Résumés
Abstract
The Sex Work Activist Histories Project (SWAHP) is an interdisciplinary research and recordkeeping initiative to record and disseminate the radical knowledges, activist expertise, and important social movement histories created by activists connected to the Canadian sex worker rights movement. This paper explores how stakeholders of SWAHP work together ethically, and maintain good relations with each other when engaging in what we call high-stakes recordkeeping. Our discussions consider both the divergences or differences between academic and non-academic project partners, our convergence or common ground, and the bridges we have built between academic and non-academic concerns and practices to establish and develop methodologies and practices that inform SWAHP’s ongoing collaborations and sex-work activist histories, archives, and related activisms. We consider how to be mutually accountable to our varied and complex analytical and affective positionalities in the specific context of working ethically and relationally in high-stakes recordkeeping. We conclude by considering the relevance of these lessons to other contexts of community-led archiving and research. This paper is a lightly edited transcript of the speaker notes from a 2021 CAIS/ACSI (Allard, Ferris, Lebovitch, Clamen, and Hughes, 2021) panel presentation. Project partners are identified individually in their article sections to share, highlight, and preserve what is unique about each project partners’ perspective and voice, and to make explicit how we work together.
Keywords:
- community archiving,
- sex work activism,
- high-stakes recordkeeping,
- anti-violence feminisms,
- relationality
Résumé
Le Sex Work Activist Histories Project (SWAHP) est une initiative interdisciplinaire de recherche et d'archivage visant à enregistrer et à diffuser les connaissances radicales, l'expertise militante et les histoires importantes des mouvements sociaux créées par des militants liés au mouvement canadien pour les droits des travailleuses du sexe. Cet article explore la manière dont les parties prenantes de SWAHP travaillent ensemble de manière éthique et entretiennent de bonnes relations les unes avec les autres lorsqu'elles s'engagent dans ce que nous appelons l'archivage à enjeux élevés. Nos discussions tiennent compte à la fois des divergences ou des différences entre les partenaires de projet académiques et non académiques, de notre convergence ou terrain d'entente, et des ponts que nous avons construits entre les préoccupations et pratiques académiques et non académiques pour établir et développer des méthodologies et des pratiques qui éclairent les collaborations au cours de SWAHP et les histoires, archives et militantismes liés au travail du sexe. Nous réfléchissons à la manière d’être mutuellement responsables de nos positions analytiques et affectives variées et complexes dans le contexte spécifique du travail éthique et relationnel dans la tenue de dossiers à enjeux élevés. Nous concluons en considérant la pertinence de ces leçons dans d’autres contextes d’archivage et de recherche communautaires. Cet article est une transcription légèrement éditée des notes du conférencier d'une présentation du panel CAIS/ACSI 2021 (Allard, Ferris, Lebovitch, Clamen et Hughes, 2021). Les partenaires du projet sont identifiés individuellement dans les sections de leurs articles pour partager, mettre en évidence et préserver ce qui est unique dans le point de vue et la voix de chaque partenaire du projet, et pour expliciter la manière dont nous travaillons ensemble.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Absolon, K. E. K. (2011). How We Come to Know. Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.
- Agustin, L. (2004). Alternate ethics, or: Telling lies to Researchers. Research for Sex Work, 7, 6-7.
- Allard, D., Lebovitch, A., Clamen, J., Ferris, S., & Hughes, M. (2021). Ethical accountability and high-stakes recordkeeping: Discussions from the Sex Work Activist Histories Project (Panel). CAIS conference proceedings. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ojs.cais-acsi.ca/index.php/cais-asci/article/view/1200/1035
- Anderson, K, & Cidro, J. (2019). Decades of doing: Indigenous women academics reflect on the practices of community-based health research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(3), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619835707
- Brown, L., & Strega, S. (2005). Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-oppressive Approaches. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
- Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law Reform (CASWLR). (2024). https://sexworklawreform.com/
- Caswell, M. (2014). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: Lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
- Caswell, M. (2020). Feeling liberatory memory work: On the archival uses of joy and anger. Archivaria, 90, 148–64.
- Caswell, M. & Cifor, M. (2016). From human rights to feminist ethics: Radical empathy in the archives. Archivaria, 81, 23-83.
