canadienne des sciences de l’information et de bibliothéconomie, 40(4), 332–346.
- Petras, V. (2023). The identity of information science. Journal of Documentation, 80(3), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2023-0074
- Ponti, M. (2013). Peer production for collaboration between academics and practitioners. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000612438430
- R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Saracevic, T. (1979). An essay on the past and future (?) of information science education—I: Historical overview. Information Processing & Management, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(79)90002-5
- Sauvé, J.-S., Hare, M., Krause, G., Poitras, C., Riddle, P., &Mongeon, P. (2024a). Canadian publications in Libraryand Information Science / Publications canadiennes enbibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information [Data set].Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14302591
- Sauvé, J.-S., Hare, M., Krause, G., Poitras, C., Riddle, P., &Mongeon, P. (2024b). Canadian publications in Libraryand Information Science / Publications canadiennes enbibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information. CanadianJournal of Information and Library Science, 48(1), p.45-54. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22200
- Schlögl, C., & Stock, W. G. (2008). Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: The case of LIS journals. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810899691
- Schrader, A. M., Shiri, A., & Williamson, V. (2012). Assessment of the research learning needs of University of Saskatchewan librarians: A case study. College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-235
- Slutsky, B., & Aytac, S. (2014). Publication patterns of science, technology, and medical librarians: Review of the 2008–2012 published research. Science & Technology Libraries, 33(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2014.952486
- Sugimoto, C. R., Tsou, A., Naslund, S., Hauser, A., Brandon, M., Winter, D., Behles, C., & Finlay, S. C. (2014). Beyond gatekeepers of knowledge: Scholarly communication practices of academic librarians and archivists at ARL Institutions, College & Research Libraries, 75(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-398
- Vakkari, P. (2024). What characterizes LIS as a fragmenting discipline? Journal of Documentation, 80(7), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2023-0207
- Vakkari, P., Chang, Y.-W., & Järvelin, K. (2022). Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science—Leading to fragmentation? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1706–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24690
- Vakkari, P., Järvelin, K., & Chang, Y.-W. (2023). The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995–2015. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(7), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24757
- Van Eck, N. J. (2024). Classification of research publications based on data from OpenAlex (Version 2023nov) [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10560276
- Weller, A. C., Hurd, J. M., & Wiberley, S. E. (1999). Publication patterns of U.S. academic librarians from 1993 to 1997. College & Research Libraries, 60(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.4.352
- White, B., & Cossham, A. (2017). Partnerships or parallel lines? The contributions of practitioners and academics to library and information research. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 22(4), 1605.
- Wiberley, S. E., Hurd, J. M., & Weller, A. C. (2017). Publication patterns of U.S. academic librarians from 1998 to 2002 | Wiberley | College & Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.67.3.205
- Zhang, C., Wang, F., Huang, Y., & Chang, L. (2023). Interdisciplinarity of Information Science: An evolutionary perspective of theory application. Journal of Documentation, 80(2), 392–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2023-0135
- Zavala Mora, D., Quirion, G., Biondo, S., & Bouchard, J. (2023). Le statut universitaire pour les bibliothécaires de l’Université Laval: Une question d’équité entre les bibliothécaires universitaires canadiens. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship, 8, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v8.38458