Abstracts
Abstract
This paper explores how a diversity policy is legitimized along moral, pragmatic and cognitive dimensions in a challenging environment (conflicting demands with regard to diversity). In this case study-based paper, we use evidence gathered from 92 interviews with members of key stakeholder groups, observation, and secondary data sources in a French business school. We find that perceptions about the legitimacy of a diversity policy may be ambivalent when legitimacy is evaluated along several dimensions. We conclude that legitimizing a diversity policy requires step-by-step management, with the organization selecting and combining various legitimization strategies over time.
Keywords:
- Legitimacy,
- diversity policy,
- legitimization strategies,
- challenging environment,
- case study,
- business school
Résumé
Cet article explore comment une politique de diversité est légitimée en termes moral, pragmatique et cognitif dans un environnement difficile (exigences contradictoires en matière de diversité). Une étude de cas d’une Ecole de Management française est conduite par le recueil de données primaires – 92 entretiens avec des parties prenantes et observation – et de données secondaires. Nous constatons que les perceptions de la légitimité d’une politique de diversité sont ambivalentes lorsque la légitimité est évaluée sur plusieurs dimensions. La légitimation d’une politique de diversité nécessiterait un management pas-à-pas, sélectionnant et combinant diverses stratégies de légitimation au cours du temps.
Mots-clés :
- Légitimité,
- politique de diversité,
- stratégies de légitimation,
- environnement difficile,
- étude de cas,
- école de management
Resumen
Este artículo explora cómo se legitima una política de diversidad en términos morales, pragmáticos y cognitivos en un entorno desafiante. Un estudio de caso de una Escuela de Negocios francesa se hizo a través de la recolección de datos primarios – 92 entrevistas y observación – y datos secundarios. Encontramos que las percepciones de la legitimidad de una política de diversidad pueden ser ambivalentes cuando se evalúa la legitimidad en varias dimensiones. Así, la legitimación de una política de diversidad requeriría una gestión gradual, durante la cual se seleccionarían y combinarían varias estrategias de legitimación a lo largo del tiempo.
Palabras clave:
- Legitimidad,
- política de diversidad,
- estrategias de legitimación,
- entorno desafiante,
- estudio de casos,
- escuela de negocios
Appendices
Bibliography
- Albouy, Valérie; Wanecq, Thomas (2003). “Les inégalités sociales d’accès aux grandes écoles”, Économie et statistique, N° 361, p. 27-52.
- Baumann-Pauly, Dorothée; Scherer, Andreas G.; Palazzo, Guido (2016). “Managing institutional complexity: A longitudinal study of legitimacy strategies at a sportswear brand company”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 137, N° 1, p. 31-51.
- Bitektine, Alex (2011). “Toward a theory of social judgements of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, N° 1, p. 151-179.
- Bitektine, Alex; Haack, Patrick (2015). “The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, N° 1, p. 49-75.
- Boyle, Mary-Ellen (2004). “Walking our talk: Business schools, legitimacy, and citizenship Mary”, Business and Society, Vol. 43, N° 1, p. 37-48.
- Bruna, Maria-Giuseppina (2011). “Diversité dans l’entreprise: d’impératif éthique à levier de créativité”, Management et avenir, Vol. 3, N° 43, p. 202-225.
- Bruna, Maria Giuseppina; Chauvet, Mathieu (2013). “La diversité, un levier de performance: plaidoyer pour un management innovateur et créatif”, Management international, Vol. 17, p. 70-84.
- Bruna Maria Giuseppina; Chanlat Jean-François (2017). “La conduite d’une politique de diversité comme processus de légitimation organisationnelle”, Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, Vol. 23, N° 55, p. 205-245.
- Buisson-Fenet, Hélène; Draelants, Hugues (2010). “Réputation, mimétisme et concurrence: Ce que “l’ouverture sociale” fait aux grandes écoles”, Sociologies pratiques, Vol. 2, N° 21, p. 67-81.
- Campbell, David; Cowton, Christopher J. (2015). “Method issues in business ethics research: finding credible answers to questions that matter”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 24, N° 1, p. 3-10
- Chanlat, Jean-François; Dameron, Stéphanie; Dupuis, Jean-Pierre; De Frietas, Maria Ester; Ozbilgin, Mustapha (2013). “Management et diversité: lignes de tension et perspectives”, Management international, vol.17, Numéro spécial, p. 5-13.
