Résumés
Résumé
Au cours des dernières années, on assiste à la montée en puissance d’un discours en faveur de l’intégration des fonctionnalités de l’intelligence artificielle aux pratiques de gestion des documents et des archives. Cela s’inscrit dans une optique d’automatisation de ces pratiques afin d’améliorer la qualité de l’information documentaire et multiplier les opportunités de son exploitation par les usagers, et ce, suivant leurs préoccupations. Cela nous amène à nous interroger sur la possibilité de parler d’un cinquième paradigme archivistique, soit celui de l’automatisation, lequel commande une révision des procédés par lesquels l’information documentaire est créée, traitée, diffusée et préservée à long terme. Sur la base de la cartographie des paradigmes archivistiques établie par Cook (2013), cet article vise à explorer la manière dont l’automatisation peut s’inscrire dans la continuité de ces paradigmes, tout en mettant de l’avant les nouveaux rôles à jouer par les archivistes et les gestionnaires de documents dans ce contexte.
Mots-clés :
- paradigme archivistique,
- archivistes,
- transformation numérique,
- intelligence artificielle,
- automatisation
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards the integration of artificial intelligence features into records and archives management practices in order to improve the quality of recorded information and multiply the opportunities of its use by users according to their needs. This raises the question of whether we can speak about a fifth archival paradigm, that is, automation, which calls for a revision of the processes by which recorded information is created, processed, disseminated and preserved over the long term. Based on Cook's archival paradigms, this article aims to explore the way automation can be part of the continuity of these paradigms and how archivists and records managers should reinvent their roles in this context.
Keywords:
- archival paradigm,
- artificial intelligence,
- automation,
- digital transformation,
- archivists,
- records managers
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Alaoui, S. (2021). L'archive participative, les archivistes et les usagers: quels défis? Quelles pistes de solutions?/Participatory archiving, archivists and users: What are the challenges? What are the possible solutions? Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 43(3), 217-244. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/781386
- Alaoui, S. (2023). L'intelligence artificielle et la gestion documentaire : quels apports? Quels enjeux? The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.16695
- Bak, G. (2012). Continuous Classification: Capturing Dynamic Relationships among Information Resources. Archival Science, 12(3), 287-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9171-8
- Balasubramanian, P. (2023). Automation in Data Science, Software, and Information Services. In S. Y. Nof (Ed.), textitSpringer Handbook of Automation (pp. 989–1014). Springer International Publishing. hrefhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_46https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_46
- Bastian, J. A., & Flinn, A. (2018). Community Archives, Community Spaces: Heritage, Memory and Identity. 1re éd. Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303526
- Benoit, E. I., & Eveleigh., A. (2019). Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions of Participatory Archives. Chapter. In Participatory Archives: Theory and Practice (p. 211-218). Facet.
- Cardin, M. (1995). Archivistique: information,organisation, mémoire: l'exemple du Mouvement coopératif Desjardins. Éditions Septenrion.
- Cardin, M. (2013). Penser l'exploitation des archives en tant que système complexe. Archives, 45(1), 135-146.
- Cardin, M., & Desîlets, C. (2017). textitConservation et valorisation collaboratives dans une perspective marketing : vers un modèle d'archivistique ouverte. IFLA: Les nouveaux enjeux de la conservation du patrimoine documentaire / New challenges for the preservation of documentary heritage: Vol. 1 9.
- Carini, P. (2009). Archivists as Educators: Integrating Primary Sources into the Curriculum. Journal of Archival Organization, 7(1 2), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332740902892619
- Colavizza, G., Blanke, T., Jeurgens, C., & Noordegraaf, J. (2022). Archives and AI: An Overview of Current Debates and Future Perspectives. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479010
- Cook, T. (2011). We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 32(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
- Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2-3), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
- Darda, K., Carre, M., & Cross, E. (2023). Value Attributed to Text-Based Archives Generated by Artificial Intelligence. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), 220915. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220915
- Duchein, M. (1977). Le respect des fonds en archivistique: principes théoriques et problèmes pratiques. Gazette des archives, 97(1), 71-96.
- Duranti, L. (1997). The Archival Bond. Archives and Museum Informatics, 11(3 4), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009025127463
- Duranti, L., Abdul-Mageed, M., Hofman, D., & Sullivan, P. (2021). I Trust AI, the latest InterPARES research project. Anuario Escuela de Archivología, 13, 36-55.https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/37898
- Duranti, L., & Rogers, C. (2012). Trust in Digital Records: An Increasingly Cloudy Legal Area. Computer Law & Security Review, 28(5), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.07.009
- Duranti, L., & Thibodeau, K. (2006). The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: The View of InterPARES*. Archival Science, 6(1), 13-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
- Eveleigh, A. (2017). Participatory archives. In Currents of archival thinking (p. 299-325). Libraries Unlimited.
