Résumés
Abstract
After 50 years of institutional history in Canada, the focus of ombuds has shifted from resolving individual complaints to improving the quality of government services for all. New tools in the ombuds world enabled the conceptualization and promotion of administrative fairness. Ombuds’ acquired expertise, which, shared with government, improved the delivery of services. Public systemic investigations are now seen as the ultimate expression of ombuds effectiveness. Consistent dialogue with public servants and organisational administrators inevitably links ombuds to policy networks. While informal links to policy networks can help ombuds resolve cases, they can also inadvertently create distance between ombuds and complainants. A former ombuds officer at Columbia University, Marsha Wagner emphasizes the importance of identifying systemic issues in ombuds practice, i.e., ombuds who do not focus on systemic issues may be derided as “wannabes”. This article suggests the pendulum has swung too far from the individual complainant to a systemic focus and urges caution in contemporary ombudship.
Keywords:
- ombudsman,
- complainants,
- client,
- resolution,
- impartiality,
- policy networks
Résumé
Après 50 ans d’histoire institutionnelle au Canada, l’objectif des ombudsmans est passé de la résolution de plaintes individuelles à l’amélioration de la qualité des services gouvernementaux pour tous. Les nouveaux outils de l’univers des ombudsmans ont permis de conceptualiser et de promouvoir l’équité administrative. Les ombudsmans ont acquis une expertise qui, partagée avec le gouvernement, a amélioré la prestation des services. Les enquêtes systémiques publiques sont désormais considérées comme l’expression ultime de l’efficacité des ombudsmans. Un dialogue constant avec les fonctionnaires et les administrateurs des organisations lie inévitablement les ombudsmans aux réseaux politiques. Si les liens informels avec les réseaux de politiques peuvent aider les ombudsmans à résoudre des cas, ils peuvent aussi, par inadvertance, créer une distance entre les ombudsmans et les plaignants. Ancienne responsable des ombudsmans à l’Université Columbia, Marsha Wagner souligne l’importance d’identifier les problèmes systémiques dans la pratique des ombudsmans; c.-à-d. les ombudsmans qui ne se concentrent pas sur les problèmes systémiques sont tournés en dérision comme des « aspirants ». Cet article suggère que le pendule est allé trop loin, passant du plaignant individuel à une approche systémique, et invite à la prudence dans la pratique contemporaine de l’ombudsman.
Mots-clés :
- ombudsman,
- plaignants,
- client,
- résolution,
- impartialité,
- réseaux politiques
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- 1. Diggs BJ. Ethics and experimental theories of motivation and learning. Ethics. 1957;67(2):100-118.
- 2. Carl S. The history and evolution of the ombudsman model. In: Hertogh M, Kirkham R, editors. Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2018. p. 17-33.
- 3. Smith RA. A brief history of the student ombudsman: the early evolution of the role in US higher education. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association. 2020;1-10.
- 4. Conway M, Pouliot A. Celebrating ombuds in higher education: ACCUO 1983-2013. 2013.
- 5. Legislative Ombudsman Advocated. Edmonton Journal. 28 Feb 1963.
- 6. Reid AD. The New Brunswick Ombudsman Act. The University of Toronto Law Journal. 1968;18(4):361-71.
- 7. Clement CW. The report of the Special Committee on Boards and Tribunals to the Legislative Assembly of Alberta; 1965.
- 8. Rowat DC. An ombudsman scheme for Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 1962;28(4):543-56.
- 9. Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Legislative Session: 3rd Session, 30th Parliament Hansard. 1973.
- 10. House of Assembly of Newfoundland and Labrador. House of Assembly proceedings Vol. XLIV No. 26, 7 May 15, 2001.
- 11. Mallin L. Ombudsman chews beefs. The Peak. 24 Nov. 1965; p. 5.
- 12. Mynott J. SFU’s first ombudsman outlines campus duties. The Peak. 24 Nov. 1965; p. 5-6.
- 13. Kuxhaus D. Presentation notes from Manitoba Manager of Ombudsman Investigations, sent via email, March 20, 2021.
- 14. McClellan G. Alberta Ombudsman annual report. 1968.
- 15. Jones D, De Villars A. Principle of Administrative Law. Toronto: Carswell; 1986.
- 16. Black S. Administrative Law in Canada. First Edition. Toronto: LexisNexis; 1992.
- 17. Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration). 1999 2 SCR 817.
- 18. Owen S. Ombudsman: Fairness for all in British Columbia: 1990 annual report to the legislative assembly. 1991.
- 19. Ombudsman Saskatchewan. What is Fairness? 2019.
- 20. Alberta Ombudsman. Administrative Fairness Guidelines. 2022.
- 21. Wagner ML. The organisational ombudsman as change agent. Negotiation Journal. 2000;16(1):99-114.
- 22. Ombudsman Ontario. A Game of Trust. 2007.
- 23. Offices of the Ombudsman in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Yukon, Ombudsperson in British Columbia. Fairness by design: An administrative fairness self-assessment guide. 2019.
- 24. Simoneau J. Communications director at Protecteur du Citoyen. [Interview]. April 2020.
- 25. Canadian Journal of Bioethics. Call for papers: Invitation to contribute to a special issue on ethics and complaints commissioner offices (ombudsperson). 11 Jan. 2021.
- 26. Mayntz R. Modernization and the logic of interorganisational networks. In: Child J, Crozier M, Mayntz R, editors. Societal Change Between Market and Organisation. Aldershot: Avebury; 1993. p. 3-19.
- 27. Borzel T. Organising Babylon: On the different concepts of policy networks. Public Administration. 1998;76(2):253-73.
- 28. Bogason P, Toonen A. Introduction: Networks in public administration. Public Administration. 1998;76(2):205-27.
- 29. Genieys W, Darviche M-S, Epperson B. Les gardiens des politiques de santé face à la réforme Obama. Gouvernement et action publique. 2020;3(9):59-79.
- 30. Genieys W, Darviche M-S, Epperson B. New policy elites and the Affordable Care Act: The making of long-term insiders. Journal of Policy History. 2022;34(1):1-24.
- 31. Newman J. Governing Public-Private Partnerships. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press; 2017.
- 32. Thatcher M. The development of policy network analysis: From modest origins to overarching frameworks. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1998;10(4):389-416.
- 33. Heclo H. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In: King A, editor. The New American Political System. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute; 1978. p. 87-124.
- 34. Henry AC. Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks. Policy Studies Journal. 2011;39(3):361-83.
- 35. Erkkilä T. Transnational governance and global diffusion of the ombudsman institution. In: Ombudsman as a Global Institution: Transnational Governance and Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. p. 21-63.
- 36. Erkkilä T. Ombudsman as a global institution. In: Ombudsman as a Global Institution: Transnational Governance and Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. p. 3-19.
- 37. Cutting A. Defending the defencers: Ombudsmen need support. EuObserver. 10 Sept. 2019.
- 38. Van de Pol U. The added value of a local ombudsman. In: Passemiers R, Reynaert H, Steyvers K, editors. The Impact of Ombudsmen. Brugge: Vanden Broele Publisher; 2009. p. 233-249.
- 39. Gill C. What can government learn from the ombudsman? In: Hertogh M, Kirkham R, editors. Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. Edward Elgan Publishing; 2018. p. 298-318.
- 40. Marin A. Leveraging moral suasion though SORT investigations. Plenary Session 2, IOI World Conference. Stockholm; Jun. 2009.