Résumés
Abstract
A nagging question for cognitive semiotics is, “What is the relationship between social structure and agency?” Answers to that question are as elusive as they are essential for explaining the social cognitive facets of meaningful interactions. Elusive in the sense that the social sciences have traditionally lacked ontological rigor in the investigation of social structures and their relationship to individuals. Indeed, the very idea of a social structure is a hotly contested ground. Critical in the sense that many participants within the cognitive semiotics programme aim to explain meaning-making as an emergent property of coordinated activities within normative institutions and organizations. This article aims to provide some measure of ontological rigor to social cognitive semiotics from a critical realist perspective as it applies to the semiotics of money and finance.
Keywords:
- Critical Realism,
- C. S. Peirce,
- Thorstein Veblen,
- Money,
- Late Capitalist Economies
Résumé
Une question récurrente pour la sémiotique cognitive est : “Quelle est la relation entre la structure sociale et l’agentivité?” Les réponses à cette question sont aussi insaisissables qu’elles sont essentielles pour expliquer les facettes cognitivo-sociales des interactions signifiantes. Elles sont insaisissables au sens où les sciences sociales ont traditionnellement manqué de rigueur ontologique dans l’étude des structures sociales et de leur rapport aux individus. En effet, l’idée même de structure sociale est un terrain vivement contesté. Elles sont essentielles dans la mesure où de nombreux promoteurs de la sémiotique cognitive visent à expliquer la création de sens comme une propriété émergente d’activités coordonnées au sein d’institutions et d’organisations normatives. Cet article vise à fournir une certaine rigueur ontologique à la sémiotique cognitivo-sociale dans une perspective informée par le réalisme critique telle qu’elle s’applique à la sémiotique de l’argent et de la finance.
Mots-clés :
- Réalisme critique,
- C. S. Peirce,
- Thorstein Veblen,
- argent,
- l’économie à l’ère du capitalisme tardif
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- ARCHER, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory : The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- BHASKAR, R. (1997) A Realist Theory of Science. London : Verso.
- BHASKAR, R. (1993) Dialectic : The Pulse of Freedom. London : Verso.
- BRANDT, P. Aa. (2017) “The Meaning and Madness of Money : A Semio-Ecological Account”. Cognitive Semiotics (10)2 : 141-168.
- BRANDT, P. Aa. (2017) “More on Money : A Response to Oakley”. Cognitive Semiotics (10)2 : 205- 208.
- ELDER-VASS, D. (2012) The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- ELDER-VASS, D. (2010) The Causal Powers of Social Structures. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- GRIFFIN, R. (1998) “What Veblen Owed Peirce : The Social Theory of Logic”. Journal of Economic Issues (32)3 : 733-757.
- HODGSON, G. (2004) The Evolution of Institutional Economics : Agency, Structure, and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London : Routledge.
- LAWSON, T. (2016) “Social Positioning and the Nature of Money”. Journal of Economic Issues (40)4 : 961-996.
- LEVINE, M. (2020) “WeWon’t”. In Bloomberg Opinion, New York April 7 : https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-07/wework-wants-softbank-s-money
- LIETS, N. G., and BRACKEN, S. (2019) “Why WeWork Won’t”. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge. (PDF)
- MOUZELIS, N. (1995) Sociological Theory : What Went Wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies. London : Routledge.
- NELLHAUS, T. (1998) “Signs, Social Ontology, and Critical Realism”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior (28)1 : 1-24.
- NITZEN, J., and BICHLER, S. (2009) Capital as Power : A Study of Order and Creorder. London : Routledge.
- OAKLEY, T. 2022) “The Semiotics of Money and Finance”. In Bloomsbury Semiotics Volume 2 : Semiotics in the Natural and Technical Sciences. S. W. Mathews (Ed.) London : Bloomsbury.
- OAKLEY, T. (2020) Rhetorical Minds : Meditations on the Cognitive Science of Persuasion. Oxford : Berghahn.
- OAKLEY, T. (2017) “Debtors, Creditors, and Sovereign Money : A Case for Institutional Blending and the Amalgamated Mind”. Cognitive Semiotics (10)2 : 169-203.
- PARKER, K. (1994) “Peirce’s Semeiotic and Ontology”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30.1 : 51-75.
- PEIRCE, C.S. (1965-66) Collected Papers 8 Volumes. Ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- RYAN-COLLINS, T., GREENHAM, T., WERNER, R., and JACKSON, A. (2012) Where Does Money Come From? London : New Economics Foundation.
- SAVAN, D. (1983) “Toward a Refutation of Semiotic Idealism”. RSSI Recherche Sémiotiques/ Semiotic Inquiry 3 : 1-8.
- SMITH, C. (2010) What is a Person? : Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
- VEBLEN, T. (1958), Theory of the Business Enterprise. New York : Mentor.
- VEBLEN, T. (1914) The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York : Macmillan.
- VEBLEN, T. (1899) Theory of the Leisure Class. New York : Macmillan.