Abstracts
Abstract
Philosophy of education’s relevance to schooling and value to society have always been contested within the field. When reading about the state of the field, one often gets the sense that philosophy of education is losing its cache, given the prevalence of data-oriented views about research. But the solution to this crisis is often difficult to identify. In this context, this essay investigates the prevalence of “golden years” thinking in the history of philosophy of education and what it would mean to think differently and go beyond this view. It explores how philosophy of education is framed as peripheral to mainstream educational research today and why students might not choose to study it. Then I examine precarity as a common discourse in history of the field. I scrutinize whether and how we are “in danger,” who “we” are, and the history of this imaginary. I conclude with reflections on moving on from these discourses in the future.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2019). Introduction to research in education. Cengage.
- Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
- Biesta, G. (2020). Educational research: an unorthodox introduction. Bloomsbury.
- Bredo, E. (2002). How can philosophy of education be both viable and good? Educational Theory, 52(3), 263–271.
- Bridges, D. (2006). The International and the excellent in educational research. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: why “what works” doesn’t work (pp. 143–158). Springer.
- Burbules, N. C. (2020). Why publish? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(3), 655–665.
- Burbules, N. C. (2002a). The dilemma of philosophy of education: “relevance” or critique? Part one. Educational Theory, 52(3), 257–261.
- Burbules, N. C. (2002b). The dilemma of philosophy of education: “relevance” or critique? Part two. Educational Theory, 52(3), 349–357.
- Carroll, J. B. (1968). Basic and applied research in education: Definitions, directions, and implications. Harvard Educational Review, 38, 263–276.
- Clark J. A. (2015). Does philosophy of education have a future? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(9), 863–869.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison. K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
- De Castell, S., & Freeman, H. (1978). Education as a socio‐practical field: The restructuring of educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 10(2), 1–25.
- Feinberg, W., & Odeshoo, J. (2000). Educational Theory in the fifties: the beginning of a conversation. Educational Theory, 50(3), 289–306.
- Fendler, L. (2006). Why generalizability is not generalizable. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: why “what works” doesn’t work (pp. 51–64). Springer.
- Gatley, J. (2023). Ameliorating educational concepts and the value of analytic philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(4), 508–518.
- Griffiths, M. (2014). Re-thinking the relevance of philosophy of education for educational policy making. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 546–559.
- Hardy, I., Heimans, S., & Lingard, B. (2011). Journal rankings: positioning the field of educational research and educational academics. Power and Education, 3(1), 4–17.
- Harris, K. (1988). Dismantling a deconstructionist history of philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(1), 50–62,
- Haynes, B. (2002). Globalisation and its consequences for scholarship in philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(1), 103–114.
- Haynes, B. (2013). R. S. Peters and the periphery. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(2), 123–127.
- Haynes, F. (2014). Editorial. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(11), 1197–1202.
- Jackson, L. (2020). Beyond virtue: The politics of educating emotions. Cambridge University Press.
- Jackson, L. (2020). “But is it really research?” Mentoring students as theorists in the era of cybernetic capitalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 17–21.
- Jackson, L. (2023). Fifty shades of academic freedom: beyond a binary view. Philosophy of Education, 79(1), 97–111.
- Jackson, L., Alston, K., Bialystok, L., Blum, L., Burbules, N. C., Chinnery, A., Hansen, D. T., Hytten, K., Mayo, C., Norris, T., Stitzlein, S. M., Thompson, W. C., Waks, L., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Snapshot 2020 from the United States and Canada. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1130–1146.
- Jackson, L., & Peters, M. (Eds.). (2023). Marxism, neoliberalism, and intelligent capitalism: An educational philosophy and theory reader, volume XII. Routledge.
- Jackson, L., & Sojot, A. N. (Eds.). (2023). Women leadership in philosophy of education: The women presidents of PESA [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(9).
- Johnston, J. S. (2019). Problems in philosophy of education: a systematic approach. Bloomsbury.
- Kaminsky, J. S. (1986). The first 600 months of philosophy of education—1935–1985: A deconstructionist history. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(1), 42–48.
- Kaminsky, J. S. (1988). Philosophy of education in Australasia: a definition and a history. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(1), 12–26.
- Kerlinger, F. N. (1960). The mythology of educational research: the methods approach. School and society, 88, 2171.
- Kilpatrick, W. H. (1951). Crucial issues in current educational theory. Educational Theory, 1(1), 1–8.
- Li, Y., Dewidar, O., Wang, X., Ghogomu, E., Wadhwani, A., Guo, K., Ma, M., Barbeau, V., Pan, B., Abdelrazeq, L., Li, Z., Alghamyan, A., Guo, L., Jahel, F., Ren, J., Madani, M.T., Allam, S., Hussain, T., Yang, M., Kojan, W., Li, X., Yang, K., & Welch, V. (2023), Methodological quality of Campbell Systematic Reviews has improved over the past decade. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(4), e1358.
- Marshall, J. D. (1975). The nature of educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 7(1), 15–26.
- Muir, J. R. (2004). Is there a history of educational philosophy? John White vs the historical evidence. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(1), 35–56.
- Peters, M. A., Arndt, S., Tesar, M., Jackson, L., Hung, R., Mika, C., Ozolins, J. T., Teschers, C., Orchard, J., Buchanan, R,. Madjar, A., Novak, R., & Besley, T. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1061–1082.
- Phillips, D. C. (2005). The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 577–597.
- Rizvi, F. (2006). Imagination and the globalisation of educational policy research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 193–205.
- Roberts, P. (2014). “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times …”: Philosophy of education in the contemporary world. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(6), 623–634.
- Rowbottom, D. P. (2014). Educational research as science? In A. D. Reid, E. P. Hart, M. A. Peters, & D. Kumar (Eds.), A companion to research in education (pp. 145–153). Springer.
- Ruitenberg, C. (2009). Introduction: The question of method in philosophy of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(3), 315–323.
- Smeyers, P. (2006). The relevance of irrelevant research: The irrelevance of relevant research. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: why “what works” doesn’t work (pp. 95–108). Springer.
- Smeyers, P., & Burbules, N. C. (2011). How to improve your impact factor: Questioning the quantification of academic quality. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(1), 1–17.
- Smeyers, P., de Ruyter, D. J., Waghid, Y., & Strand, T. (2014). Publish yet perish: On the pitfalls of philosophy of education in an age of impact factors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(6), 647–666.
- Smeyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2006). Introduction: On the rhetoric of “what works” contextualizing educational research and the picture of performativity. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: why “what works” doesn’t work (pp. 1–16). Springer.
- Snook, I. (2013). Respectability and relevance: Reflections on Richard Peters and analytic philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(2), 191–201.
- Soltis, J. F. (1971). Analysis and anomalies in philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 3(2), 37–50.
- Standish, P. (2010). What is the philosophy of education? In R. Bailey (Ed.), The philosophy of education: an introduction (pp. 4–20). Bloomsbury.
- Stengel, B. S. (2002). Cause for worry or agenda for action? Educational Theory, 52(3), 281–290.
- Stone, L. (2006). Kuhnian science and education research: analytics of practice and training. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: why “what works” doesn’t work (pp. 127–142). Springer.