Abstracts
Résumé
Introduction Les troubles mentaux courants (TMC) représentent de 30 % à 50 % des absences maladies toutes confondues. Le succès du retour au travail (RAT) n’est pas dû au seul fait de l’individu, mais plutôt au résultat de l’interaction entre les acteurs impliqués dans le processus. De nombreuses applications en santé mentale ont été développées pour améliorer la prise en charge des patients et optimiser la communication entre les professionnels, sans toutefois être validées. De plus, aucune solution technologique n’a été développée à ce jour pour faciliter à la fois la concertation des acteurs du RAT (p. ex. gestionnaire, professionnels de la santé) et l’accompagnement systématique de l’employé dans son RAT.
Objectif Pour combler ces lacunes, l’objectif de cet article est double : 1) décrire le développement de l’application PRATICAdr, Plateforme de Retour Au Travail axée sur les Interactions et la Communication entre les Acteurs : un programme Durable favorisant le Rétablissement ; 2) documenter les tests utilisateurs de l’application PRATICAdr.
Méthode Le développement de PRATICAdr se décline en 3 phases : 1) l’analyse des besoins ; 2) la conceptualisation des mécanismes internes à l’application et des techniques de programmation ; 3) le test de l’application en situation réelle. L’application est évaluée par des questionnaires et entrevues pour mesurer la satisfaction des utilisateurs.
Résultats PRATICAdr permet de suivre en temps réel le parcours des acteurs impliqués dans l’accompagnement personnalisé de l’employé dans son RAT. La schématisation du processus de RAT et l’inclusion d’outils d’évaluation validés systématisent la concertation et la prise de décision partagée des acteurs, ainsi que le suivi et les actions posées en vue d’entreprendre un RAT favorisant le rétablissement. L’interface de PRATICAdr a été développée pour simplifier l’expérience utilisateur de l’employé en absence maladie et des acteurs du RAT. Les résultats de satisfaction des premiers utilisateurs de PRATICAdr, 16 employés d’une grande organisation dans le domaine de la santé en processus de RAT à la suite d’un TMC, apprécient (moyenne > 9/10) non seulement la Plateforme Web, mais également la participation des acteurs du RAT et les questionnaires inclus dans PRATICAdr. Des éléments d’amélioration sont aussi proposés.
Conclusion PRATICAdr est implantée dans 2 grandes organisations (> 15 000 employés) afin d’évaluer son efficacité auprès d’employés en absence maladie en raison d’un TMC et en processus de RAT. Dans le cadre de cet article, l’objectif était de présenter non seulement le développement de PRATICAdr, mais aussi de mesurer la satisfaction des utilisateurs. Les premiers résultats indiquent une appréciation élevée chez les employés en absence maladie, utilisateurs de PRATICAdr. En termes de pistes futures, l’intégration de l’apprentissage automatique sera abordée dans l’objectif de personnaliser le programme de RAT selon les prédictions de durée d’absence maladie et de RAT durable.
Mots-clés :
- retour au travail,
- trouble mental courant,
- acteurs du retour au travail,
- applications mobiles
Abstract
Introduction Common mental disorders (CMDs) account for 30% to 50% of all illness absences. The success of RTW is not only due to the individual but rather to the result of the interaction between the stakeholders involved in the RTW process. Numerous mental health applications have been developed to improve patient management and optimize communication between professionals, but have not been validated. Moreover, no technological solution has been developed to date to facilitate both consultation among the RTW stakeholders (e.g., managers, health professionals) and systematic support for the employee in his or her RTW.
Objective To address these shortcomings, the purpose of this article is twofold: 1) to describe the development of the PRATICAdr application (Return-to-Work Platform focused on Stakeholder Interaction and Communication: a Sustainable Recovery Program) and 2) to document PRATICAdr application user testing.
Method The development of PRATICAdr has been operationalized in three phases: 1) needs assessment, 2) conceptualization of the internal mechanisms of the application and programming techniques and 3) testing of the application in real situation. The application is evaluated through questionnaires and interviews to measure user satisfaction.
Results PRATICAdr allows to follow in real time the path of RTW stakeholders involved in the personalized support of the employee in his RTW. The operationalization of the RTW process and the inclusion of validated assessment tools help systematize the stakeholders’ consultation and shared decision-making, as well as the monitoring and actions taken to undertake a recovery-promoting RTW. The PRATICAdr interface was developed to simplify the user experience for the employee on sick leave and all RTW stakeholders. Regarding user satisfaction, results show that the first 16 users of PRATICAdr, employees in a large healthcare organization returning to work following a CMD, were very satisfied (average>9/10) with the Web application, as well as the participation of RTW stakeholders and the questionnaires included in PRATICAdr. Improvements were also suggested.
