Résumés
Résumé
Nous passons en revue les effets de trois mécanismes incitatifs sur les efforts fournis par les travailleurs dans un cadre collectif. À cet égard nous présentons les cadres d’analyses retenus et les principaux résultats expérimentaux obtenus dans le cadre de rémunérations individuelles, relatives puis collectives.
Abstract
We present the effects of three incentives schemes on the efforts exerted by workers in a collective framework. To that purpose, we present the retained framework and the main experimental results under individual incentives, relative incentives and finally collective incentives.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Abeler, J., S. Altmann, S. Kube et M. Wibral (2010), « Gift Exchange and Workers’ Fairness Concerns: When Equality is Unfair », Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(6) : 1299-1324.
- Adams, J. S. (1965), « Inequity in Social Exchange », in L. Berkowitz (éd.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, p. 267-299.
- Ahn, T., R. M. Isaac et T. C. Salmon (2008), « Endogenous Group Formation », Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(2) : 171-194.
- Ahn, T. K., R. M. Isaac et T. Salmon (2009), « Coming and Going: Experiments on Endogenous Group Sizes for Excludable Public Goods », Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2) : 336-351.
- Akerlof, G. (1982), « Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange », Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4) : 543-569.
- Akerlof, G. et J. Yellen (1990), « The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment », Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2) : 255-283.
- Anderson, L. R., J. M. Mellor et J. Milyo (2004), « Social Capital and Contributions in a Public-Goods Experiment », American Economic Review, 94(2) : 373-376.
- Andreoni, J. et B. D. Bernheim (2009), « Social Image and the 50–50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects », Econometrica, 77(5) : 1607-1636.
- Andreoni, J. et R. Petrie (2004), « Public Goods Experiments Without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising », Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8) : 1605-1623.
- Bandiera, O., I. Barankay et I. Rasul (2007), « Incentives for Managers and Inequality among Workers: Evidence from a Firm-Level Experiment », The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2) : 729-773.
- Bandiera, O., I. Barankay et I. Rasul (2013), « Team Incentives: Evidence from a Firm Level Experiment », Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5) : 1079-1114.
- Barankay, I. (2012), « Rank Incentives: Evidence from a Randomized Workplace Experiment », Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
- Bellemare, C., P. Lepage et B. Shearer (2010), « Peer Pressure, Incentives, and Gender: An Experimental Analysis of Motivation in the Workplace », Labour Economics, 17 (1) : 276-283.
- Bewley, T. (1999), Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bonein, A. (2014), « Social Comparison and Peer Effects with Heterogeneous ability », CREM working paper 2014-11.
- Brekke, K. A., K. E. Hauge, J. T. Lind et K. Nyborg (2011), « Playing with the Good Guys. A Public Good Game with Endogenous Group Formation », Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10) : 1111-1118.
- Brosig, J., M. Margreiter, et J. Weimann, J (2005), « Endogenous Group Formation and the Provision of Public Goods : The Role of Promises and Lies », mimeo.
- Bull, C., A. Schotter et K. weigelt (1987), « Tournaments and Piece Rates: An Experimental Study », Journal of Political Economy, 95(1) : 1-33.
- Cahuc, P. et B. S. Dormont (1997), « Profit-sharing: Does it Increase Productivity and Employment? A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence on French Micro Data », Labour Economics, 4(3) : 293-319.
- Campbell III, C. M et K. S. Kamlani (1997), « The Reasons for Wage Rigidity: Evidence from a Survey of Firms », The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3) : 759-789.
- Carpenter, J., P. Matthews et J. Schirm (2010), « Tournaments and Office Politics: Evidence from a Real Effort Experiment », American Economic Review, 100 (1) : 504-517.
- Cason, T. N., R. M. Sheremeta et J. Zhang (2012), « Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games », Games and Economic Behavior, 76(1) : 26-43.
- Chan, T. Y., J. Li et L. Pierce (2014), « Compensation and Peer Effects in Competing Sales Teams », à paraître dans Management Science.
- Chao, H. et R. Croson (2013), « An Experimental Comparison of Incentive Contracts in Partnerships », Journal of Economic Psychology, 34 : 78-87.
- Charness, G. et P. Kuhn (2007), « Does Pay Inequality Affect Worker Effort? Experimental Evidence », Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4) : 693-723.
