Abstracts
Résumé
L’implantation de foyers de groupe se bute souvent à ce qu’on appelle le phénomène « pas dans ma cour ». Afin de mieux comprendre ce phénomène et d’en identifier la source, cette étude pilote examine l’expérience des résidents de quartiers où l’opposition à l’implantation de tels foyers s’est manifestée. Les résultats ont permis d’identifier les raisons sous-jacentes en plus d’explorer l’impact négatif de la présence de tel foyers sur la vie de la communuaté environnante. Enfin, l’auteure conclut que l’écoute du citoyen et la reconnaissance de ses inquiétudes s’avèrent essentiels à une plus grande acceptation et à un meilleur soutien de la communauté envers ces foyers.
Abstract
Implementation of group homes often come up against the “Not in My Back Yard” (NIMBY) phenomenon. In order to better understand this phenomenon, this pilot study examines the experience of community residents in three borough where opposition to the implementation of group homes was encountered. Results reveal the underlying reasons for this problem as well as explore the negative impact of the presence of such group homes in the community. Finally, the author concludes that listening to citizens and acknowledging their concerns are essential to developing greater acceptance and a better support towards group homes.
Resumen
La implantación de hogares se encuentra con frecuencia con lo que llamamos el fenómeno “no en mi patio trasero”. A fin de comprender mejor este fenómeno e identificar la fuente, este estudio piloto examina la experiencia de los residentes de las colonias en las que se ha manifestado una oposición a la implantación de dichos hogares. Los resultados permitieron identificar las razones subyacentes, además de explorar el impacto negativo de la presencia de dichos hogares en la vida de la comunidad circundante. Por último, la autora concluye que escuchar al ciudadano y reconocer sus inquietudes es esencial para una mayor aceptación y un mejor apoyo de la comunidad hacia dichos hogares.
Resumo
A implantação de residências de grupo depara freqüentemente com o que chamamos de fenômeno “não no meu bairro”. Afim de melhor compreender este fenômeno e de identificar sua fonte, este estudo piloto examina a experiência dos moradores de bairros onde manifestou-se a oposição à implantação de tais residências. Os resultados permitiram determinar as razões subjacentes, além de explorar o impacto negativo da presença de tais residências na vida da comunidade local. Finalmente, a autora conclui que a consulta ao cidadão e o reconhecimento de suas preocupações são essenciais para uma maior aceitação e um melhor apoio da comunidade em relação a estas residências.
Appendices
Références
- Ashmore, R.D., 1975, Background considerations in developing strategies for changing attitudes and behaviour toward the mentally retarded, in Begab, M.J., Richardson, S.A., eds., The Mentally Retarded and Society : A Social Science Perspective, Baltimore, University Park Press, 159-174.
- Baillargeon, D., Martineau, S., Proulx, S., 1991, “Pas dans ma rue” vers une stratégie pour réduire l’intolérance et favoriser la cohabitation sociale, Conseil québécois de la recherche sociale.
- Balukas, R., Wald Baken, J.., 1985, Community resistance to development of group homes for people with mental retardation, Rehabilitation Literature, 46, 194-198.
- Baron, R. C., Piasecki, J. R., 1981, The community versus the community care, in Budson, R.D., ed., New Directions for Mental Health Services : Issues in Community Residential Care, San Franscisco, Jossey-Bass, 63-76.
- Berdiansky, H.A., Parker, R., 1977, Establishing a group home for the adult mentally retarded in North Carolina, Mental Retardation, 15, 4, 8-12.
- Côté, J., Ouellet, L., Lachance, R., Lemay, D., 1992, Relation entre le contact et la distance sociale à l’égard des personnes avec une maladie mentale, Service Social, 41, 3, 95-104.
- Cupaiuolo, A.., 1979, Community interaction with V.A. family care homes for the mentally ill : A comparative study of conflict and non-conflict, unpublished doctoral, University of Columbia, New York.
- Dear, M., 1977, Impact of Mental health facilities on property values, Community Mental Health Journal, 13, 150-157.
- Dear, M., 1992, Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 288-300.
- Dear, M., Taylor, S. M., 1982, Not on our Street : Community Attitudes to Mental Health Care, London, Pion.
- Dorvil, H., 1988, L’accueil différentiel de la communauté à l’égard du malade mental, Santé mentale au Québec, 13, 1, 105-118.
- Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., Allen, S., 1993, Doing Naturalistic Inquiry : A Guide to Methods, Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
- Eynon, T. G., 1989, Building community support, Corrections Today, 51, 2, 148-152.
- Farber, S., 1986, Market segmentation and the effects of group homes for the handicapped on residential property values, Urban Studies, 23, 519-525.
- Gardner, P., 1981, Community Acceptance of Alternative Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Mentally Retarded Citizens of Ohio, vol. mimeograph.
- Gelman, S., Epp, D. J., Downing R. H., Twark, R., Eyerle R. W., 1989, Impact of group homes on the values of adjacent residential properties, Mental Retardation, 27, 3, 127-134.
- Gendron, J. L., Piat, M., 1991, La recherche américaine sur l’intolérance des collectivités à l’endroit des ressources intermédiaires, Service social, 40, 3, 147-157.
- Gottlieb, J., 1975, Public, peer and professional attitudes toward mentally retarded persons, in Begab, M. J., Richardson, S. A., ed., The Mentally Retarded and Society : A Social Science Perspective, Baltimore, University Park Press, 99-125.