Conclusion PRATICAdr is implemented in two large organizations (>15,000 employees) in order to evaluate its effectiveness with employees on sick leave due to CMD registered in a RTW process. The aim of this article was to present not only the development of PRATICAdr, but also to measure user satisfaction. Preliminary results indicate a high level of satisfaction among employees on sick leave who used PRATICAdr. In terms of future avenues, the integration of e-learning will be addressed with the objective of customizing the RTW program according to the predictions of duration of sick leave and sustainable RTW.
Keywords:
- return to work,
- common mental disorder,
- return to work stakeholders,
- mobile applications
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Axén, I., Björk Brämberg, E., Vaez, M., Lundin, A. et Bergström, G. (2020). Interventions for common mental disorders in the occupational health service : A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 93(7), 823‑838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01535-4
- Bhatt, U., Xiang, A., Sharma, S., Weller, A., Taly, A., Jia, Y., Ghosh, J., Puri, R., Moura, J. M. F. et Eckersley, P. (2020). Explainable Machine Learning in Deployment. ArXiv :1909.06342 [Cs, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06342
- Clark, M., DiBenedetti, D. et Perez, V. (2016). Cognitive dysfunction and work productivity in major depressive disorder. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 16(4), 455‑463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1195688
- Corbière, M., Mazaniello-Chézol, M., Bastien, M.-F., Wathieu, E., Bouchard, R., Panaccio, A., Guay, S. et Lecomte, T. (2020). Stakeholders’ Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders : A Scoping Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(3), 381‑419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09861-2
- Corbière, M., Mazaniello-Chézol, M., Lecomte, T., Guay, S. et Panaccio, A. Developing a collaborative and sustainable return-to-work program for employees with common mental disorders: A participatory research with public and private organizations. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1931481
- Corbière, M., Negrini, A., Durand, M.-J., St-Arnaud, L., Briand, C., Fassier, J.-B., Loisel, P. et Lachance, J.-P. (2017). Development of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and Validation with Workers Suffering from a Common Mental Disorder or Musculoskeletal Disorder. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(3), 329‑341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9661-2
- Corbière, M., Villotti, P., Lecomte, T., Bond, G. R., Lesage, A. et Goldner, E. M. (2014). Work accommodations and natural supports for maintaining employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 37(2), 90‑98. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000033
- Dewa, C. S., Hoch, J. S., Loong, D., Trojanowski, L. et Bonato, S. (2020). Evidence for the Cost-Effectiveness of Return-to-Work Interventions for Mental Illness Related Sickness Absences : A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09904-z
- Doumbouya, M. B., Kamsu-Foguem, B., Kenfack, H. et Foguem, C. (2014). Telemedicine using mobile telecommunication : Towards syntactic interoperability in teleexpertise. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 648‑659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.01.003
- Durand, M.-J., Nastasia, I., Coutu, M.-F. et Bernier, M. (2017). Practices of Return-to-Work Coordinators Working in Large Organizations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(1), 137‑147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9640-7
- East, M. L. et Havard, B. C. (2015). Mental Health Mobile Apps : From Infusion to Diffusion in the Mental Health Social System. JMIR Mental Health, 2(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.3954
- Eskilsson, T., Norlund, S., Lehti, A. et Wiklund, M. (2020). Enhanced Capacity to Act : Managers’ Perspectives When Participating in a Dialogue-Based Workplace Intervention for Employee Return to Work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09914-x
- Fowler, M. et Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28‑35.
- Gayed, A., Bryan, B. T., LaMontagne, A. D., Milner, A., Deady, M., Calvo, R. A., Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Glozier, N. et Harvey, S. B. (2019). A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate HeadCoach : An Online Mental Health Training Program for Workplace Managers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(7), 545‑551. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001597
- Good, A. et Sambhanthan, A. (2014). Accessing web based health care and resources for mental health : Interface design considerations for people experiencing mental illness. 25‑33.