- Charness, G. et P. Kuhn (2011), « Lab Labor: What Can Labor Economists Learn From the Lab », in Ashenfelter, O. et D. Card (éds), Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, p. 229-330.
- Charness, G. et C-L. Yang (2014), « Starting Small Toward Voluntary Formation of Efficient Large Groups in Public Goods Provision », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 102 : 119-132.
- Charness, G., T. Gross et C. Guo (2014), « Merit Pay and Wage Compression with Productivity Differences and Uncertainty », mimeo.
- Chowdhury, S. M et O. Gurtler (2013), « Sabotage in Contests: A Survey », University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics, working paper series 051.
- Cinyabuguma, M., T. Page et L. Putterman (2005), « Cooperation under the Threat of Expulsion in a Public Goods Experiment », Journal of Public Economics, 89(8) : 1421-1435.
- Cochard, F., H. Couprie et A. Hopfensitz (2009), « Do Spouses Cooperate? And If Not: Why? », TSE Working Papers 09-134.
- Cohn, A., E. Fehr et L. Goette, (2014), « Fair Wages and Effort Provision: Combining Evidence from the Lab and the Field », Management Science, à paraître.
- Corgnet, B., R. Hernán González et S. Rassenti (2013), « Peer Pressure and Moral Hazard in Teams: Experimental Evidence », Working Papers 13-01, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Coricelli, G., D. Fehr et G. Fellner (2004), « Partner Selection in Public Goods Experiments », Journal of Conflict Resolution 48(3) : 356-378.
- Croson, R., E. Fatás et T. Neugebauer (2006). « Excludability And Contribution: A Laboratory Study in Team Production », mimeo.
- Dasgupta, P, (1986). « The Theory of Technological Competition ». in J. E. Stiglitz et G. F. Mathewson, Theoretically Optimal but Behaviorally Fragile. Maastricht University, working paper
- Eckel, C. C. et P. J. Grossman (2005), « Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(3) : 371-392.
- Eriksson, T., A. Poulsen et M. C. Villeval (2009), « Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence », Labour Economics, 16(6) : 679-688.
- Falk, A., E. Fehr et U. Fischbacher (2005), « Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions », Econometrica, 73(6) : 2017-2030.
- Falk, A. E., E. Fehr et D. Huffman (2008), « The Power and Limits of Tournament Incentives », mimeo.
- Falk, A., et A. Ichino (2006), « Clean Evidence on Peer Effects », Journal of Labor Economics, 24(1) : 39-57.
- Fehr, E. et U. Fischbacher (2004a), « Social Norms and Human Cooperation », Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4) : 185-190.
- Fehr, E. et U. Fischbacher (2004b), « Third-Party Punishment and Social Norms », Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2) : 63-87.
- Fehr, E. et S. Gächter (2000), « Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments », American Economic Review, 90(4) : 980-994.
- Fehr, E., L. Goette et C. Zehnder, C (2009), « A Behavioral Account of the Labor Market: The Role of Fairness Concerns », Annual Review of Economics, 1 : 355–384.
- Fehr, E., G. Kirchsteiger et A. Riedl (1993), « Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation », Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2) : 437-460.
- Fershtman, C. et U. Gneezy (2011), « The Trade-off between Performance and Quitting in High-Power Tournaments », Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2) : 318-336.
- Fischbacher, U. et S. Gächter (2010), « Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments », American Economic Review, 100(1) : 541-556.
- Fischbacher, U., S. Gächter et E. Fehr (2001), « Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment », Economic Letters, 71(3) : 397-404.
- Gächter, S., B. Herrmann et C. Thöni (2004), « Trust, Voluntary Cooperation, and Socio-Economic Background: Survey and Experimental Evidence », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(4) : 505-531.
- Gächter, S., D. Nosenzo et M. Sefton (2012), « The Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity », Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(4) : 1346-1367.
- Gächter, S., D. Nosenzo et M. Sefton (2013), « Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences? », Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3) : 548-573.
- Gächter, S. et C. Thöni (2010), « Social Comparison and Performance: Experimental Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(3) : 531-543.
- Gächter, S. et C. Thöni (2014), « Peer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation », CESifo working paper 4741.
- Georganas, S., M. Tonin et M. Vlassopoulos (2013), « Peer Pressure and Productivity: The Role of Observing and Being Observed », IZA Discussion Papers 7523.