- Flinn, A., & Sexton, A. (2019). Activist Participatory Communities in Archival Contexts: Theoretical Perspectives. In Participatory Archives: Theory and Practice (p. 173-190). Facet.
- Freire, I. T., Moulin-Frier, C., Sanchez-Fibla, M., Arsiwalla, X. D., & Verschure, P. (s.~d.). Modeling the Formation of Social Conventions from Embodied Real-Time Interactions. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06108
- Garoufallou, E., Siatri, R., Zafeiriou, G., & Balampanidou, E. (2013). The Use of Marketing Concepts in Library Services: A Literature Review. Library Review, 62(4/5), 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2012-0061
- Gouvernement du Canada. (1985). La Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/fra/lois/p-21/index.html
- Gouvernement du Canada. (2022). La Loi sur l'intelligence artificielle et les données (LIAD) - document complémentaire. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innover-meilleur-canada/fr/loi-lintelligence-artificielle-donnees-liad-document-complementaire.
- Gupta, D. K. (2015). Role of IFLA in Marketing Initiatives in Library and Information Services. In Marketing and Consumer Behavior: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association (p. 380-388). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7357-1.ch017
- Gupta, D., & Savard, R. (2011). Marketing Libraries in a Web 2.0. De Gryuter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110263534
- Gupta, V. et P., & Shriram. (2019). Recommender Systems for Digital Libraries: A review of concepts and concerns. Library philosophy and practice, 2417. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/215162001.pdf
- Hedges, M., Marciano, R., & Goudarouli, E. (2022). Introduction to the Special Issue on Computational Archival Science. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495004
- Héon, G. (1995). Les plans de classification en archivistique. Archives, 27(1), 73-90.
- Hodel, T. (2022). Chapter 6: Supervised and Unsupervised: Approaches to Machine Learning for Textual Entities. In Archives, Access and Artificial Intelligence, Édité par Lise Jaillant (p. 157-178). Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839455845-007
- Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory Archive: Towards Decentralised Curation, Radical User Orientation, and Broader Contextualisation of Records Management. Archival Science, 8(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
- Jaillant, L. (2022). Archives, Access and Artificial Intelligence: Working with Born-Digital and Digitized Archival Collections. Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839455845
- Jaillant, L., & Caputo, A. (2022). Unlocking Digital Archives: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on AI and Born-Digital Data. AI & SOCIETY, 37(3), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01367-x
- Jakubik, J., Schöffer, J., Hoge, V., Vössing, M., & Kühl, N. (2023). An Empirical Evaluation of Predicted Outcomes as Explanations in Human-AI Decision-Making. Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 1752, 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23618-1_24
- Jin, J., Yu, K., Kua, J., Zhang, N., Pang, Z., & Han, Q.-L. (2023). Cloud-Fog Automation: Vision, Enabling Technologies, and Future Research Directions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(2), 1039-1054. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3272696
- Kaldeli, E., Menis-Mastromichalakis, O., Bekiaris, S., Ralli, M., Tzouvaras, V., & Stamou, G. (2021). CrowdHeritage: Crowdsourcing for Improving the Quality of Cultural Heritage Metadata. Information, 12(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020064
- Lappin, J., Jackson, T., Matthews, G., & Ravenwood, C. (2021). Rival Records Management Models in an Era of Partial Automation. Archival Science, 21(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09354-9
- Lee, J. A. (2016). Be/Longing in the Archival Body: Eros and the Endearing Value of Material Lives. Archival Science, 16(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9264-x
- Lemay, Y., & Klein, A. (2015). Archives et émotions. Documentation et bibliothèques, 58(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.7202/1028930ar
- Lemieux, V. L., & Werner, J. (2023). Protecting Privacy in Digital Records: The Potential of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 16(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3633477
- Lessard, R. (2005). Les archives publiques au Québec : La difficile construction d'une mémoire collective. Archives, 36(2), 173-198.
