Abstracts
Résumé
Introduction : L’opérationnalisation de mesures de la performance sensibles aux soins infirmiers s’avère très variable. Elle aboutit à des mesures parfois sous-optimales et difficiles d’accès pour les gestionnaires et le personnel infirmier. L’objectif est de proposer une méthode rigoureuse d’opérationnalisation de mesures de la performance sensibles aux soins infirmiers basées sur des données de routine.
Source d’information : La source d’information principale de cet article est une méthode d’opérationnalisation adaptée d’un guide de rapport et d’un instrument d’évaluation de mesures de performance. Elle comprend 7 processus et 33 attributs de qualité interreliés. L’application de cette méthode d’opérationnalisation a été expérimentée avec succès dans un hôpital universitaire.
Discussion : L’opérationnalisation de mesures de la performance sensibles aux soins infirmiers est un processus complexe. Cette méthode est une proposition originale qui permet de justifier et d’argumenter les choix réalisés. Nous discutons la façon dont cette méthode constitue une réponse à 3 enjeux méthodologiques majeurs : (1) des méthodes d’opérationnalisation hétérogènes et peu détaillées ; (2) des attributs essentiels (p. ex. pertinence, validité scientifique, faisabilité) qui ne font pas consensus et (3) des modèles d’architecture des données hétérogènes.
Implication et conclusion : Cette méthode d’opérationnalisation offre une approche systématique et transparente pour produire des mesures de la performance sensibles aux soins infirmiers à partir de données de routine. Elle pourrait permettre de bonifier leur opérationnalisation, faciliter leur compréhension et leur évaluation.
Mots-clés :
- infirmières et infirmiers,
- évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé,
- qualité des soins de santé,
- amélioration de la qualité,
- méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique
Abstract
Introduction: The operationalization of nursing-sensitive performance measures has been highly variable. It results in measures that are sometimes suboptimal and difficult for managers and nurses to access. The objective is to propose a rigorous method for operationalizing nurse-sensitive performance measures based on routine data.
Source of Information: The primary source of information for this article is an operationalization method adapted from a reporting guide and performance measure evaluation instrument. It includes 7 processes and 33 interrelated quality attributes. The application of this operationalization method was successfully tested in a university hospital.
Discussion: Operationalization of nursing-sensitive performance measures is a complex process. This method is an original proposal that allows for the justification and argumentation of the choices made. We discuss how this method is a response to 3 methodological issues: (1) heterogeneous and poorly detailed operationalization methods; (2) critical attributes (e.g., relevance, scientific validity, feasibility) that lack consensus and (3) heterogeneous data architecture models.
Implication and conclusion: This operationalization method provides a systematic and transparent approach to generating nursing-sensitive performance measures from routine data. It could improve their operationalization, facilitate their understanding and evaluation.
Keywords:
- nurses,
- outcome and process assessment (health care),
- quality of health care,
- quality improvement,
- epidemiologic research design
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Aiken, L. H. (2008). Economics of nursing. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 9(2), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154408318253
- Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J., & Silber, J. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(16), 1987-1993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987
- Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D., Griffiths, P., Rafferty, A. M., Bruyneel, L., McHugh, M., Maier, C. B., Moreno-Casbas, T., Ball, J. E., Ausserhofer, D., & Sermeus, W. (2016). Nursing skill mix in European hospitals: cross-sectional study of the association with mortality, patient ratings, and quality of care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(7), 559-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005567
- Baernholdt, M., Dunton, N., Hughes, R. G., Stone, P. W., & White, K. M. (2018). Quality Measures: A Stakeholder Analysis. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000292
- Barchielli, C., Rafferty, A. M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). Integrating Key Nursing Measures into a Comprehensive Healthcare Performance Management System: A Tuscan Experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1373. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1373
- Becker, M., Breuing, J., Nothacker, M., Deckert, S., Brombach, M., Schmitt, J., Neugebauer, E., & Pieper, D. (2019). Guideline-based quality indicators—a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines. Implementation Science, 14(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0918-y
- Biron, A. D., Vézina, M., St-Hilaire, C., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., & Richer, M. C. (2012). Role of performance measurement in a major redevelopment project: the case of the McGill University Health Centre Transition Support Office. Healthcare quarterly, 15(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2012.22768
- Boyle, D. K., & Baernholdt, M. (2021). Overview of the Quality Health Outcomes Model. Dans M. Baernholdt & D. K. Boyle (dir.), Nurses Contributions to Quality Health Outcomes (p. 3-17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69063-2_1
- Brehaut, J. C., Colquhoun, H. L., Eva, K. W., Carroll, K., Sales, A., Michie, S., Ivers, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2016). Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness. Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(6), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2248
- Brown, B., Gude, W. T., Blakeman, T., van der Veer, S. N., Ivers, N., Francis, J. J., Lorencatto, F., Presseau, J., Peek, N., & Daker-White, G. (2019). Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Implementation Science, 14(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5
- Clarke, S. P., & Donaldson, N. E. (2008). Nurse Staffing and Patient Care Quality and Safety. Dans R. G. Hughes (dir.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses (p. 2-111; 2-135). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2676/
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2021). CMS Measures Inventory Tool https://cmit.cms.gov/CMIT_public/ListMeasures
- CPSI. (2012). The Economics of Patient Safety in Acute Care: Technical Report. Canadian Patient Safety Institute.
