Résumés
Abstract
For most of Canada’s approximately 40-year debate on medically assisted death, euthanasia and assisted suicide were considered distinct issues. Yet in 2016 their ethical, psychological, and practical differences were effectively disregarded when the two acts were grouped together in the legislation under the umbrella term “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD). The lack of distinction under the law of the two terms ignores important ethical considerations from the MAiD practitioners’ perspective. Although the principle of respect for autonomy must remain central to the assessments of MAiD eligibility, it cannot be the only consideration. This paper examines the ethical considerations and principles that underlie decisions to provide MAiD through an analysis of the progress, and results, of the 40-year debate on assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Keywords:
- MAiD,
- medical assistance in dying,
- suicide,
- assisted suicide,
- euthanasia,
- Canada
Résumé
Pendant la majeure partie du débat sur l’assistance médicale à mourir qui a duré environ 40 ans au Canada, l’euthanasie et le suicide assisté ont été considérés comme des questions distinctes. Pourtant, en 2016, leurs différences éthiques, psychologiques et pratiques ont été ignorées lorsque les deux actes ont été regroupés dans la législation sous le terme générique d’ « assistance médicale à mourir » (AMM). L’absence de distinction juridique entre les deux termes ignore d’importantes considérations éthiques du point de vue des praticiens de l’AMM. Bien que le principe du respect de l’autonomie doive rester au centre de l’évaluation de l’éligibilité à l’AMM, il ne peut être la seule considération. Ce texte examine les considérations et les principes éthiques qui sous-tendent les décisions d’octroi de l’AMM en analysant les progrès et les résultats du débat sur le suicide assisté et l’euthanasie, qui dure depuis 40 ans.
Mots-clés :
- AMM,
- assistance médicale à mourir,
- suicide,
- suicide assisté,
- euthanasie,
- Canada
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- 1. White BP, Close E, Willmott L, et al. Comparative and critical analysis of key eligibility criteria for voluntary assisted dying under five legal frameworks. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 2021;44(4):1663-1700.
- 2. Health Canada. Third annual report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2021. Government of Canada; 2022.
- 3. Government of Canada. The Criminal Code. Internet Archive. Dawson SE; 1892.
- 4. Library of Parliament. House of Commons Debates, 28th Parliament, 4th Session Vol. 2; 1972.
- 5. Legislative Services Branch. Consolidated federal laws of Canada, Criminal Code; 2015.
- 6. Senate of Canada. Of Life and Death. Special Senate Committee on euthanasia and assisted suicide (35th Parliament, 1st Session). SenCanada; 1994.
- 7. Supreme Court of Canada. Rodriguez v. British Columbia, 1993 CanLII 75 (SCC); 1993.
- 8. Supreme Court of Canada. Carter v. Canada, 2015 CanLII, 1 SCR 331; 2015.
- 9. Quebec Superior Court. Truchon c. Procureur général du Canada, 2019 QCCS 3792 (CanLII); 2019.
- 10. Keyserlingk EW. Assisted suicide, causality and the Supreme Court of Canada. McGill Law Journal. 1994;39:2.
- 11. Law Reform Commission of Canada. Working paper 28 euthanasia aiding suicide and cessation of treatment; 1982.
- 12. Law Reform Commission of Canada. Report 20 euthanasia aiding suicide and cessation of treatment; 1983.
- 13. Parliament of Canada. C-215 (35-1); 1995.
- 14. Parliament of Canada. C-304 (35-2); 1996.
- 15. Parliament of Canada. S-2 (36-2); 1999.
- 16. Parliament of Canada. C-407 (38-1); 2005.
- 17. Parliament of Canada. C-562 (39-2); 2008.
- 18. Parliament of Canada. C-384 (40-3); 2010.
- 19. Assemblée Nationale Du Québec. Bill 52, An Act respecting end-of-life care. Assnat; 2013.
- 20. Assemblée Nationale Du Québec. Dying with dignity. Assnat; March 2012.
- 21. Supreme Court of British Columbia. Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 886 (CanLII); 2012.
- 22. The Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-Assisted Dying. Final report; 2015.
- 23. External Panel on Options for a Legislative Response to Carter v. Canada. Final report; 2015.
- 24. Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying. Medical Assistance in Dying: A Patient-Centred Approach; 2016.
- 25. Parliament of Canada. C-14 An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical assistance in dying); 2016.
- 26. Parliament of Canada. C-7 An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying); 2021.
- 27. Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. Medical Assistance in Dying and Mental Disorders as a Sole Underlying Condition: An Interim Report; 2022.
- 28. Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. Medical Assistance in Dying: Choices for Canadians; 2023.
- 29. Expert Panel on MAiD and Mental Illness. The Final Report of the Expert Panel on MAiD and Mental Illness; 2022.
- 30. Favaro A. Woman with chemical sensitivities chose medically-assisted death after failed bid to get better housing. CTVNews. 24 Aug 2022.
- 31. Marcus J. Canadian man applies for euthanasia because he can’t afford a home. The Independent. 19 Nov 2022.