Résumés
Abstract
Continuing on from recent discussions on the overlap between Paul Ricoeur’s philosophy and care ethics, this article will aim to clarify the status of practice in Ricoeur’s work. I will argue that even though Ricoeur’s philosophy is indeed marked by its “desire for a foundation,” as care ethicist Joan Tronto has pointed out, this aim is more of a fragile wager than a principle, and is always at risk of being overturned by practices and other worldviews. I will demonstrate this point by arguing that (1) Ricoeur’s hermeneutic approach to practice leads to the view that objective methods of knowledge and explanation are always grounded by the broader hermeneutic task of practical understanding and care for the self; (2) in moral reasoning, Ricoeur’s analysis of the conflict between respect for the rule and respect for persons results in his prioritizing of respect for the singular other rather than the universal rule, meaning that the other can always disrupt and reorient universal or foundational modes of reasoning; and finally (3) within healthcare relations Ricoeur aims to develop an alternative understanding of respect that places it in a dialectical relation with care. These practice-oriented readings of hermeneutics, morality, and respect aim to open up a dialogue between care ethics and philosophical approaches that have often been placed outside of care ethics.
Résumé
Poursuivant les récentes discussions concernant les recoupements entre la philosophie de Paul Ricoeur et les éthiques du care, cet article a pour objectif de clarifier le statut de la pratique dans l’oeuvre de Ricoeur. Je soutiendrai que même si la philosophie ricoeurienne est bien marquée par un « désir d’un fondement », ainsi que l’éthicienne du care Joan C. Tronto le souligne, cet objectif repose plus sur un pari que sur un véritable principe, et risque toujours d’être renversé par les pratiques ou d’autres visions du monde. Je démontrerai cela en soutenant trois arguments. 1) L’approche herméneutique de Ricoeur concernant la pratique mène à penser que les méthodes objectives de connaissance et d’explication sont toujours soutenues par une tâche herméneutique plus large de la compréhension pratique et du souci de soi. 2) En ce qui a trait au raisonnement moral, l’analyse de Ricoeur sur le conflit entre le respect de la règle et le respect de la personne accorde la priorité au respect de l’autre singulier plutôt que de la règle universelle. Ainsi, l’autre peut toujours perturber et réorienter l’universel ou les modes fondateurs du raisonnement. 3) Réfléchissant aux relations thérapeutiques (healthcare relations), Ricoeur tend à suggérer une nouvelle compréhension du respect qui se place dans une relation dialectique avec le souci (care). Ces lectures – de l’herméneutique, de la moralité et du respect – orientées vers la pratique ouvrent la voie à un dialogue entre les éthiques du care et des approches philosophiques que l’on considère souvent éloignées de celles-ci.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Canguilhem, Georges, La connaissance de la vie, Paris, Vrin, 1992.
- De Lange, Ds Frits, “Affirming Life in the Face of Death: Ricoeur’s Living up to Death as a Modern ars moriendi and a Lesson for Palliative Care”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2014, p. 509-518.
- Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College de France, 1981-82, Gros, Frédéric (ed.), translated from French by Graham Burchell, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
- Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press, 1982.
- Hettema, Theo L., “Autonomy and its Vulnerability: Ricoeur’s View on Justice as a Contribution to Care Ethics”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2014, p. 493-498.
- Junker-Kenny, Maureen, “Dignity, Fragility, Singularity in Paul Ricoeur’s Ethics”, in Düwell, Marcus, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 286-297.
- Kittay, Eva Feder, “The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability”, Ratio Juris, Volume 24, Issue 1, 2011, p. 49-58.
- Lewin, David, “Ricoeur and the Capability of Modern Technology,” in Todd S. Mei and David Lewin (eds.), From Ricoeur to Action: The Socio-Political Significance of Ricoeur’s Thinking, London and New York, Bloomsbury, 2012.
- Marcel, Gabriel, Being and Having, translated from French by Katherine Farrer, Westminster, Dacre Press, 1949.
- Martin, Luther H., Gutman, Huck and Hutton, Patrick H. (eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, University of Massachusetts Press, 1988.
- Michel, Johan, Ricoeur and the Post-Structuralists: Bourdieu, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, Castoriadis, translated from French by Scott Davidson, London and Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd., 2014.
- Ricoeur, Paul, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, translated from French by Denis Savage, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1970.
- Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, translated from French by Kathleen Blamey, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
- Ricoeur, Paul, Critique and Conviction: Conversations with FrançoisAzouvi and Marc de Launay, translated from French by Kathleen Blamey, New York, Columbia University Press, 1998.
- Ricoeur, Paul, “The Difference Between the Normal and the Pathological as a Source of Respect”, inReflections on the Just, translated from French by David Pellauer, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- Ricoeur, Paul, “Science and Ideology”, inFrom Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II, translated from French by Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson, London and New York, Continuum, 2008, p. 239-262.
- Schaafsma, Petruschka, “Philosophical Anthropology against Objectification. Reconsidering Ricoeur’s Fallible Man”, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Volume 75, Issue 2, 2014, p. 152-168.
- Sevenhuijsen, Selma, Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics, London and New York, Routledge, 1998.
- Tronto, Joan, Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice, New York and London, New York University Press, 2013.
- Van Heijst, Annelies, Professional Loving Care: An Ethical View of the Healthcare Sector, Leuven, Peeters, 2001.
- Van Nistelrooji, Inge, Schaafsma, Petruschka, and Tronto, Joan, “Ricoeur and the Ethics of Care”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2014, p. 485-491.
- Van Nistelrooji, Inge, “Self-sacrifice and self-affirmation within care-giving”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2014, p. 519-528.
- Van Stichel, Ellen, “Love and Justice’s Dialectical Relationship: Ricoeur’s Contribution on the Relationship between Care and Justice within Care Ethics”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2014, p. 499-508.
- Vebeek, Peter-Paul, “Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis”, Human Studies, Volume 31, Issue 1, 2008. p. 11-26.