- D'Amour, D., Dubois, C. A., Tchouaket, E., Clarke, S., & Blais, R. (2014). The occurrence of adverse events potentially attributable to nursing care in medical units: cross sectional record review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.017
- Damschroder, L. J., Robinson, C. H., Francis, J., Bentley, D. R., Krein, S. L., Rosland, A. M., Hofer, T. P., & Kerr, E. A. (2014). Effects of Performance Measure Implementation on Clinical Manager and Provider Motivation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(4), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3020-9
- Di Zio, M., Fursova, N., Gelsema, T., Gießing, S., Guarnera, U., Petrauskienė, J., Quenselvon Kalben, L., Scanu, M., ten Bosch, K. O., van der Loo, M., & Walsdorfer, K. (2016). Methodology for data validation 1. European Commission, Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/system/files/methodology_for_data_validation_v1.0_rev-2016-06_final.pdf
- Doran, D., Mildon, B., & Clarke, S. P. (2011). Vers un bulletin national de la pratique infirmière : Synthèse des connaissances. http://www.nhsru.com/wp-content/uploads/8083781_FR_Knowledge_Synthesis_Toward_a_National_Nursing_Report_Card_March_111.pdf
- Doran, D. M. (2003). Preface. Dans D. M. Doran (dir.), Nursing Outcomes : The State of the Science,(p. vii-x). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Dubois, C.-A., D’Amour, D., Brault, I., Dallaire, C., Déry, J., Duhoux, A., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Mathieu, L., Karemere, H., & Zufferey, A. (2015). Indicateurs prioritaires pour évaluer la contribution infirmière à la qualité des soins : revue systématique des écrits. Secrétariat international des infirmières et infirmiers de l'espace francophone. https://sidiief.org/produit/indicateurs-prioritaires-pour-evaluer-la-contribution-infirmiere-a-la-qualite-des-soins-revue-systematique-des-ecrits/
- Dubois, C. A., D'Amour, D., Brault, I., Dallaire, C., Dery, J., Duhoux, A., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Mathieu, L., Karemere, H., & Zufferey, A. (2017). Which priority indicators to use to evaluate nursing care performance? A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(12), 3154-3167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13373
- Dubois, C. A., D'Amour, D., Pomey, M. P., Girard, F., & Brault, I. (2013). Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for better measurement: a systematic and interpretive review. BMC Nursing, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-12-7
- Dubois, C. A., D'Amour, D., Tchouaket, E., Clarke, S., Rivard, M., & Blais, R. (2013). Associations of patient safety outcomes with models of nursing care organization at unit level in hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 25(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt019
- Englebright, J., & Jackson, E. (2017). Wrestling with Big Data: How Nurse Leaders Can Engage. Dans C. W. Delaney, C. A. Weaver, J. J. Warren, T. R. Clancy, & R. L. Simpson (dir.), Big Data-Enabled Nursing: Education, Research and Practice (p. 115-137). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53300-1_7
- Gagalova, K. K., Leon Elizalde, M. A., Portales-Casamar, E., & Görges, M. (2020). What You Need to Know Before Implementing a Clinical Research Data Warehouse: Comparative Review of Integrated Data Repositories in Health Care Institutions. JMIR formative research, 4(8), e17687-e17687. https://doi.org/10.2196/17687
- Gallant, S., & Perrenoud, B. (2016). Check-list CLARITY [document inédit]. Centre des formations de la Direction des Ressources humaines et Commission recherche & développement de la Direction des soins du CHUV.
- Griffiths, P., Richardson, A., & Blackwell, R. (2012). Outcomes sensitive to nursing service quality in ambulatory cancer chemotherapy: Systematic scoping review. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(3), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.06.004
- Hall, L. M., Doran, D., Laschinger, H. S., Mallette, C., Pedersen, C., & O'Brien-Pallas, L. L. (2003). A balanced scorecard approach for nursing report card development. Outcomes Management, 7(1), 17-22.
- Hermann, R. C., & Palmer, R. H. (2002). Common ground: a framework for selecting core quality measures for mental health and substance abuse care. Psychiatric Services, 53(3), 281-287.
- Idvall, E., Rooke, L., & Hamrin, E. (1997). Quality indicators in clinical nursing: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025006.x
- Iezzoni, L. I. (2013). Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes (4e éd.). Health Administration Press ; AUPHA.
- Irvine, D., Sidani, S., & Hall, L. M. (1998). Linking outcomes to nurses' roles in health care. Nursing Economics, 16(2), 58-64, 87.
- Jones, T. L. (2016). Outcome Measurement in Nursing: Imperatives, Ideals, History, and Challenges. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(2), 1.
