Résumés
Abstract
Language use within Canadian postsecondary institutions reflects ongoing neocolonialism and the privileging of European and North American English varieties. This article shares student perspectives of interactions with faculty on themes of language development and linguistic discrimination, discovered in qualitative interviews using Appreciative Inquiry methodology. Participants’ stories reveal both appreciation for supportive practices that facilitate the development of academic language skills and frustration with linguistic discrimination. Practices valued by participants include using simple and clear language, creating a comfortable environment for non-native English speakers, honouring multilingualism, and providing supportive instruction in discipline-specific language. Students also identified experiences of linguistic discrimination that resulted in academic and personal harm. In students’ stories, a tension between encouraging academic language development while avoiding discriminatory practices emerges. Paths forward in navigating this tension while challenging colonial language hierarchies may include integrating pedagogies using an academic literacies framework while also creating space for translingual practices in classrooms and institutions.
Keywords:
- academic language,
- academic literacies,
- linguistic discrimination,
- intercultural teaching,
- translingualism,
- neocolonalism in higher education
Résumé
L’utilisation des langues dans les établissements postsecondaires canadiens reflète le néocolonialisme continu et la préférence des variétés d’anglais européennes et nord-américaines. Cet article présente les perspectives d’étudiants envers les interactions avec le corps enseignant sur les thèmes du développement linguistique et de la discrimination linguistique, découvertes lors d’entretiens qualitatifs utilisant la méthode de l’Interrogation appréciative. Les récits des participants révèlent à la fois une appréciation des pratiques de soutien qui facilitent le développement des compétences linguistiques académiques et une frustration face à la discrimination linguistique. Les pratiques appréciées par les participants incluent l’utilisation d’un langage simple et clair, la création d’un environnement confortable pour les personnes dont l’anglais n’est pas la langue maternelle, la reconnaissance du multilinguisme et la prestation d’information de soutien dans un langage spécifique à la discipline. Les étudiants ont également fait état d’expériences de discrimination linguistique ayant entraîné des préjudices scolaires et personnels. Les récits des étudiants font apparaître une tension entre le fait d’encourager le développement de la langue académique tout en évitant les pratiques discriminatoires. Les voies à suivre pour naviguer cette tension tout en remettant en question les hiérarchies linguistiques coloniales peuvent inclure l’intégration de pédagogies utilisant un cadre de littératie académique tout en créant un espace pour les pratiques translinguistiques dans les salles de classe et les institutions.
Mots-clés :
- langage académique,
- littératies académiques,
- discrimination linguistique,
- enseignement interculturel,
- translinguisme,
- néocolonialisme dans l’enseignement supérieur
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208918
- Baik, C., & Greig, J. (2009). Improving the academic outcomes of undergraduate ESL students: The case for discipline‐based academic skills programs. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067005
- Blackett, A., Reed, A. M., Rigaud, M.-C., & Walker, B. (2022). Scarborough charter on anti-Black racism and Black inclusion in Canadian higher education: Principles, actions, and accountabilities. National Dialogues and Action for Inclusive Higher Education and Communities. https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/principal/sites/utsc.utoronto.ca.principal/files/docs/Scarborough_Charter_EN_Nov2022.pdfs
- Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. In The sociolinguistics of globalization (p. xvi). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307
- Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530254
- Canadian Bureau for International Education. (2022). International students in Canada. https://cbie.ca/infographic/
- Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041
- Cavazos, A. G., & Musanti, S. I. (2021). Insights from a faculty learning community on translingual community-engaged pedagogy at a Hispanic serving institution. Language and Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1936544
- Chilisa, B., & Tsheko, G. N. (2014). Mixed methods in Indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878
- Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivasta, S. (1987). Appreciative Inquiry in organizational life. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169).
- Creswell, J. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57–71). Oxford University Press.
- Davis, L. P., & Museus, S. D. (2019). What is deficit thinking? An analysis of conceptualizations of deficit thinking and implications for scholarly research. NCID Currents, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/currents.17387731.0001.110
- De Costa, P. I. (2020). Linguistic racism: Its negative effects and why we need to contest it. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 833–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1783638
- Dobinson, T., & Mercieca, P. (2020). Seeing things as they are, not just as we are: Investigating linguistic racism on an Australian university campus. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1724074
- Dovchin, S. (2019). The politics of injustice in translingualism: Linguistic discrimination. In T. A. Barrett & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Critical inquiries in the sociolinguistics of globalization (pp. 84–101). Multilingual Matters.
- Dovchin, S. (2020). The psychological damages of linguistic racism and international students in Australia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1759504
- Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of Appreciative Inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox. Action Research, 4(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070103
- Houshmand, S., Spanierman, L. B., & Tafarodi, R. W. (2014). Excluded and avoided: Racial microaggressions targeting Asian international students in Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035404
- Kachru, B. B. (1996). World Englishes: Agony and ecstasy. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333196
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
- Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principles and practices. Sage.
- Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed). Routledge.
- Mahboob, A., & Szenes, E. (2010). Linguicism and racism in assessment practices in higher education. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 3(3), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v3i3.325
- Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bustamante, R. M., & Nelson, J. A. (2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805
- Page, C. (2022). Linguistic racism, deficit constructions, and the Othering of international students. In C. L. Cho & J. K. Corckett (Eds.), Global perspectives on microaggressions in higher education: Understanding and combatting violence in universities. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kwantlen-ebooks/reader.action?docID=7020761&ppg=45
- Roessingh, H., & Douglas, S. R. (2012). Educational outcomes of English language learners at university. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 42(1), 80–97.
- Sah, P. K. (2019). Academic discourse socialization, scaler politics of English, and racialization in study abroad: A critical autoethnography. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 174+. Gale Academic OneFile.
- Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed). SAGE.
- Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2016). Linguicism. In G. Gertz & P. Boudreault (Eds.), The SAGE deaf studies encyclopedia (pp. 583–586). SAGE. https://www-doi-org.roxy.nipissingu.ca/10.4135/9781483346489.n188
- Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2017). Higher education and the modern/colonial global imaginary. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616672673
- Surtees, V. (2019). Challenging deficit constructions of the international student category in Canadian higher education. TESL Canada Journal, 36(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i1.1302
- Toronto Metropolitan University Faculty of Arts. (2021). National forum on anti-Asian racism: Building solidarities. https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/national-forum-on-anti-asian-racism/nfaaar-resources-package.pdf
- Trigos Carrillo, L. (2019). A critical sociocultural perspective to academic literacies in Latin America. Íkala, 24(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a10
- Whitney, D. K., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). The power of Appreciative Inquiry: A practical guide to positive change (2nd ed). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268
- Wingate, U. (2018). Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching, 51(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264