Abstracts
Abstract
How do unions respond to the emerging threats and opportunities posed by digitalization in the sphere of employment relations? What factors account for the focus and varying effectiveness of their responses? This paper seeks to address these questions in the case of Italy—a theoretically interesting case that combines significant digitalization-related challenges, historically strong industrial relations institutions under increasing pressure, and diverse union confederations.
From the available evidence, we find that Italian union strategies and demands so far have been primarily focused on interventions at the macro and meso levels, with a view to extending traditional forms of protection—especially sectoral collective bargaining agreements—to deal with the disruptive effects of digitalization. This focus has been coupled with some limited innovation in union agendas and discursive repertoires focused on the micro level of intervention, as well as a shift in union preferences toward inclusion of platform workers and self-employed workers in their constituencies. Whilst highlighting the importance of agential factors, we nonetheless find that the focus and effectiveness of union interventions are crucially shaped by prior institutional legacies and distributions of power resources, as well as by the ideological orientation and strategic capabilities of individual unions themselves.
Overall, Italian unions have to date tended to privilege gradual response strategies based on extension and adaptation of existing and established institutions. It remains to be seen whether such adaptive approaches will be sufficient to effectively govern the digital transformation of work or whether more radical institutional experimentation will become necessary. Either way, in order to build smart industrial relations in Italy, unions will have an active role to play.
Keywords:
- industrial relations institutions,
- trade union strategies,
- Industry 4.0,
- e-commerce,
- platforms
Résumé
Comment les syndicats réagissent-ils aux menaces et aux opportunités émergentes que pose le numérique dans le domaine des relations de travail ? Quels facteurs expliquent l’orientation et l’efficacité variable de leurs réponses ? Cet article cherche à répondre à ces questions à partir du cas de l’Italie — un cas intéressant au niveau théorique, car il combine d’importants défis liés au numérique, des institutions de relations de travail historiquement fortes sous pression croissante et diverses confédérations syndicales.
D’après les données disponibles, nous constatons que les stratégies et les revendications des syndicats italiens ont, jusqu’à présent, été principalement axées sur les interventions aux niveaux macro et méso, plaidant en faveur d’une extension des formes traditionnelles de protection — en particulier des accords de négociation collectifs sectoriels — en vue de contrer les effets perturbateurs du numérique. Cela a été associé à quelques innovations modérées dans l’agenda des syndicats et des répertoires discursifs axés sur le niveau d’intervention micro, tout comme un changement des préférences des syndicats vers l’inclusion dans leurs rangs des travailleurs des plateformes digitales et des travailleurs indépendants. Tout en soulignant l’importance des facteurs structuraux, nous constatons, néanmoins, que la focalisation et l’efficacité des interventions des syndicats sont influencées de manière déterminante par les héritages institutionnels et la répartition des ressources de pouvoir, ainsi que par l’orientation idéologique et les capacités stratégiques des syndicats locaux eux-mêmes.
Dans l’ensemble, les syndicats italiens ont, jusqu’à ce jour, eu tendance à privilégier des stratégies de réponse graduelle fondées sur l’extension et l’adaptation des institutions existantes et établies. Toutefois, il reste à voir si de telles approches suffiront pour gérer efficacement la transformation numérique du travail ou si une expérimentation institutionnelle plus radicale deviendra nécessaire. Quoi qu’il en soit, si l’on souhaite nouer de meilleures (smart en anglais) relations de travail en Italie, les syndicats auront un rôle actif à y jouer.
Mots-clés:
- institutions,
- relations de travail,
- stratégies syndicales,
- industrie 4.0,
- commerce électronique,
- plateformes
Appendices
References
- Aloisi, Antonio and Elena Gramano (2019) “Workers without Workplaces and Unions without Unity: Non-Standard Forms of Employment, Platform Work and Collective Bargaining.” In Valeria Pulignano and Frank Hendrickx (eds.), Employment Relations for the 21st Century, Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, p. 107.
- Aloisi, Antonio and Valerio De Stefano (2020) “Regulation and the Future of Work: The Employment Relationship as an Innovation Facilitator.” International Labour Review, 159 (1), 47-69.
- Armaroli, Ilaria, Silvia Spattini and Paolo Tomassetti (2018) SUNI - Smart Unions for a New Industry. Report. Online at: http://suniproject.adapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/comparative_report.pdf (29/06/2020).
- Arntz, Melanie, Terry Gregory and Ulrich Zierahn (2016), “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” OECD Working Papers, No.189, Paris.
- Baccaro, Lucio and Chris Howell (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s. Cambridge: CUP.
- Bernaciak, Magdalena and Marta Kahancová (2017) “Introduction: Innovation against all Odds?” In (eds.), Innovative union practices in Central-Eastern Europe, Brussels: ETUI.
- Broughton, Andrea and Chiara Manzoni (2017) “Smart Industrial Relations: A Review of Practices in the Manufacturing, Automotive and Chemicals sectors in Western Europe.” Technical Report, IRES Lucia Morosini.
- Cedefop (2017) “Investing in Skills Pays off: The Economic and Social Cost of Low-Skilled Adults in the EU.” Online at: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/5560 (29/06/2020).
- Degryse, Christophe (2016) “Digitalisation of the Economy and its Impact on Labour Markets.” ETUI RP-Working Papers, 2016.02.
- Doellgast, Virginia, Ursula Holtgrewe and Stephen Deery (2009) “The Effects of National Institutions and Collective Bargaining Arrangements on Job Quality in Front-Line Service Workplaces.” ILR Review, 62 (4), 489-509.
