Abstracts
Abstract
The reception of Frances Burney’s final novel, The Wanderer, demonstrates the periodical press’s ability to shape British concepts of authorship and audience expectations in the Romantic era. William Hazlitt’s and John Wilson Croker’s reviews of this novel illustrate that, despite their apparent ideological differences, the Edinburgh and Quarterly reviews could combine to redefine the British literary tradition and reading public in national and masculinist terms. Such reviews attempt to police the borders of the British canon, to the exclusion of writers like Burney who seem not to meet the new demands of Romantic-era review culture.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Edited by L. G. Mitchell, Oxford UP, 1993.
- Burney, Frances. Evelina, or, A Young Lady’s Entrance into the World. Edited by Susan Kubica Howard, Broadview, 2000.
- Burney, Frances. The Journals and Letters of Fanny Burney (Madame D’Arblay). Edited by Joyce Hemlow et al., 12 vols, Oxford UP, 1972-84.
- Burney, Frances. The Wanderer; or, Female Difficulties. Edited by Margaret Anne Doody et al., Oxford UP, 1991.
- Byron, George Gordon. Byron’s Letters and Journals. Edited by Leslie A. Marchand, vol. 3, Belknap, 1974.
- Connolly, Claire. “‘I accuse Miss Owenson’: The Wild Irish Girl as Media Event.” Colby Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 98-115. Periodicals Archive Online, www.proquest.com.
- Croker, John Wilson. Review of Diary and Letters of Madame D’Arblay, by Frances Burney. Quarterly Review, vol. 70, 1842, pp. 243-287.
- Croker, John Wilson. Review of The Wanderer, by Frances Burney. Quarterly Review, vol. 21, 1814, pp. 124-130.
- Cutmore, Jonathan. “A Plurality of Voices in the Quarterly Review.” Cutmore, Conservatism, pp. 61-85.
- Cutmore, Jonathan, editor. Conservatism and the Quarterly Review: A Critical Analysis. Pickering & Chatto, 2007.
- Cutmore, Jonathan. Contributors to the Quarterly Review: A History, 1809-25. Pickering & Chatto, 2008.
- Doody, Margaret Anne. Frances Burney: The Life in the Works. Rutgers UP, 1988.
- Edgeworth, Maria. Patronage. Pandora, 1986.
- Gunzenhauser, Bonnie. “‘A very rational animal’: William Hazlitt on the Romantic-Era Reading Public.” Keats-Shelley Journal, vol. 57, 2008, pp. 66-88.
- Hazlitt, William. The Complete Works of William Hazlitt. Edited by P. P. Howe, vol. 9, Frank Cass, 1967.
- Hazlitt, William. Review of The Wanderer, by Frances Burney. Edinburgh Review, vol. 24, 1815, pp. 320-338. Periodicals Archive Online, www.proquest.com.
- Hofkosh, Sonia. “Sexual Politics and Literary History: William Hazlitt’s Keswick Escapade and Sarah Hazlitt’s Journal.” At the Limits of Romanticism: Essays in Cultural, Feminist, and Materialist Criticism, edited by Mary A. Favret and Nicola J. Watson, Indiana UP, 1994, pp. 125-142.
- Johnson, Claudia L. Jane Austen: Women, Politics, and the Novel. U of Chicago P, 1988.
- Keane, Angela. Women Writers and the English Nation in the 1790s: Romantic Belongings. Cambridge UP, 2000.
- Klancher, Jon P. The Making of English Reading Audiences, 1790-1832. U of Wisconsin P, 1987.
- Lapp, Robert Keith. Contest for Cultural Authority: Hazlitt, Coleridge, and the Distresses of the Regency. Wayne State UP, 1999.
- Mack, Robert L. “The Novelist and the Critics: Frances Burney’s Manuscript Corrections and Additions to The Wanderer; or, Female Difficulties.” Journal x, vol. 9, no. 1, Autumn 2004, pp. 17-51.
- Morgan, Peter F. “Croker as Literary Critic in the Quarterly Review.” Wordsworth Circle, vol. 8, no. 1, Winter 1977, pp. 62-68. Periodicals Archive Online, www.proquest.com.
- Mulvihill, James. “The Poetics of Authority: Representation in Hazlitt’s Political Criticism.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 101, no. 4, Oct. 2002, pp. 540-560. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/27712276.
- Perkins, Pam. “Private Men and Public Women: Social Criticism in Fanny Burney’s The Wanderer.” Essays in Literature, vol. 23, no. 1, Spring 1996, pp. 69-83. Research Library, www.proquest.com.
- Ragaz, Sharon. “Walter Scott and the Quarterly Review.” Cutmore, Conservatism, pp. 107-132.
- Root, Christina. “Jacobin Poetics and Napoleonic Politics: Hazlitt’s Critique of Wordsworth.” European Romantic Review, vol. 6, no. 2, Winter 1996, pp. 227-245.
- Schoenfield, Mark. British Periodicals and Romantic Identity: The “Literary Lower Empire”. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
- Schoenfield, Mark. “Novel Marriages, Romantic Labor, and the Quarterly Press.” Prose Studies, vol. 25, no. 1, Apr. 2002, pp. 62-83. Taylor & Francis Online, .
- St Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge UP, 2004.
- Stewart, David. “The Examiner, Robert Southey’s Print Celebrity and the Marketing of the Quarterly Review.” Prose Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, Apr. 2009, pp. 22-39. Taylor & Francis Online, .
- Uphaus, Robert W. “Hazlitt, the Novel, and the French Revolution.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, vol. 17, 1987, pp. 217-227.
- Whale, John. “Hazlitt on Burke: The Ambivalent Position of a Radical Essayist.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 25, no. 4, Winter 1986, pp. 465-481. JSTOR, .
- Wheatley, Kim. “Paranoid Politics: The Quarterly and Edinburgh Reviews.” Prose Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, Dec. 1992, pp. 319-343.
- Wheatley, Kim. “Plotting the Success of the Quarterly Review.” Cutmore, Conservatism, pp. 19-39.
- Wu, Duncan. William Hazlitt: The First Modern Man. Oxford UP, 2008.