July 2018, Turtle Island (Canada). Robert Lepage’s works Slāv and Kanata, based, respectively, on slave songs and on the relationship between First Nations and white settlers in Canada, make the headlines and spark debates on cultural appropriation. “We as Indigenous people have a voice, …[one] that Lepage needs to learn from and never dismiss. You cannot, no matter how educated you think you are, tell our stories without us. That is just not possible. You need us to provide the context, the pain, the suffering, the texture. Without that you’re left with a vapid production that continues to perpetuate stereotypes and ignores our very existence today,” said Steve Bonspiel, editor and publisher of The Eastern Door in Kahnawake (Drimonis, 2018). October 2019, Santiago de Chile. A popular uprising takes place in Chile. In response, President Piñera declares a state of emergency in the metropolitan region on October 19, then quickly extends it to other regions. The military takes over, dictates curfews, and makes hundreds of arrests in just the few first hours. Cacerolazos break the silence at night. The events recall Pinochet’s dictatorship, and, on October 25, over two million people protest, claiming they are not at war and that Piñera is “a murderer just like Pinochet.” The protests will unravel for months, in the midst of which a constitutional process will be launched to replace Pinochet’s 1980 constitution. In parallel, vandalism against at least a dozen memorial sites and Human Rights Houses (established to remember human rights abuses during Pinochet’s dictatorship) will be perpetrated, confirming how the contestation of memory was a central aspect of these events (Andrade Daigre, 2020). These recent events in Canada and Chile highlight how debates and issues around collective memory are contemporary and can have vital consequences. Whether the desire for reconciliation is superficial or real, there have been multiple initiatives to shape and preserve the ways in which individuals and collectives remember episodes of oppression or authoritarianism. However, these initiatives often raise debates and questions about the instrumentalization of memory for political or personal purposes. Sometimes the victims do not feel understood; at other times, the allies of the protagonists feel that they are wrongly judged. Recovering historical memory, especially in connection to episodes of oppression and violence, is a sensitive—and far from unanimous—process. This special issue explores ethical issues around the inclusiveness, politicization, and instrumentalization of memory, particularly in relation to the remembering of episodes of oppression or violence. The articles address these issues from the perspectives of various disciplines (political science, art history, philosophy, sociology, law) and in light of case studies from Canada, Chile, Colombia, Rwanda, South Korea, and Spain. We believe the main contribution of this special issue is twofold. First, the special issue exposes a great variety of memory-recall mechanisms (both official and unofficial) and sheds light on their respective specificities, limitations, and challenges. Second, it discusses and analyzes how sociopolitical variables interact with memory processes, as plural memories emerge, become hierarchized (and sometimes silenced), and play into politics. The next two sections will detail this double contribution and situate it in the existing literature. A third section will present the organization of this special issue and the individual contributions of each paper. (Some readers could be interested in reading this last section first.) In the struggle they face in shaping their narratives of the past, postconflict nations rely on mechanisms that help sort and cement what is remembered and forgotten. These mechanisms are a fundamental piece of dealing with the past, since “whether or not the past passes away depends not only on its meanings and …
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Andrade Daigre, Sebastián, Estallido Social, 2020, URL: https://estallidosocial.com/ (last accessed June 8, 2020).
- Antze, Paul, and Lambek, Michael, Tense Past: Cultural Essays in Trauma and Memory, New York, London: Routledge, 1996.
- Argenti, Nicolas, and Schramm, Katharina, (eds.) Remembering Violence: Anthropological Perspectives on Intergenerational Transmission, New York, Berghahn Books, 2010
- Bilbija, Ksenija, Fair, Jo Ellen, Milton, Cynthia E. and Payne, Leigh A., (eds.), The Art of Truth-Telling about Authoritarian Rule, Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.
- Brants, Chrisje and Kelp, Katrien, “Transitional Justice: History-Telling, Collective Memory, and the Victim-Witness,” International Journal of Conflict and Violence, vol. 7, no. 1, 2013, p. 36–49.
- Bratton, Michael, “Violence, partisanship and transitional justice in Zimbabwe,” Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 49, no. 3, 2011, p. 353–380.
- Brunyeel, Kevin, “The King’s Body: The Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial and the Politics of Collective Memory,” History and Memory, vol. 26, no. 1, 2014, p. 75–108.
- Cole, Jennifer, Forget Colonialism? Sacrifice and the Art of Memory in Madagascar, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 2001.
- Confino, Alon, “Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method,” The American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, p. 1386–1403.
- Drimonis, Touta, 2018, “Like SLĀV, Kanata is a missed opportunity for Robert Lepage,” Canada’s National Observer, 2018, URL: https://www.nationalobserver.com/2018/07/27/opinion/slav-kanata-missed-opportunity-robert-lepage (last accessed June 8, 2020).
- Foucault, Michel, “Nietzsche, la généalogie, l’histoire.” in Dits et écrits, Vol. 1, 1954–1975, 1004–1024, Paris, Quarto/ Gallimard, 2001.
- Foucault, Michel, “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Vol. 1, New York, Picador, 2003.
- Gibson, James L., Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 2004.
- Griffin, Larry J., “‘Generations and Collective Memory’ Revisited: Race, Region, and Memory of Civil Rights,”’ American Sociological Review, vol. 69, no. 4, 2004, p. 544–557.
