Abstracts
Résumé
Il y a plus de 200 000 élèves HDAA au Québec. Par conséquent, plus de 200 000 plans d’intervention (PI) ont été élaborés, mis en oeuvre et révisés au Québec. Or, l’élaboration, la mise en oeuvre et la révision d’un PI sont des pratiques encore loin d’être optimales et représentent différents coûts significatifs en éducation; des coûts pédagogiques, de développement, d’acquisition, d’utilisation, de collaboration et de formation. Cela étant dit, il appert essentiel d’examiner ce que les recherches antérieures disent pour informer et guider les pratiques et les futures recherches. Cet article présente une recension des écrits permettant de dresser un portrait du passé pour enfin proposer des pistes de recherches futures et guider les pratiques actuelles.
Mots-clés :
- adaptation scolaire,
- élèves HDAA,
- inclusion scolaire,
- plan d’intervention
Abstract
There are more than 200,000 students with special needs in Quebec. Therefore, more than 200,000 individualized education programs (IEPs) were developed, implemented, and reviewed in Quebec. However, developing, implementing, and reviewing IEPs are still far from being optimal practices and represent different significant costs in education: pedagogical cost, developmental cost, acquisition cost, usage cost, collaboration cost, and training cost. That being said, it is essential to examine what research has to say so it can inform and guide present practices and future research. This article presents a literature review in order to draw a historical portrait so we can suggest venues for future research and guide present practices.
Keywords:
- special education,
- student with special needs,
- inclusive education,
- individualized education programs (IEP)
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Agran, M. et Hughes, C. (2008). Asking student input: Students’ opinions regarding their individualized education program involvement. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 69-76.
- Aleada, L. T. (2006). Are individualized education plans a good thing? A survey of teachers’ perceptions of the utility of IEPs in regular education settings. Journal of Instructional Technology, 33, 263-272.
- Arivett, D. L., Rust, J. O., Brissie, J. S. et Dansby, V. S. (2007). Special education teachers’ perceptions of school psychologists in the context of individualized education program meetings. Education, 127, 378-388.
- Attifeld, R. (1985). Park Dean School tires the IEP. British Journal of Special Education, 12(1), 17-18.
- Bateman, B. D., (2011) Individualized education programs for children with disabilities. Dans J. M. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan, Handbook of special education (pp. 77-90). Philadelphia, PA : Taylor & Francis/Routledge
- Bateman, B. D. et Herr, C. M. (2006). Writing measurable IEP goals and objectives. Verona, WI : IEP Resources.
- Bateman, B. D. et Linden, M. A. (1998). Better IEPS: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (3e ed.). Longmont, CO : Sopris West.
- Blackwell, W. H. et Rossetti, Z. S. (2014). The development of individualized education programs: Where have we been and where should we go now? SAGE Open, 2014(April-June), 1-15.
- Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., McWilliam, R. A. et Pimentel, J. S. (2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23(3), 233-243.
- Bouchard, G. (1985). Un enfant, un besoin, un service Gilles E. Bouchard., Pour une éducation de qualité à l’enfance en difficulté d’adaptation scolaire au Québec. Montréal, QC : Conseil scolaire de l’île de Montréal.
- Bourdages, C. et Chouinard, R. (1992). L’Élève et la Signifiance de son Plan d’Intervention Personnalisé. Montréal, QC : Commission des écoles catholiques de Montréal.
- Brock, K. A. et Shanberg, R. (1990). Avoiding unnecessary due process hearings. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6(1), 33-39.
- Broughton, V. (1997). The individualized family service plan: Does the form make a difference to the process? (Thèse de doctorat inédite). University de Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
- Budoff, M., Thormann, J. et Gras, A. (1986). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA : Brookline.
- Cheney, C. (2002, March). Using a web-based tutorial to teach the IEP process. Office of postsecondary education. Dans No child left behind: The vital role of rural schools. 22nd Annual National Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES), Reno, Nevada (p. 236-241). Repéré à https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463124.pdf
- Childre, A. et Chambers, C. R. (2005). Family perceptions of student centered planning and IEP meetings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(3), 217-233.