- Frege, Carola and John Kelly, eds. (2004) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: OUP.
- Fullin, Giovanna (2002) “The Unions for Atypical Workers in Italy.” Transfer, 8 (3), 531-535.
- Gasparri, Stefano, Peter Ikeler and Giovanna Fullin (2019) “Trade Union Strategy in Fashion Retail in Italy and the USA: Converging Divergence between Institutions and Mobilization?” European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25 (4), 345-361.
- Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca (2011) “European Trade Unions and ‘Atypical’ Workers.” Industrial Relations Journal, 42 (3), 293-310.
- Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca and Richard Hyman (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: OUP.
- Hauptmeier, Marco and Edmund Heery (2014) “Ideas at Work.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (18), 2473-2488.
- Hayter, Susan (2011) The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy: Negotiating for Social Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Heery, Edmund (2002) “Partnership versus Organising: Alternative Futures for British Trade Unionism.” Industrial Relations Journal, 33 (1), 20-35.
- Hyman, Richard and Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick (2010) “Trade Unions, Politics and Parties: Is a New Configuration Possible?” Transfer, 16 (3), 315-331.
- Joyce, Simon, Mark Stuart, Chris Forde and Danat Valizade (2019) “Work and Social Protection in the Platform Economy in Europe.” Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 25, 153-184.
- Katz, Harry C., Rosemary Batt and Jeffrey H. Keefe (2003) “The Revitalization of the CWA: Integrating Collective Bargaining, Political Action and Organizing.” ILR Review, 56 (4), 573-589.
- Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz and Robert B. McKersie (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
- Leonardi, Salvo, Maria Concetta Ambra and Andrea Ciarini (2018) “Italian Collective Bargaining at a Turning Point.” In Salvo Leonardi and Roberto Pedersini (eds.), Multi-Employer Bargaining under Pressure: Decentralization Trends in Five European Countries. Brussels: ETUI, p. 185-224.
- Lévesque, Christian and Gregor Murray (2010) “Understanding Union Power: Resources and Capabilities for Renewing Union Capacity.” Transfer, 16 (3), 333-350.
- McAdam, Doug (1996) ‘‘Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.’’ In Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- McGuire, Donna (2013) “Analysing Union Power, Opportunity and Strategic Capability: Global and Local Union Struggles Against the General Agreement on Trade in Services.” Global Labour Journal, 5 (1), 45-67.
- McKinsey Global Institute (2017) A Future that Works: Automation, Employment and Productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
- Moore, Phoebe, Martin Upchurch and Xanthe Whittaker (2017) Humans and Machines at Work - Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Murray, Gregor, Christian Lévesque, Glenn Morgan and Nicolas Roby (2020) “Disruption and Re-Regulation in Work and Employment: from Organisational to Institutional Experimentation.” Transfer, 26 (2), 135-156.
- Pedersini, Roberto (2020) “Living and Working in Italy.” Eurofound. Online at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/country/italy (29/06/2020).
- Pfeiffer, Sabine (2017) “Industrie 4.0 in the making - Discourse Patterns and the Rise of Digital Despotism.” In Kendra Briken, Shiona Chillas, Martin Krzywdzinski and Abigail Marks (eds.), The New Digital Workplace, London: Palgrave, p. 21-41.
- Prodi, Elena, Francesco Seghezzi and Michele Tiraboschi, eds. (2017) Il piano Industria 4.0 un anno dopo. ADAPT Labour Studies, e-Book series, No. 65.
- Pulignano, Valeria, Domenico Carrieri and Lucio Baccaro (2018) “Industrial Relations in Italy in the Twenty-First Century.” Employee Relations, 40 (4), 654-673.
- Pulignano, Valeria, Paul Thompson and Nadja Doerflinger (2020) “Workplace Change and Institutional Experimentation: A Case Study of Service-Sector Work in Europe.” Transfer, 26 (2), 175-187.
- Regalia, Ida and Marino Regini (2018) “Trade Unions and Employment Relations in Italy during the Economic Crisis.” South European Society and Politics, 23 (1), 63-79.
- Sacchetto, Devi and Marco Semenzin (2016) “Workers’ Cooperatives in Italy: Between Solidarity and Autocratic Centralism.” In Ngai Pun, Ben Hok-bun Ku, Hairong Yan and Anita Koo (eds.), Social Economy in China and the World. London: Routledge, p. 135-155.
- Streeck, Wolfgang and Anke Hassel (2003) “Trade Unions as Political Actors.” In John T. Addison and Claus Schnabel (eds.), International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 335-365.
- Tassinari, Arianna and Vincenzo Maccarrone (2017) “The Mobilisation of Gig Economy Couriers in Italy: Some Lessons for the Trade Union Movement.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (3), 353-357.
- Tassinari, Arianna and Vincenzo Maccarrone (2020) “Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK.” Work, Employment and Society, 34 (1), 35-54.
- Vandaele, Kurt (2018) “Will Trade Unions Survive in the Platform Economy? Emerging Patterns of Platform Workers’ Collective Voice and Representation in Europe.” ETUI RP-WP.
- Visser, Jelle (2019) Trade Unions in the Balance. Geneva: International Labour Organization’s Bureau for Workers’ Activities.
- Wood, Alex J. (2020) Despotism on Demand. How Power Operates in the Flexible Workplace. Ithaca: ILR Press.