- Gerchak, Y. et Q-M. He (2003), « When will the Range of Prizes in Tournaments Increase in the Noise or in the Number of Players? », International Game Theory Review, 5(2) : 1-15.
- Gill, D. et V. Prowse (2012), « A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition », American Economic Review, 102(1) : 469-503.
- Glaeser, E., D. Laibson et B. Sacerdote (2002), « An Economic Approach to Social Capital », Economic Journal, 112(483) : 437-458.
- Glaeser, E., D. Laibson, J. Scheinkman et C. Soutter (2000), « Measuring Trust », Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3) : 811-846.
- Goerg, S. J., S. Kube et R. Zultan (2010), « Treating Equals Un-equally: Incentives in Teams, Workers’ Motivation, and Production Technology », Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4) : 747-772.
- Greiner, B., A. Ockenfels, A et P. Werner (2011), « Wage Transparency and Performance: A Real-effort Experiment », Economics Letters, 111(3) : 236-238.
- Guala, F., L. Mittone et M. Ploner (2013), « Group Membership, Team Preferences, and Expectations », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86 : 183-190.
- Gunnthorsdöttir, A., D. Houser et K. McCabe (2007), « Disposition, History and Contributions in Public Goods Experiments », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62(2) : 304-315.
- Gürtler, O. et C. Harbring (2010), « Feedback in Tournaments under Commitment Problems: Experimental Evidence », Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19(3) : 771-810.
- Hamilton, B. H., J. A. Nickerson et H. Owan (2003), « Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation », Journal of Political Economy, 111(3) : 465-497.
- Harbring, C (2006), « The Effect of Communication in Incentive Systems: An Experimental Study », Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(5) : 333-353.
- Harbring, C., et B. Irlenbusch (2003), « An Experimental Study on Tournament Design », Labour Economics, 10(4) : 443-464.
- Harbring, C. et B. Irlenbusch (2005), « Incentives in Tournaments with Endogenous Prize Selection », Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 161(4) : 636-663.
- Harbring, C. et B. Irlenbusch (2008), « How Many Winners are Good to Have? On Tournaments with Sabotage », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3-4) : 682-702.
- Harbring, C. et B. Irlenbusch (2011), « Sabotage in Tournaments: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment », Management Science, 57(4) : 611-627.
- Hillman, A. L. et J. G. Riley (1989), « Politically Contestable Rents and Transfers », Economics and Politics, 1 : 17-39.
- Hirshleifer, J. et J. G. Riley (1978), « Elements of the Theory of Auctions and Contests », UCLA Economics Working papers 118.
- Holmström, B. (1982), « Moral Hazard in Teams », Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2) : 324-340.
- Jacquemet N., O. L’Haridon et I. Viadelle (2014), « Marché du travail, évaluation et économie expérimentale », Revue Française d’Économie, XXIX(1) : 189-226.
- Johnson, D. et T. Salmon (2014), « Sabotage vs Discouragement: Which Dominates Post Promotion Tournament Behavior? », Working Papers University of Calgary, 2013-31.
- Kalra, A. et M. Shi (2001), « Designing Optimal Sales Contests: A Theoretical Perspective », Marketing Science, 20 : 170-193.
- Kandel, E. et E. P. Lazear (1992), « Peer Pressure and Partnerships », Journal of Political Economy, 100(4) : 801-817.
- Konrad, K. A. (2009), Strategy and Dynamics in Contests, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kuhnen, C. M. et A. Tymula (2012), « Feedback, Self-Esteem and Performance in Organizations », Management Science, 58(1) : 94-113.
- Lazear, E. P. (1986), « Salaries and Piece Rates », The Journal of Business, 59(3) : 405-431.
- Lazear, E. P. (2000), « Performance Pay and Productivity », American Economic Review, 90(5) : 1346-1361.
- Lazear, E.P. et S. Rosen (1981), « Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts », Journal of Political Economy, 89(5) : 841-864.
- Lazear, E. et K. Shaw (2007), « Personnel Economics: The Economist’s View of Human Resources », Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4) : 91-114.
- Ledyard, J. (1995), « Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research », in A. Roth, et J. Kagel (éds), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press.
