Making Curriculum Visible Through a Multi-Dimensional, Interactive Curriculum Map, MyCourseMap

Tee, Lisa; Serrano Santos, Jose; Seaman, Kristen; Sim, Tin; Bedford, Simon; Tee, Lai

doi:https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2021-v18n3-04

Arafeh, S. (2016). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A case study and proposed content scope and sequence mapping tool. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 585‑611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000278

Google Scholar

Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades, 1994-2014. Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education. http://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum. McGraw-Hill Education.

Google Scholar

Barrie, S., & Pizzica, J. (2019). Reimagining university curriculum for a disrupted future of work: Partnership pedagogy. In J. Higgs, W. Letts, & G. Crisp (Eds.), Education for employability (Volume 2, pp. 143‑152). Brill Sense.

Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Bennett, D. (2018). Graduate employability and higher education: Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, 31‑61. http://herdsa.org.au/...

Google Scholar

Benson, V., Anderson, D., & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 143‑154. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10353

Google Scholar

Coates, H. (2008). Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning. Australasian student engagement report. Australian Council for Educational Research, Australasian Survey of Student Engagement. http://research.acer.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

DiLullo, C. (2020). Learners of a new generation. In L. K. Chan & W. Pawlina (Eds.), Teaching anatomy (pp. 11‑21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43283-6_2

Google Scholar

Dyjur, P., & Lock, J. (2016). A model to build capacity through a multi-program curriculum review process. Journal of Professional, Continuing, and Online Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18741/p9bc77

Google Scholar

Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: From conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x

Google Scholar

Evans, K. H., Ozdalga, E., & Ahuja, N. (2016). The medical education of Generation Y. Academic Psychiatry, 40(2), 382‑385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0399-5

Google Scholar

Funnell, P. (2017). Using audience response systems to enhance student engagement and learning in information literacy teaching. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(2), 28‑50. https://doi.org/10.11645/11.2.2238

Google Scholar

Hamilton, D., & Weiner, G. (2000, April). Subjects, not subjects: Curriculum pathways, pedagogies, and practices in the United Kingdom [Paper presentation]. Internationalization of Curriculum Studies Conference, Baton Rouge, United States. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED442715

Google Scholar

Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21. Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123‑137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120036547

Google Scholar

Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213‑225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511040

Google Scholar

Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191‑201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802048729

Google Scholar

Holmes, D. W., Sheehan, M., Birks, M., & Smithson, J. (2017). Development of a competency mapping tool for undergraduate professional degree programmes, using mechanical engineering as a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 126‑143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1324404

Google Scholar

Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357‑372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2013.802995

Google Scholar

Howard, S. K., & Mozejko, A. (2015). Teachers: Technology, change and resistance. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions (pp. 307‑317). Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Howell, J. A., Roberts, L. D., Seaman, K., & Gibson, D. C. (2017). Are we on our way to becoming a “Helicopter University”? Academics’ views on learning analytics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(1), 1‑20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758‑017‑9329‑9

Google Scholar

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277‑1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Google Scholar

James, R., Krause, K.-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/134870

Google Scholar

Krause, K-L. (2005, September). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities [Keynote address]. The James Cook University Symposium 2005. Sharing scholarship in learning and teaching: Engaging students. http://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

Krause, K.-L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493‑505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892

Google Scholar

Krause, K.-L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. http://melbourne‑cshe.unimelb.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

Kregor, G., Breslin, M., & Fountain, W. (2012). Experience and beliefs of technology users at an Australian university: Keys to maximising e-learning potential. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1382‑1404. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.777

Google Scholar

Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing technology-enhanced learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes S. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 289‑306). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑9827‑7_17

Google Scholar

Lawson, R., Taylor, T., Fallshaw, E., Summers, J., Kinash, S., French, E., & Angus-Leppan, T. (2013). Hunters and gatherers: Strategies for curriculum mapping and data collection for assuring learning. Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, Office for Learning and Teaching. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

Liang, H.-N., & Sedig, K. (2010). Can interactive visualization tools engage and support pre-university students in exploring non-trivial mathematical concepts? Computers & Education, 54(4), 972‑991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.001

Google Scholar

Margolis, E. (2007). The visible curriculum. Routledge.

