Résumés
Abstract
Uterine transplantation is an experimental procedure currently available only to cisgender women recipients suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility. Clinicians, researchers, and advocates have advanced the possibility of providing these quality-of-life transplantations to transgender women. This article examines the ethical and practical implications of removing sex- and gender-based requirements entirely for uterine transplantation recipients. Given the significant costs and risks, and the modest quality-of-life benefits, ethical arguments against offering uterine transplantations to people who do not identify as women but are otherwise suitable recipients are dubious and prejudicial. Successful uterine transplantations with non-women recipients could potentially diminish the socio-cultural connection between uterine functionality and womanhood, which is a key motivation for women now seeking this high-risk procedure.
Keywords:
- uterine transplantation,
- recipient eligibility,
- gender requirements,
- cisgender,
- transgender
Résumé
La transplantation d’utérus est une procédure expérimentale qui n’est actuellement disponible que pour les femmes cisgenres souffrant d’une infertilité utérine absolue. Les cliniciens, les chercheurs et les défenseurs ont avancé la possibilité de fournir ces transplantations de qualité de vie aux femmes transgenres. Cet article examine les implications éthiques et pratiques de la suppression totale des exigences liées au sexe et au genre pour les receveuses de greffe d’utérus. Compte tenu des coûts et des risques importants, et des avantages modestes en termes de qualité de vie, les arguments éthiques qui s’opposent à ce que des transplantations d’utérus soient proposées à des personnes qui ne s’identifient pas comme des femmes, mais qui sont par ailleurs des receveuses appropriées, sont douteux et préjudiciables. Des transplantations d’utérus réussies avec des receveuses qui ne sont pas des femmes pourraient potentiellement diminuer le lien socioculturel entre la fonctionnalité de l’utérus et la féminité, qui est une motivation clé pour les femmes qui recherchent aujourd’hui cette procédure à haut risque.
Mots-clés :
- transplantation d’utérus,
- éligibilité du receveur,
- exigences de genre,
- cisgenre,
- transgenre
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Remerciements / Acknowledgements
Je suis reconnaissant au professeur Timothy Caulfield pour sa perspicacité et ses sages conseils concernant cet article. Les évaluateurs ont formulé des commentaires et des critiques excellents et constructifs, qui ont permis d’améliorer considérablement cet article.
I am grateful to Professor Timothy Caulfield for his discerning insights and sage advice regarding this article. The peer reviewers offered excellent and challenging commentary and criticism, which has greatly improved this article.
Bibliography
- 1. Jones BP, Saso S, Yazbek J, et al. Uterine transplantation: scientific impact paper no. 65 April 2021. BJOG. 2021;128(10):e51-e66.
- 2. Lefkowitz A, Edwards M, Balayla J. The Montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Transplant International. 2012;25(4):439-47.
- 3. Jones BP, Williams NJ, Saso S, et al. Uterine transplantation in transgender women. BJOG. 2019;126(2):152-56.
- 4. Jahromi AH, Horen SR, Dorafshar AH, et al. Uterine transplantation and donation in transgender individuals; proof of concept. International Journal of Transgender Health. 2021;22(4):349-59.
- 5. Balayla J, Pounds P, Lasry A, Volodarsky-Perel A, Gil Y. The Montreal criteria and uterine transplants in transgender women. Bioethics. 2021;35(4):326-30.
- 6. Mamo L. Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007
- 7. N S, Marwah V, editors. Reconfiguing Reproduction: Feminist Health Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New Delhi: Zubaan; 2014.
- 8. Neyer G, Bernardi L. Feminist perspectives on motherhood and reproduction. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. 2011;36(2):162-76.
- 9. Sutton K. “We too deserve a place in the sun”: the politics of transvestite identity in Weimar Germany. German Studies Review. 2012;35(2):335-54.
- 10. Morford MPO, Lenardon RJ. Athena. Classical Mythology 6th ed. Oxford University Press; 1999.
- 11. Stephanson R, Wagner DN, editors. The Secrets of Generation: Reproduction in the Long Eighteenth Century Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2015.
- 12. Segers S. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges. BMC Medical Ethics. 2021;22:59.
- 13. Zaami S, Marinelli E, di Luca NM, Montanari Vergallo G. Ethical and medico-legal remarks on uterus transplantation: may it solve uterine factor infertility? European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2017;21(22):5290-96.
- 14. Johannesson L, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, et al. Uterus transplantation trial: 1-year outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;103(1):199-204.
- 15. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):607-16.
- 16. Ruvalcaba Castellón LA, García Amador MI, Díaz González RE, et al. The history behind successful uterine transplantation in humans. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2017;21(2):126-34.
