Résumés
Résumé
L’habileté à détecter et à manipuler la structure morphologique des mots contribue aux performances en lecture et en écriture. Malgré l’importance de la conscience morphologique pour le développement des habiletés langagières, les tâches utilisées pour sa mesure mobilisent des habiletés extrêmement variées. L’objectif de cet article est de mieux comprendre la conscience morphologique de locuteurs du français L2, à l’aide d’une reprise de l’étude de Bourdages et Foucambert (2018). Soixante-sept élèves anglophones en immersion précoce en français (âgés de 8 à 12 ans) ont effectué six tâches différentes traditionnellement utilisées pour mesurer la conscience morphologique. Les données sont analysées à l’aide d’analyses factorielles confirmatoires pour trouver le modèle s’ajustant le mieux aux données recueillies. Contrairement aux résultats pour les locuteurs français L1, les résultats montrent l’importance du type d’unité manipulée et montrent que ces élèves ont de faibles capacités à remarquer et à manipuler les unités morphologiques. Notre discussion porte sur les stratégies visant à promouvoir le développement de la conscience morphologique dans le cadre du programme d’immersion. De manière plus générale, nous soutenons que l’activité métalinguistique devrait être au coeur des programmes d’immersion, car ces capacités soutiennent la production et la compréhension de la langue.
Mots-clés :
- conscience morphologique,
- dimensionnalité des habiletés langagières,
- habiletés métalinguistiques,
- performances langagières,
- cognition,
- classes d’immersion
Abstract
The ability to detect and manipulate the morphological structure of words contributes to reading and writing performance. Despite the importance of morphological awareness for the development of language skills, the tasks used to measure it mobilize extremely varied skills. The purpose of this article is to better understand the morphological awareness of L2 French speakers, using a replication of Bourdages & Foucambert's (2018) study. Sixty-seven English-speaking early French immersion students (ages 8-12) completed 6 different tasks traditionally used to measure morphological awareness. The data are analyzed using confirmatory factor analyses to find the model that best fits the data collected. In contrast to the results for L1 French speakers, the results show the importance of the type of unit manipulated and show that these students have poor abilities to notice and manipulate morphological units. Our discussion focuses on strategies to promote the development of morphological awareness in the immersion program. More generally, we argue that metalinguistic activity should be a focus of immersion programs, as these abilities support language production and comprehension.
Keywords:
- morphological awareness,
- dimensionality of language skills,
- metalinguistic skills,
- language performance,
- cognition,
- immersion classes
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Apel, K. (2014). A Comprehensive Definition of Morphological Awareness. Topics in Language Disorders, 34, 197-209. Apothéloz, D. (2002). La construction du lexique français. Principes de morphologie dérivationnelle. Paris, France : Ophrys.
- Apel, K., Diehm, E. et Apel, L. (2013). Using Multiple Measures of Morphological Awareness to Assess its Relation to Reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(1), 42-56.
- Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E.B., Brimo, D. et Perrin, N.A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25, 1283-1305.
- Bae, H. S. et Joshi, R. M. (2017). Role of morphological awareness in biliteracy development: Within- and cross-language perspectives among Korean ESL learners in grades five and six. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 21-31.
- Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
- Berthiaume, R., Besse, A.-S. et Daigle, D. (2010). L'évaluation de la conscience morphologique: proposition d'une typologie des tâches. Language Awareness, 19(3), 153-170.
- Berthiaume, R., Bourcier, A. et Daigle, D. (2018). Morphological processing tasks and measurement issues. Dans R. Berthiaume, D. Daigle et A. Desrochers (Eds.), Morphological Processing and Literacy Development: Current Issues and Research (49-87). New York: Routledge.
- Bourdages, R. et Foucambert, D. (2018). Regard sur les dimensions sous-jacentes dans les épreuves de conscience morphologique. SHS Web of Conferences, 46.
- Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R. et Deacon, S. H. (2010). The Effects of Morphological Instruction on Literacy Skills: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144-179.
- Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. Dans L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Casalis, S. et Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.
- Casalis, S., Mathiot, E., Bécavin, A-S., et Colé, P. (2003). Conscience morphologique chez des apprentis lecteurs tout-venant et en difficultés. Silexicales, 3, 57-66.
- Chomsky, N. et Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
- Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C. et Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l'apprentissage de la lecture chez l'apprenti-lecteur français du CP au CE2. L'année psychologique, 104(4), 701-750.
- Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R. et Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength of weakness? Learning, Cognition and Dyslexia. 192-211.
- Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L. et Kirby, J. (2009). Flexibility in young second-language learners: examining the language specificity of orthographic processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 215-229.
