Résumés
Abstract
This paper examines the extent of the opposition between environmentalists and those concerned with wild-animal suffering and considers whether there are any points they may agree on. The paper starts by presenting the reasons to conclude that suffering and premature death prevail over positive well-being in nature. It then explains several ways to intervene in order to aid animals and prevent the harms they suffer, and claims that we should support them. In particular, the paper argues in favour of carrying out more research to learn the best ways to intervene without causing more harm to other animals and to intervene first in areas significantly transformed by human action. It then examines what positions environmentalist views can have towards intervention in nature for the sake of animals. It claims that, while ecocentric and naturocentric views will strongly oppose intervention in certain circumstances, they should not do so in other cases in which the values they promote are not at stake or might be outweighed. The paper then argues that, contrary to what it might seem at first, biocentric views should strongly support intervention. It then discusses whether there may be certain practical issues about which those concerned with wild animal suffering and environmentalists may support the same approach, such as opposition to the greening of desert ecosystems. Finally, it claims that raising awareness about wild animal suffering seems to be the most urgent task now for those concerned about it.
Résumé
Le présent article examine l’étendue de l’opposition entre les environnementalistes et ceux qui se préoccupent de la souffrance des animaux sauvages, afin de déterminer s’il existe des points sur lesquels ils peuvent être en accord. L’article débute en présentant les raisons permettant de conclure que la souffrance et la mort prématurée l’emportent sur le bien-être positif dans la nature. Ensuite, il explique plusieurs façons d’intervenir afin d’aider les animaux et de prévenir les maux dont ils souffrent et plaide pour la mise en oeuvre de celles-ci. Plus précisément, l’article préconise un plus grand nombre de recherches afin de déterminer les meilleures façons d’intervenir sans causer davantage de maux à d’autres animaux ainsi que pour prioriser des interventions en des endroits que l’action humaine a significativement transformés. L’article examine par la suite les positions que les conceptions environnementalistes peuvent adopter quant aux interventions dans la nature pour le bien des animaux. L’article propose que, bien que des visions écocentriques et naturocentriques s’opposent vivement à l’intervention dans certaines circonstances, elles ne devraient cependant pas s’y opposer dans les cas où les valeurs qu’elles promeuvent n’entrent pas en jeu ou peuvent avoir moins de poids que d’autres facteurs. L’article soutient ensuite que, contrairement à ce que l’on pourrait penser à première vue, les théories biocentristes devraient fortement appuyer l’intervention. Il pose la question à savoir si certains problèmes pratiques peuvent faire l’objet d’une approche commune parmi les environnementalistes et ceux qui se soucient de la souffrance des animaux sauvages, par exemple s’opposer à l’écologisation des déserts. Enfin, l’article propose que la tâche la plus pressante pour ceux qui se préoccupent de la souffrance des animaux sauvages consiste à accroître la sensibilisation à ce problème.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Agar, Nicholas, Life’s Intrinsic Value: Science, Ethics and Nature, New York, Columbia University Press, 2001.
- Animal Ethics, “The Situation of Animals in the Wild,” Animal Ethics, 2016a: http://animal-ethics.org/wild-animals.
- Animal Ethics, “Helping Animals in the Wild,” Animal Ethics, 2016b: http://animal-ethics.org/helping-animals-in-the-wild.
- Bradley, Ben, Well-Being and Death, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Buddle, Bryce M., D. Neil Wedlock, Michel Denis, H. Martin Vordermeier, and R. Glyn Hewinson, “Update on Vaccination of Cattle and Wildlife Populations against Tuberculosis,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 151, no. 1-2, 2011, p. 14-22.
- Callicott, J. Baird, In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany, State University of New York, 1989.
- Callicott, J. Baird, “The Case against Moral Pluralism,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 12, no. 2, 1990, p. 99-124.
- Cappuccino, Naomi, and Peter W. Price (eds.), Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis, San Diego, Academic Press, 1995.
- Cooper, Jonathan E., “Physical Injury,” in A. Fairbrother, L. N. Locke, and G. L. Hoff (eds.), Noninfectious Disease of Wildlife, Ames, Iowa State University Press,1999 [1982], p. 157-172.
- Cumming, David H. M., M. Brock Fenton, Ignatius L. Rautenbach, Russell D. Taylor, Graeme S. Cumming, Meg S. Cumming, Jennifer M. Dunlop, A. Gavin Ford, Mark D. Hovorka, David S. Johnston, Matina C. Kalcounis, Zaccheus Mahlanga, and Christine V.R. Portfors,“Elephants, Woodlands and Biodiversity in Miombo Woodland in Southern Africa,” South African Journal of Science, vol. 93, 1997, p. 231-236.
