Abstracts
Abstract
This exploratory essay considers how and why humanities research is excluded, co-opted, or othered in methods courses and methods course offerings for education research at an R1 institution. While not generalizable (ironically?), concerns have also been raised by philosophers of education that philosophy is not taught or is rarely taught as a research method in colleges of education (Norris, 2021). As though there are only two kinds of research—quantitative and qualitative—this paper asks why humanities methods are rare in an R1 education research core. The short answer might point to numbers: there simply are not that many graduate students in history and philosophy of education. The longer answer, however, arguably involves scholarly turf wars waged within the politics of inquiry. This paper provides a brief overview of the history and politics of the methods wars, an explanation of a research core and the courses constituting it at Georgia State University, and a view from the outside looking in: peering over the qual and quant gate to see that philosophy is already there, but denied credibility, acknowledgement, and understanding.
Appendices
Bibliography
- American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40. https://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/12ERv35n6_Standard4Report%20.pdf
- American Philosophical Association. (1996). APA statement on research in philosophy. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 70(2), 119–121.
- Baez, B., & Boyles, D. (2009). The politics of inquiry: Education research and the “Culture of Science.” Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Brint, S. G. (1994). In the age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and in public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107–279, 116 Stat. 1941 (2002). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-747/pdf/COMPS-747.pdf
- Eisenhart, M. (2005). Science plus: A response to the responses to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 52–58.
- Eisenhart M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13.
- Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31–38.
- Georgia State University. (2024, August 30). Special collections and archives: Georgia State University history: brief history; admin. org. https://research.library.gsu.edu/c.php?g=115683&p=754351
- Howe, K. R. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09342003
- Lagemann, E. C. (1997). Contested terrain: A history of education research in the United States, 1890–1990. Educational Researcher, 26(9), 5–17.
- Lather, P. (2010). Engaging science: Policy from the side of the messy. New York: Peter Lang.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
- “National Academy of Sciences.” (n.d.). U.S. Department of State Archive. https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/io/unesco/members/48802.htm#:~:text=The%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences,use%20for%20the%20general%20welfare
- National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2001). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-107publ110/pdf/PLAW-107publ110.pdf
- Norris, T. (2024). “But what should I do in my methodology chapter?” Promoting philosophy as legitimate educational research. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 31(3), 202-217.
- Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
- Reading Excellence Act, Pub. L. No. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-105hr2614rh/pdf/BILLS-105hr2614rh.pdf
- Rossides, D. W. (1998). Professions and disciplines: functional and conflict perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Silva, E. T., & Slaughter, S. (1980). Prometheus bound: The limits of social science professionalization in the progressive period. Theory and Society, 9(6), 781–819.
- St. Pierre, E. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 239–266.