- Lim, N., M. Ahearne et S.H. Ham (2009), « Designing Sales Contests: Does the Prize Structure Matter? » Journal of Marketing Research, 46 : 356-371.
- List, J.A., D. van Soest, J. Stoop et H. Zhou (2014), « On the Role of Group Size in Tournaments: Theory and Evidence from Lab and Field Experiments », NBER Working Paper 20008.
- Manski, C. F. (1993), « Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem », Review of Economic Studies, 60(3) : 531-542.
- Mas, A. et E. Moretti (2009), « Peers at Work », American Economic Review, 99(1) : 112-145.
- Maximiano, S., R. Sloof et J. Sonnemans (2007), « Gift Exchange in a MultiWorker Firm », Economic Journal, 117(522) : 1025-1050.
- Murphy K. J. (1999), « Executive Compensation »,in O. Ashenfelter et D. Card (éds), Handbook of Labor Economics, 3 : 2485-2563.
- Nalbantian, H. R. et A. Schotter (1997), « Productivity under Group Incentives: An Experimental Study », American Economic Review, 87(3) : 314-341.
- Nalebuff, B. J. et J. E. Stiglitz (1983), « Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition », Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1) : 21-43.
- Nosenzo, D. (2010), « The Impact of Pay Comparisons on Effort Behavior », Working Paper 2010-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Oliveira, A. D., R. T. A. Croson et C. C. Eckel (2014), « One Bad Apple: Heterogeneity and Information in Public Good Provision », Experimental Economics, à paraître.
- Önes, U. et L. Putterman (2007), « The Ecology of Collective Action: A Public Goods and Sanctions Experiment with Controlled Group Formation », Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62(4) : 495-521.
- Orrison, A., A. Schotter et K. Weigelt (2004), « Multiperson Tournaments: An Experimental Examination », Management Science, 50(2) : 268-279.
- Owens, M. (2012), « Responsibility-Alleviation and Other-Regarding Preferences with Peer Workers in Labor Markets: An Experimental Investigation », Journal of Labor Research, 33(3) : 353-369.
- Page, T., L. Putterman et B. Unel (2005), « Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry, and Efficiency », Economic Journal, 115(506) : 1032-1053.
- Riedl, A. et A. Ule (2002), « Exclusion and Cooperation in Social Network Experiments », mimeo.
- Rosen, S. (1986), « Prizes and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments », American Economic Review, 76(4) : 701-715.
- Rosen, S. (1987), « The Theory of Equalizing Differences », in O. Ashenfelter et R. Layard (éds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Elsevier.
- Schotter, A. et K. Weigelt (1992), « Asymmetric Tournaments, Equal Opportunity Laws and Affirmative Action: Some Experimental Results », Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2) : 511-539.
- Selten, R. (1967), « Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments », inSauermann, H. (éd.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Tübingen : Mohr, p. 136-168.
- Sheremeta, R. M. et S. Y. Wu (2011), « Optimal Tournament Design and Incentive Response: An Experimental Investigation of Canonical Tournament Theory », Chapman University, ESI Working Paper.
- Sherstyuk, K., O. Hill, M. Dowling et L. Ma (2002), « Altruism and Voluntary Provision of Public Goods », Economics Bulletin, 3(31) : 1-8.
- Skaperdas, S. (1996), « Contest Success Functions », Economic Theory, 7(2) : 283-290.
- Smith, A. (2011), « Group Composition and Conditional Cooperation », The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(5) : 616-622.
- Sutter, M. et C. Strassmair (2009), « Communication, Cooperation and Collusion in Team Tournaments: An Experimental Study », Games and Economic Behavior, 66(1) : 506-525.
- Tullock, G. (1980), « Efficient Rent Seeking », inJ. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, G. Tullock, (éds), Toward a Theory of the Rent-seeking Society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, p. 97-112.
- van Dijk, F., J. Sonnemans et F. Van Winden (2001), « Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment », European Economic Review, 45(2) : 187-214.
- Via Delle, I., L. Santos-Pinto et J-L. Rullière (2011), « Self-Confidence and Teamwork: An Experimental Test », Gate Working Paper 1126.
- Weigelt, K., J. Dukerich et A. Schotter (1989), « Reactions to Discrimination in an Incentive Pay Compensation Scheme : A Game-Theoretic Approach », Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(1) : 26-44.