Abstracts
Abstract
In 2020, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPCC) led a joint federal-provincial investigation into privacy violations stemming from the use of facial recognition technologies. The investigation was prompted specifically by the mobilization of Clearview AI’s facial recognition software in law enforcement, including by regional police services as well as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Clearview AI’s technology is based on scraping social media images, which, as the investigation found, constitutes a privacy law violation according to provincial and federal private sector legislation. In response to the investigation, Clearview AI claimed that consent for scraping social media images was not required from users because the information is already public. This common fallacy of social media privacy serves as a pivot point for the integration of digital policy literacy into the OPCC’s digital literacy materials in order to consider the regulatory environment around digital media, alongside their political-economic and infrastructural components. Digital policy literacy is a model that expands what is typically an individual- or organization-level responsibility for privacy protection by considering the wider socio-technical context in which a company like Clearview can emerge.
Keywords:
- facial recognition,
- policy,
- digital literacy,
- regulation,
- privacy
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Agre, Philip E. 2001. Your Face Is Not a Bar Code: Arguments Against Automatic Face Recognition in Public Places. Whole Earth 106: 74–77.
- Agre, Philip E., and Marc Rotenberg, eds. 1997. Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Allen, Anita L. 1999. Coercing Privacy. William and Mary Law Review 40 (3): 723–757.
- Allen, Kate, Wendy Gillis, and Alex Boutilier. 2020. Mounties, Rexall, Small-town Cops: They’ve All Used Controversial Face-match App. Toronto Star, February 28. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/facial-recognition-app-clearview-ai-has-been-used-far-more-widely-in-canada-than-previously/article_2de39e45-4bf1-5b56-9f07-ad117454569e.html [accessed August 21, 2022].
- Andrejevic, Mark, and Neil Selwyn. 2022. Facial Recognition. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Bacchini, Fabio, and Ludovica Lorusso. 2019. Race, Again: How Face Recognition Technology Reinforces Racial Discrimination. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3): 321–335.
- Barbrook, Richard, and Andy Cameron. 1996. The Californian Ideology. Science as Culture 6 (1): 44–72.
- Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Black, Daniel. 2023. Facial Analysis: Automated Surveillance and the Attempt to Quantify Emotion. Information, Communication & Society 26 (7): 1438–1451.
- Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen. 2015. Informed Consent: We Can Do better to Defend Privacy. IEEE Security & Privacy 13 (2): 103–107.
- Brockbank, Nicole. 2021. Toronto Police Used Clearview AI Facial Recognition Software in 84 Investigations. CBC News, December 23. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-police-report-clearview-ai-1.6295295 [accessed January 31, 2023]
- Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Buckingham, David. 2007. Digital Media Literacies: Rethinking Media eEducation in the Age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education 2 (1): 43–55.
- Buolamwini, Joy, and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, New York, February 23–24, 77–91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdf [accessed February 2, 2023].
- Choi, Moonsun. 2016. A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory & Research in Social Education 44 (4): 565–607.
- Cinnamon, Jonathan. 2017. Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism. Surveillance & Society 15 (5): 609–625.
- Clement, Andrew, and Jonathan A. Obar. 2015. Canadian Internet “Boomerang” Traffic and Mass NSA Surveillance: Responding to Privacy and Network Sovereignty Challenges. In Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era, edited by Michael Geist, 13–44. Ottawa, CA: University of Ottawa Press.
- Cohen, Julie. 2016. The Surveillance-Innovation Complex: The Irony of the Participatory Turn. In The Participatory Condition in the Digital Age, edited by Darin Barney, Gabriella Coleman, Christine Ross, Jonathan Sterne, and Tamar Tembeck, 207–226. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Elmer, Greg. 2015. Scraping the First Person. In Compromised Data: From Social Media to Big Data, edited by Greg Elmer, Ganaele Langlois, and Joanna Redden, 112–125. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Eneman, Marie, Jan Ljungberg, Elena Raviola, and Bertil Rolandsson. 2022. The Sensitive Nature of Facial Recognition: Tensions Between the Swedish Police and Regulatory Authorities. Information Polity 27: 219–232.