- Christle, A. et Yell, M., (2010). Individualized education programs: Legal requirements and research findings. Exceptionality, 18, 109-123.
- Clark, S. G. (2000). The IEP process as a tool for collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(2), 56-66.
- Commission des droits de la personne et les droits de la jeunesse. (2015). La signature par les parents du plan d’intervention en milieu scolaire. Repéré à http://www.cdpdj.qc.ca/Publications/Signature_parents_plan_intervention.pdf
- Conseil supérieur de l’Éducation. (1996). L’intégration scolaire des élèves handicapé et en difficulté. Québec, QC : Gouvernement du Québec.
- Cooper, P. (1996). Are Individual Education Plans a waste of paper? British Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 115-119.
- Cusumano, D. L. (2007). Is it working?: An overview of curriculum based measurement and its uses for assessing instructional, intervention, or program effectiveness. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(1), 24-34. Repéré à http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100099
- Dabkowski, D. M. (2004). Encouraging active parent participation in IEP team meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 34-39.
- Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
- Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
- Deno, S. L. et Mirkin, P. (1980). Data-based IEP development: An approach to substantive compliance. Teaching Exceptional Children, 12, 92-97.
- Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S, Marston, D. et Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-526.
- Diliberto, J. A. et Brewer, D. (2012). Six tips for successful IEP Meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44, 30-37.
- Downing, J. (1988). Active versus passive programming: A critique of IEP objectives for students with the most severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 197-210.
- Eason, I. A. et Whitbred, K. (2006). IEP and inclusion tips for parents and teachers. Verona, WI : Attainment.
- Eichler, J. B. (1999). The Individualized Program Requirement: Conceptualization versus Reality. (Thèse de doctorat inédite). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
- Enell, N. C. (1984). A cost comparison of preparing special education Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) with and without computer assistance. Carmichael, CA : San Juan Unified School District.
- Etscheidt, S. (2003). An analysis of legal hearings and cases related to individualized education programs for children with autism. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 51-69.
- Gaudreau, L., Legault, F., Brodeur, M., Hurteau, M., Dunberry, A., Séguin, S. P. et Legendre R. (2008). Rapport d’évaluation de l’application de la. Politique de l’adaptation scolaire. Déposé au ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport, Direction de l’Adaptation scolaire. Montréal, QC : UQAM.
- Gavins, M. V. (2007). IEP development as a function of pedagogical experience in special education teachers. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université de Maryland, College Park, MD.
- Giangreco, M. F., Dennis R. E., Edelman S. W. et Loninger C. J. (1994). Dressing your IEPs for the general education climate analysis of IEP goals and objectives for students with multiple disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(5), 288-296.
- Gilliam, J. E. et Coleman M. C. (1981). Who influences IEP committee decisions? Exceptional Children, 47(8), 642-644.
- Goddard, A. (1997). The role of individual education plans / programmes in special education: A critique. Support for Learning, 12(4),170-174.
- Goldstein, S. et Turnbull A. P. (1982). Strategies to increase parent participation in IEP Conferences. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 360-361.
- Gonçalves, G. et Lessard, C. (2013). L’Évolution du champ de l’adaptation scolaire au Québec : politiques, savoirs légitimes et enjeux actuels. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 36(4), 299-326.
- Goodman, J. et Bond, L. (1993). The individualized education program: A retrospective critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 408-422.
- Goodman, J., Bains, L. et Moussalli, M. (2011). IEP workboxes: An intervention for increasing the cognitive development of preschool students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(4), 251-256.
- Goupil, G. (1994). La formation en milieu scolaire des intervenants au plan d’intervention personnalisé. Revue Francophone de la Déficience Intellectuelle, 5(1), 43-52.
- Goupil, G. (2004). Le plan d’intervention, de service et de transition. Montréal, QC : Gaëtan Morin.
- Goupil, G., Tassé, M. J., Doré, C., Horth, R., Lévesque, J. Y. et Mainguy, E. (2000). Analyse descriptive des plans d’intervention personnalisés (Rapport de recherche). Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, QC.
