Abstracts
Abstract
The predominant form of research dissemination resides in the scholar’s domain, namely academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals. This paper describes how two colleagues and researchers integrated documentary filmmaking with research methods in their respective scholarly work, supporting the case for documentary film as an alternative form of scholarly work and knowledge mobilization outside the walls of the university. The authors add to the ongoing conversation for a more dynamic use of digital video-recording that moves beyond simple data collection and encourage researchers to tap into multimodal forms of expression, specifically digital filmmaking.
Résumé
La dissémination de la recherche passe principalement par des canaux universitaires, tels que des colloques universitaires ou des publications relues par des pairs. Cet article décrit la manière dont deux collègues et chercheurs ont intégré la réalisation de films documentaires à leurs méthodes de recherche universitaire. Ce faisant, elles confirment l’intérêt du film documentaire comme méthode alternative de recherche universitaire et de mobilisation du savoir à l’extérieur des murs de l’université. Les auteurs ajoutent ainsi leurs voix aux discussions actuelles préconisant une utilisation plus dynamique de l’enregistrement vidéo numérique, au-delà de la simple cueillette de données et encouragent les chercheurs à tirer avantage de ces autres formes d’expression, particulièrement la production numérique de films.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aufderheide, P. (2007). Documentary film: A very short introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bergman, T. (2009). Documentary film theories. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 318 – 321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bruner, J. (1994). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2008). Arts-informed research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 55-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London, UK: Longman Publishing Group.
- Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Hampe, B. (2007). Making documentary films and videos: A practical guide to planning, filming, and editing documentaries (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt Paperback.
- Heider, K. G. (2006). Ethnographic film. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Hughes, J. (2013, January 15). Exploring social justice through digital literacies. [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZOt6RDhkVY
- Hughes, J. (2007). Poetry: A powerful medium for literacy and technology development. What works? Research into Practice Series [Research Monograph #7]. Retrieved from the Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat website: https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/Hughes.pdf
- Hughes, J. (2008a). Poetry and new media: In conversation with four poets. Language and Literacy, 10(2), 1-28.
- Hughes, J. (2008b). The performative pull of research with new media. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(3), 16-34.
- Hughes, J. & John, A. (2009). From page to digital stage: Creating digital performances of poetry. Voices From the Middle, 16(3), 15-22.
- Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. (2006). Creating an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43-81.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
- Madison, D. S. (2006). Staging fieldwork / Performing human rights. In D. S. Madison, & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. 397-418). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Petrarca, D. (2013, January 1). Coffee. Cup. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/56611736
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Nichols, B. (2010). Introduction to documentary (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pauwels, L. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology: An introduction. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in visual methodology (pp. 3-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ruby, J. (2008). A future for ethnographic film? Journal of Film and Video, 60(2), 5-14.
- Shrum, W., Duque, R., & Brown, T. (2005). Digital video as research practice: Methodology for the millennium. Journal of Research Practice, 1(1), Article M4. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/6/12
- Stake (2000). Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Vaughan, J. (2013). Technological innovation in libraries: Perceptions and definitions. Library Technology Reports, 49(7), 10–17.
- Weber, S. (2008). Visual images in research. In J. G. Knowles, & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 41-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.