Résumés
Abstract
Inspired by a human-centered perspective on technological changes of work, this paper presents a theoretical effort of bridging two distinct fields: Industry 4.0 and intergenerational knowledge transmission. It contributes to the literature on knowledge management with an analysis of how Industry 4.0, as one of the new objects of the 21st century management, challenges and transforms practices of intergenerational knowledge transmission. Based on a narrative literature review, we identify four facets representing the main managerial considerations on Industry 4.0, discuss their implications for intergenerational knowledge transmission and outline avenues for future research.
Keywords:
- Intergenerational knowledge transmission,
- knowledge management,
- Industry 4.0,
- human-centered perspectives
Résumé
Inspiré par une perspective centrée sur l’humain quant aux changements technologiques du travail, cet article présente un effort théorique de rapprochement entre deux domaines distincts : l’Industrie 4.0 et la transmission intergénérationnelle des connaissances. Il contribue à la littérature sur la gestion des connaissances en analysant comment l’Industrie 4.0, en tant que nouvel objet de la gestion du 21e siècle, remet en question et transforme les pratiques de transmission intergénérationnelle des connaissances. Sur la base d’une revue de littérature narrative, nous identifions quatre facettes représentant les considérations managériales principales sur l’Industrie 4.0, discutons de leurs implications pour la transmission intergénérationnelle des connaissances et proposons des pistes de recherches futures.
Mots-clés :
- transmission intergénérationnelle des connaissances,
- gestion des connaissances,
- Industrie 4.0,
- perspectives centrées sur l’humain
Resumen
Inspirado en una perspectiva centrada en el ser humano sobre los cambios tecnológicos del trabajo, este artículo presenta un esfuerzo teórico para conectar dos campos distintos: La Industria 4.0 y la transmisión intergeneracional del conocimiento. Contribuye a la literatura sobre la gestión del conocimiento con un análisis de cómo la Industria 4.0, como uno de los nuevos objetos de la gestión del siglo XXI, desafía y transforma las prácticas de transmisión intergeneracional del conocimiento. Basándonos en una revisión narrativa de la literatura, identificamos cuatro facetas que representan las principales consideraciones de gestión sobre la Industria 4.0, discutimos sus implicaciones para la transmisión intergeneracional del conocimiento y esbozamos vías de investigación futura.
Palabras clave:
- Transmisión intergeneracional del conocimiento,
- gestión del conocimiento,
- Industria 4.0,
- perspectivas centradas en el ser humano
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- *Abele, E., Metternich, J., & Tisch, M. (2019). Learning Factories—Concepts, Guidelines, Best-Practice Examples. Springer International Publishing.
- *Agostini, L., & Filippini, R. (2019). Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0030
- Andriani, M., Christiandy, A., Wiratmadja, I., & Sunaryo, I. (2022). Knowledge Management Effectiveness Model in facilitating Generation Differences. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2129494
- *Ansari, F. (2019). Knowledge Management 4.0: Theoretical and Practical Considerations in Cyber Physical Production Systems. IFAC PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1597–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.428
- Anthony, C. (2021). When Knowledge Work and Analytical Technologies Collide: The Practices and Consequences of Black Boxing Algorithmic Technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 1173–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755
- Autor, D. H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43550118
- Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767
- Baskerville, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(2), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500090
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
- Beane, M. (2019). Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217751692
- Beazley, H., Boenisch, J., & Hardan, D. (2002). Continuity management: preserving corporate knowledge and productivity when employees leave. Wiley.
- Becker, K. (2018). Organizational Unlearning: Time to Expand Our Horizons? Learning Organization, 25(3), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-10-2017-0095
- * Blanchet, M. (2016). Industrie 4.0. Nouvelle donne industrielle, nouveau modèle économique. Outre-Terre, 46(1), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.3917/oute1.046.0062
- Bootz, J.-P., Michel, S., Pallud, J., & Monti, R. (2022). Possible changes of Industry 4.0 in 2030 in the face of uberization: Results of a participatory and systemic foresight study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 184, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121962
- Bosse, C. K., Hellge, V., & Schröder, D. (2019). Partizipation als Schlüssel zum Erfolg. Mittelstand-Digital Magazin(11), 5-11.
- Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
- *Calısş Duman, M., & Akdemir, B. (2021). A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 167, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120615
- *Capestro, M., & Kinkel, S. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Knowledge Management: A Review of Empirical Studies. In M. Bettiol, E. Di Maria, & S. Micelli (Eds.), Knowledge Management and Industry 4.0. New Paradigms for Value Creation (Vol. 9, pp. 19–52). Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Carlile, P. R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
- Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
- De Long, D. W., & Davenport, T. (2003). Better practices for retaining organizational knowledge: Lessons from the leading edge. Employment Relations Today, 30(3), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.10098
- Dragicevic, N., Ullrich, A., Tsui, E., & Gronau, N. (2020). A conceptual model of knowledge dynamics in the industry 4.0 smart grid scenario. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1633893
- Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (2011). Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Second ed.). Wiley.
- Ebrahimi, M., Saives, A. L., & Holford, W. D. (2008). Qualified ageing workers in the knowledge management process of high-tech businesses. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810859569
- Ermine, J. L. (2010). Une démarche pour le transfert intergénérationnel des savoirs. Téléscope, 16(1), 83-107.
- *Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162
- Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
- Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
- Fiol, M., & O’Connor, E. (2017). Unlearning Established Organizational Routines—Part I. Learning Organization, 24(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2016-0056
- *Flores, E., Xu, X., & Lu, Y. (2020). Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0309
- Foray, D. (2009). L’économie de la connaissance: La Découverte.
- *Foresti, F., & Varvakis, G. (2018). Ubiquity and Industry 4.0. In K. North, R. Maier, & O. Haas (Eds.), Knowledge Management in Digital Change: New Findings and Practical Cases (pp. 343–358). Springer International Publishing.
- Frank, H., & Hatak, I. (2014). Doing a research literature review. In A. Fayolle & M. Wright (Eds.), How to get published in the best entrepreneurship journals: a guide to steer your academic career (pp. 94–117). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- *Franken, R., & Franken, S. (2018). Wandel von Mangementfunktionen im Kontext der Digitalisierung. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, P. Ittermann, & J. Niehaus (Eds.), Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit. Die Vision Industrie 4.0 und ihre sozialen Herausforderungen (2nd ed., pp. 99-120). Nomos.
- Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
- Gerpott, F. H., & Fasbender, U. (2020). Intergenerational learning in age-diverse meetings: A social comparison perspective. In A. L. Meinecke, J. A. Allen, & N. Lehmann-Willenbrock (Eds.), Managing Meetings in Organizations (Vol. 20, pp. 185–206). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Voelpel, S. C. (2017). A Phase Model of Intergenerational Learning in Organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0185
- Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Wenzel, R., & Voelpel, S. C. (2021). Age diversity and learning outcomes in organizational training groups: the role of knowledge sharing and psychological safety. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(18), 3777–3804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1640763
- Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
- *Harteis, C., & Fischer, C. (2017). Wissensmanagement unter Bedingungen von Arbeit 4.0. In G. W. Maier, G. Engels, & E. Steffen (Eds.), Handbuch Gestaltung digitaler und vernetzter Arbeitswelten (p. 1–18). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Harvey, J.-F. (2012). Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(3), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211238733
- Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.2307/259122
- Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Ittermann, P., & Niehaus, J. (Eds.). (2018). Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit. Die Vision Industrie 4.0 und ihre sozialen Herausforderungen (2nd ed.). Nomos.