- Grisham-Brown, J. S. et Hemmeter, M. L. (1998). Writing IEP goals and objectives: Reflecting an activity-based approach to instruction for children with disabilities. Young Exceptional Children, 1, 2-10.
- Hamilton, D. A. (1995). The utility of the assessment evaluation programming system in the development of quality IEP goals and objectives for young children, birth to three, with visual impairments. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
- Hammer, M. R. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase student participation in IEP conferences. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 295-380.
- Hardman, M. L., McDonnell, J. et Welch, M. (1997). Perspectives on the future of IDEA. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 61-77.
- Hawbaker, B. W. (2007). Student-led IEP meetings: Planning and implementation strategies. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 3(5), Article 4. Repéré à http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol3/iss5/art4
- Hendrick-Keefe, C. (1992). Developing responsive IEPs through holistic assessment. Intervention in School and Clinic, 1(28), 34-40.
- Hill, C. C. (2006). The individualized education program: An analysis of IEP litigation from 2000 to present. (Thèse de doctorat). Accessible par ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI no. 325012).
- Hoehle, R. L. (1993). The development of an expert system to evaluate the IEP components of student records (Thèse de doctorat inédite). University of Utah, Logan, UT.
- Hollis, J. (1998). Conducting individualized education program meetings that withstand due process: The informal evidentiary proceeding. Springfield, IL : CC Thomas.
- Huefner, D. S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA ‘97. Special Education, 33(4), 195-204.
- Hummel, J. W. et Deganan, S. C. (1986). Options for technology-assisted IEPs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(9), 562-566.
- Hunt, P. et Farron-Davis, F. (1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 247-253.
- Hunt, P., Goetz, L. et Anderson, J. (1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 125-130.
- Jenkins, M. (1987). Effect of a Computerized individual education program (IEP) writer on time savings and quality. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(3), 55-66.
- Jung, L. A. (2007). Writing SMART objectives and strategies that fit the routine. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(4), 54-58.
- Jung, L. A., Gomez C., Baird S. M. et Galyon Keramidas, C. L. (2008). Designing intervention plans. Bridging the gap between individualized education programs and implementation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(1), 26-33.
- Karger, J. (2006). Access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities: The role of the IEP. Wakefield, MA : National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Repéré à http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2004/ncac-curriculum-access-role-iep.html
- Karger, J. et Hitchcock, C. (2003). Access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities: A brief legal interpretation. Repéré à http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2003/ncac-curriculum-access-legal-interpretation.html
- Kowalski, E., McCall, R., Aiello, R. et Lieberman, L. (2009). Effectively using IEP goal banks. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 80, 44-56.
- Krishnakumar, P., Geeta, M. G. et Palat, R. (2006). Effectiveness of individualized education program for slow learners. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 73, 135-137.
- Lent Michnowicz, L., McConnell, S. R., Peterson, C. A. et Odom, S. L. (1995). Social goals and objectives of preschool IEPs: A content analysis. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(4), 273-282.
- Lignugaris-Kraft, B., Marchand-Martella, N. et Martella, R. C. (2001). Writing better goals and short-term objectives or benchmarks. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 52-58.
- Lovitt, T., Cushing, S. S. et Stump, C. S. (1994). High school students rate their IEPs: Low Opinions and lack of ownership. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(1), 34-37.
- Lowman, J. J. (2016). A comparison of three professional development mechanisms for improving the quality of standards-based IEP objectives. Communication Disorder Quarterly, 37(4) 211-224.
- Lynch, E. C. et Beare, P. L. (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders. Rase Feature Article, 11(2), 48-55.
- Lynch, S. et Adams, P. (2008). Developing standardized-based individualized education program objectives for student with significant needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 36-39.
- Maher, C. A. et Barbarck, C. R. (1980). A framework for comprehensive evaluation of the individualized education program (IEP). Learning Disability Quarterly, 3(3), 49-55.
- Margolis, H. et Free, J. (2001). The consultant corner. Computerized IEP programs: A guide for educational consultants. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 171-178.
- Martin, J. E. et Marshal, L. H. (1995). ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(3), 147-156.
