Abstracts
Résumé
En 1918-19, la grippe « espagnole » a tué entre 2,5 et 5 % de la population mondiale (entre 30 et 50 millions de morts). Image quintessenciée de l’épidémie moderne, presque tous les scénarios pandémiques s’accordent aujourd’hui pour y voir le modèle d’une pandémie « sévère ». Peut-on toutefois sérieusement comparer le risque pandémique actuel à ce qui reste comme l’un des pires cataclysmes sanitaires de l’histoire ?
Summary
The 1918 pandemic is still unique in the history of flu pandemics. The pathogenicity of the virus was extreme, and young adults more than infants and old people were its main victims. Many a death was caused by complications. The response of the French authorities didn’t live up to the emergency requirements. Hospitals being requisitioned by the military, the civilian population lacked everything: beds, doctors, nurses, ambulances, drugs. For want of preventive or curative medicine, authorities could have done very little at any rate: public health measures (quarantine and isolation of the sicks) were unable to stop contagion. More than the war itself, present day historians indict the war-boosted increase in railways and sea communications between the continents and between the rear and the front. This momentous growth in transportation activities brought about a « bacterial equalization » throughout social categories and regions of the world. A most singular episode, whose historical chances to replicate within the next ten years are rather slim.
Appendices
Références
- 1. Johnson NPAS, Mueller J. Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918-1920 « Spanish » influenza pandemic. Bull History Med 2002 ; 76 : 105-15.
- 2. Meltzer MI, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. The economic impact of pandemic influenza in the United States: priorities for intervention. Emerg Infect Dis 1999 ; 5 : 659-71.
- 3. HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan. Washington : US Department of Health and Human Services, 2005.
- 4. Doyle A, Bonmarin I, Lévy-Bruhl D, et al. Estimation de l’impact d’une pandémie grippale et analyse de stratégies. Préparation à la lutte contre une pandémie grippale. Paris : Institut National de Veille Sanitaire, 2005.
- 5. Bubnoff AV. The 1918 flu virus is resurrected. Nature 2005 ; 437 : 794-5.
- 6. Kayser J. Resurrected influenza virus yields secrets of deadly 1918 pandemic. Science 2005 ; 310 : 28-9.
- 7. Crosby AW. Epidemic and peace, 1918. Westport : Greenwood Press, 1976.
- 8. Neustadt RE, Fineberg HV. The swine flu affair. Decision-making on a slippery disease. Washington : US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978.
- 9. Kilbourne ED. A virologist’s perspective on the 1918-19 pandemic. In: Phillips H, Killingray D, eds. The Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918-19. New Perspectives. Londres : Routledge, 2003 : 29-38.
- 10. Zinsser H. Manifestations of influenza during the earlier periods of its appearance in France. Medical Record 1920 ; 97 : 459-60.
- 11. Patterson KD, Pyle GF. The geography and mortality of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bull History Med 1991 ; 65 : 4-21.
- 12. Hildreth ML. The influenza epidemic of 1918-1919 in France: contemporary concepts of aetiology, therapy, and prevention. Soc History Med 1991 ; 4 : 277-94.
- 13. Delater. La grippe dans la nation armée de 1918 à 1921. Revue d’Hygiène 1923 ; 45 : 409-634.
- 14. Zylberman P. A holocaust in a holocaust. The Great War and the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic in France. In: Phillips H, Killingray D, eds. The Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918-19. New Perspectives. Londres : Routledge, 2003 : 191-201.
- 15. Rice G, Bryder L. Black November. The 1918 Influenza epidemic in New Zealand. Wellington : Allen and Unwin, 1988 : 228.
- 16. Patterson KD. Pandemic influenza 1700-1900: a study in historical epidemiology. Totowa NJ : Rowan and Littlefield, 1986 : 91.
- 17. A potential influenza pandemic: possible macroeconomic effects and policy issues. Washington DC : Congressional Budget Office, 8 décembre 2005 : 5-6.