Abstracts
Résumé
Ce texte porte sur l’utilisation des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) en pédagogie universitaire, telle que perçue par les étudiants. Plus précisément, cette étude présente à la fois les pratiques pédagogiques faisant appel aux TIC les plus favorables à l’apprentissage, mais également celles qui le sont le moins. Les données ont été recueillies a) par le biais d’une enquête par questionnaire et b) par des groupes de discussion, auprès de quelque 10 266 étudiants universitaires du Québec (Canada). Les résultats montrent que les étudiants considèrent que certaines pratiques pédagogiques faisant appel aux TIC favorisent leurs apprentissages, alors que d’autres leur sont moins bénéfiques. Les résultats sont particulièrement intéressants puisqu’ils permettent de démontrer notamment qu’au-delà des TIC, ce sont plutôt les pratiques pédagogiques sous-jacentes à l’usage des outils technologiques qui font toute la différence.
Mots-clés :
- TIC,
- technologies de l’information et de la communication,
- pédagogie universitaire,
- apprentissage
Abstract
In this article, the students’ perception of the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in higher education is presented. More specifically, this study describes which pedagogical practices using ICT enhance and which are less conducive to learning, according to 10,266 university students. These students completed a questionnaire and some discussion groups were conducted. The results show that university students perceived that some pedagogical practices, such as using emails, forums and an integrated learning platform, contribute to enhance their learning. However, results also show that some pedagogical practices using ICT are less conducive to learning.
Keywords:
- ICT,
- information and communication technologies,
- higher education,
- learning
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post-secondary education and training. Paris, France : UNESCO/IIEP.
- Buckley, C. A., Pitt, E., Norton, B. et Owens, T. (2010). Students approaches to study, conceptions of learning and judgments about the value of networked technologies. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 55-65. doi:10.1177/1469787409355875
- Collis, B. et van der Wende, M. (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. Enschede, Pays-Bas : University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
- Delavigne, V. (2000). Les mots du nucléaire : Contribution socioterminologique à une analyse de discours (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Rouen : Université de Rouen, 324-329.
- Depover, C., Karsenti, T. et Komis, V. (2007). Enseigner avec les technologies.Favoriser les apprentissages, développer les compétences. Québec, Canada : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Ipsos MORI. (2008). Great expectations of ICT. How higher education institutions are measuring up (étude effectuée pour le Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC]). Londres, R.-U. : auteur.
- Kirkup, G. et Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching – A tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 185-199. doi:10.1080/17439880500093810
- Knight, J. (2010). Distinguishing the learning approaches adopted by undergraduates in their use of online resources. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 67-76. doi:10.1177/1469787409355873
- Lameule, G. (2008). Les effets de l’usage des technologies d’information et de communication en formation d’enseignants, sur la construction des postures professionnelles. Savoirs, 17, 73-94.
- Lockyer, L., Patterson, J. et Harper, B. (2001). ICT in higher education: Evaluating outcomes for health education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 275-283.
- Margaryan, A., Nicol, D., Littlejohn, A. et Trinder, K. (2008). Students use of technologies to support formal and informal learning. Dans J. Luca et E. Weippl (dir.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA) 2008 (p. 4257-4266). Chesapeake, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Monsakul, J. (2008). A research synthesis of instructional technology in higher education. Dans K. McFerrin et al. (dir.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE) International Conference 2008 (p. 2134-2139). Chesapeake, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 20-28. doi:10.2307/1176724
- Rogers, G. (2004). History, learning technology and student achievement: Making the difference? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(3), 232-247. doi:10.1177/1469787404043811
- Rogers, P. L. (2001). Traditions to transformations: The forced evolution of higher education. AACE Journal, 9(1), 47-60.
- Ruberg, L. F., Moore, D. M. et Taylor, C. D. (1996). Student participation, interaction, and regulation in a computer-mediated communication environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3), 243-268.
- Saunders, G. et Klemming, F. (2003). Integrating technology into a traditional learning environment. Reasons and risks of success. Active Learning in Higher Education,4(1), 74-86. doi:10.1177/1469787403004001862
- Szabo, Z. et Schwartz, J. (2009). Learning methods for teacher education: Blackboard discussions produce deep learning. Dans G. Siemens et C. Fulford (dir.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA) 2009 (p. 2323-2334). Chesapeake, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Turney, C. S. M., Robinson, D., Lee, M. et Soutar, A. (2009). Using technology to direct learning in higher education: The way forward. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 71-83. doi:10.1177/1469787408100196
- Valdes-Corbeil, M. et Corbeil, J. (2008). Enhancing social presence by replacing the discussion forum with a blog. Dans G. Richards (dir.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008 (p. 1318-1323). Chesapeake, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Van der Maren, J.-M. (1996). Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation. 2e éd. Montréal, Canada : Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
- Wang, Y. M. (2007). Internet uses in university courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(2), 279-292.
- Zemsky, R. et Massy, W. F. (2004). Why the e-learning boom went bust. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(44), B6-B8.