- Caswell, M., Cifor, M., & Ramirez, M.H. (2016). "To suddenly discover yourself existing": Uncovering the impact of community archives. American Archivist, 79(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.56
- Cifor, M. & Gilliland, A. (2016). Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: An introduction to the special issue. Archival Science, 16(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3
- Drake, T.S., Conner-Gaten, A. & Booth, S.D. (2022). Archiving black movements: Shifting power and exploring a community-centered approach. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v4i1.17
- Ferris, S. (2016). Street sex work and Canadian cities: Resisting a dangerous order. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
- Ferris, S. & Allard, D. (2016). Tagging for activist ends and strategic ephemerality: Creating the Sex Work Database as an activist digital archive. Feminist Media Studies, 16(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1118396
- Ferris, S., Lebovitch, A., & Allard, D. (2023). Eco-systems for community research and recordkeeping. http://community-research.ca/
- Ferris, S., Ladner, K., Allard, D., & Hughes, M. (2018). Commemoration and decolonization in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women Database. PUBLIC Journal: Art, Culture, Ideas, 57, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1386/public.29.57.96_1
- First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC) (2023). The First Nations Principles of OCAP® https://fnigc.ca/ocap-training
- Flinn, A. (2010). Independent community archives and community-generated content: "Writing, saving and sharing our histories". Convergence, 16(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707
- Gilliland, A.J. (2014). Moving past: Probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
- Global Network of Sex Work Projects (GSWP). (2024). https://www.nswp.org/
- Godoy, N. L. (2021). Community-driven archives: Conocimiento, healing, and justice. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3(2). 10.24242/jclis.v3i2.136
- Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: communicative action and the public sphere. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 559-603). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
- Ladner, K., Ferris, S., Allard, D., Miedema, C., Ace, H., & Hughes, M. (2021). Recordkeeping for Miyo we’citowin, Indigenous governance and digital sovereignties. Presented at the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association Annual Conference.
- Lebovitch, A. & Ferris, S. (Eds). (2019). Sex work activism in Canada: Speaking out, standing up. Winnipeg: ARP Press.
- Lobo, R. (2019). Archive As prefigurative space: Our lives and black feminism in Canada. Archivaria, 87, 68-86.
- Maynard, R. & Simpson, L. B. (2022). Rehearsals for Living. Toronto: Penguin Random House.
- Nathan, L., Shaffer, E., & Castor, M. (2015). Stewarding collections of trauma: Plurality, responsibility, and questions of action. Archivaria, 80, 89-118.
- Payne, K. (2022). Archival harm reduction: A theoretical framework for utilizing harm-reduction concepts in archival practice. Archivaria, 94, 154-81.
- Pheterson, G. (1996). The prostitution prism. Amsterdam University Press.
- Pivot Legal Society. (2015). Current projects: Decriminalizing sex work in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.pivotlegal.org/sex_workers_rightsp
- Rault, J. & Cohen, T.L. (n.d.) Heavy processing Part I - Lesbian processing. Digital Research Ethics Collaboratory. Retrieved from http:/ww.drecollab.org/heavy-processing/
- Sheffield, R. (2017). Community archives. In H. MacNeil & T. Eastwood (Eds.), Currents of Archival Thinking (2nd Ed., pp. 351-376). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
- Sloan, K., Vanderfluit, J., & Douglas, J. (2019) Not "Just My Problem to Handle": Emerging themes on secondary trauma and archivists. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 6. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol6/iss1/20
- UNAIDS & WHO. (2007). Ethical considerations in biomedical HIV prevention trials. Geneva: UNAIDS.
- Williams, S. M. & Drake, J. (2017). Power to the people: Documenting police violence in Cleveland. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.33
- Wilson, S. (2012). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
- Wright, K., & Laurent, N. (2021). Safety, collaboration, and empowerment: Trauma-informed archival practice. Archivaria, 91, 38-73.
- X, A., Campbell, T., & Stevens, M. (2009). Love and lubrication in the archives, or rukus!: A black queer archive for the United Kingdom. Archivaria, 68, 271-294.
- Zavala, Z., Migoni, A.A., Caswell, M., Geraci, N. & Cifor, M. (2017) "A process where we’re all at the table": community archives challenging dominant modes of archival practice, Archives and Manuscripts, 45(3), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1377088