Résumés
Résumé
Dans cet article, les auteures proposent un regard transdisciplinaire sur l’esthétigramme, un outil méthodologique de recherche qui sert aussi de dispositif d’enseignement et d’apprentissage. Leur revue de la littérature fait la lumière sur les apports de l’esthétigramme dans les domaines de l’enseignement des arts visuels, de la littérature, de la littératie numérique et des mathématiques. Cet article vise à montrer le potentiel d’application transversale de l’esthétigramme, à la fois comme outil méthodologique de recherche et comme dispositif d’enseignement dans différentes disciplines.
Mots-clés :
- processus d’apprentissage,
- esthétigramme,
- phénoménologie,
- métacognition,
- méthodologie qualitative
Abstract
In this article, the authors adopt a transdisciplinary approach toward aesthetigrams, a research strategy that identifies and situates participants’ learning processes in teaching and learning contexts. The literature review sheds light on the use of aesthetigrams in visual arts, literature, digital literacy, and mathematics. This article aims to demonstrate the potential for cross-disciplinary application of the aesthetigrams, both as a research methodology and a teaching strategy.
Keywords:
- learning processes,
- aesthetigram,
- phenomenology,
- metacognition,
- qualitative methodologies
Resumen
En este artículo, las autoras ofrecen una mirada transdisciplinaria al estetigrama, una herramienta metodológica de investigación que también sirve como dispositivo de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Su revisión de la literatura arroja luz sobre las contribuciones del estetigrama en los campos de la enseñanza de las artes visuales, la literatura, la alfabetización digital y las matemáticas. Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar el potencial de aplicación transversal del estetigrama, tanto como herramienta metodológica de investigación como dispositivo de enseñanza en diferentes disciplinas.
Palabras clave:
- procesos de aprendizaje,
- estetigrama,
- fenomenología,
- metacognición,
- metodología cualitativa
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Albin-Clark, J. (2021). What is documentation doing? Early childhood education teachers shifting from and between the meanings and actions of documentation practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 22(2), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120917157
- Drotner, K. (2012). Processual methodologies and digital forms of learning. Dans O. Erstad et J. Sefton-Green (dir.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (p. 39-56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026239
- Lemieux, A. (2015). Think it through: Fostering aesthetic experiences to raise interest in literature at the high school level. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 12(2), 66-93. http://jcacs.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jcacs/article/view/37301/36029
- Lemieux, A. (2016). Moments de réception en lecture et en spectature : le cas d’Incendies au CEGEP. Multimodalités, 3. https://revuemultimodalites.com/articles/moment-de-reception-en-lecture-et-en-spectature-e-cas-dincendies-au-cegep1
- Lemieux, A. (2017). In-class film-viewing for empathy development in higher education. Canadian Review of Art Education, 44(1), 64-73. http://crae.mcgill.ca/article/download/9/80
- Lemieux, A. (2020). De/constructing literacies: Considerations for engagement. Peter Lang.
- Lemieux, A. et Rowsell, J. (2020). On the relational autonomy of materials: Entanglements in maker literacies research. Literacy, 54(3), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12226
- Lemieux, A., Smith, A., McLean, C. et Rowsell, J. (2020). Visualizing mapping as pedagogy for literacy futures. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 35(2), 36-58. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/841
- Lemieux, A. (2021a). Antidualisms in maker literacies research: Technological processes, materialities, mappings. Education & didactique, 15(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.7996
- Lemieux, A. (2021b). What does making produce? Posthuman insights into documenting relationalities in maker education for teachers. Professional Development in Education, 47(2-3), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1886155
- Lemieux, A. et Thériault, V. (2021). W(e)aving: When maker literacies and diffraction collide. Studies in the Education of Adults, 53(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2021.1921446
- Lemieux, A. et Mason, S. (2022). When in doubt, map it out: Teachers’ digital storytelling researched through documentation. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28002
- McGregor, S. L. T. (2018). Understanding and evaluating research: A critical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802656
- Ricoeur, P. (1985). Temps et récit III. Le temps raconté. Seuil.
- White, B. (1998). Aesthetigrams: Mapping aesthetic experiences. Studies in Art Education, 39(4), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320237
- White, B. (2009). Aesthetics primer. Peter Lang.
- White, B. (2011). Private perceptions, public reflections: Aesthetic encounters as vehicles for shared meaning making. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12, 1-26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ962614.pdf
- White, B. (2013). Pay attention, pay attention, pay attention. Dans B. White et T. Costantino (dir.), Aesthetics, Empathy and Education (p. 99-116). Peter Lang.
- White, B. et Lemieux, A. (2017). Mapping holistic learning: An introductory guide to aesthetigrams. Peter Lang.