Abstracts
Résumé
L’autisme est défini comme un trouble du développement caractérisé par une perturbation des interactions sociales et par des altérations de la capacité à communiquer associées à des activités stéréotypées. Les différentes thérapeutiques mises en oeuvre n’obtiennent souvent que des résultats partiels et instables. Les corpus théoriques proposés par la psychanalyse, la psychologie cognitive, la neurophysiologie, la neuropharmacologie et la génétique n’offrent que des éclairages très focalisés, laissant de larges zones d’ombre. La psychanalyse, qui a pendant longtemps constitué l’approche privilégiée, est aujourd’hui décriée par certaines associations de parents qui préfèrent aux théories psychanalytiques les hypothèses organiques de l’autisme. Les problèmes liés à la définition, à la classification de l’autisme, à la compréhension étiopathogénique et aux thérapeutiques se trouvent au coeur des controverses. L’objectif de cet article est de détecter les clivages et de soulever les questions à approfondir pour tenter de mieux prendre en charge les personnes autistes.
Summary
Autism is a pervasive developmental disorder of childhood characterised by disturbances in both social interactions and communication as well as stereotyped patterns of activities and behaviour. The increase in estimates of the prevalence of autism has raised the question of an «epidemic» of autism. More active case assessment and changes in diagnostic criteria probably account in large part for such increase. Investigators have attempted to define the neural pathophysiology of autism ever since the hypothesis of «refrigerator mother»as its cause was replaced by the view that it is a developmental disorder of the immature brain. However consensus is yet to be reached concerning the brain regions implicated. Psychoanalysis, cognitive psychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and genetics propose restricted view of the major issues leaving extensive areas unexplored. Therapeutic approaches induce only partial and uncertain results. There is no cure for autism but substantial evidence indicates that early, intensive, individualised education is beneficial for children. All modern intervention programs for autism affected children share a high degree of environmental structuring and predictability and an extensive individual approach. Autism being a behaviourally defined syndrome, it gave rise to a number of controversies concerning definition, classification, etiopathogeny and therapeutics. In the 1990s a crisis has occured in France with a loss of confidence between parents and psychiatrists with a problem concerning the means and ways of care of the autist. The aim of this paper is to point out the different questions raised by autism in order to better understand this syndrome which touches upon essential behaviour-related aspects such as self consciousness, reality perception, the functioning of the thought and communication, as well as the role of hereditary and acquired influences in normal and pathological development.
Appendices
Références
- 1. Williams D. Si on me touche, je n’existe plus. Paris: J’ai lu, 1992: 312 p. (Nobody nowhere. New York: Times Books, 1992); Quelqu’un quelque part. Paris: J’ai lu, 1996: 320 p. (Somebody somewhere. New York: Times Books, 1994).
- 2. Grandin T. Ma vie d’autiste. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1994: 234 p. (Emergence: labeled autistic. Californie: Arena Press, 1986).
- 3. Bouissac J. Qui j’aurai été. Autisme-Alsace, 2002: 142 p.
- 4. Rapin I. The autistic-spectrum disorders. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 302-3.
- 5. Chakrabarti S, Fombonne E. Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. JAMA 2001; 285: 3093-9.
- 6. Kanner L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child 1943; 2: 217-50.
- 7. Asperger H. Die autistischen Psychopathen im Kindesalter. Archiv für Psychiatry und Nervenkrankeiten 1944; 117: 76-136. Les psychopathes autistiques. Paris: PUF, 1998: 150 p.
- 8. Mazet P, Houzel D, Burstejn C. Autisme infantile et psychoses précoces. Encyclopédie Médico-Chirurgicale 1998; 37: 201-G10.
- 9. Bettelheim B. La forteresse vide: l’autisme infantile et la naissance de soi. Paris: Gallimard, 1969: 570 p. (The empty fortress: infantile autism and the birth of self. New York: Free Press, 1967).
- 10. Gillberg C, Coleman M. Autism and medical disorders: a review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996; 38: 191-202.
- 11. Folstein S, Rutter M. Infantile autism: a genetic study of 21 twin pairs. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1977; 18: 297-321.
- 12. Sigman M, Capps L. L’enfant autiste et son développement. Paris: Retz, 2001.
- 13. Malvy J, Adrien JL, Sauvage D. Signes précoces de l’autisme et films familiaux. Psychiatrie de l’Enfant 1997; XL: 175-98.
- 14. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Lansing M. Stratégies éducatives de l’autisme et des autres troubles du développement. Paris: Masson, 1989: 236 p.
- 15. Gepner B.Impact thérapeutique de la communication facilitée chez 12personnes autistes.Résultats d’une étude longitudinale.Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc 2001; 49: 301-12.
- 16. Andres C. Molecular genetics and animal models in autistic disorder. Brain Res Bull 2002; 57: 109-19.
- 17. Ornitz E. Neurophysiology of infantile autism. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1985; 24: 251-62.
- 18. Bauman M, Kemper T. Neuroanatomic observations of the brain autism. In: The neurobiology of autism. Baltimore (Maryland): John Hopkins University Press, 1994: 119-45.
- 19. Dawson G, Warrenburg S, Fuller P. Cerebral lateralization in individuals diagnosed as autistic in early childhood. Brain Lang 1982; 15: 353-68.
- 20. Zilbovicius M, Boddaert N, Belin P, et al. Temporal lobe dysfunction in childhood autism: a PET study. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 1988-93.
- 21. Schultz R, Gauthier I, Klin A, et al. Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 331-40.
- 22. Rapin I. Understanding childhood language disorders. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998; 10: 561-6.
- 23. Nadel J, Guirini C, Peze A, et al. The evolving nature of imitation as a format for communication. In: Nadel J, Butterworth G, eds. Imitation in infancy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 209-34.
- 24. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a «theory of mind»? Cognition 1985; 21: 37-46.
- 25. Mottron L. Nouvelle données en cognition dans l’autisme. Paris: Colloque Autisme-France, 23 novembre 2002.
- 26. Sacks O. Un anthropologue sur Mars. Paris: Seuil, 1996: 321-85. (An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Vintage Books, 1995).