- Kelley, E. T., Arispe, I., & Holmes, J. (2006). Beyond the initial indicators: lessons from the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project and the US National Healthcare Quality Report. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18 Suppl 1, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl027
- Kötter, T., Blozik, E., & Scherer, M. (2012). Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review. Implementation Science, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-21
- Langendam, M. W., Piggott, T., Nothacker, M., Agarwal, A., Armstrong, D., Baldeh, T., Braithwaite, J., Castro Martins, C., Darzi, A., Etxeandia, I., Florez, I., Hoving, J., Karam, S. G., Kötter, T., Meerpohl, J. J., Mustafa, R. A., Muti-Schünemann, G. E. U., van der Wees, P. J., Follmann, M., & Schünemann, H. J. (2020). Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review. BMC health services research, 20(1), 875-875. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05665-w
- Montalvo, I. (2007). The National Database of Nursing Quality IndicatorsTM (NDNQI®). OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(3), Manuscript 2. https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume122007/No3Sept07/NursingQualityIndicators.aspx
- Morin, D. (1997). Génériques ou spécifiques: réflexion critique sur les indicateurs de résultats en soins infirmiers. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 49, 67-73.
- Muntlin Athlin, Å. (2018). Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(11-12), 2230-2247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14155
- Myers, H., Pugh, J. D., & Twigg, D. E. (2018). Identifying nurse-sensitive indicators for stand-alone high acuity areas: A systematic review. Collegian, 25(4), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.10.004
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2021). The NICE menu of general practice and clinical commissioning group indicators. https://www.nice.org.uk/standards-and-indicators
- Nothacker, M., Stokes, T., Shaw, B., Lindsay, P., Sipilä, R., Follmann, M., Kopp, I., & on behalf of the Guidelines International Network Performance Measures Working, G. (2016). Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures. Implementation Science, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z
- National Quality Forum. (2021). Measure evaluation criteria and guidance for evaluating measures for endorsement. http://www.qualityforum.org/Measuring_Performance/Endorsed_Performance_Measures_Maintenance.aspx
- O'Brien, A., Weaver, C., Settergren, T., Hook, M. L., & Ivory, C. H. (2015). EHR Documentation: The Hype and the Hope for Improving Nursing Satisfaction and Quality Outcomes. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000132
- Oner, B., Zengul, F. D., Oner, N., Ivankova, N. V., Karadag, A., & Patrician, P. A. (2021). Nursing-sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017). Nursing Open, 8(3), 1005-1022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654
- Oracle. (2021). Définition d’un data warehouse. Oracle. https://www.oracle.com/ch-fr/database/what-is-a-data-warehouse/
- Qureshi, S. M., Purdy, N., & Neumann, W. P. (2021). Developing a modelling approach to quantify quality of care and nurse workload — Field validation study. Operations Research for Health Care, 29, 100301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2021.100301
- Rapin, J., D’Amour, D., & Dubois, C.-A. (2015). Indicators for Evaluating the Performance and Quality of Care of Ambulatory Care Nurses. Nursing Research and Practice, 2015, 861239. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/861239
- Rapin, J., D’Amour, D., Penseyres, T., Santos, G., Adatte, V., Lehn, I., & Mabire, C. (2017). Développement d’un système de gestion de la performance des soins dans un centre hospitalier universitaire suisse. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 131(4), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.131.0061
- Reiter, A., Fischer, B., Kötting, J., Geraedts, M., Jäckel, W. H., Barlag, H., & Doebler, K. (2007). QUALIFY: Instrument for the Assessment of Quality Indicators. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267256474_QUALIFY_Instrument_for_the_Assessment_of_Quality_Indicators
- Schwirian, P. M. (1981). Toward an explanatory model of nursing performance. Nursing Research, 30(4), 247-253.
- Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC health services research, 17(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
- Secrétariat international des infirmières et infirmiers de l'espace francophone. (2015). La Qualité des soins et la Sécurité des patients: une priorité mondiale. https://www.sidiief.org/wp-content/uploads/SIDIIEF-M-moire-Qualit-des-soins.pdf
- Sinuff, T., Muscedere, J., Rozmovits, L., Dale, C. M., & Scales, D. C. (2015). A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24(6), 393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003978
- Souissi, L. (2009, mai). Processus de construction des indicateurs de mesure de performance dans un établissement de soins privé. 30e congrès de l'AFC, Strasbourg, France. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00460548/document
- Tchouaket, E., Dubois, C.-A., & D'Amour, D. (2017). The economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 medical-surgical units: retrospective and matching analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13260
- Unruh, L., & Wan, T. T. H. (2004). A Systems Framework for Evaluating Nursing Care Quality in Nursing Homes. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOMS.0000023302.80118.74
- Veillard, J., Champagne, F., Klazinga, N., Kazandjian, V., Arah, O. A., & Guisset, A. L. (2005). A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 17(6), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi072
- Westra, B. L., Latimer, G. E., Matney, S. A., Park, J. I., Sensmeier, J., Simpson, R. L., Swanson, M. J., Warren, J. J., & Delaney, C. W. (2015). A national action plan for sharable and comparable nursing data to support practice and translational research for transforming health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(3), 600-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocu011