Résumés
Abstract
Background: The Covid-19 pandemic imposed numerous constraints on medical practice and exacerbated preexisting vulnerabilities in Lebanon’s healthcare system, which was already grappling with instability due to concurrent political and economic crises. This situation had a complex impact on the doctor-patient relationship (DPR), with both negative and positive repercussions. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with physicians from various specialties practicing at a tertiary-care center in Lebanon. Our study aimed to 1) explore the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the DPR in Lebanon, and 2) provide recommendations for improving the DPR, healthcare policy, and education. Results: Thematic analysis of the data revealed that the pandemic had varying effects on the DPR. While both physicians and patients seemed to have developed a more favourable perception of the medical profession, communication between them appeared to be challenged by the use of personal protective equipment and patients’ concerns about close contact with physicians. The media played a vital role in educating and raising awareness during the pandemic but lacked organization and ethical standards, leading to anticipated fear and confusion among the society. Telemedicine emerged as an alternative means for communication and remote care but faced several obstacles including inadequate internet infrastructure and disruptions to physicians’ personal lives. Conclusion: Our qualitative study unveiled the multifaceted impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on perceiving the healthcare system, doctor-patient interactions, and the role of telemedicine in Lebanon, among others. These findings underscore the importance of effective communication in enhancing the DPR, the need to address misinformation on social media, and the imperative for systemic improvements to strengthen the resilience of Lebanon’s healthcare system.
Keywords:
- doctor-patient relationship,
- Covid-19 pandemic,
- Lebanon,
- medical ethics,
- qualitative study
Résumé
Contexte : La pandémie de Covid-19 a imposé de nombreuses contraintes à la pratique médicale et a exacerbé les vulnérabilités préexistantes du système de santé libanais, déjà en proie à l’instabilité due à des crises politique et économique concomitante. Cette situation a eu un impact complexe sur la relation médecin-patient (RMP), avec des répercussions à la fois négatives et positives. Méthodes : Nous avons mené des entretiens semi-structurés avec des médecins de diverses spécialités exerçant dans un centre de soins tertiaires au Liban. Notre étude visait à 1) explorer l’impact de la pandémie de Covid-19 sur la relation médecin-patient au Liban, et 2) fournir des recommandations pour améliorer la RMP, la politique des soins de santé et l’éducation. Résultats : L’analyse thématique des données a révélé que la pandémie a eu des effets variables sur la RMP. Alors que les médecins et les patients semblent avoir développé une perception plus favorable de la profession médicale, la communication entre eux semble avoir été entravée par l’utilisation d’équipements de protection individuelle et par les préoccupations des patients concernant les contacts étroits avec les médecins. Les médias ont joué un rôle essentiel dans l’éducation et la sensibilisation au cours de la pandémie, mais ils ont manqué d’organisation et de normes éthiques, ce qui a suscité la peur et la confusion au sein de la société. La télémédecine est apparue comme un moyen alternatif de communication et de soins à distance, mais elle s’est heurtée à plusieurs obstacles, notamment une infrastructure Internet inadéquate et des perturbations dans la vie personnelle des médecins. Conclusion : Notre étude qualitative a révélé l’impact multiforme de la pandémie de Covid-19 sur la perception du système de santé, les interactions médecin-patient et le rôle de la télémédecine au Liban, entre autres. Ces résultats soulignent l’importance d’une communication efficace pour améliorer la RMP, la nécessité de lutter contre la désinformation sur les médias sociaux et l’impératif d’améliorations systémiques pour renforcer la résilience du système de santé libanais.
Mots-clés :
- relation médecin-patient,
- pandémie de Covid-19,
- Liban,
- éthique médicale,
- étude qualitative
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- 1. HellÍn T. The physician–patient relationship: recent developments and changes. Haemophilia. 2002;8(3):450-4.
- 2. Decety J. Empathy in medicine: what it is, and how much we really need it. American Journal of Medicine. 2020;133(5):561-6.
- 3. Chandra S, Mohammadnezhad M, Ward P. Trust and communication in a doctor-patient relationship: a literature review. Journal of Healthcare Communications. 2018;3(3):36.
- 4. Osorio J. Evolution and changes in the physician-patient relationship. Colombia Medica. 2011;42:400-5.
- 5. Chipidza FE, Wallwork RS, Stern TA. Impact of the doctor-patient relationship. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders. 2015;17(5):10.4088.
- 6. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical Care. 2009;47(8):826-34.
- 7. Świątoniowska-Lonc N, Polański J, Tański W, Jankowska-Polańska B. Impact of satisfaction with physician–patient communication on self-care and adherence in patients with hypertension: cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research. 2020;20:1046.
- 8. Kaba R, Sooriakumaran P. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. International Journal of Surgery. 2007;5(1):57-65.
- 9. Harbishettar V, Krishna KR, Srinivasa P, Gowda M. The enigma of doctor-patient relationship. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019;61(Suppl 4):S776-81.
- 10. Ayoub F, Fares Y, Fares J. The psychological attitude of patients toward health practitioners in Lebanon. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;7(10):452-8.