- Graves, M. et Doucet, Dr. S. (2016). Factors Affecting Interprofessional Collaboration when Communicating through the use of Information and Communication Technologies : A Literature Review. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22230/jripe.2017v6n2a234
- Joyce, S., Modini, M., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R., Mitchell, P. B. et Harvey, S. B. (2016). Workplace interventions for common mental disorders : A systematic meta-review. Psychological Medicine, 46(4), 683‑697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715002408
- Lacourse, É., Giguère, C.-É. et Dupéré, V. (2020). Algorithmes d’apprentissage et modèles statistiques : Un exemple de régression logistique régularisée et de validation croisée pour prédire le décrochage scolaire. Dans M. Corbière et N. Larivière (Éds.), Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes. Dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé (2e édition, p. 880). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Lecomte, T., Potvin, S., Corbière, M., Guay, S., Samson, C., Cloutier, B., Francoeur, A., Pennou, A. et Khazaal, Y. (2020). Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues : Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(5), e17458. https://doi.org/10.2196/17458
- Lundberg, S. M. et Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 10.
- MacEachen, E., McDonald, E., Neiterman, E., McKnight, E., Malachowski, C., Crouch, M., Varatharajan, S., Dali, N. et Giau, E. (2020). Return to Work for Mental Ill-Health : A Scoping Review Exploring the Impact and Role of Return-to-Work Coordinators. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(3), 455‑465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09873-3
- Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. et Dean, J. (2013). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. arXiv :1301.3781 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
- Nigatu, Y. T., Liu, Y., Uppal, M., McKinney, S., Rao, S., Gillis, K. et Wang, J. (2016). Interventions for enhancing return to work in individuals with a common mental illness : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 46(16), 3263‑3274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002269
- Olff, M. (2015). Mobile mental health : A challenging research agenda. 9.
- Phillips, E. A., Gordeev, V. S. et Schreyögg, J. (2019). Effectiveness of occupational e-mental health interventions : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 45(6), 560‑576. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3839
- Russell, E. et Kosny, A. (2019). Communication and collaboration among return-to-work stakeholders. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(22), 2630‑2639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1472815
- Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V. et Young, M. (2014). Machine Learning : The High-Interest Credit Card of Technical Debt. 9.
- Semkovska, M., Quinlivan, L., O’Grady, T., Johnson, R., Collins, A., O’Connor, J., Knittle, H., Ahern, E. et Gload, T. (2019). Cognitive function following a major depressive episode : A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 851‑861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30291-3
- Short, C. E., DeSmet, A., Woods, C., Williams, S. L., Maher, C., Middelweerd, A., Müller, A. M., Wark, P. A., Vandelanotte, C., Poppe, L., Hingle, M. D. et Crutzen, R. (2018). Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions : Viewpoint of Methodologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(11), e292. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9397
- Singh, R. et O’Hagan, F. (2019). “Apping Up : Prospects for Information Technology Innovation in Return to Work Communication. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 29(1), 104‑118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9768-8
- Skarpaas, L. S., Haveraaen, L. A., Småstuen, M. C., Shaw, W. S. et Aas, R. W. (2019). Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 759. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4607-y
- Skivington, K., Lifshen, M. et Mustard, C. (2016). Implementing a collaborative return-to-work program : Lessons from a qualitative study in a large Canadian healthcare organization. Work, 55(3), 613‑624. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162437
- Ståhl, C. (2012). Implementing Interorganizational Cooperation in Labour Market Reintegration : A Case Study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(2), 209‑219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9337-x
- Stratton, E., Lampit, A., Choi, I., Calvo, R. A., Harvey, S. B. et Glozier, N. (2017). Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees : A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0189904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189904
- Strudwick, G., Impey, D., Torous, J., Krausz, R. M. et Wiljer, D. (2020). Advancing E-Mental Health in Canada : Report From a Multistakeholder Meeting. JMIR Mental Health, 7(4), e19360. https://doi.org/10.2196/19360
- Vogel, N., Schandelmaier, S., Zumbrunn, T., Ebrahim, S., de Boer, W. E., Busse, J. W. et Kunz, R. (2017). Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011618.pub2
- Volker, D., Zijlstra-Vlasveld, M. C., Brouwers, E. P. M. et van der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M. (2017). Process Evaluation of a Blended Web-Based Intervention on Return to Work for Sick-Listed Employees with Common Mental Health Problems in the Occupational Health Setting. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(2), 186‑194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9643-4
- World Health Organization. (2019). Draft global strategy on digital health 2020-2024. World Health Organization.
- Young, A. E. (2013). Return to Work Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Work Disability. Dans P. Loisel et J. R. Anema (Éds.), Handbook of Work Disability (p. 409‑423). Springer New York. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9_25
- Young, A. E., Wasiak, R., Roessler, R. T., McPherson, K. M., Anema, J. R. et van Poppel, M. N. M. (2005). Return-to-Work Outcomes Following Work Disability : Stakeholder Motivations, Interests and Concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 543‑556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0