Abstracts
Résumé
Depuis la parution de l’article « Pedagogy of Multiliteracies » par le New London Group en 1996, plusieurs chercheurs, ainsi que des enseignants et professeurs, se sont intéressés au développement des « multilittératies » dans des contextes d’apprentissage. De plus, l’importance de la multimodalité dans plusieurs formes de communications met en évidence la nécessité de développer une littératie médiatique multimodale dans des contextes d’apprentissage (Lacelle et al., 2017; Lebrun et al., 2012). La littérature numérique offre un potentiel de développement d’une pensée critique concernant la technologie et les médias (Aarseth, 1997; Ensslin, 2014; Hayles, 2008; Simanowski et al., 2010). Le but de cet article est de démontrer les résultats d’une étude exploratoire menée dans un cégep anglophone où l’auteur a enseigné la littérature numérique à des étudiants. Durant cette étude, les étudiants ont également eu l’occasion de créer leurs propres récits en utilisant l’application numérique Twine. Ce qui ressort de l’analyse des données est la façon dont l’interprétation et la création des textes numériques et interactifs ont engendré une réflexion sur la technologie ainsi qu’une articulation de plusieurs littératies.
Mots-clés :
- littératies multiples,
- multilittératies,
- littérature numérique,
- fiction interactive,
- fiction hypertextuelle,
- cégep
Abstract
Since the New London Group's "Pedagogy of Multiliteracies" was published in 1996, several researchers, as well as teachers and professors, have been interested in the development of multiliteracies in learning contexts. In addition, the importance of multimodality in several forms of communication highlight the need to develop multimodal media and critical literacy in learning contexts (Lebrun, Lacelle, & Boutin, 2012; 2017). To respond to this need, digital literature offers the potential for developing critical thinking about technology and media (Aarseth, 1997; Ensslin, 2014; Hayles, 2008; Simanowski et al., 2010). The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the results of an exploratory study conducted in an English-speaking CEGEP where the author taught digital literature to students. During this study, the students also had the opportunity to create their own digital narratives using the digital application, Twine. What emerges from the data analysis is how the interpretation and creation of digital and interactive texts engendered a reflection on technology, as well as an articulation of several literacies.
Keywords:
- multiliteracies,
- digital literature,
- interactive texts,
- hypertextual fiction,
- cegep
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Anderson, G. L. et Irvine, P. (1993). Informing critical literacy with ethnography. Dans C. Lankshear et P. L. McLaren (dir.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern (p. 81-104). State University of New York Press.
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. et Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
- Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. et Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525-536.
- Baillargeon, N. (2011). Liliane est au lycée : est-il indispensable d'être cultivé? Flammarion.
- Boulay, S., Maroquène, G. et Roger, C., (2010). Les fanfictions : un renouvellement du statut de l’auteur et des habitudes de lecture. Étude fanfiction. http://etude.fanfiction.free.fr/master_definition.php
- Butler, A. (2017). Unvarnished truth of social media: Why critical media literacy is needed (now more than ever). International Critical Media Literacy Conference, 20. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/criticalmedialiteracy/2017/2017/20
- Chen, D. et Gu, P. L. (2004). Causality analysis of social balkanization of information technology. Studies in Science of Science, 1. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KXYJ200401003.htm
- Cope, B. et Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
- Daemmrich, I. G. (2007). Novices encounter a novice literature: Introducing digital literature in a first-year college writing class. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 34(4), 420-433.
- Dakers, J. R. (2006). Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ensslin, A. (2014). Literary gaming. MIT Press.
- Farber, M. (2015). Gamify your classroom: A field guide to game-based learning. Peter Lang.
- Ferdig, R. E. et Pytash, K. E. (2014). Using video games for literacy acquisition and studying literate practices. Dans K. Schrier (dir.), Learning, education and games (p. 55-71). ETC Press.
- Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Routledge
- Gee, J. P. et Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
- Hayles, N. K. (2007). Hyper and deep attention: The generational divide in cognitive modes. Profession, 187-199.
- Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
- Hinkel, E. (2001). Building awareness and practical skills to facilitate cross-cultural communication. Dans M. Celce-Murcia (dir.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3e éd., p. 443-458). Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
- Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American should know. Houghton Mifflin.
- Jacobs, G. E. (2013). Reimagining multiliteracies: A response to Leander and Boldt. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(4), 270-273.
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
- Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, “reading”, and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331.
- Jota, A. (2007). Lost Pig. http://grunk.org/lostpig/
- Kolb, D. A. et Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. Dans C. L. Cooper (dir.), Theories of group processes (p. 33-58). John Wiley & Sons.
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
- Lacelle, N., Boutin, J.-F. et Lebrun, M. (dir.). (2017). La littératie médiatique multimodale appliquée en contexte numérique - LMM@ : outils conceptuels et didactiques. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Lankshear, C. et Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.
- Leander, K. et Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22-46.
- Lebrun, M., Lacelle, N. et Boutin, J.-F. (dir.). (2012). La littératie médiatique multimodale : de nouvelles approches en lecture-écriture à l’école et hors de l’école. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur. (2017). Politique de la réussite éducative. Gouvernement du Québec. https://securise.education.gouv.qc.ca/politique-de-la-reussite-educative/
- Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2009). Formation générale : commune, propre et complémentaire aux programmes d’études conduisant au diplôme d’études collégiales. Gouvernement du Québec. http://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/1944836?docref=K_RawHYC__Uvare3Q05_Mw
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93.
- Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.
- People’s Republic of Interactive Fiction. (s. d.). Play some interactive fiction. http://pr-if.org/doc/play-if-card/play-if-card.html
- Ponce, R. N. (2014). Surviving history: The fever!
- Rideout, V. et Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. Common Sense Media.
- Rowsell, J. et Decoste, E. (2012). (Re)designing writing in English class: A multimodal approach to teaching writing. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(3), 246-260.
- Ruppin, V. (2017). La création littéraire numérique comme participation active du spectateur lecteur dans un contexte scolaire. Revue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale, 6. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rechercheslmm/2017-v6-rechercheslmm03474/1043754ar.pdf
- Saemmer, A. (2015). Rhétorique du texte numérique : figures de la lecture, anticipations de pratiques. Presses de l'Enssib.
- Salen, K. et Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
- Salter, A. (2014). What is your quest?: From adventure games to interactive books. University of Iowa Press.
- Short, E. (2000). Galatea. https://nickm.com/if/emshort/galatea.html
- Simanowski, R., Schäfer, J. et Gendolla, P. (2010). Reading moving letters: Digital literature in research and teaching. A handbook. Transcript Verlag.
- Snow, K. (2015). Beneath Floes. https://bravemule.itch.io/beneathfloes
- Squire, K. D. (2008). Video-game literacy: A literacy of expertise. Dans J. Coiro, M. Knobel, D. Leu et C. Lankshear (dir), Handbook of research on new literacies (p. 635-670). MacMillan.
- Statistique Canada. (2018). A portrait of Canadian youth. Gouvernement du Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-631-x/11-631-x2018001-eng.htm
- Steinkuehler, C. (2007). Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. ELearning, 4(3), 297-318.
- Steinkuehler, C. (2011). Video games and digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 61-63.
- Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K. et Barab, S. (dir.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge University Press.
- Storksdieck, M. (2016). Critical information literacy as core skill for lifelong STEM learning in the 21st century: Reflections on the desirability and feasibility for widespread science media education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 167-182.