- 11. Saade Riachy C, Nemr E. Medical professionalism in Lebanon: between doctors’ perception and patients’ satisfaction. International Journal of Medical Education. 2020;11:171-2.
- 12. Kosremelli Asmar M, Yérétzian J. Private health care assessment in Lebanon. 2020.
- 13. Verlinde E, De Laender N, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Willems S. The social gradient in doctor-patient communication. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2012;11:12.
- 14. Hu L, Bai L, Zhao S, Lu R. Analysis of doctor-patient relationship in post-COVID-19 period: perspective differences between citizen and medical staff. Inquiry. 2021;58:469580211060300.
- 15. Fakhari A, Dolatkhah R, Dehkharghani KF. How the COVID-19 outbreak affected physician-patient relationship. Journal of Community Medicine and Health Solutions. 2020;1:023-5.
- 16. Gomes VTS, Rodrigues RO, Gomes RNS, Gomes MS, Viana LVM, Silva FSE. The doctor-patient relationship in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2020;66(Suppl 2):7-9.
- 17. Filip R, Gheorghita Puscaselu R, Anchidin-Norocel L, Dimian M, Savage WK. Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of pandemic measures and problems. Journal of Personlized Medicine. 2022;12(8):1295.
- 18. Harris P, Moss D. Covid, pandemics, plague and public affairs: Lessons from history. Journal of Public Affairs. 2020;20(4):e2548.
- 19. Mathews M, Meredith L, Ryan D, et al. The roles of family physicians during a pandemic. Healthcare Management Forum. 2023;36(1):30-5.
- 20. Ghosh A, Sharma K, Choudhury S. COVID-19 and physician-patient relationship: potential effects of ‘masking’, ‘distancing’ and ‘others’. Family Practice. 2021;38(2):193-4.
- 21. Gao B, Dong J. Does the impact of COVID-19 improve the doctor-patient relationship in China? American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2020;360(3):305-6.
- 22. Nwoga H, Ajuba M, Ezeoke U. Effect of COVID-19 on doctor-patient relationship. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2020;7(12):4690-96.
- 23. Samarasekara K. ‘Masking’ emotions: doctor-patient communication in the era of COVID-19. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2021;97(1148):406.
- 24. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23(4):334-40.
- 25. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008;6(4):331-9.
- 26. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-44.
- 27. Naderifar M, Goli H, Ghaljaie F. Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2017;14(3).
- 28. Sravanti L. Interpersonal relationships: Building blocks of a society. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;59(1):123.
- 29. Roubille C, Ribstein J, Hurpin G, Fesler P, Fiat E, Roubille F. Confidence vanished or impaired until distrust in the doctor-patient relationship because of COVID-19: Confidence vanished or impaired until distrust: “COVID” in relationship. La Revue de medecine interne. 2021;42(1):58-60.
- 30. Fahed G, Fares AH, Ghosn A, et al. The lived experiences of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Ecancermedicalscience. 2023;17:1598.
- 31. Bensing JM, Brink-Muinen Avd, Boerma WGW, Dulmen Sv. The manifestation of job satisfaction in doctor-patient communication; a ten-country European study. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine. 2013;3(1):44-52.
- 32. Ness MM, Saylor J, Di Fusco LA, Evans K. Healthcare providers’ challenges during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A qualitative approach. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2021;23(2):389-97.
- 33. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020;88:901-7.
- 34. Johnson SB, Butcher F. Doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are their duties and what is owed to them? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2021;47(1):12-5.
- 35. Gaeta C, Brennessel R. COVID-19: emergency medicine physician empowered to shape perspectives on this public health crisis. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7504.
- 36. Wong CK, Yip BH, Mercer S, et al. Effect of facemasks on empathy and relational continuity: a randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2013;14:200.
- 37. González-Padilla DA, Tortolero-Blanco L. Social media influence in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2020;46(Suppl 1):120-4.
- 38. Depoux A, Martin S, Karafillakis E, Preet R, Wilder-Smith A, Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2020;27(3):taaa031.
- 39. Rocha YM, de Moura GA, Desidério GA, de Oliveira CH, Lourenço FD, de Figueiredo Nicolete LD. The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health. 2023;31(7):1007-16.
- 40. Nittari G, Khuman R, Baldoni S, et al. Telemedicine practice: review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2020;26(12):1427-37.
- 41. Wickramasinghe NS, Fadlalla AM, Geisler E, Schaffer JL. A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. Internatinal Journal of Electronic Healthcare. 2005;1(3):316-34.
- 42. Bashshur RL, Howell JD, Krupinski EA, Harms KM, Bashshur N, Doarn CR. The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions in primary care. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2016;22(5):342-75.
- 43. Grassi L, Caruso R, Costantini A. Communication with patients suffering from serious physical illness. Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine. 2015;34:10-23.
- 44. Pritchard DE, Moeckel F, Villa MS, Housman LT, McCarty CA, McLeod HL. Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice. Personalized Medicine. 2017;14(2):141-52.