- Cunha, Luciano Carlos, “If Natural Entities Have Intrinsic Value, Should We Then Abstain from Helping Animals who Are Victims of Natural Processes?” Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, p. 51-63.
- Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, New York, Oxford University Press, 2011.
- Elliot, Robert, Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration, New York, Routledge, 1997.
- Environmental Protection Agency, United States, (EPA) Status and Future Directions of the High Production Volume Challenge Program, Washington, D. C., Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 2004.
- Faria, Catia, and Eze Paez, “Animals in Need: The Problem of Wild animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature,” Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, p. 7-13.
- Faria, Catia, “Animal Ethics Goes Wild: The Problem of Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature,” PhD thesis, Barcelona, Pompeu Fabra University, 2016.
- Finkel, Zoe V, “Marine Net Primary Production,” in Freedman, B. (ed.), Global Environmental Change, Dordrecht, Springer, 2014, p. 117-124.
- Garmendia, Gabriel, and Andrew Woodhall (eds.), Intervention or Protest: Acting for Nonhuman Animals, Wilmington, Vernon Press, 2016.
- Gompertz, Lewis, Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes, Lewiston, Edwin Mellen, 1997 [1824].
- Goodpaster, Kenneth E., “On Being Morally Considerable,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 75, no. 6, 1978, p. 308-325.
- Guldemond, Robert A. R., Andrew Purdon, and Rudi J. van Aarde, “A Systematic Review of Elephant Impact across Africa,” PloS ONE, vol. 12, no. 6, 2017.
- Guldemond, Robert A. R., and Rudi J. Van Aarde, “A Meta-analysis of the Impact of African Elephants on Savanna Vegetation,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 72, no. 4, 2008, p. 892-899.
- Hettinger, Ned, and Bill Throop, “Refocusing Ecocentrism,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 21, no. 1, 1999, p. 3-21.
- Hettinger, Ned, “Valuing Predation in Rolston’s Environmental Ethics: Bambi Lovers versus Tree Huggers,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 16, no. 1, 1994, p. 3-20.
- Horta, Oscar, “The Ethics of the Ecology of Fear against the Nonspeciesist Paradigm: A Shift in the Aims of Intervention in Nature,” Between the Species, vol. 13, no. 10, 2010, p. 163-187: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol13/iss10/10/.
- Huston, Michael A., and Steve Wolverton, “The Global Distribution of Net Primary Production: Resolving the Paradox,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 79, no. 1, 2009, p. 343-377.
- Issar, Arie S., “Progressive Development by Greening the Deserts, To Mitigate Global Warming and Provide New Land and Income Resources,” in Issar, Arie S. (ed.), Progressive Development To Mitigate the Negative Impact of Global Warming on the Semi-arid Regions, Dordrecht, Springer, 2010, pp. 37-42.
- Johnson, Edward, “Animal Liberation against the Land Ethic,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 3, no. 3, 1981, p. 265-273.
- Katz, Eric, “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature,” Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, 1992, p. 231-241.
- Kirkwood, James K., Anthony W. Sainsbury, and Peter M. Bennett, “The Welfare of Free-Living Wild Animals: Methods of Assessment,” Animal Welfare, vol. 3, no. 4, 1994, p. 257-273.
- Lavery, Trish J., Ben Roudnew, Peter Gill, Justin Seymour, Laurent Seuront, Genevieve Johnson, James G. Mitchell, and Victor Smetacek, (2010) “Iron Defecation by Sperm Whales Stimulates Carbon Export in the Southern Ocean,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2010, rspb20100863.
- Leopold, Aldo, Sand County Almanac, with Essays on Conservation from Round River, New York, Ballantine Books, 1966 [1949].
- Li, Peng, Changhui Peng, Meng Wang, Weizhong Li, Pengxiang Zhao, Kefeng Wang, Yanzheng Yang, and Qiuan Zhu, “Quantification of the Response of Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production to Multifactor Global Change,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 76, 2017, p. 245-255.
- Linkola, Pentti, Can Life Prevail? A Radical Approach to the Environmental Crisis, London, Integral Tradition Publishing, 2009.
- McCue, Marshall D., “Starvation Physiology: Reviewing the Different Strategies Animals Use To Survive a Common Challenge,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology, vol. 156, no. 1, 2010, p. 1-18.