- Holford, D. W. (2020). Managing Knowledge in Organizations. A Critical Pragmatic Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
- IDW. (2021). Projekt KüSTE mit Künstlicher Intelligenz zur Erfahrungssicherung beim Generationswechsel in Unternehmen. https://nachrichten.idw-online.de/2021/07/02/projekt-kueste-mit-kuenstlicher-intelligenz-zur-erfahrungssicherung-beim-generationswechsel-in-unternehmen
- IBM. (2019). EcoPlant: Cutting energy waste by up to 50 percent. https://www.ibm.com/case-studies/ecoplant
- *Ilvonen, I., Thalmann, S., Manhart, M., & Sillaber, C. (2018). Reconciling digital transformation and knowledge protection: a research agenda. Knowledge management research & practice, 16(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1445427
- *Johansson, J., Abrahamsson, L., Bergvall Kåreborn, B., Fältholm, Y., Grane, C., & Wykowska, A. (2017). Work and Organization in a Digital Industrial Context. Management Revue, 28(3), 281–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26381577
- Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392–414. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25682421
- Julien, N., & Martin, É. (2021). L’usine du futur: Stratégies et déploiement. Industrie 4.0, de l’IoT aux jumeaux numériques (2nd ed.). Dunod.
- *Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Retrieved from https://en.acatech.de/publication/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiative-industrie-4-0-final-report-of-the-industrie-4-0-working-group/
- *Karacay, G. (2018). Talent Development for Industry 4.0. In A. Ustundag & E. Cevikcan (Eds.), Industry 4.0: Managing The Digital Transformation (p. 123–136). Springer.
- Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390305
- Knight, T., Skouteris, H., Hooley, M., & Townsend, M. (2014). The Act of Giving: A Systematic Review of Nonfamilial Intergenerational Interaction. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2014.929913
- Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
- *Kohler, D., & Weisz, J.-D. (2016). Industrie 4.0. Les défis de la transformation numérique du modèle industriel allemand. La documentation française.
- *Kohler, D., & Weisz, J. (2017). Industrie 4.0, une révolution sociétale? Allemagne d’aujourd’hui, 222(4), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.3917/all.222.0044
- *Kopp, R., Dhondt, S., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Kohlgrüber, M., & Preenen, P. (2019). Sociotechnical perspectives on digitalisation and Industry 4.0. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 16, 290. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2019.099896
- Kuyken, K., Ebrahimi, M., & Saives, A.-L. (2018). Towards a taxonomy of intergenerational knowledge transfer practices: insights from an international comparison (Germany—Quebec). The Learning Organization, 25(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2017-0023
- Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Leonard, D., & Swap, W. C. (2005). Deep Smarts: How to Cultivate and Transfer Enduring Business Wisdom. Harvard Business Press.
- Levy, M. (2011). Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111151974
- Lindner, D., Ludwig, T., & Amberg, M. (2018). Arbeit 4.0 – Konzepte für eine neue Arbeitsgestaltung in KMU. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 55(5), 1065-1085. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-0425-7
- *Maier, E., & Reimer, U. (2018). Digital Change—New Opportunities and Challenges for Tapping Experience and Lessons Learned for Organisational Value Creation. In K. North, R. Maier, & O. Haas (Eds.), Knowledge Management in Digital Change (pp. 83–96). Springer.
- Marcinkus Murphy, W. (2012). Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross-generational learning and developing millennial leaders. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21489
- McNichols, D. (2010). Optimal knowledge transfer methods: a Generation X perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015543
- *Meindl, B., Ayala, N. F., Mendonça, J., & Frank, A. G. (2021). The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 168, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120784
- Mertens, P., Barbian, D., & Baier, S. (2017). Digitalisierung und Industrie 4.0 – eine Relativierung. Springer Vieweg.
- Mitchell, H. (2007). Technology and Knowledge Management: Is Technology Just an Enabler or Does it also Add Value? In M. E. Jennex (Ed.), Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 41–47). Idea Group Publishing.
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
- Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm014
- North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2015). Intergenerational resource tensions in the workplace and beyond: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, international. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.003
- Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Trentesaux, D., Zambrano, R. G., & Millot, P. (2017). Designing intelligent manufacturing systems through Human-Machine Cooperation principles: A human-centered approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 111, 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.014
- Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
- *Pfeiffer, S. (2016). Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work. Societies, 6(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016
- *Pfeiffer, S. (2017). The Vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the Making—a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded. NanoEthics, 11(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3
- *Pfeiffer, S., & Suphan, A. (2018). Industrie 4.0 und Erfahrung – das unterschätzte Innovations- und Gestaltungspotenzial der Beschäftigten im Maschinen- und Automobilbau. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, P. Ittermann, & J. Niehaus (Eds.), Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit. Die Vision Industrie 4.0 und ihre sozialen Herausforderungen (2nd ed., pp. 275-302). Nomos.
- Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103821
- Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
- Porsche. (2020). Augmented Reality Usage Triples in Porsche Workshops Amid COVID-19. https://newsroom.porsche.com/en_US/technology/porsche-tech-live-look-augmented-reality-usage-covid-19-20702.html
- Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of corporation. Harvard Business School Reprint.
- *Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., & Krcmar, H. (2017). A Competency Model for “Industrie 4.0” Employees. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen.
- Prügl, R., & Spitzley, D. I. (2021). Responding to Digital Transformation by External Corporate Venturing: An Enterprising Family Identity and Communication Patterns Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12578
- *Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A Complex View of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987
- Roche. (2018). Reverse mentoring: it’s a two-way street. https://www.roche.com/stories/reverse-mentoring
- Rondi, E., Überbacher, R., Von Schlenk Barnsdorf, L., & Hülsbeck, M. (2021). Intergenerational Knowledge Transfer in Family Firms during Times of Digital Innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.13198abstract
- *Schallock, B., Rybski, C., Jochem, R., & Kohl, H. (2018). Learning Factory for Industry 4.0 to provide future skills beyond technical training. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.156
- *Scheer, A.-W. (2020). Unternehmung 4.0 (Vol. 3rd edition). Springer Vieweg.
- Schlegel, C., Geering, A., & Weber, U. (2021). Learning in virtual space: An intergenerational pilot project. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 38(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001433
- Schmidt, X., & Mühlfeld, K. (2017). What’s so special about intergenerational knowledge transfer? Identifying challenges of intergenerational knowledge transfer. Management Revue, 28(4), 375–411. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26407256
- * Schneider, P. (2018). Managerial challenges of industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Review of Managerial Science, 12(3), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0283-2 .
- *Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
- *Sergi, B. S., Popkova, E. G., Bogoviz, A. V., & Litvinova, T. N. (2019). Understanding Industry 4.0. AI, the Internet of Things, and the Future of Work. Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Šestáková, M. (2019). The Human Factor in Industry 4.0 and Some of Its Intergenerational Implications. Paper presented at the 14th International Workshop on Knowledge Management, Trenčín, Slovakia.
- *Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H., & Li, Y. (2017). Examining the Feasibilities of Industry 4.0 for the Hospitality Sector with the Lens of Management Practice. Energies, 10(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040499
- Simola, S. (2016). Mentoring the morally courageous: a relational cultural perspective. Career Development International, 21(4), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0010
- *Sopadang, A., Chonsawat, N., & Ramingwong, S. (2020). Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements. In D. T. Matt, V. Modrák, & H. Zsifkovits (Eds.), Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements (pp. 279–302). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Tempest, S. (2003). Intergenerational Learning A Reciprocal Knowledge Development Process that Challenges the Language of Learning. Management learning, 34(2), 181–200.
- Thomas, J. C., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (2001). The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.404.0863
- *Thornley, C., Carcary, M., Connolly, N., O’Duffy, M., & Pierce, J. (2016). Developing a Maturity Model for Knowledge Management (KM) in the Digital Age. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Belfast, Ireland.
- Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
- *Trompisch, P. (2017). Industrie 4.0 und die Zukunft der Arbeit. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 134(7), 370-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-017-0531-1
- Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00268
- Vallourec. (2019). Reverse mentors to support our digital transformation. https://www.vallourec.com/en/components/news/news_corp/2019/20191004-reverse-mentors-support-digital-transfo
- *Whysall, Z., Owtram, M., & Brittain, S. (2019). The new talent management challenges of Industry 4.0. Journal of Management Development, 38(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2018-0181
- *Wilkesmann, M., & Wilkesmann, U. (2018). Industry 4.0—organizing routines or innovations? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2017-0019
- Woodfield, P., & Husted, K. (2017). Intergenerational knowledge sharing in family firms: Case-based evidence from the New Zealand wine industry. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.001
The references tagged with an asterisk (*) are the results of the narrative literature review.