- Gangadharan, Seeta Peña. 2014. Data-based Discrimination. In Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays, edited by Seeta Peña Gangadharan, with Virginia Eubanks, and Solon Barocas, 1–5. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.
- Hill, Kashmir. 2020. The Secretive Company that Might End Privacy as We Know It. New York Times, January 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html [accessed July 12, 2022].
- ICO [Information Commissioner’s Office (UK)]. 2022. ICO Fines Facial Recognition Database Company Clearview AI Inc more than £7.5m and Orders UK Data to be Deleted. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2022/05/ico-fines-facial-recognition-database-company-clearview-ai-inc/ [accessed July 11, 2023]
- Introna, Lucas, and David Murakami Wood. 2004. Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems. Surveillance & Society 2 (2/3): 177–198.
- Kitchin, Rob. 2014. Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts. Big Data & Society 1 (1): 1–12.
- Kosta, Eleni. 2022. Algorithmic State Surveillance: Challenging the Notion of Agency in Human Rights. Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 212–224.
- Kunelius, Risto, and Adrienne Russell. 2019. Surveillance Scandals and the Systemic Crisis of the Public. In The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal, edited by Howard Tumber and Silvio Waisbord, 295–303. London: Routledge.
- Lentz, Becky. 2014. The Media Policy Tower of Babble: A Case for “Policy Literacy Pedagogy.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 31 (2): 134–140
- Lyon, David. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Lyon, David. 2019. Surveillance Capitalism, Surveillance Culture and Data Politics. In Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights, edited by Didier Bigo, Engin Isin, and Evelyn Ruppert, 64–77. London: Routledge.
- Magnet, Shoshana. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Marks, Paul. 2021. Can the Biases in Facial Recognition be Fixed; Also, Should They? Communications of the ACM 64 (3): 20–22.
- Marx, Gary T. 2012. Foreword: Privacy is Not Quite Like the Weather. In Privacy Impact Assessment, edited by David Wright and Paul de Hert, v–xiv. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
- Maynard, Robyn. 2017. Policing Black Lives: State Violence in Canada from Slavery to the Present. Winnipeg, CA: Fernwood Publishing.
- McSorley, Tim. 2021. The Case for a Ban on Facial Recognition Surveillance in Canada. Surveillance & Society 19 (2): 250–254.
- Morozov, Evgeny. 2019. Capitalism’s New clothes. The Baffler, February 4. https://thebaffler.com/latest/capitalisms-new-clothes-morozov [accessed August 24, 2022].
- Mosco, Vincent. 2009. The Political Economy of Communication. 2nd edition. London: Sage.
- Mueller, Milton. 2022. A Critique of the “Surveillance Capitalism” Thesis: Toward a Digital Political Economy. SSRN, August 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4178467 [accessed August 24, 2022]
- Noble, Safia U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression. New York: New York University Press.
- O’Neill, Brian. 2010. Media Literacy and Communication Rights: Ethical Individualism in The New Media Environment. International Communication Gazette 72 (4–5): 323–338.
- Offices, The. 2021. Investigation Report P2021-IR-01: Joint Investigation of Clearview AI, Inc. by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, and the Information Privacy Commissioner of Alberta. February 3. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/investigations/investigations-into-businesses/2021/pipeda-2021-001/ [accessed July 13, 2022].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2011. Data at Your Fingertips: Biometrics and the Challenges to Privacy. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/health-genetic-and-other-body-information/gd_bio_201102/ [accessed July 10, 2023].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2015. A Guide for Individuals: Protecting Your Privacy. https://www.priv.gc.ca/media/2036/guide_ind_e.pdf [accessed July 10, 2023].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2016. Businesses and Your Personal Information. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/information-and-advice-for-individuals/your-privacy-rights/businesses-and-your-personal-information/ [accessed July 10, 2023].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2018. 10 Tips for Protecting Personal Information. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/information-and-advice-for-individuals/your-privacy-rights/02_05_d_64_tips/ [accessed July 10, 2023].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2019. PIPEDA Fair Information Principles. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/privacy-laws-in-canada/the-personal-information-protection-and-electronic-documents-act-pipeda/p_principle/ [accessed January 31, 2023].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2020. Joint Investigation of the Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, and the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. October 28. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/investigations/investigations-into-businesses/2020/pipeda-2020-004/ [accessed July 13, 2022].