Google Scholar

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43‑59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02505024

Google Scholar

Micheletto, M. J. (2011). Using audience response systems to encourage student engagement and reflection on ethical orientation and behavior. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4(10), 9‑18. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v4i10.5970

Google Scholar

Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S., & Harris, K. (1999). Decision‐making behaviour of potential higher education students. Higher Education Quarterly, 53(3), 211‑228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00127

Google Scholar

O’Neill, G., Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2014). Supporting programme teams to develop sequencing in higher education curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 268‑280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.867266

Google Scholar

Oliver, B., Ferns, S., Whelan, B., & Lilly, L. (2010). Mapping the curriculum for quality enhancement: Refining a tool and processes for the purpose of curriculum renewal. In Proceedings of the Australian Quality Forum 2010. Quality in uncertain times (pp. 80‑88). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26655

Google Scholar

Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: Recommendations for Australian higher education providers. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821‑836. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446415

Google Scholar

Owen, S., Stupans, I., Ryan, G., Woulfe, J., & McKauge, L. (2011). Outcomes-based planning, graduated descriptors and quality indicators for pharmacy experiental placements. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://ltr.edu.au/...

Google Scholar

Pajo, K., & Wallace, C. (2001). Barriers to the uptake of web-based technology by university teachers. Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 70‑84. http://ijede.ca/...

Google Scholar

Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the virtual generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 69‑80. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.24401703

Google Scholar

Reed, P. (2014). Staff experience and attitudes towards technology enhanced learning initiatives in one Faculty of Health & Life Sciences. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22770

Google Scholar

Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and teaching Generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 50(1), 2‑11. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ971235

Google Scholar

Stern, E., & Wall, S. (2018). The visible curriculum. In A. D. Peterkin & A. Skorzewska (Eds.), Health Humanities in postgraduate medical education (pp. 115‑142). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329‑346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235436

Google Scholar

Tee, L. (2019). Making curriculum visible: Engaging students in learning outcomes and career relevance through a multi-dimensional interactive map [Final report]. Australian government, Department of Education and Training, Higher Education Group. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/84238

Google Scholar

Tee, L., Ferns, S., & Hughes, J. D. (2018). The capabilities that count for early professional success in pharmacy: A case study of graduates, employer and course teaching team perspectives. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 9(1), 23‑40. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2018vol9no1art679

Google Scholar

Tee, L., Hattingh, L., Rodgers, K., Ferns, S., Chang, V., & Fyfe, S. (2015). MyCourseMap: An interactive visual map to increase curriculum transparency for university students and staff. In Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning and Tertiary Education Conference (pp. 285‑296). http://2015conference.ascilite.org/...

Google Scholar

Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change [Final report]. Paul Hamlyn Foundation. http://phf.org.uk/...

Google Scholar

Treleaven, L., & Voola, R. (2008). Integrating the development of graduate attributes through constructive alignment. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 160‑173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308319352

Google Scholar

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy. http://www.advance-he.ac.uk/...

Google Scholar

Uchiyama, K. P., & Radin, J. L. (2009). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 33(4), 271‑280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9078-8

Google Scholar

Wijngaards-de Meij, L., & Merx, S. (2018). Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 219‑231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2018.1462187

Google Scholar

Making Curriculum Visible Through a Multi-Dimensional, Interactive Curriculum Map, MyCourseMapReprésenter un programme d’études au moyen d’une carte de curriculum interactive multidimensionnelle, MyCourseMap[Record]

Abstract

Résumé

References

Abstracts

Abstract

Résumé

Appendices

References

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article