- 17. Hanafy A, Diaz-Garcia C, Olausson M, Brännström M. Uterine transplantation: one human case followed by a decade of experimental research in animal models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011;51(3):199-203.
- 18. Caldwell BV, Mazer RS, Wright PA. Luteolysis as affected by uterine transplantation in the Syrian hamster. Endocrinology. 1967;80(3):477-82.
- 19. Saso S, Petts G, David AL, et al. Achieving an early pregnancy following allogeneic uterine transplantation in a rabbit model. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2015;185:164-69.
- 20. Scott JR, Anderson WR, Kling TG, Yannone ME. Uterine transplantation in dogs. Gynecology and Obstetretic Investigation. 1970;1(3):140-48.
- 21. Andraus W, Ejzenberg D, Miyashiro Nunes Dos Santos R, et al. Sheep model for uterine transplantation: the best option before starting a human program. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017;72(3):178-82.
- 22. Macedo Arantes R, Souto Nacif L, Soares Pinheiro R, et al. Novel technique in a sheep model of uterine transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings. 2020;52(5):1399-1401.
- 23. de Oliveira E, da Silva Tavares KA, Vieira Gomes MT, et al. Description and evaluation of experimental models for uterine transplantation in pigs. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017;15(4):481-85.
- 24. Shockley M, Arnolds K, Beran B, et al. Uterine viability in the baboon after ligation of uterine vasculature: a pilot study to assess alternative perfusion and venous return for uterine transplantation. Fertility and Sterility. 2017;107(4):1078-82.
- 25. Favre-Inhofer A, Rafii A, Carbonnel M, Revaux A, Ayoubi JM. Uterine transplantation: review in human research. Journal of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Human Reproduction. 2018;47(6):213-21.
- 26. Rubinkam M. Women with transplanted uterus gives birth to ‘miracle’ baby. Associated Press. 9 Jan 2020.
- 27. Gruendell A. Experience: I had a baby using a donated uterus. The Guardian. 15 Oct 2021.
- 28. Haller S. Woman born without a uterus births ‘miracle baby’ after transplant. Now she offers hope. USA Today. 9 Oct 2019.
- 29. O’Donovan L, Williams NJ, Wilkinson S. Ethical and policy issues raised by uterus transplants. British Medical Bulletin. 2019;131(1):19-28.
- 30. Flyckt R, Kotlyar A, Arian S, et al. Deceased donor uterine transplantation. Fertility and Sterility. 2017;107(3):e13.
- 31. Chmel R, Pastor Z, Matecha J, Janousek L, Novackova M, Fronek J. Uterine transplantation in an era of successful childbirths from living and deceased donor uteri: current challenges. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. 2020;164(1):115-20.
- 32. Carbonnel M, Dahm-Kähler P, Revaux A, Brännström M, Ayoubi JM. Adapting surgical skills from robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer to uterine transplantation: a look to an optimistic future! Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2020;14(6):841-47.
- 33. Vali S, Jones BP, Saso S, et al. Uterine transplantation: legal and regulatory implications in England. BJOG. 2021;129(4):590-96.
- 34. O’Donovan L. Why uterine transplantation requires us to rethink the role of the pre-conception welfare principle. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2022;9(2):lsac028.
- 35. Williams N. Should deceased donation be morally preferred in uterine transplantation trials? Bioethics. 2016;30(6):415-24.
- 36. Oedingen C, Bartling T, Mühlbacher AC, Schrem H, Krauth C. Systematic review of public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: principles of distributive justice. The Patient. 2019;12(5):475-89.
- 37. Petrini C, Gainotti S, Morresi A, Nanni Costa A. Ethical issues in uterine transplantation: psychological implications and informed consent. Transplantation Proceedings. 2017;49(4):707-10.
- 38. Ashurst DP, Hall DZ. Childless womanhood. In: Understanding Women in Distress. Routledge; 1989. p. 97-103.
- 39. Cavaliere G. Ectogenesis and gender-based oppression: resisting the ideal of assimilation. Bioethics. 2020;34(7):727-34.
- 40. Murphy TF. Assisted gestation and transgender women. Bioethics. 2015;29(6):389-97.
- 41. Reilly DR. Surrogate pregnancy: a guide for Canadian prenatal health care providers. CMAJ. 2007;176(4):483-85.
- 42. Wagner DN, Stephanson R, Pierson RA. Portrait of an organ: a cultural analysis of medical images and treatments of the uterus. International Journal of Body, Mind & Culture. 2019;6(2):59-70.
- 43. Ralston SJ. Uterine transplantation: a maternal-fetal medicine perspective. Seminars in Perinatology. 2022;46(3):151522.
- 44. Hariton E, Bortoletto P, Goldman RH, et al. A survey of public opinion in the United States regarding uterine transplantation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018;25(6):980-85.