- Diamanti, V., Benaki, A., Mouzaki, A., Ralli, A., Antoniou, F., Papaioannou, S. et Protopapas, A. (2018). Development of early morphological awareness in Greek: Epilinguistic versus metalinguistic and inflectional versus derivational awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 545‑567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000522
- Dicks, J. et Genesee, F. (2017). Bilingual Education in Canada. Dans O. García, A. M. Y. Lin et S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and Multilingual Education (453-467). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S. et Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(3), 405-440.
- Fejzo, A. (2015). The contribution of morphological awareness to the spelling of morphemes and morphologically complex words in French. Reading and Writing, 29, 207–228.
- Fejzo, A., Desrochers, A. et Deacon, S. H. (2018). The acquisition of derivational morphology in children. Dans R. Berthiaume, D. Daigle et A. Desrochers (Eds.), Morphological Processing and Literacy Development: Current Issues and Research (pp. 112-132). New York: Routledge.
- Foucambert, D. et Bourdages, R., (2017). Logix© (version 1.0) [Logiciel informatique], Montréal.
- Gombert, J. É. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Gombert, J. É., Gaux, C. et Demont, E. (1994). Capacités métalinguistiques et lecture : quels liens ? Repères, 9, 61-73.
- Green, L., D., McCutchen, C., Schwiebert, T., Quinlan, A., Eva-Wood, A. et Juelis, J. (2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 452–761.
- Harley, B. (1992). Patterns of Second Language Development in French Immersion. Journal of French Language Studies, 2, 159-183.
- Jeon, E. (2011). Contribution of Morphological Awareness to Second-Language Reading Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 217-235.
- Juan-Garau, M. et Lyster, R. (2019). Becoming bilingual through additive immersive programs. Dans A. De Houwer et L. Ortega (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism (213–232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23(2), 95-147.
- Kemp, N. (2006). Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading & Writing, 19, 737-765.
- Kieffer, M.J., Petscher, Y., Proctor, C.P. et Silverman, R.D. (2016). Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts? Modeling the Contributions of Language Comprehension Skills to Reading Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1-19.
- Lam, K. et Chen, X. (2018). The crossover effects of morphological awareness on vocabulary development among children in French immersion. Reading & Writing, 31, 1893-1921.
- Levesque, K.C., Kieffer, M.J. et Deacon, S.H. (2018). Inferring meaning from meaning meaningful parts: The contributions of morphological skills to the development of children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54, 63-80.
- Llombart-Huesca, A. (2017). Morphological awareness and spelling in Spanish heritage language learners. Linguistics and Education, 37, 11-21.
- Lyster, R. (2004). Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 321-341.
- Lyster, R. (2008). Evolving perspectives on learning French as a second language through immersion. Dans D. Ayoun (Ed.), Studies in French applied linguistics (3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Lyster, R. (2011). Content-based second language teaching. Dans E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, (2ème édition, 611–630). New York: Routledge.
- Lyster, R., Quiroga, J. et Ballinger, S. (2013). The effects of biliteracy instruction on morphological awareness. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(2), 169-197.
- Maynard, C., Brissaud, C. et Armand, F. (2018). The acquisition of inflectional morphology in children. Dans R. Berthiaume, D. Daigle et A. Desrochers (Eds.), Morphological Processing and Literacy Development: Current Issues and Research (91-111).
- McBride–Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W. Y. et Shu, H. U. A. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 415-435.
- Muse, A. E. (2005). The nature of morpholological knowledge. Florida State University, Tallahassee.
- Oliveira, M., Levesque, K. C., Deacon, S. H. et da Mota, M. M. P. E. (2020). Evaluating models of how morphological awareness connects to reading comprehension: A study in Portuguese. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(2), 161-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12296
- Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213-237. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.3.01par
- Roy, C. et Labelle, M. (2007). Connaissance de la morphologie dérivationnelle chez les francophones et non-francophones de 6 à 8 ans. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 263-291.
- Scheidnes, M. (2020). Sentence repetition and non-word repetition in early total French immersion. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 107–131.
- Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, E. L. et Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 959-988.
- StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
- Thomas, A. (2021). Input Issues in the Development of L2 French Morphosyntax. Languages, 6.
- Tibi, S. et Kirby, J. R. (2017). Morphological awareness: Construct and predictive validity in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1019-1043.
- Tighe, E. L. et Schatschneider, C. (2015). Exploring the Dimensionality of Morphological Awareness and Its Relations to Vocabulary Knowledge in Adult Basic Education Students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 293-311.
- Tong, X., McBride, C., Ho, C. S.-h., Waye, M. M. Y., Chung, K. K. H., Wong, S. W. L. et Chow, B. W. Y. (2018). Within- and cross-language contributions of morphological awareness to word reading and vocabulary in Chinese–English bilingual learners. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1765-1786.