- OPCC [Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada]. 2022. Privacy Guidance on Facial Recognition for Police Agencies. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/surveillance/police-and-public-safety/gd_fr_202205/ [accessed July 10, 2023].
- Pasquale, Frank A. 2013. Privacy, Antitrust, and Power. George Mason Law Review 20 (4): 1009–1024.
- Rezende, Isadora Neroni. 2020. Facial Recognition in Police Hands: Assessing the “Clearview Case” from a European Perspective. New Journal of European Criminal Law 11 (3): 375–389.
- Ruppert, Evelyn, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo. 2017. Data Politics. Big Data & Society 4 (2): https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749.
- Rustad, Michael L., and Thomas. H. Koenig. 2019. Towards a Global Data Privacy Standard. Florida Law Review 71 (2): 365–454.
- Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. When Data Is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction. Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–12.
- Scassa, Teresa. 2020. Data Protection and the Internet: Canada. In Data Protection in the Internet, edited by Dário Moura Vicente and Sofia de Vasconcelos Casimiro, 55–76. Cham, CH: Springer.
- Shade, Leslie Regan. 2012. Toward a Model of Digital Policy Literacy. In iConference ‘12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, Toronto, Canada, February 7–10, 459–461. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2132176.2132247 [accessed January 25, 2023].
- Shade, Leslie Regan. 2015. I Want My Internet! Young Women on the Politics of Usage-based Billing. In eGirls, eCitizens: Putting Technology, Theory and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young Women’s Voices, edited by Jane Bailey and Valerie Steeves, 411–434. Ottawa, CA: University of Ottawa Press.
- Shade, Leslie Regan, and Sharly Chan. 2020. Digital Privacy Policy Literacy: A Framework for Canadian Youth. In The Handbook of Media Education Research, edited by Divina Frau-Meigs, Sirkku Kotilainen, Manisha Pathak-Shelat, Michael Hoechsmann, and Stuart R. Poyntz, 327–338. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Shade, Leslie Regan, and Tamara Shepherd. 2013. Viewing Youth and Mobile Privacy through a Digital Policy Literacy Framework. First Monday 18 (12): https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4807.
- Shore, Alexis. 2022. Talking About Facial Recognition Technology: How Framing and Context Influence Privacy Concerns and Support for Prohibitive Policy. Telematics and Informatics 70: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101815.
- Smith, Alanna. 2020. Two Calgary Officers Tested Clearview AI Facial-recognition Software. Calgary Herald, February 28. https://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/two-calgary-officers-tested-clearview-ai-facial-recognition-software [accessed January 31, 2023]
- Smith, Karen Louise, Leslie Regan Shade, and Tamara Shepherd. 2017. Open Privacy Badges for Digital Policy Literacy. International Journal of Communication 11: 2784–2805.
- Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Stevens, Nikki, and Os Keyes. 2021. Seeing Infrastructure: Race, Facial Recognition and the Politics of Data. Cultural Studies 35 (4–5): 833–853.
- Taplin, Jonathan. 2017. Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy. New York: Little, Brown.
- Therrien, Daniel. 2021. Appearance before the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI) on Facial Recognition Technology. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/advice-to-parliament/2021/parl_20210510_02/ [accessed July 10, 2023].
- Therrien, Daniel. 2022. The State of Privacy as I End My Term. Presented at at The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Canada Privacy Symposium, Toronto, Canada, May 26. https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches/2022/sp-d_20220526/ [accessed July 25, 2022].
- Weinberg, Lindsay. 2017. Rethinking Privacy: A Feminist Approach to Privacy Rights after Snowden. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 12 (3): 5–20.
- West, Sarah Myers. 2019. Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy. Business & Society 58 (1): 20–41.
- Zimmer, Michael. 2010. “But the Data is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12: 313–325
- Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89.
- Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019a. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
- Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019b. The Threat of Surveillance Capitalism, and the Fight for a Human Future. ABC: Religion & Ethics, August 21. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/shoshana-zuboff-threat-of-surveillance-capitalism/11433716 [accessed August 29, 2022].