- 45. Fischer N, Xun H, Lossie A, et al. Perspectives of 281 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome on uterine transplantation. Fertility and Sterility. 2021;115(4):1074-83.
- 46. Farr RH, Grotevant HD. Adoption. In: Fiese BH, Celano M, Deater-Deckard K, et al., editors. APA Handbook of Contemporary Family Psychology: Foundations, Methods, and Contemporary Issues Across the Lifespan. American Psychological Association; 2019. p. 725-41.
- 47. van Niekerk A, van Zyl L. The ethics of surrogacy: Women’s reproductive labour. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1995;21(6):345-49.
- 48. McLachlan HV. Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1997;23(6):344-48.
- 49. Ramskold LAH, Posner MP. Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2012;39(6):397-402.
- 50. Balding C. International child adoption laws and empirical analysis. Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy. 2014;13(1):51-84.
- 51. McTernan E. Uterus transplants and the insufficient value of gestation. Bioethics. 2018;32(8):481-88.
- 52. Boulay H, Mazaud-Guittot S, Supervielle J, et al. Maternal, foetal and child consequences of immunosuppressive drugs during pregnancy in women with organ transplant: a review. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2021;14(8):1871-78.
- 53. Ricci S, Bennett C, Falcone T. Uterine transplantation: evolving data, success, and clinical importance. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2021;28(3):502-12.
- 54. Horsburgh CC. A call for empirical research on uterine transplantation and reproductive autonomy. Hastings Center Report. 2017;47(Suppl 3):S46-49.
- 55. De-Castro-Peraza ME, Garcia-Acosta JM, Delgado-Rodriguez N, et al. Biological, psychological, social, and legal aspects of trans parenthood based on a real case—a literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(6):925-41.
- 56. Brown A, Wade K. The incoherent role of the child’s identity in the construction and allocation of legal parenthood. Legal Studies. 2023;43(1):29-46.
- 57. Moore FD. Therapeutic innovation: ethical boundaries in the initial clinical trials of new drugs and surgical procedures. Daedalus. 1969;98(2):502-22.
- 58. Frydman R, Parneix I, Fries N, Testart J, Raymond JP, Bouchard P. Pregnancy in a 46, XY patient. Fertility and Sterility. 1988;50(5):813-14.
- 59. Weyers S, de Sutter P, Brannstrom M. Uterine transplantation for trans women: Prerequisites and limitations. In: van Trotsenburg M, Luikenaar RAC, Meriggiola MC, editors. Context, Principles and Practice of Transgynecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 228-231.
- 60. Jain M, Kumar P, Iyer V, Halder A. Primary testicular failure. In: Kumar A, Sharma M, editors. Basics of Human Andrology. Singapore: Springer; 2017.
- 61. Haupt C, Henke M, Kutschmar A, et al. Antiandrogen or estradiol treatment or both during hormone therapy in transitioning transgender women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;11:CD013138.
- 62. Unger CA. Hormone therapy for transgender patients. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2016;5(6):877-84.
- 63. Jones BP, Saso S, L’Heveder A, et al. The vaginal microbiome in uterine transplantation. BJOG. 2020;127(2):230-38.
- 64. Kirczenow MacDonald T, Walks M, Biener M, Kibbe A. Disrupting the norms: reproduction, gender identity, gender dysphoria, and intersectionality. International Journal of Transgender Health. 2021;22(1-2):18-29.
- 65. Charter R, Ussher JM, Perz J, Robinson K. The transgender parent: experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. International Journal of Transgenderism. 2018;19(1):64-77.
- 66. Siegel Watkins E. On the Pill: A Social History of Contraceptives, 1950-1970. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.
- 67. Moore LJ. Extracting men from semen: masculinity in scientific representations of sperm. Social Text. 2002;20(4):91-119.
- 68. Robertson JA. Other women’s wombs: uterus transplants and gestational surrogacy. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2016;3(1):68-86.
- 69. Altawil Z, Arawi T. Uterine transplantation: ethical considerations within middle eastern perspectives. Developing World Bioethics. 2016;6(2):91-7.
- 70. Pitts V. In the Flesh: The Cultural Politics of Body Modification. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
- 71. Unger CA. Care of the transgender patient: the role of the gynecologist. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;210(1):16-26.
- 72. Laqueur T. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Harvard University Press; 1990.
- 73. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10259):565-82.
- 74. Petropanagos A. Pronatalism, geneticism and ART. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. 2017;10(1):119-47.
- 75. Bergmann S, Schindler M, Munger C, Penfold CA, Boroviak TE, Building a stem cell-based primate uterus. Communications Biology. 2021;4:749.