- Church-Morel, Amy; Bartel-Radic, Anne (2016). “Skills, identity, and power: The multifaceted concept of language diversity”, International Management, Vol. 21, N° 1, p. 12-24.
- Claasen, Cyrlene; Roloff, Julia (2012). “The link between responsibility and legitimacy: the case of de beers in nambia”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 107, N° 3, p.379-398.
- Cox, Taylor H. Jr (2001). Creating the multicultural organization, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
- Cuppen, Eefje (2012). “Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: Considerations for design and methods”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 45, N° 1, p. 23-46.
- Dameron, Stephanie; Durand, Thomas (2013). “Strategies for business schools in a multi‐polar world”, Education + Training, Vol. 55 N° 4/5, p. 323-335,
- Dass, Parshotam; Parker, Barbara (1999). “Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 13, N° 2, p. 68-80.
- De Jong, Gjalt; van Houten, Jerry (2014). “The impact of MNE cultural diversity on the internationalization performance relationship: Theory and evidence from European multinational enterprises”, International Business Review, Vol. 23, N° 1, p. 313-326.
- De Saint Martin, Monique (2008). “Les recherches sociologiques sur les grandes écoles: de la reproduction à la recherche de justice”, Éducation et sociétés, Vol. 1, N° 21, p. 95-103
- Ely, Robin J.; Thomas, David A. (2001). “Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, N° 2, p. 229-273.
- Fisher, Greg; Kuratko, Donald F.; Bloodgood, James M.; Hornsby, Jeffrey S. (2017). “Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 32, N° 1, p. 52-71.
- Gardiner, Louise; Lacy, Peter (2005). “Lead, respond, partner or ignore: the role of business schools on corporate responsibility”, Corporate Governance. Vol. 5, N° 2, p. 174-186.
- Gioia, Dennis A.; Corley, Kevin G. (2002). “Being good vs. looking good: business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 1, N° 1, p. 107-120.
- Greenwood, Royston; Raynard, Mia; Kodeih, Farah, & al. (2011). “Institutional complexity and organizational responses”, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 5, N° 1, p.317-371.
- Haack, Patrick; Schoeneborn, Dennis; Wickert, Christopher (2012) “Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment?”, Organization Studies, Vol. 33, N° 5-6, p. 815-845.
- Haas, Aurore; Shimada, Sakura (2014). “Les politiques de gestion de la diversité dans les organisations: Proposition de typologie à l’usage des chercheurs et des entreprises”, Management international, Vol. 18, N° 2, p. 14-21.
- Hawawini, Gabriel (2005). “The future of business schools”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 24, N° 9, p. 770-782.
- Kirton, Gill; Greene, Anne-Marie (2010). The dynamics of managing diversity, Oxford, UK, Elsevier.
- Lamberti, Lucio; Lettieri, Emanuele (2011). “Gaining legitimacy in converging industries: Evidence from the emerging market of functional food”, European Management Journal, Vol. 29, N° 6, p. 462-475.
- Lamin, Anna; Zaheer, Srilata (2012). “Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders”, Organization Science, Vol. 23, N° 1, p. 47-66.
- Laszlo, Chris; Waddock, Sandra; Sroufe, Robert (2017). “Torn Between Two Paradigms: A Struggle for the Soul of Business Schools”, AI Practitioner, Vol. 19, N° 2, p. 108-119.
- Lejeune, Christophe; Schultz, Majken; Vas, Alain (2015). “How does accreditation influence the dynamics of organizational identity for business schools?”, International Management, Vol. 19, N° 3, p. 83.
- Lorbiecki, Anna; Jack, Gavin (2000). “Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management.” British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, N° 1, p. S17-S31.
- Marais, Magalie; Reynaud, Emmanuelle; Vilanova, Laurent (2018). “CSR dynamics in the midst of competing injunctions: The case of Danone”, European Management Review, Forthcoming.
- Maxwell, Gillian A.; Blair, Sharon; McDougall, Marilyn (2001). “Edging towards managing diversity in practice”, Employee Relations, Vol. 23, N° 5, p. 468-482.