- Martin, J. E., Dycke, J. L. V., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E. et Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316.
- Mason, C., McGahee-Kovac, M. et Johnson, L. (2004). How to help students lead their IEP meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 18-25.
- Massanari, C. B. (2002). Connecting the IEP to the general curriculum: A talking paper. Des Moines, IA: Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center. Repéré à https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED469280
- McCormick, J. M. (1998). An analysis of individual Education Program goals and objectives for preschool handicapped children and their relationship to curriculum. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). University of Rowan, Glassboro, NJ.
- McGahee-Kovac, M. (1995). A student’s guide to the IEP. Washingon, DC : National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities, NICHCY.
- McGlohon D. D. (1983). Development of a training program to improve the quality of IEPs. (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
- McLaughlin, M. J., Nolet, V., Rhim, L. M. et Henderson, K. (1999). Integrating standards: Including all students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3), 66-71.
- Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (MEQ). (2004). Le plan d’intervention... au service de la réussite de l’élève : Cadre de référence pour l’établissement des plans d’intervention. Québec, QC : Gouvernement du Québec.
- More, C. M. et Hart Barnett, J. E. (2014). Developing individualized IEP goals in the age of technology: Quality challenges and solutions. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(2), 103-109.
- Moore c. Colombie-Britannique (2012). 2012 CSC 61, 3 R.C.S. 360. Repéré à http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/12680/index.do
- Morgan, D. (1981). Characteristics of a quality IEP. Education Unlimited, 3(3), 12-17.
- Myara, N. (2012). Cahier de charges fonctionnel pour la conception et l’évaluation des plans d’intervention. (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC.
- National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Notari, A. R. et Bricker, D. D. (1990). The utility of a curriculum-based assessment instrument in the development of individualized education plans for infants and young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(2), 5-11.
- Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services U.S. Department of Education. (2000). A guide to the Individualized Education Program. Repéré à http://www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html
- Poirier, N. et Goupil, G. (2011). Étude descriptive sur les plans d’intervention pour des élèves ayant un trouble envahissant du développement. McGill Journal of Education, 46(3), 459-472.
- Pretti-Frontczac, K. et Bricker, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 92-105.
- Price, N. et Goodwin L. (1980). Individualized education programs: A cost study. Exceptional Children, 46, 446-454.
- Rakap, S. (2015). Quality of individualized education programme goals and objectives for preschool children with disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 173-186.
- Rodger, S. (1995). Individual education plans revisited: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 42(3), 221-239.
- Rotter, K. (2014). IEP Use by general and special education teachers. SAGE Open, (April-June), 1-8. doi: 10.1177/2158244014530410
- Rowland, C. M., Quinn, E. D. et Steiner, S. A. M. (2015). Beyond legal: Crafting high-quality IEPs for children with complex communication needs. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 53-62.
- Ruble, L., McGrew, A., Dalrymple, J., Lee, N. et Jung, A. (2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1459-1470.
- Ryan, L. B. et Rucker, C. N. (1986). Computerized vs. non-computerized individualized education programs: Teachers’ attitudes, time, and cost. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(1), 5-12.
- Sanches-Ferreira, P. M., Lopes-dos-Santos, S. A., Santos, M. et Silveira-Maia, M., (2013). How individualized are the individualized education programmes (IEPs): An analysis of the contents and quality of the IEPs Goals. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 507-520.
- Schenck, S. J. (1980). The diagnostic / instructional link in individualized education programs. The Journal of Special Education, 14(3), 337-345.
- Shinn, M. R. et Shinn, M. M. (2000). Writing and evaluating IEP goals and making appropriate revisions to ensure progress and participation in the general curriculum. Dans C. Telzrow & M. Tankersley (dir.), IDEA Amendments of 1997: Practice guidelines for school-based teams (p. 351-382). Bethesda, MD : National Association of School Psychologists.
- Shriner, J. G. et DeStefano, L. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: The role of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69, 147-161.
- Siegel, E. et Allinder, R. M. (2005). Review of assessment procedures for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 343-351.
- Sigafoos, J., Elkins, J., Couzens, D., Gunn, S., Roberts, D. et Kerr, M. (1993). Analysis of IEP goals and classroom activities for children with multiple disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 8, 99-105.
- Smith, S. W. (1990a). Comparison of individualized education programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 85-99.
- Smith, S. W. (1990b). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education from intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 57(1), 5-14.
- Smith, S. W. et Kortering, L. J. (1996). Using computers to generate IEPs: rethinking the process. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(2), 81-90.
- Spellman, R. T. (1989). An investigation of teachers’ effectiveness in preparing the individualized educational plan (IEP) as mandated by Public Law 94-142. (Thèse de doctorat inédite). New York University, NY, NY.
- Spillane M. M. (1990). IEP quality: Changes observed following a period of staff training and form revision. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université de Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
- Sweeney, M. A. (1997). The effects of self-determination training on student involvement in the IEP process. (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Université de l’État de Floride. Tallahassee, FL.
- Thompson, S. J., Thurlow, M. L. Quenemoen, R. F., Esler, A. et Whetstone, P. (2001). Addressing standards and assessments on state IEP forms. Synthesis report 38. Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Repéré à https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED454682.pdf
- Torgerson, C. W., Miner, C. A. et Shen, H. (2004). Developing student competence in self-directed IEPs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(3), 162-167.
- Tottle, J. L. (1998). A case study of educators understanding and use of individualized program plans. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université de Calgary, Calgary, AB.
- Tribunal des droits de la personne (2009). Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse c. Commission scolaire des Phares, QCTDP 19 (CanLII). Repéré à http://canlii.ca/t/26x8g.
- Turnbull, K. K. et Hughes, D. L. (1987). A pragmatic analysis of speech and language IEP conferences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 18, 275-286.
- Turner, M. D., Baldwin, L., Kleinert, H. L. et Farmer, J. (2000). The relation of a statewide alternate assessment for students with severe disabilities to other measures of instructional effectiveness. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 69-76. doi:10.1177/002246690003400202
- Van Dycke, J. L. (2005). Determining the impact of the self-directed IEP instruction on secondary IEP documents. (These de docotoat inédite). University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
- Van Dycke, J. L., Martin, J. E. et Lovett, D. L. (2006). Why is this cake on fire? Inviting students into the IEP process. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 42-47.
- Vannest, K. J., Burke, M. D., Payne, T. E., Davis, C. R. et Soares, D. A. (2011). Electronic progress monitoring of IEP goals and objectives. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 40-51.
- Venditti, R. (2005). Intégration scolaire des élèves handicapés par une déficience intellectuelle et droit à l’égalité (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit.) Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC.
- Vérificateur Général du Québec (2004). Rapport à l’assemblée nationale pour l’année 2003-2004 Tome I, Aide aux élèves en difficulté. Québec, QC : Gouvernement du Québec.
- Watts, E. H., O’Brian, M. et Wojcik, B. W. (2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration: How do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(1), 43-56.
- Weisenfeld, R. B. (1987). Functionality in the IEPs of children with Down Syndrome. Mental Retardation, 25, 281-286.
- Wilhovsky, E. P. (2003). Communicating IEP goal progress to parent. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
- Wright, W. D. et Wright, P. D. (2006). Smart IEPs. From emotions to advocacy: The special education survival guide (2e éd.). Hartfield, VA : Harbor House Law.
- Yell, M. L. et Drasgow, E. (2010). The continuing influence of the law in special education. Exceptionality, 18, 107-108.
- Yell, M. L. et Stecker, P. M. (2003). Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 73-88.
- Yoshida R., Fenton K., Kaufman M. J., & Maxwell. J. P. (1978). Parental involvement in the special education pupil planning process: The school’s perspective. Exceptional Children, 44, 531-533.
- Ysseldyke, J. E. et Algozzine, B. (1982). Critical issues in special and remedial education. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin.
- Zeitlin, V. M. et Curcic, S. (2013). Parental voices on individualized education programs: “Oh, IEP meeting tomorrow? Rum tonight!” Disability & Society, 29, 372-387.