- Halbwachs, Maurice, On Collective Memory, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1992 [English translation of Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire, Paris, Felix Alcan, 1925].
- Hill, Gabrielle l’Hirondelle and McCall, Sophie, The Land We Are: Artists and Writers Unsettle the Politics of Reconciliation, Winnipeg: ARP Books, 2015.
- Hodgkin, Katharine and Radstone, Susannah, Contested Pasts: The Politics of Memory, New York, Routledge, 2003.
- Huyssen, Andreas, Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia, London, Routledge, 1995.
- International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), “What is Transitional Justice?” New York, 2009, URL: https://www.ictj.org/about/transitional-justice (Last accessed June 9, 2020).
- Isurin, Ludmila, Collective Remembering: Memory in the World and in the Mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- Jelin, Elizabeth, State Repression and the Labors of Memory, translated by Judy Rein and Marcial Godoy-Anativia, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2003.
- Kienzler, Hanna and Sula-Raxhimi, Enkelejda, “Collective Memories and Legacies of Political Violence in the Balkans,” Nationalities Papers, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 173–181.
- Lambek, Michael, “Memory in a Maussian Universe”, in Memory Cultures: Memory, Subjectivity and Recognition, edited by S. Radstone and K. Hodgkin, New Brunswick and London, Transaction, 2006.
- Langenbacher, Eric, “Collective Memory as a Factor in Political Culture and International Relations,” in Eric Langenbacher and Yossi Shain (eds.), Power and the Past: Collective Memory and International Relations, Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press, 2010, p. 13–50.
- Larson, Jeff A. and Lizardo, Omar, “Generations, Identities, and the Collective Memory of Che Guevara,” Sociological Forum, vol. 22, no. 4, 2007, p. 425–451.
- Lemoine, Hervé, “Conserver, détruire, communiquer, dissimuler…,” Pouvoirs, vol. 153, no. 2, 2015, p. 75–84.
- Lynch, Michael, “Archives in Formation: Privileged Spaces, Popular Archives and Paper Trails,” History of Human Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, 1999, p. 65–87.
- Mälksoo, Maria, “The Memory Politics of Becoming European: The East European Subalterns and the Collective Memory of Europe,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 15, no. 4, 2009, p. 653–680.
- McGrattan, Cillian and Hopkins, Stephen, “Memory in Post-Conflict Societies: From Contention to Integration?”, Ethnopolitics, vol. 16, no. 5, 2017, p. 488–499.
- Milton, Cynthia E., “At the Edge of the Peruvian Truth Commission: Alternative Paths to Recounting the Past,” Radical History Review, 98, 2007, pp. 3–33.
- Milton, Cynthia E., “Curating Memories of Armed State Actors in Peru’s Era of Transitional Justice,” Memory Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, 2015, p. 361–378.
- Milton, Cynthia E. and Reynaud, Anne-Marie, “Archives, Museums and Sacred Storage: Dealing with the Afterlife of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada,” International Journal of Transitional Justice, vol. 13, no. 3, 2019, p. 524–545.
- Minow, Martha, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence, Boston, Beacon Press, 1998.
- Nascimento Araújo, Maria Paula and Sepúlveda dos Santos, Myrian, “History, Memory and Forgetting: Political Implications,” RCCS Annual Review [Online], no. 1, 2009.
- Nguyen, Viet Thanh, Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2017.
- Olick, Jeffrey K., “Memory and the Nation: Continuities, Conflicts, and Transformations,” Social Science History, vol. 22, no. 4, 1998, p. 377–387.
- Olsen, Tricia D., Payne, Leigh A, Reiter, Andrew G., and Weibelhaus-Brahm, Eric, “When Truth Commissions Improve Human Rights,” International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol.4, no.3, 2010, p. 457-476.
- Onken, Eva-Clarita, “The Baltic States and Moscow’s 9 May Commemoration: Analysing Memory Politics in Europe,” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, 2007, p. 23–46.
- Pollak, Michael, “Memória, esquecimento e silêncio,” Estudos Históricos, vol. 2, no. 3, 1989, p. 3–15.
- Reynaud, Anne-Marie, Emotions, Remembering and Feeling Better: Dealing with the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement in Canada, Bielefeld, transcript Verlag, 2017.
- Ricoeur, Paul, La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, Paris, Seuil, 2000.
- Rousso, Henri, Le syndrome de Vichy, Paris, Seuil, 1987.
- Samuel, Raphael, Theatres of Memory: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture, London, Verso, 1994.
- Schuman, Howard, and Scott, Jacqueline, “Generations and Collective Memories,” American Sociological Review, vol. 54, no. 3, 1989, p. 359–381.
- Schwartz, Barry, “The Social Context of Commemoration: A Study in Collective Memory,” Social Forces, vol. 61, no. 2, 1982, p. 374–402.
- Schwartz, Barry, “Rethinking Conflict and Collective Memory: The Case of Nanking,” in Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ronald N. Jacobs, and Philip Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 529–563.
- Sturken, Marita, Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering, Berkeley, London, University of California Press, 1997.
- Verovšek, Peter J., “Memory, Narrative, and Rupture: The Power of the Past as a Resource for Political Change,” Memory Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, p. 208–222.
- Viggiani, Elisabetta, Talking Stones: The Politics of Memorialization in Post-Conflict Northern Ireland, New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2014.