- Menger, Pierre- Michel; Marchika, Colin; Hanet, Danièle (2015). “La concurrence positionnelle dans l’enseignement supérieur”, Revue Economique, Vol. 66, N° 1, p. 237-288.
- Misra, Shekhar; McMahon, Gary (2006). “Diversity in higher education: the three Rs”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 82, N° 1, p. 40-43.
- Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
- Nkomo, Stella; Hoobler, Jenny M. (2014). “A historical perspective on diversity ideologies in the United States: Reflections on human resource management research and practice”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 24, N° 3, p. 245-257.
- Palazzo, Guido; Scherer, Andreas G. (2005). “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66, N° 1, p. 71-88.
- Panwar, Rajat; Paul, Karen; Nybakk, Erlend (2014). “The legitimacy of CSR actions of publicly traded companies versus family-owned companies”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125, N° 3, p. 481-496.
- Patton, Michael Q. (2005). Qualitative research, Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
- Perugien, Sabrina; Barth, Isabelle (2016). “Pour la mise en oeuvre d’un management de la diversité. En quoi une école peut-elle faire école?” Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie et de Gestion des Comportements Organisationnels (RIPCO), Vol. 22, N° 54, p. 263-294.
- Pfeffer, Jeffrey; Fong, Christina T. (2004). “The business school ‘business’: some lessons from the US experience”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, N° 8, p. 1501-1520.
- Reast, Jon; Maon, François; Lindgreen, Adam; Vanhamme, Joëlle (2013). “Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bidimensional model”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 118, N° 1, p. 139-153.
- Redon, Gaëlle (2016). “Politique de gestion de la diversité dans les grandes écoles françaises: Quelles intentions stratégiques?” @GRH, Vol. 2, N° 19, p. 37-64.
- Robinson, Gail; Dechant, Kathleen. (1997). “Building a business case for diversity”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 11, N° 3, p. 21-31.
- Scherer, Andreas G.; Palazzo, Guido; Seidl, David (2013). “Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 50, N° 2, p. 259-284.
- Soubiron, Aude (2012), “Entre “égalité des chances” et “diversité”: les reformulations du problème des inégalités d’accès et de succès dans les grandes écoles en France”, Inégalités sociales et enseignement supérieur, De Boeck Supérieur, p. 71-84.
- Suchman, Mark (1995). “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, N° 3, p. 571-610.
- Swanson, Diane L.; Frederick, William C. (2003). “Are business schools silent partners in corporate crime?” Journal of Corporate Citizenship, N° 9, Spring, p. 24-27
- Tapie, Pierre; Dardelet, Chantal; (2010). Ouverture sociale des grandes écoles - Livre blanc des pratiques - Premiers résultats et perspectives. Paris, La Documentation Française.
- Thomas, David A. (2004). “Diversity as strategy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, N° 9, p. 98-108.
- Thomas, Tom; Lamm, Eric (2012). “Legitimacy and organizational sustainability”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 110, N° 2, p. 191-203.
- Thomas, Lisa; Billsberry, Jon; Ambrosini, Véronique; Barton, Harry (2014). “Convergence and divergence dynamics in British and French business schools: How will the pressure for accreditation influence these dynamics?”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 25, N° 2, p. 305-319.
- Tost, Leigh (2011). “An integrative model of legitimacy judgments”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, N° 4, p. 686-710.
- Van Dijk, Hans; Van Engen, Marloes L.; Paauwe, Jaap (2012). “Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 111, N° 1, p. 73-84.
- Van Ewijk, A. 2011. “Diversity and diversity policy: Diving into fundamental differences”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 24, N° 5, p. 680-694.
- Van Zanten, A. (2010). “L’ouverture sociale des grandes écoles: diversification des élites ou renouveau des politiques publiques d’éducation?”, Sociétés contemporaines, Vol. 79, N° 3, p. 69-95.
- Vidaver-Cohen, Deborah (2007), “Reputation beyond the rankings: A conceptual framework for business school research”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10, N° 4, p. 278
- Weaver, Gary R.; KlebeTrevino, Linda; Cochran, Philip L. (1999). “Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, N° 5, p. 539-552.
- Yin, Robert K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
- Yuan, Wenlong; Yongjian, Bao; Verbeke, Alain. (2011). “Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework.”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10, N° 1, p. 75-92.