Abstracts
Abstract
Students’ laptops are subject to growing digital forms of surveillance by their schools. Following the theoretical tradition of media “domestication,” this paper examines the incorporation of Student Activity Monitoring Software (SAMS) into the everyday routines of one Australian secondary school. Drawing on two years of fieldwork, the paper details how SAMS was broadly accepted by school staff and students as complementing—rather than challenging—the moral economy of the school. With school leaders keen to increase student surveillance without being seen to diminish teacher professionalism, the paper shows how SAMS was appropriated and objectified in ways that teachers and students perceived as preserving established classroom power relations. At the same time, school leaders could maintain core school values while also projecting an appearance of innovation and being “data-driven.” However, rather than this surveillance system being wholly “tamed,” we also show how SAMS was leading to subtle shifts within the school—not least the surrendering of governance and accountability to the software company, alongside the further entrenchment of “soft surveillance” logics into classrooms.
Keywords:
- classroom surveillance,
- media domestication,
- Student Activity Monitoring Software,
- soft surveillance,
- student laptops
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Adorjan, Michael and Rosemary Ricciardelli. 2019. Youth responses to the surveillance school. Young, 27(5):451-467.
- Bayne, Sian., Peter Evans, Rory Ewins, Jeremy Knox, James Lamb, Hamish Macleod, Clara O’Shea, Jenn Ross, Phillipa Sheail and Christine Sinclair. 2020. The manifesto for teaching online. MIT Press
- Berker, Thomas, Maren Hartmann, and Yves Punie. 2006. Domestication of media and technology. Open University Press
- Carlile, Anna. 2018. School surveillance, control, and resistance in the United Kingdom. in Deakin, John, Emmeline Taylor, and Aaron Kupchik (eds). The Palgrave international handbook of school discipline, surveillance, and social control. Palgrave (pp.17-42)
- Caron, André, and Letizia Caronia. 2001. Active users and active objects. Convergence 7(3):38-61
- Crooks, Roderic. 2019. Cat-and-Mouse games: dataveillance and performativity in urban schools. Surveillance & Society, 17(3/4):484-498.
- Fereday, Jennifer, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1):80-92.
- Fisk, Nathan. 2016. Framing internet safety. MIT Press.
- Haddon, Leslie. 2007. Roger Silverstone’s legacies: domestication. New Media & Society, 9(1):25-32.
- Hankerson, DeVan, Cody Venzke, Elizabeth Laird, Hugh Grant-Chapman, and Dhanaraj Thakur. 2021. Online and observed. Center for Democracy & Technology.
- Hartmann, Maren. 2020. (The domestication of) Nordic domestication? Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 2(1):47-57
- Henriksen, Ida Marie, and Aksel Tjora. 2018. Situational domestication and the origin of the café worker species. Sociology, 52(2):351-366.
- Hope, Andrew. 2018. Unsocial Media: School Surveillance of Student Internet Use. In The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control, edited by John Deakin, Emmeline Taylor, and Aaron Kupchik, 425–444. London: Palgrave.
- Hope, Andrew. 2021. Visions of the pre-criminal student. in The pre-crime society (pp. 105-126). Bristol University Press.
- Ideland, Marlin. 2021. Google and the end of the teacher? Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1):33-46.
- Kshetri, Nir. 2021. School surveillance of students via laptops may do more harm than good. The Conversation, 10th November, https://theconversation.com/school-surveillance-of-students-via-laptops-may-do-more-harm-than-good-170983
- Kumar, Priya, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, and Tamara Clegg. 2019. The platformization of the classroom. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2):145-152.
- Lafontaine, Constance. 2020. Towards lively surveillance. in Proceedings of Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, Copenhagen, July. Springer.
- Law, John. 1987. The structure of sociotechnical engineering. The Sociological Review, 35(2):404-425
- Luckin, Rose, Wayne Holmes, Mark Griffiths, and Laurie Forcier. 2017. Intelligence unleased. Pearson
- Martin, Aaron, Rosamunde Van Brakel, and Daniel Bernhard. 2009. Understanding resistance to digital surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 6(3):213-232.
- Martínez, Carolina, and Tobias Olsson. 2021. Domestication outside of the domestic. Media, Culture & Society 43(3):480–496.
- Monahan, Torin, and Rodolfo Torres. 2010. Schools under surveillance. Rutgers University Press.
- Nemorin, Selena. 2017. Post-panoptic pedagogies. Surveillance and Society, 15(2):239-253.
- Neville, Stephen. 2021. The domestication of privacy-invasive technology on YouTube. Convergence 27(5): 1288-1307
- Nichols, T. Philip, and Alexander Monea. 2022. De-escalating ‘dataveillance’ in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(4):23-27.
- Page, Damien. 2017. The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1):1-13.
- Selwyn, N., Henderson, M. and Chao, S. (2017) ‘The possibilities and limitations of ‘Open Data’ in schools’ Cambridge Journal of Education 47(2):167-187
- Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A. and Perrotta, C. (2023). Making Sense of The Digital Automation of Education. Postdigital Science & Education 5(1):1-14
- Selwyn, N., O’Neill, C., Smith, G., Andrejevic, M. and Gu, X (2023) A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia 186(1):149-164
- Silverstone, Roger. 2006. Domesticating domestication. in Berker, Thomas, Maren Hartmann, and Yves Punie (eds) Domestication of media and technology, (pp.229-248), Open University Press
- Silverstone, Roger and Eric Hirsch. 1992 . Consuming technologies. Routledge
- Singh, Sava Saheli, Jade E. Davis, and Chris Gilliard. 2021. ‘Smart’ educational technology. Surveillance & Society, 19(2):262-271.
- Sørensen, Knut. 2006. Domestication: the enactment of technology. in Berker, Thomas, Maren Hartmann, and Yves Punie (eds) Domestication of media and technology (pp.40-61), Open University Press
- Southerton, Claire. and Emmeline Taylor. 2021. Dataveillance and the dividuated self. in The Pre-Crime Society (pp. 249-268). Bristol University Press.
- Steeves, Valerie, Priscilla Regan, and Leslie Regan Shade. 2018. Digital surveillance in the networked classroom. in Deakin, John, Emmeline Taylor, and Aaron Kupchik (eds). The Palgrave international handbook of school discipline, surveillance, and social control (pp. 445-466). Palgrave
- Taylor, Emmeline. 2013. Surveillance schools. Palgrave.
- Thomson, Pat and Claire Hall. 2016. Place-based methods for researching schools. Bloomsbury
- Vickery, Jacqueline Ryan. 2016. Media discourses of girls at risk and domestication of mobile phone surveillance. In Surveillance Futures (pp. 93-109). Routledge.
- Widmer, Sarah, and Anders Albrechtslund. 2021. The ambiguities of surveillance as care and control. Nordicom Review, 42(4):79-93.
- Zuboff, Shoshana. 2018. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Profile.