- Marciano, R., Lemieux, V., Hedges, M., Esteva, M., Underwood, W., Kurtz, M., & Conrad, M. (2018). Chapter 9: Archival Records and Training in the Age of Big Data. Advances in Librarianship, 44, 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B010
- McKemmish, S. (1994). Are records ever actual? In S. McKemmish & M. Piggott (Eds.), The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years (pp. 187–203)). Monash University. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/chapter/Are_records_ever_actual_/3823350
- Meng, F., & Ghena, B. (2023). Research on Text Recognition Methods Based on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Advances in Computer and Communication, 4(5), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.26855/acc.2023.10.014
- Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and User-Centered Design: How Can Personas Benefit Product Design Processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003
- Murphy, R. M., Klopotowska, J. E., Keizer, N. F., Jager, K. J., Leopold, J. H., Dongelmans, D. A., Abu-Hanna, A., & Schut, M. C. (2023). Adverse Drug Event Detection Using Natural Language Processing: A Scoping Review of Supervised Learning Methods. PLOS ONE, 18(1), 0279842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279842
- Ngoepe, M., Jacobs, L., & Mojapelo, M. (2022). Inclusion of Digital Records in the Archives and Records Management Curricula in a Comprehensive Open Distance E-Learning Environment. Information Development, 40(2), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221081812
- Organisation internationale de normalisation. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023-Technologies de l'information : Intelligence artificielle- Système de management. ISO. Genève, Suisse. https://www.iso.org/fr/standard/81230.html
- Palmer, D. (2010). Emotional Archives: Online Photo Sharing and the Cultivation of the Self. Photographies, 3(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2010.499623
- Piggott, M., Bastian, J. A., & Flinn, A. (2018). Community Archives and the Records Continuum. In Community Archives, Community Spaces: Heritage, Memory and Identity (p. 41-60).
- Poole, A. H. (2019). Social Tagging and Commenting in Participatory Archives: A Critical Literature Review. In Chapter. In Participatory Archives: Theory and Practice (p. 15-32). Facet.
- Pötzsch, H. (2018). Archives and Identity in the Context of Social Media and Algorithmic Analytics: Towards an Understanding of iArchive and Predictive Retention. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3304-3022. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817748483
- Ray, D. et S., & William. (2016). Marketing relationnel. Rentabiliser les politiques de satisfaction, fidélité, réclamation. Dunod.
- Recanati, A. M. (2023). Job Disruption. In A. M. Recanati, AI Battle Royale (pp. 183–294). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19278-4_6
- Rolan, G., Humphries, G., Jeffrey, L., Samaras, E., Antsoupova, T., & Stuart, K. (2019). More Human than Human? Artificial Intelligence in the Archive. Archives and Manuscripts, 47(2), 179-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1502088
- Shabou, M., Basma, J. T., Knafou, J., & Gaudinat, A. (2020). Algorithmic Methods to Explore the Automation of the Appraisal of Structured and Unstructured Digital Data. Records Management Journal, 30(2), 175-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0049
- Silva, S. C., Corbo, L., Vlačić, B., & Fernandes, M. (2023). Marketing Accountability and Marketing Automation: Evidence from Portugal. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(1), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-0117
- Smiraglia, R. P., & Cai, X. (2017). Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization. Knowledge organisation, 44(3), 215-233.
- Terras, M. (2022). Chapter 7: Inviting AI into the Archives: The Reception of Handwritten Recognition Technology into Historical Manuscript Transcription. In Archives, Access and Artificial Intelligence, édité par Lise Jaillant (p. 179-204). Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839455845-008
- Tzouganatou, A. (2022). Openness and Privacy in Born-Digital Archives: Reflecting the Role of AI Development. AI & Society, 37(3), 991-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01361-3
- Université de Montréal (2024). La Déclaration de Montréal sur l'IA responsable. https://declarationmontreal-iaresponsable.com/
- Vassilakaki, E., & Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. (2017). Beyond Preservation: Investigating the Roles of Archivist. Library Review, 66(3), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-09-2016-0077
- Welland, S., & Cossham, A. (2019). Defining the Undefinable: An Analysis of Definitions of Community Archives. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(8/9), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049
- White, K. L., & Gilliland, A. J. (2010). Promoting Reflexivity and Inclusivity in Archival Education, Research, and Practice. The Library Quarterly, 80(3), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/652874
- Williams, L. (2019). What Computational Archival Science Can Learn from Art History and Material Culture Studies. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data, 3153-3155. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006527
- Yeo, G. (2005). Understanding users and use: a market segmentation approach. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 26(1), 25-53.
- Yeo, G. (2012). Bringing things together: Aggregate records in a digital age. Archivaria, 43-91.
- Zini, É. (2020). L'utilisation des personas à Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec: Une rencontre avec notre public. Documentation et bibliothèques, 66(3), 16 28. https://doi.org/10.7202/1071198ar