Abstracts
Résumé
Face au défi du passage à l’enseignement à distance, de nombreux établissements d’enseignement supérieur ont développé des programmes de formation pour leurs enseignants. À la fin de la session d’hiver 2020, le Centre de pédagogie universitaire de l’Université de Montréal a développé un cycle comprenant une vingtaine d’activités pour concevoir et encadrer des cours à distance. Cette première itération a fait l’objet d’un processus d’évaluation systématique pour bonifier les formations futures. Cette évaluation a reposé sur la rétroaction des formateurs et des enseignants. Nous présentons ici les instruments mobilisés, relevant des approches qualitatives et quantitatives, pour sonder les enseignants.
Mots-clés :
- Formation des enseignants,
- évaluation de formation,
- formation à distance (FAD),
- pédagogie universitaire
Abstract
In response to the issue of the transition to distance learning, many higher education institutions developed training programs for their teachers. At the end of the 2020 winter session, the Centre de pédagogie universitaire (Université de Montréal) developed a cycle of some 20 activities to design and supervise distance courses. This first iteration was the subject of a systematic evaluation process to improve future training. This evaluation was based on trainers’ and teachers’ feedback. We present instruments used, based on qualitative and quantitative approaches, to survey teachers.
Keywords:
- Teacher training,
- training assessment,
- distance learning,
- university pedagogy
Appendices
Références
- Aman, R. R. (2009). Improving student satisfaction and retention with online instruction through systematic faculty peer review of courses [thèse de doctorat, Oregon State University]. ScholarsArchive@OSU. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/...
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice‑Hall.
- Centre de pédagogie universitaire. (2020). Programme du cycle de formation « Concevoir et encadrer des activités pédagogiques à distance pour mon cours de l’été 2020 ». Université de Montréal. http://cpu.umontreal.ca/...
- Coutinho, S. A. et Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131‑151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. et Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982‑1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- Gilibert, D. et Gillet, I. (2010). Revue des modèles en évaluation de formation : approches conceptuelles individuelles et sociales. Pratiques psychologiques, 16(3), 217‑238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2009.03.006
- Gkolia, A., Belias, D. et Koustelios, A. (2014). Teacher’s job satisfaction and selfefficacy: A review. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 321‑342. http://eujournal.org/...
- Gross, M. (2005). The impact of low-level skills on information-seeking behavior: Implications of competency theory for research and practice. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 45(2), 155‑162. http://jstor.org/...
- Gross, M. et Latham, D. (2012). What’s skill got to do with it? Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 574‑583. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21681
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45‑51.
- Hermann, C. F. (1963). Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(1), 61‑82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390887
- King, W. R. et He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740‑755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
- Kirkpatrick, D. et Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3e éd.). Berrett‑Koehler.
- Kruger, J. et Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121‑1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
- McCain, D. V. (2016). Evaluation basics (2e éd.). Association for Training Development.
- Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group guidebook. SAGE.
- Office québécois de la langue française. (s.d.). Focus. Dans Banque de dépannage linguistique. http://bdl.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/...
- Pintrich, P. R. et de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33‑40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
- Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G. et Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91‑97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
- Santos, A. et Stuart, M. (2003). Employee perceptions and their influence on training effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(1), 27‑45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.tb00082.x
- Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3‑4), 207‑231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
- Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R. et Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61(2018), 136‑150. https://doi.org/10/gc32c5
- Thibeault, E.-N. (2010). À propos de la méthodologie des entretiens de groupe focalisés. Adjectif : analyses et recherches sur les TICE, (T1). http://www.adjectif.net/...
- Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Siddiq, F. et Scherer, R. (2020, avril). So, we’re all online? Readiness for online learning [questionnaire]. Google Forms. https://t.co/ionAbGIMJj
- Venkatesh, V. et Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273‑315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‑5915.2008.00192.x
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. et Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425‑478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540