- McGowan, Christopher, The Raptor and the Lamb: Predators and Prey in the Living World, New York, Henry Holt and Company, 1997.
- McMahan, Jeff, “The Moral Problem of Predation,” in Chignell, Andrew, Terence Cuneo, and Matthew C. Halteman (eds.), Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments on the Ethics of Eating, London, Routledge, 2015, p. 268-294.
- Moberg, Gary P. (ed.), Animal stress, New York, Springer, 2013 [1985].
- Naess, Arne, “Should We Try To Relieve Clear Cases of Suffering in Nature?” Pan Ecology, vol. 6, no. 1, 1991, p. 1-5.
- Nagel, Thomas, “Death,” Noûs, vol. 4, no. 1, 1970, p. 73-80.
- Nepal Mountain News, “Quenching Wildlife Thirst by Pumping Ground Water,” Nepal Mountain News, 9 December 2011: http://www.nepalmountainnews.com/cms/2011/12/09/quenching-wildlife-thirst-pumping-ground-water.
- Ng, Yew-Kwang, “Towards Welfare Biology: Evolutionary Economics of Animal Consciousness and Suffering,” Biology and Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 1, 1995, p. 255-285.
- Nicol, Stephen, Andrew Bowie Simon Jarman, Delphine Lannuzel, Klaus M. Meiners, and Pier Van Der Merwe, “Southern Ocean Iron Fertilization by Baleen Whales and Antarctic Krill,” Fish and Fisheries, vol. 11, no. 2, 2010, p. 203-209.
- Nussbaum, Martha C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Member-ship, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2006.
- Palmer, Clare A., Animal Ethics in Context, New York, Columbia University Press, 2010.
- Pearce, David, “A Welfare State for Elephants? A Case Study of Compassionate Stewardship,” Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, vol. 3, no. 2, 2015, p. 133-152.
- Reuters, “Zambia Distributes Food to Starving Wildlife,” SOS Rhino, October 18, 2002: http://www.sosrhino.com/news/rhinonews101802.php.
- Richmond, Amos, “The Greening of the Desert: A Case for the Development of the Arid Lands,” Technology in Society, vol. 9, no. 1, 1987, p. 113-121.
- Rolston III, Holmes, “Disvalues in Nature,” The Monist, vol. 75, no. 2, 1992, p. 250-278.
- Rolston III, Holmes, Conserving Natural Value, Columbia University Press, 1994.
- Roman Joe, and James J. McCarthy, “The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 10, e13255, 2010.
- Rupprecht, Charles E., Colleen A. Hanlon, and D. Slate, “Oral Vaccination of Wildlife against Rabies: Opportunities and Challenges in Prevention and Control,” Developments in Biologicals, vol. 119, no. 1, 2003, p. 173-184.
- Ryf, Patrick, “The Case of Wild Animals,” master’s thesis, Basel, University of Basel, 2016.
- Sagoff, Mark, “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, 1984, p. 297-307.
- Sapontzis, Steve F., Morals, Reason, and Animals, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1987.
- Shelton, Jo-Anne, “Killing Animals that Don’t Fit In: Moral Dimensions of Habitat Restoration,” Between the Species, vol. 13, no. 4, 2004, p. 1-21: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol13/iss4/3.
- Sözmen, Beril İdemen, “Harm in the Wild: Facing Non-human Suffering in Nature,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 16, no. 5, 2013, p. 1075-1088.
- Stearns, Stephen C., The Evolution of Life Histories, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Taylor, Paul, Respect for Nature, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1986.
- Tomasik, Brian, “The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering,” Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, vol. 3, no. 2, 2015a [2009], p. 133-152.
- Tomasik, Brian, “Climate Change and Wild Animals,” Essays on Reducing Suffering, 2017 [2008]: http://reducing-suffering.org/climate-change-and-wild-animals.
- Varner, Gary, “Biocentric Individualism,” in Schmidtz, David, and Elizabeth Willott, (eds.), Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters, What Really Works, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 108-120.
- Warhurst, A. Michael, The REACH Files: A Policy Guide, Brussels, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), 2004.
- White, T. C. R., “The Role of Food, Weather and Climate in Limiting the Abundance of Animals,” Biological Reviews, vol. 83, no. 3, 2008, p. 227-248.
- Wobeser, Gary A., Essentials of Disease in Wild Animals, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 2005.