Abstracts
Abstract
We investigate how managers in French companies report their engagements and motivations regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in 2007 and 2017. We conducted and analysed 14 in-depth structured interviews with managers in 2007 and again in 2017. Thematic analysis shows that in 2007, managers focused on instrumental motivations for CSR, citing economically driven artefacts and pro-environmental efforts. In 2017, most managers reported increased and reinforced environmental and social engagements with a parallel shift in the expression of their motivations; seeing CSR as a responsibility to society and future generations, or as a normal, natural activity.
Keywords:
- CSR,
- SME,
- France,
- instrumental,
- normative values
Résumé
Nous étudions la manière dont les managers des entreprises françaises rendent compte de leurs engagements et de leurs motivations en matière de responsabilité sociale d’entreprise (RSE) en 2007 et 2017. Nous avons réalisé et analysé 14 entretiens structurés approfondis avec des managers en 2007 et à nouveau en 2017. L’analyse thématique montre qu’en 2007, les managers citent les motivations instrumentales, citant des artefacts économiques et des efforts pro-environnementaux. En 2017, ils citent des engagements environnementaux et sociaux accrus et renforcés; percevant la RSE comme une responsabilité envers la société et les générations futures, ou comme une activité « normale ».
Mots-clés :
- RSE,
- PME,
- France,
- valeurs instrumentales,
- normatives
Resumen
Investigamos cómo los gerentes de las empresas francesas se expresan sobre sus compromisos y motivaciones en la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) en 2007 y 2017. Realizamos y analizamos 14 entrevistas con gerentes en 2007 y nuevamente en 2017. El análisis temático muestra que, en 2007, los gerentes se enfocaron en motivaciones instrumentales, citando artefactos impulsados económicamente y esfuerzos proambientales. En 2017, la mayoría de los gerentes reportaron compromisos ambientales y sociales incrementados y reforzados, con un cambio paralelo en la expresión de sus motivaciones; ver la RSC como una responsabilidad normal con la sociedad y las generaciones futuras.
Palabras clave:
- RSE,
- PYME,
- Francia,
- valores instrumentales,
- normativos
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), p. 932-968.
- Aragón, C., Narvaiza, L., & Altuna, M. (2016). Why and how does social responsibility differ among SMEs? A social capital systemic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), p. 365-384.
- Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L. J., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), p. 693-705.
- Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., & Gelabert, L. (2017). Does greenwashing pay off? Understanding the relationship between environmental actions and environmental legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), p. 363-379.
- Berthoin Antal, A., Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France. A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business and Society, 46(1), p. 9-32.
- Berthoin Antal, A., Sobczak, A. (2013). Culturally embedded organizational learning for global responsibility. In J. Griffin A. Prakash (Eds.), Business and Society special issue on corporate responsibility: Mechanisms and initiatives (1-32).
- Bon, V., Pensel, J.-L., Morlet, D. (2015). Les PME engagées en RSE: des clés de compréhension à partir d’une approche qualitative. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion109, p. 75-100.
- Bowen, F. (2007). Corporate social strategy: Competing views from two theories of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), p. 97-113.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), p. 77-101.
- Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), p. 453-470.
- Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), p. 946-967.
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), p. 497-505.
- Castellò, I., Lozano, J. (2009). From risk management to citizenship corporate social responsibility: analysis of strategic drivers of change. Corporate Governance, 9(4), p. 373-385.
- Chauvey, J. N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), p. 789-803.
- Christmann, P., Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), p. 863-878.
- Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), p. 111-122.
- Dierkes, M., Berthoin Antal, A. (1986). Whither corporate social reporting: Is it time to legislate? California Management Review, 28(3), p. 106-121.
- El-Baz, J., Laguir, I., Marais, M., Staglianò, R. (2016). Influence of national institutions on the corporate social responsibility practices of small- and medium-sized enterprises in the food-processing industry: Differences between France and Morocco. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), p. 117-133.
- Evan, W. M., Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp N., E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Fassin, Y., De Colle, S., & Freeman, R. E. (2017). Intra-stakeholder alliances in plant-closing decisions: A stakeholder theory approach. Business Ethics:A European Review, 26(2), p. 97-111.
- Feinerer, I., Hornik, K. & Meyer (2008). Text mining infrastructure. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), p. 1-54.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
- Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), p. 213-231.
- Gond, J. P., & Igalens, J. (2008). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise. Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
- Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), p. 87-99.
- Hill, C. W. L., Jones, T. W. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of ManagementStudies, 29(2), p. 131-154.
- Hudson S. Roloff J. (2010). In Search of Sustainability? SMEs in Brittany, France. (193-214). In: Spence L., Painter-Morland, M. (eds) Ethics in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Springer, Dordrecht.
- Husted, B. W., Montiel, I., Christmann, P. (2016). Effects of local legitimacy on certification decisions to global and national CSR standards by multinational subsidiaries and domestic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), p. 382-397.
- Igalens, J. (2007). L’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à travers les rapports annuels de développement durable d’entreprises françaises du CAC 40. Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 10(2), p. 129-155.
- L’Agenda 2030 en France (2018). available at: https://www.agenda-2030.fr/, accessed on 13/11/2018.
- Kaplan S. (2020). Beyond the business case for social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), p. 1-4.
- Labelle, F., Courrent, J., Spence, M. (2017). Préférences des PME en matière de politiques publiques de responsabilité sociale des entreprises: une comparaison France-Québec. Management International, 21(3), p. 130-144.
- Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), p. 404-424.
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), p. 340-363.
- Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Rubin, H. J., Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: Expanding core CSR theory. Business & Society, 55(1), p. 23-55.
- Spence, L., & Painter-Morland, M. (Eds.). (2010). Ethics in small and medium sized enterprises: A global commentary (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), p. 571-610.
- Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), p. 303-319.
- Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), p. 1703-1725.
- Winkler, P., Etter, M., & Castelló, I. (2020). Vicious and virtuous circles of aspirational talk: From self-persuasive to agonistic CSR rhetoric. Business & Society, 59(1), p. 98-128.