- Gottlieb, J., Stritchart, S., 1981, Citizen Advocacy : Perceptions of community attitudes, in Mittler, P., ed., Frontier of Knowledge in Mental Retardation : Social, Educational and Behaviorial Aspects, vol. 1, Baltimore, University Park Press, 391-405.
- Gouvernement du Québec, 1989, Politique de santé mentale, Ministère de la Santé et des services sociaux.
- Gouvernement du Québec, 1997, Orientations pour la transformation des services de santé mentale, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Direction de la Planification et de l’Évaluation.
- Harasymiw, S. J., Horne, M. D., Lewis, S. C., 1976, A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance, Rehabilitation Literature, 37, 98-102.
- Heal, L. W., Sigelman, C. K., Switzky, H. N., 1978, Research on community residential alternatives for the mentally retarded, in N.R., Ellis, ed., International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, vol. 9, New York, Academic Press, 209-249.
- Hogan, R., 1986, It can’t happen here : Community opposition to group homes, Sociological Focus, 19, 361-374.
- Hôpital Douglas et Hôpital Louis-H. Lafontaine, 2001, Statistiques, Montréal.
- Johnson, P. J., Beditz, J., 1981, Community support systems : Scaling community acceptance, Community Mental Health Journal, 17, 2, 153-160.
- Julien, C., 1990, The Impact of Community Correctional Centres on Neighborhood Crimes in the District of Columbia, District of Columbia : Office of Planning and Program Analysis, Department of Corrections.
- Kastner, L. S., Reppucci, N. D., Pezzoli, J. J., 1980, Assessing community attitudes toward mentally retarded persons, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 137-144.
- Lincoln, Y., Guba, E., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
- Lubin, R. A., Schwartz, A. A., Zigman, W. B., Janicki, M. P., 1982, Community acceptance of residential programs for developmentally disabled persons, Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 3, 191-200.
- Mambort, T., Thomas, E., Few, R., 1981, Community Acceptance : A Realistic Approach, Montgomery County, Ohio, Montgomery County Board of Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities.
- Merton, R., Fiske, M., Kendall, P., 1990, The Focused Interview, 2nd ed., New York, The Free Press.
- Metropolitan Human Services Commission, 1986, Group Home Study Research Report, Columbus, Ohio.
- Miles, M. B., Humberman, A. M., 1994, An Expanded Source Book : Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications.
- Moreau, F. A., Novak, A. R., Sigelman, C. K., 1980, Physical and social integration of developmentally disabled individuals into the community, in Novak, A.R., Heal, L.W., eds., Integration of Developmentally Disabled Individuals into the Community, Baltimore, Brookes, 91-103.
- Myers, L., Bridges, S., 1995, Public discourse : Property rights, public good and NIMBY, in Silver, M., Melkonian, M., ed., Contested Terrain : Power, Politics and Participation in Suburbia, Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press, 133-148.
- Patton, M. Q., 1990, Qualitative Evaluation And Research Methods, 2nd ed., Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
- Pittock, F., Potts, M., 1988, Neighborhood attitudes to people with mental handicap : A comparative study, The British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 34, 66, 35-45.
- Poulin, C., Lévesque, M., 1995, Les déterminants socioculturels des attitudes d’acceptation et de rejet des personnes désinstitutionalisées chez les Montréalais francophones, Santé publique de Montréal-Centre, ÉCOHS.
- Punch, M., 1994, Politics and ethics in qualitative research, in Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., ed., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications.
- Rabkin, J. G., Muhlin, G., Cohen, P. W., 1984, What the neighbors think : Community attitudes toward local psychiatric facilities, Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 304-312.
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness, 1990, Public Attitudes Toward People with Chronic Mental Illness : Final Report.
- Scott, N. J., Scott, R. A., 1980, The impact of housing markets on deinstitutionalization, Administration in Mental Health, 7, 210-222.
- Seltzer, M. M., 1985, Public attitudes toward community residential facilities for mentally retarded persons, in Bruininks, R. H., Lakin, K. C., eds., Living and Learning in a Least Restrictive Environment, Baltimore, Brookes, 99-113.
- Sigelman, C. K., Spanhel, C. L., Lorenzen, C. D., 1979, Community reactions to deinstitutionalization, Journal of Rehabilitation, 45, 52-55.
- Solomon, P., Davis. J., 1984, Community attitudes toward residential facilities for psychiatric patients, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 8, 2, 38-41.
- Tara, A., 1985, Community Attitudes Toward the Mentally Retarded : A Neighborhood Field Study, unpublished doctoral, United States International University.
- Tringo, J. L., 1970, The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups, The Journal of Special Education, 4, 295-306.
- Trute, B., Tefft, B., Segall, A., 1989, Social rejection of the mentally ill : A replication study of public attitude, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24, 69-76.
- Wiener, D., Anderson, R. J., Nietupski, J., 1982, Impact of community-based residential facilities for mentally retarded adults on surrounding property values using realtor analysis methods, Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 278-282.
- Willms, J. D., 1981, Neighborhood attitudes toward group homes for mentally retarded adults, in Mittler, P., ed., Frontiers of Knowledge in Mental Retardation, vol. 1, Baltimore, University Park Press, 337-344.
- Wolpert, J., 1978, Group Homes for the Mentally Retarded : An Investigation of Neighborhood Property Impacts, New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities.
10.7202/706586ar