Abstracts
Abstract
We propose that teacher candidates need to have extended experiences with learning to teach imaginatively, which is to say that teacher candidates need to have experiences that enable them to consider new possibilities in education. We first attend to the general theoretical framework offered by imaginative education before moving on to consider the implications of imaginative education for teacher education programs. We conclude with some provocations to the field that we hope will be of use for those who might wish to join us in considering how we might teach teachers to teach in imaginative ways — a complex sentence with an even more complicated set of implications.
Résumé
Nous recommandons que les futurs enseignants vivent un éventail d’expériences d’apprentissage et ce, afin d’enseigner de manière imaginative. Cela signifie que les enseignants en devenir ont besoin d’expériences leur permettant d’envisager de nouvelles avenues en éducation. Tout d’abord, nous nous attardons au cadre théorique général de l’éducation imaginative. Par la suite, nous examinons les répercussions de l’éducation imaginative sur les programmes de formation des maîtres. Nous terminons cet article en mettant le milieu au défi. Ainsi, nous espérons que nos propos seront utiles à ceux désireux de se joindre à nous pour repenser la formation des maîtres, dans l’optique de leur enseigner à enseigner de manière plus imaginative…un énoncé bien complexe ayant des répercussions encore plus complexes.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Bullock, S. M. (2011). Inside teacher education: Challenging prior views of teaching and learning. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- Bullock, S. M. (2016). Reframing my pedagogy by understanding candidates’ learning relationships with their cooperating teachers. Poster presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Washington, DC.
- Chodakowski, A. (2009) Teaching made wonderful: Redesigning teacher education with imagination in mind (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Secret, sacred, and cover stories. In D. J. Clandinin & F. M. Connelly (Eds.), Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal,54(January), 77-80.
- Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Egan, K. (2011). Learning in depth: A simple innovation that can transform schooling. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Hoban, G. F. (2007). Using slowmation to engage preservice elementary teachers in understanding science content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 75-91.
- Hopper, T., & Sanford, K. (2010). Starting a program-wide ePortfolio practice in teacher education: Resistance, support and renewal [podcast]. Teacher Education Quarterly. Retrieved from http://teqjournal.org/hopper.html
- Learning in Depth. (n.d.). The Learning in Depth program. Retrieved from http://ierg.ca/LID/
- LeCornu, R., & Ewing, R. (2008). Reconceptualising professional experiences in preservice teacher education...reconstructing the past to embrace the future. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1799-1812.
- Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Developing and assessing professional knowledge as a science teacher educator: Learning about teaching from student teachers. In S. M. Bullock & T. Russell (Eds.), Self-studies of science teacher education practices (Vol. 12, pp. 121-138). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- Petrarca, D. (2013). A promising practicum pilot–exploring associate teachers’ access and interactions with a web-based learning tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 9, 149-170.
- Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change.” New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt.
- Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
- Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Vick, M. (2006). “It’s a difficult matter”: Historical perspectives on the enduring problem of the practicum in teacher preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 181-198.
- Wordsworth, W. (1850). The prelude or, growth of a poet’s mind; an autobiographical poem. London, United Kingdom: Edward Moxon.
- Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education ‘washed out’ by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7-11.