Abstracts
Abstract
This paper reflects on hybrid learning design focusing on co-agency between teachers and students. The research question is: How could learning design with technology leverage the hybridity of the learning environment and teacher and student co-agency for post-pandemic learning? To answer this question, we examine academic publications for related studies to derive possible post-Covid learning design principles to answer the research question. Aligned with the focus of bridging hybridity, we draw on studies involving different emerging technologies from two different contexts: France and Singapore. The implications for hybridity, co-agency, and zone of possibility are analysed. The discussion stresses the virtual, material, and agentic transformation in hybrid learning design for a post-pandemic learning design.
Keywords:
- emergent technology,
- hybridity,
- agency,
- zone of possibility,
- teacher-student
Résumé
Cet article est une réflexion sur la conception d'apprentissage hybride axée sur la co-agence entre enseignants et étudiants. La question de recherche est la suivante : comment la conception de l'apprentissage avec la technologie pourrait-elle tirer parti de l'hybridité de l'environnement d'apprentissage et de la coagence des enseignants et des étudiants pour l'apprentissage post-pandémique ? Pour répondre à cette question, nous examinons les publications académiques pour des études connexes afin de dériver d'éventuels principes de conception d'apprentissage post-Covid pour répondre à la question de recherche. Conformément à l'objectif de bridging hybridity, nous nous appuyons sur des études impliquant différentes technologies émergentes dans deux contextes différents : la France et Singapour. Les implications pour l'hybridité, la coagence et les zones de possibilité sont analysées. La discussion met l'accent sur la transformation virtuelle, matérielle et agentique dans la conception d'apprentissage hybride pour une conception d'apprentissage post-pandémique.
Mots-clés :
- technologie émergente,
- hybridité,
- agence,
- zone de possibilité,
- enseignants-élèves
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ang, Q. (Oct 2021). Not everyone has right environment for HBL, which should be used as last resort: Chan Chun Sing. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/not-everyone-has-right-environment-for-hbl-which-should-be-used-as
- Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 28(3), 801-831. https://doi/abs/10.1086/345321
- Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report# 7.
- Castañeda, L., Attwell, G., & Dabbagh, N. (2023). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the networked ecosystems with people agency: Presentation of the special issue. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 23(71).
- Cook, J., Mor, Y., & Santos, P. (2020). Three cases of hybridity in learning spaces: Towards a design for a Zone of Possibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12945
- Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Utilisation of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science, 45(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9398-5
- Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. Routledge.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1975). Qu’est-ce qu’une littérature mineure ? Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure, 29-50.
- Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
- Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
- Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative, augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9207-1
- Fawns, T., Markauskaite, L., Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2021). H2m pedagogy: Designing for hybrid learning in medical education. Hybrid learning spaces. Springer International.
- Gérin-Lajoie, Serge; Roy, Normand et Lafleur, France (2022). La comodalité : De quoi parle-t-on et que savons-nous sur ce mode de formation ?. Communication présentée au Colloque "La formation à distance en comodalité au temps des bilans postpandémiques" dans le cadre du 89e congrès annuel de l'Association francophone pour le savoir (ACFAS), Québec, Canada.
- Gobeil-Proulx, J. (2019). La perspective étudiante sur la formation comodale, ou hybride flexible. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 16(1), 56-67.
- Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
- Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Dohn, N. B. (2014, April). Design for networked learning: framing relations between participants' activities and the physical setting. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on networked learning (pp. 137-144).
- Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
- Hirst, E., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2006). Patrolling the borders of otherness: Dis/placed identity positions for teachers and students in schooled spaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(3), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1303_4
- Impedovo, M. A., & Gadille, M. (2021). Embodiment in knots of sense-making between learning physical and virtual configurations. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(2), 145-162.
- Laferrière, T., & Cox, M. (2021). Editorial: Systemic perspectives on new alignments during COVID-19: Digital challenges and opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28158
- Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oup Oxford.
- LaViola Jr, J. J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D., & Poupyrev, I. P. (2017). 3D user interfaces: theory and practice. Addison-Wesley Professional.
- Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Examining the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12261
- Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2022). Design considerations for digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Losses and gains. In S. Tan & M. E. K. Lin (Eds.), Discourses, modes, media and meaning in an era of pandemic (pp. 69-88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168195-7
- Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The internet and higher education, 29, 40-48.
- OCDE (2021), The State of Global Education: 18 Months into the Pandemic, Éditions OCDE, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1a23bb23-en.
- Matusov, E. (2020). A student's right to freedom of education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, SF1-SF28. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.356
- Matusov, E. (2022). The teachers' pedagogical fiduciary duty to their students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-26.
- Ramlowat, D. D., & Pattanayak, B. K. (2019). Exploring the internet of things (IoT) in education: a review. In Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications (pp. 245-255). Springer.
- Rodriguez, R. C., & Liu, C. Y. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of the Hyflex learning model. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(4), 393-410.
- Rosborough, A. (2016). Understanding relations between gesture and chronotope: Embodiment and meaning-making in a second-language classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1121400
- Proulx, T.; Inzlicht, M. (2012). The Five "A" s of Meaning Maintenance: Finding meaning in the Theories of Sense-Making. Psycholoy Inquiry 23, 317–335.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (2nd Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 397-417). Cambridge University Press.
- Schraube, E. (2009). Technology as materialised action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103543
- Tan, S. C., Chue, S., & Teo, C. L. (2016). Teacher learning in a professional learning community: Potential for a dual-layer knowledge building. In C. K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners. 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 178-185). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
- Teo, C. L., Tan, S. C., & Chan, C. (2021). Pedagogical transformation and teacher learning for knowledge building: Turning COVID-19 challenges into opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(4), 1-26. https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/28057
- Tchounikine, P. (2019). Learners' agency and CSCL technologies: towards an emancipatory perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 237-250. https://10_1007-S11412-019-09302-5
- Teo, C. L., & Manasi, P. (2021). Knowledge building and young children: Learning sciences and early childhood pedagogy. Early Educators (pp.26-39). Singapore: Association For Early Childhood Educators.
- UNESCO Report. (2020). New UNESCO Report shows extent of global inequalities in education and calls for greater inclusion as schools re-open. https://en.unesco.org/news/GEM-Report-2020
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
- Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B. & Flueggen, F. (2021). High school students' experience of online learning during Covid-19: the influence of technology and pedagogy, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337